Loading Image
Heavy metal pollution background

Results

1. sinR/tasA Knock-out

Knockout Plasmid ConstructionTargeted knockout of B. subtilis 168

We visited the National Center for Biotechnology Information ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) to download the CDS sequences of the target genes tasA and sinR. Subsequently, we used the online software CHOPCHOP ( https://chopchop.cbu.uib.no) for sgRNA design. We selected the two most efficient sgRNAs as experimental sgRNA sequences and handed them over to the professional company to synthesize oligonucleotide chains.

Table 1-1:sgRNA for gene knockout

sgRNA Sequence
sgRNA-tasA TCTCATTCGAAGCTACACAG
sgRNA-sinR AACCGAGACGTCCAGAACAG

The sgRNA was ligated by Golden Gate, and the upstream and downstream homologous arms of sinR-tasA gene were ligated by Gibson homologous recombination.

5

Fig 1-1: Constructed Knockout Plasmid

5
5

Fig 1-2: pJOE8999-sgRNA Sequence Alignment Output

The sequencing results showed that we successfully constructed the final knockout plasmids pJOE8999-sgsinR-donor and pJOE8999-sgtasA-donor.

5
5

Fig 1-3: pJOE8999-sgRNA-donor Sequence Alignment Output

Targeted knockout of B. subtilis 168

The plasmids we successfully constructed were transformed into Bacillus subtilis 168 and coated on a kanamycin-resistant and 0.4 % mannose-containing plate for overnight culture.

5

Fig 1-4: Kanamycin-0.4 % mannose selective plates for Bacillus subtilis 168 carrying the knockout plasmid.

A pair of primers upstream and downstream of the target genes was used to verify the genome of the mannose-induced knockout bacteria by PCR, and the results were positive, indicating that there were successfully knocked out colonies. The PCR products were sequenced, and the sequencing results showed that the sinR and tasA genes were missing, and the rest were completely paired, without deletion or mutation, indicating that the sinR-tasA gene of Bacillus subtilis was successfully knocked out.

5

Fig 1-5: Bacillus subtilis knockout bacteria Sequence Alignment Output.

Elimination of knockout plasmid

In order to eliminate the influence of the knockout plasmid on the subsequent experiments, we transferred the verified bacteria to the anti-free LB liquid medium for 3 consecutive rounds to eliminate the knockout plasmid. Single colonies were streaked on solid media containing and without kanamycin antibiotics, and kanamycin antibiotic-sensitive bacteria were selected. After the colony PCR verification was in line with the expectation, the colony was expanded and cultured to obtain plasmid-eliminated ΔtasAΔsinR Bacillus subtilis 168, and the strain was preserved.

5

Fig 1-6: Colony PCR verification result
M: DL5000 marker
Lane 1, 2 ,3 and 4: Using plasmid-specific primers, no plasmid-derived amplicon was detected
Lane 5, 6, 7 and 8: PCR using primers flanking the genomic target gene produced an amplicon of ~1,000 bp, consistent with the expected size upon successful knockout.

5

Fig 1-7: Experimental validation of plasmid curing
a.Kanamycin-0.4 % mannose selective plate
b.Kanamycin-selective LB plate
c.Antibiotic-free LB plate

The formation of knockout bacteria biofilms

Congo red can be combined with TasA fibers,which was used to stain the biofilm of knockout bacteria and wild bacteria. The results showed that the biofilm formed by the knockout bacteria was lighter stained, indicating that there are no TasA fibers in the biofilm of the knockout strain, and the knockout effect was good.

5

Fig 1-8: Result of Congo Red staining.

Collectively, we successfully constructed a tasA-sinR double-deletion mutant of Bacillus subtilis 168, providing a genetically defined host for subsequent functional characterization.

2. Adhesion Module

2.1 TasA Fusion Protein

By modifying the tasA gene in Bacillus subtilis, we enhanced its adhesion to polystyrene filler. In this project, we selected three potential adhesion peptides or proteins: Mfp5 from mussel foot protein and two computer-simulated polystyrene-binding peptides. These were fused with TasA to improve the bacterial affinity for polystyrene. To expand the system's applicability, we also developed a SpyTag/SpyCatcher system that resolved secretion challenges for large molecular TasA fusion proteins, enabling broader applications across various adhesion proteins.

