Describe how and why you chose your iGEM project.
Industrial Textile Dyes: Major Types and Applications
The global textile dye market is overwhelmingly dominated by synthetic dyes due to their cost efficiency, superior color fastness, and broad chromatic range compared to natural alternatives [1]. This sector represents a critical segment of the broader $44.41 billion dyes and pigments industry in 2024, projected to reach $87.99 billion by 2037 at a 5.4% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) [2]. Geographically, the Asia-Pacific region commands more than 70% of the market share, anchored significantly by China’s, the world’s largest textile exporter with $118.5 billion in 2021, accounted for approximately 52% of the Asia’s total exports [2].
The era of synthetic dyes began in 1856 with William Perkin’s serendipitous synthesis of mauveine. Since this groundbreaking discovery, approximately 10,000 synthetic dyes have been developed, fundamentally transforming textile coloration chemistry [3]. Dyes are classified primarily by their chemical structure and application methods. Structurally, azo dyes (-N=N- bonds) constitute 60–70% of synthetics, favored for red/yellow/orange shades due to their ease of synthesis and cost-effectiveness [4]. However, they face significant scrutiny because certain types can degrade under specific reductive conditions (e.g., in landfills, anaerobic water bodies, or potentially in contact with human skin) to release potentially carcinogenic aromatic amines [5]. Anthraquinone dyes (20–25%) provide superior lightfastness, making them indispensable for durable blues and greens in applications like automotive textiles despite higher production costs, while other classes like phthalocyanine, methine, and styryl dyes comprise smaller, specialized shares [6]. Classification by application method categorizes dyes into: Disperse dyes for hydrophobic synthetics (e.g., polyester), applied via high-temperature (130°C) or thermosol (180–220°C) processes; Acid dyes, which form ionic bonds with protein fibers (wool/silk); Reactive dyes, which form covalent bonds with cellulose; Vat and sulfur dyes, which require chemical reduction (vatting) in an alkaline medium to become soluble for cellulose dyeing, followed by oxidation to reform the insoluble dye within the fiber [7].
Environmental and Health Impacts of Conventional Synthetic Dyes
Conventional synthetic dyes pose severe ecological and public health threats at multiple stages of their lifecycle. A significant environmental burden stems from wastewater discharge, with approximately 10-15% of dyes used in textile processing discharged untreated into waterways globally. This results in the annual release of an estimated over 700,000 tons of dye-laden effluents worldwide, containing persistent pollutants that resist natural degradation [4, 9]. Azo dyes, constituting 60-70% of industrial colorants, present a particular concern at they can degrade into carcinogenic aromatic amines such as benzidine – classified as Group 1 human carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) - which bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms and infiltrate human food chains [10]. Heavy metals like chromium, lead, and cadmium, employed as mordants or present as impurities, further contaminate water and soil systems, exhibiting chronic toxicity through bioaccumulation and posing significant risks to aquatic like and human health [11]. Ecotoxicological studies using zebrafish (Danio rerio) show that industrial dyes induce toxicity through oxidative stress, genotoxicity, and organ-specific damage. For instance, the azo dye Congo Red generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to hepatotoxicity and apoptosis in zebrafish, independent of light-blocking effects [12, 13]. The complex aromatic structures and stability of synthetic dyes render them highly resistant to conventional biological wastewater treatments, which typically achieve less than 50% removal efficiency for highly soluble dyes like reactives [14]. While advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) like ozonation can degrade these pollutants, they remain energy-intensive and can generate harmful by-products; alternative adsorption methods generate hazardous sludge requiring specialized disposal [15, 16]. Additionally, dye manufacturing and application consume substantial resources, requiring 150-250 liters of water per kilogram of fabric processed while generating extreme pH waste streams (pH 2-12) that significantly escalate remediation costs [15].