Construction of fusion protein

We constructed our plasmid using homologous recombination. After lac operon expression in the vector, we designed homologous arms at both ends of the target gene and used homologous recombinase to introduce the target gene into the plasmid backbone, thereby constructing pHT01-tasA plasmid. The pHT01-tasA plasmid was then used as a plasmid scaffold to construct the TasA fusion protein plasmid.

Table 2.1-1: Fragment primer containing a homologous arm.

Gene Forward Primer Reverse Primer
tasA AATTAAAGGAGGAAGGATCCATGGGTATGAAAAAGAAATT CCGCTCATTAGGCGGGCTGCTTAATTTTTATCCTCGCTATGCG
mfp5 GGTGGTGGTGGTTCTGGCGGTGGCGGTTCCATGAGCTCTGAAGAATACAA CCGCTCATTAGGCGGGCTGCTTAGCTAGAACCGCCACCGTAGT
mcherry GGTGGTGGTGGTTCTGGCGGTGGCGGTTCCATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGA CTCATTAGGCGGGCTGCTTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCC
PS-tag1 GGTGGATGCGCCATATGTTTGCGTGGAAGATTTTTTAAGCAGCCCGCTAATGAGCGG AAACATATGGCGCATCCACCAGCTTCCTCCTCCTCCATTTTTATCCTCGCTATGCG
PS-tag2 TTGGTGGCGCACAATTGTTTGGCGCCATATTAGATAAGCAGCCCGCTAATGAGCGG AAACAATTGTGCGCCACCAAAAGCTTCCTCCTCCTCCATTTTTATCCTCGCTATGCG

We selected Bacillus subtilis with both endogenous tasA and sinR sequences knocked out as our engineered strain. Since the constitutive promoter plasmid carrying exogenous TasA protein exhibits toxicity to the engineered bacteria and maintains continuous expression of the foreign protein, which adversely affects growth, we designed an IPTG-inducible promoter (lac operon) preceding the exogenous tasA sequence.

5

Fig 2.1-1: pHT01-tasA plasmid and other TasA fusion protein plasmids.

5

Fig 2.1-2: Sequencing results of pHT01-tasA plasmid and other TasA fusion protein plasmids.

Sequencing results of pHT01-tasA and other TasA fusion protein particles showed that the sequencing results of key regions were completely consistent with standard gene sequences, with no mutations occurring. pHT01-tasA and other TasA fusion protein particles have been successfully constructed, and the bacterial strains were preserved for functional validation.

pHT01 plasmid functional verification

pHT01-TasA-mcherry function verification

To explore the function of the TasA fusion protein, we introduced the pHT01-TasA-mcherry plasmid into knockout bacteria, added 1mM IPTG, and induced expression at 37℃for 48 hours. The fluorescence expression results were observed under a fluorescence microscope.

5

Fig 2.1-3: Fluorescence microscope examination results.
Left picture: Observation under a fluorescence microscope in a bright field; Right picture: Observation under green excitation light of a fluorescence microscope.

According to the results of fluorescence microscopy examination, the TasA-MCherry fusion protein expressed by \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-mcherry after IPTG induction can emit red fluorescence, indicating that the TasA fusion protein we constructed can be expressed in Bacillus subtilis.

TasA fusion protein Congo red staining

To further verify the function of the TasA fusion protein we constructed, we performed cone red staining on the TasA protein on the surface of biofilms with wild-type Bacillus subtilis 168 strain(WT) introduced, Bacillus subtilis 168 strain with tasA and sinR genes (\(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)) knocked out, and knockout bacteria with pHT01-tasA-mfp5、pHT01-tasA-PS tag1、pHT01-tasA-PS tag2 (\(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-mfp5,\(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-PS tag1,\(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-PS tag1) plasmid introduced. Observe the expression of the fusion protein.

5

Fig 2.1-4: TasA protein Congo red measurements. W = OD502/Quality conversion coefficient.
Control group: \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA strain; Positive control group: WT strain; Experimental group: \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-mfp5 strain, \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-PS tag1 strain, \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-PS tag2 strain; Three repetitions in each group.

According to the results of Congo red staining of TasA protein, the control group with the tasA gene knocked out basically did not express TasA protein, while the engineered bacteria introduced with pHT01-tasA-PS-tag1 and pHT01-tasA-PS-tag2 plasmids expressed a higher content of TasA protein. It indicates that the fusion protein plasmid we constructed has a strong ability to express fusion proteins. The amount of TasA protein expressed by Bacillus subtilis with the pHT01-tasA-mfp5 plasmid introduced in the figure is less than that of the wild type. This might be due to the excessive molecular weight of the TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein, which has a certain impact on the secretion and assembly of the protein.

Verification of the adhesion function of TasA protein

In order to investigate the function of the pHT01-tasA plasmid, we cultured three strains: wild-type Bacillus subtilis 168 (WT), the tasA-sinR mutant strain (\(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)), and the \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA knockout strain with the pHT01-tasA plasmid. The cultures were incubated for 24 hours in polystyrene microspheres. Following ultrasonic washing to detach adherent bacteria, the bacterial suspension was diluted with PBS and spread on agar plates for colony-forming unit (CFU) counting.

CFU counts revealed that Bacillus subtilis strain 168 exhibited significantly reduced adhesion capacity after tasA gene knockout. However, the introduction of exogenous tasA gene partially offset this impairment. Strains with exogenous tasA expression still showed lower CFU counts compared to wild-type 168 strains, likely due to insufficient levels of induced TasA protein production.

5

Fig 2.1-5: Schematic diagram of dilution and coating of three types of bacteria.

5

Fig 2.1-6: CFU count bar chart.
Control group: \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\) strain; Positive control group: WT strain; Experimental group: \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA strain; Three repetitions in each group.

Meanwhile, we performed crystal violet staining on the Bacillus subtilis adhering to the polystyrene spheres. By measuring the changes in the OD570 absorbance of the bacterial liquid eluted from the small ball filter material, the influence of different strains on adhesion was further analyzed.

In the two bacterial crystal violet staining experiments, it can be seen that the OD570 measured by Bacillus subtilis with the exogenous tasA gene introduced was higher than that of the control group. The results indicate that the adhesion ability of Bacillus subtilis with the exogenous tasA gene introduced has been improved to a certain extent, and the exogenous TasA protein can enhance the adhesion ability of Bacillus subtilis to a certain extent.

5

Fig 2.1-7: Comparison of crystal violet staining results of two types of bacteria.
Control group: \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\) strain; Experimental group: \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA strain; Three repetitions in each group.

Adhesion force test

To test the adhesion ability of the TasA fusion protein, we introduced knockout bacteria of the plasmids pHT01-tasA-Mfp5, pHT01-tasA-PS tag1, and pHT01-tasA-PS tag2 (\(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-Mfp5, \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-PS tag1, \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-PS tag1) and incubated them with polystyrene microsphere filter media for 24 hours respectively. The bacteria adhering to the polystyrene beads were ultrasonically eluted and then diluted with PBS for coating. CFU counts were conducted and compared with knockout bacteria introduced with the pHT01-tasA plasmid (\(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA)for comparative analysis.

It can be known from the CFU count results that the adhesion force of Bacillus subtilis introduced with TasA fusion protein granules has been significantly improved compared with the \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA strain. The adhesion of Bacillus subtilis introduced with the TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein plasmid was stronger than that of Bacillus subtilis introduced with the TasA-PS tag1/TasA-PS tag2 fusion protein plasmid.

5

Fig 2.1-8: Schematic diagram of dilution and coating of granular bacteria containing different TasA fusion proteins.

5

Fig 2.1-9: Bar chart of CFU counts for strains containing different fusion protein granules.
Control group: \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA strain; Experimental group: \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-mfp5 strain, \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-PS tag1 strain, \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-PS tag2 strain; Three repetitions in each group.