Facing these challenges and stringent regulatory pressures, particularly EU REACH restrictions on amine-releasing azo dyes, the industry is driving innovations in wastewater treatment and cleaner dyeing technologies. Research into novel adsorbents is active, with NiOOH-modified industrial waste residues demonstrating exceptional adsorption capacity (348 mg/g for Congo Red), capable of removing >90% of toxic amines within 5 minutes [17]. The industry’s trajectory involves balancing performance demands with increasingly stringent environmental imperatives. While promising, truly sustainable alternatives face scalability challenges. Bio-based dyes derived from microorganisms, plants, or animals, and closed-loop water recycling systems must overcome hurdles related to cost competitiveness, color rang consistency, and performance matching synthetic dyes under evolving global regulations [18].
Natural Dyes: Diversity and Limitations
Natural dyes encompass a broad spectrum of pigments derived from botanical sources (e.g., indigo from Indigofera for blue, anthraquinones from madder root for red, flavonoids for yellows), animal sources (e.g., cochineal insects for crimson, mollusks for Tyrian purple), and microbial sources (e.g., violacein from Chromobacterium for purple-blue) [19, 20]. These pigments are valued for their biodegradability, low-toxicity, and additional functional properties like UV resistance and antimicrobial activity[20, 21]. For instance, plant-based dyes such as those from turmeric rhizomes yield yellows, while microbial carotenoids (e.g., bixin from Bixa orellana seeds) provide orange hues [22]. Despite their ecological advantages, natural dyes face significant barriers to industrial adoption. Supply chain inconsistencies arise from seasonal variability, geographical constraints, and low extraction yields—obtaining Tyrian purple historically required thousands of mollusks for minimal pigment, while indigo extraction efficiencies rarely exceed 2%, generating substantial biomass waste [4, 19]. Performance deficiencies include poor color fastness and reproducibility: without toxic metal mordants (e.g., chromium or alum), natural dyes exhibit weak binding to fibers, leading to rapid fading under light exposure or washing. Anthocyanin-based reds shift hue with pH changes (e.g., red in acid, blue in alkali), and betanin degrades at high temperatures, limiting batch consistency [20, 21, 23]. Technological bottlenecks further impede scalability. Conventional solvent extraction is energy-intensive, and dyeing processes often lack standardization. Although emerging techniques like microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) improve efficiency, they have yet to become economically viable for large-scale applications [24]. Additionally, many natural pigments require complex mordanting protocols to enhance stability, which introduces environmental toxins and contradicts their eco-friendly premise [22, 23].
Our Solution: Engineered Biocatalysis for Sustainable Dyeing
To address the environmental and health crises caused by synthetic dyes, we developed an innovative biocatalytic platform centered on Bacillus megaterium tyrosinase (TyrBm) fused to the self-assembling scaffold protein CipA from Photorhabdus luminescens [25, 26]. This system harnesses enzymatic precision and immobilization technology to revolutionize textile dyeing. By expressing TyrBm-CipA fusion proteins in E. coli, we create reusable enzymatic "nanofactories" that simplify purification through CipA-mediated crystalline inclusion formation [25]. These immobilized enzymes efficiently oxidize tyrosine derivatives (e.g., Boc-L-tyrosine) into non-toxic, melanin-inspired pigments—generating hues from earthy browns to vibrant reds [27, 28].
This platform is designed to eliminate reliance on carcinogenic azo dyes and heavy metals, drastically reducing water consumption and avoiding alkaline/acidic effluent. Crucially, the immobilized TyrVs-CipA fusion enzyme retains >70% activity after 7+ catalytic cycles [26], enabling cost-effective reuse and minimizing waste. This platform not only offers a scalable, biodegradable alternative to synthetic dyes but also paves the way for circular textile economies through enzyme recyclability and low-impact processing. By integrating synthetic biology with green chemistry principles, our solution delivers a versatile, ethically engineered answer to the industry’s sustainability challenges.
1. Said, B., S. Harfi, and A. Elharfi, Classifications, properties and applications of textile dyes: A review. 2017.
2. Baghel, R., Dyes and Pigments Market. 2025: Research Nester.
3. Christie, R., Colour Chemistry. 2014.
4. Benkhaya, S., S. M'Rabet, and A. El Harfi, Classifications, properties, recent synthesis and applications of azo dyes. Heliyon, 2020. 6(1): p. e03271.