Meanwhile, we performed crystal violet staining on the Bacillus subtilis adhering to the polystyrene spheres. By measuring the changes in the \(\text{OD}_{570}\) absorbance of the bacterial liquid eluted from the small ball filter material, the differences in adhesion forces of different fusion proteins were further analyzed. The TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein has a stronger adhesion ability compared to the TasA-PS tag1/TasA-PS tag2 fusion protein. Considering that the Mfp5 adhesion protein has a wider range of adhesion activities, we chose the TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein for verification in the subsequent experiments.

5

Fig 2.1-10: Comparison of crystal violet staining results of granulosa containing different TasA fusion proteins.
Control group: \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA strain; Experimental group: \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-mfp5 strain, \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-PS tag1 strain, \(\textit{tasA}^-\textit{sinR}^-\)/tasA-PS tag2 strain; Three repetitions in each group.

During the CFU counting experiment, the number of adherents of TasA-PS tag1 was higher than that of TasA-PS tag2, but the amount of biofilm adhered by TasA-PS tag1 was greater than that of TasA-PS tag2. The difference in adhesion exhibited by the fusion protein It might be because the environment during the crystal violet staining and elution process has a significant impact on the structure of PS-tag1, resulting in a lower \(\text{OD}_{570}\) of the TasA-PS tag1 fusion protein in Figure 2.1-11.

Detection of adhesion force of fusion proteins in sewage environment

Due to the high concentration of heavy metal ions and low environmental pH in the heavy metal wastewater treatment environment, in order to ensure that Bacillus subtilis introduced with TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein still exerts adhesion in the wastewater environment, we simulated environmental conditions with different \(\text{Cd}^{2+}\) concentrations and lower pH values. To explore the influence of different environments on the adhesion of the TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein.

We designed SYG media containing different \(\text{Cd}^{2+}\) concentrations (0 mg/L, 0.25 mg/L, 0.5 mg/L, 1 mg/L, 2 mg/L), and incubated the knockout bacteria introduced with pHT01-tasA-mfp5 with polystyrene microsphere filter media for 48 hours. The bacteria adhering to the polystyrene beads were ultrasonically eluted and then diluted with PBS and coated for CFU counting.

5

Fig 2.1-11: Schematic diagram of dilution and coating of TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein bacteria at different \(\text{Cd}^{2+}\) concentrations.

5

Fig 2.1-12: Bar charts of CFU counts of TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein bacteria at different \(\text{Cd}^{2+}\) concentrations.

It can be known from CFU counts that within a certain range of \(\text{Cd}^{2+}\) concentrations (0-0.5mg/L), with the increase of \(\text{Cd}^{2+}\) concentration, the adhesion ability of the TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein decreases to a certain extent, but there were no significant differences.

We simultaneously designed SYG media with different pH values (pH=2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). The knockout bacteria introduced with pHT01-tasA-mfp5 were incubated and cultured with polystyrene microsphere filter media for 48 hours. The bacteria adhering to the polystyrene microspheres were ultrasonically eluted and then diluted with PBS and spread for CFU counting.

5

Fig 2.1-13: Schematic diagram of dilution and coating of TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein bacteria under different environmental pH conditions.

5

Fig 2.1-14: Bar charts of CFU counts of TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein bacteria under different environmental pH conditions.

It can be known from the CFU count that when the pH value of the living environment is too low (pH=2), the growth of TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein bacteria is significantly inhibited. With the increase of pH (pH=3), the inhibitory effect of environmental pH on the growth of TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein bacteria was relieved to a certain extent; In a weakly acidic environment (pH=4-6), there was no significant difference in the CFU count of TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein bacteria, and the adhesion ability was less affected by the environmental PH. When pH= 7, the CFU count of TasA-Mfp5 fusion protein bacteria decreased significantly. This might be because the surface of the polystyrene microspheres incubated with the bacterial liquid was damaged during the experiment, and the adhesion process with the fusion protein was affected.