5. Rodrigues de Almeida, E.J., et al., Azo dyes degradation and mutagenicity evaluation with a combination of microbiological and oxidative discoloration treatments. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2019. 183: p. 109484.
6. Hunger, K., Industrial Dyes. 2002.
7. Burkinshaw, S.M., Physico‐chemical Aspects of Textile Coloration. 2016.
8. Yaseen, D.A. and M. Scholz, Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents: a critical review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2018. 16(2): p. 1193-1226.
9. Benkhaya, S., S. M' rabet, and A. El Harfi, A review on classifications, recent synthesis and applications of textile dyes. Inorganic Chemistry Communications, 2020. 115.
10. Lellis, B., et al., Effects of textile dyes on health and the environment and bioremediation potential of living organisms. Biotechnology Research and Innovation, 2019. 3(2): p. 275-290.
11. Bruschweiler, B.J. and C. Merlot, Azo dyes in clothing textiles can be cleaved into a series of mutagenic aromatic amines which are not regulated yet. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 2017. 88: p. 214-226.
12. Khandelwal, D., et al., Unveiling the impact of dyes on aquatic ecosystems through zebrafish - A comprehensive review. Environ Res, 2024. 261: p. 119684.
13. Kishor, R., et al., Ecotoxicological and health concerns of persistent coloring pollutants of textile industry wastewater and treatment approaches for environmental safety. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021. 9(2).
14. Katheresan, V., J. Kansedo, and S.Y. Lau, Efficiency of various recent wastewater dye removal methods: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2018. 6(4): p. 4676-4697.
15. Vikrant, K., et al., Recent advancements in bioremediation of dye: Current status and challenges. Bioresour Technol, 2018. 253: p. 355-367.
16. Holkar, C.R., et al., A critical review on textile wastewater treatments: Possible approaches. J Environ Manage, 2016. 182: p. 351-366.
17. Xie, D.A., et al., Remarkable purification of organic dyes by NiOOH-modified industrial waste residues. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2024. 664: p. 136-145.
18. Shahid, M., I. Shahid ul, and F. Mohammad, Recent advancements in natural dye applications: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013. 53: p. 310-331.
19. Zheng, H., H. Zhang, and Z.H. Zhang, Characteristics and extraction technology of natural pigments from animals and plants. Forest Research, 2003. 16: p. 628-635.
20. Arora, J., P. Agarwal, and G. Gupta, Rainbow of Natural Dyes on Textiles Using Plants Extracts: Sustainable and Eco-Friendly Processes. Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2017. 07(01): p. 35-47.
21. Repon, M.R., et al., Natural dyes in textile printing: parameters, methods, and performance. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024. 31: p. 1-32.
22. Yameen, M., et al., Sustainable appraisal of lipstick tree seeds (Bixa orellana)-based bixin natural orange colorant for green mordanted silk fabrics and wool yarns. Sci Prog, 2024. 107(2): p. 368504241242282.
23. Meng-Wei, J., et al., Extraction of Natural Valerian Dyes and Their Dyeing Properties on Cotton and Linen Fabrics. Journal of Wuhan Polytechnic, 2019.
24. Nonglait, D.L. and J.S. Gokhale, Review Insights on the Demand for Natural Pigments and Their Recovery by Emerging Microwave-Assisted Extraction (MAE). Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2023. 17(7): p. 1681-1705.
25. Wang, Y., R. Heermann, and K. Jung, CipA and CipB as Scaffolds To Organize Proteins into Crystalline Inclusions. ACS Synth Biol, 2017. 6(5): p. 826-836.
26. 郑依琳, et al., 细菌酪氨酸酶高效异源表达及其在生物染发和丝素多肽多巴修饰中的应用. 生物工程学报, 2024. 40(9): p. 3083-3102.
27. Shen, Y., et al., Colorful Pigments for Hair Dyeing Based on Enzymatic Oxidation of Tyrosine Derivatives. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021. 13(29): p. 34851-34864.
28. Battistella, C., et al., Bioinspired Chemoenzymatic Route to Artificial Melanin for Hair Pigmentation. Chemistry of Materials, 2020. 32(21): p. 9201-9210.