2.2 SpyTag-SpyCatcher System

Background and Introduction

SpyTag is a short peptide that forms an isopeptide bond upon encountering its protein partner SpyCatcher. This covalent peptide interaction is a simple and powerful tool for bioconjugation and extending what protein architectures are accessible. Originated from fibronectin binding protein FbaB, SpyTag-SpyCatcher exhibit spontaneous reconstruction ability under a wide range of pH values, redox conditions and temperatures, which can perfectly fit in harsh application conditions. In the practical application of the TasAnchor system, there may be issues with the TasA fusion protein being relatively large, making it difficult to express and secrete. By inserting SpyTag-SpyCatcher into our adhesion system, we can further improve the modularity of TasAnchor, make it easier to adapt to various filter materials.

Plasmid Construction

We use Gibson Assembly to construct pHT01-TasA-SpyTag. We transferred it into E. coli \(\text{DH5}_\alpha\) to amplify, then transformed the plasmid into \(\textit{sinR}^-\textit{tasA}^-\) B. subtilis 168 for expression. We also use Gibson Assembly to construct pET28(a)-mCherry-SpyCatcher and pET28(a)-Mfp5-SpyCatcher, transferred into E. coli \(\text{DH5}_\alpha\) to amplify, then transformed the plasmid into E. coli BL21(DE3) for expression.

5

Fig 2.2-1: pHT01-TasA-SpyTag, pET28(a)-mCherry-SpyCatcher and pET28(a)-Mfp5-SpyCatcher plasmids.

Sequence spytag is inserted based on formerly constructed plasmid pHT01-TasA. Plasmid pET28(a)-Mfp5-SpyCatcher is constructed based on original pET28(a), and oligonucleotide mfp5-spycatcher is purchased from company. Plasmid pET28(a)-mCherry-spycatcher is constructed based on pET28(a)-Mfp5-SpyCatcher, while mCherry is derived from plasmid mCherry-Rab7a-7. Sequence of related primers are as follows:

Table 2.2-1: Related primers of SpyTag-SpyCatcher system.

Plasmid Forward Primer Reverse Primer
pHT01-TasA TCAACCATAACGATGTGAGCAGAACCACCACCACCATTTTTATCCTCGCTATGCG TCACATCGTTATGGTTGATGCTTACAAACCTACTAAATAAGCAGCCCGCCTAATGAG
pET28(a) TGAGATCCGGCTGCTAACAA CATGGTATATCTCCTTCTTAAAG
Mfp5-SpyCatcher CTTTAAGAAGGAGATATACCATGAGCTCTGAAGAATACAA TTGTTAGCAGCCGGATCTCATTAGTGGTGATGGTGGTGGT
pET28(a)-SpyCatcher CATGGTATATCTCCTTCTTAAAG GTAGCGGTGGTGGTGGTTCT
pET28(a)-SpyCatcher CTTTAAGAAGGAGATATACCATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAG AGAACCACCACCACCGCTACCGCCGCCACCCTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGC

The sequencing results separately show that SpyTag was successfully inserted into pHT01-TasA, and pET28(a)-Mfp5-SpyCatcher and pET28(a)-mCherry-SpyCatcher are successfully constructed as well.

5

Fig 2.2-2: Sequencing results of pHT01-TasA-SpyTag, pET28(a)-mCherry-SpyCatcher and pET28(a)-Mfp5-SpyCatcher.

We also performed colony PCR with corresponding primers to verify whether our plasmids are successfully transferred into B. subtilis or E. coli BL21(DE3).

5

Fig 2.2-3: Colony PCR result of pHT01-TasA-SpyTag \(\textit{sinR}^-\textit{tasA}^-\) B. subtilis 168.

5

Fig 2.2-4: Colony PCR result of pET28(a)-Mfp5-SpyCatcher E. coli BL21(DE3).

5

Fig 2.2-5: Colony PCR result of pET28a-mCherry-SpyCatcher E. coli BL21(DE3).

SpyTag-SpyCatcher Interaction Experiment

Before conducting the adhesion experiment, we decided to validate the SpyTag-SpyCatcher system in Bacillus subtilis. We decided to incubate the mCherry-SpyCatcher protein with Bacillus subtilis expressing TasA-SpyTag on the surface to observe whether there was fluorescence binding.

First, we need to purify mCherry-SpyCatcher protein. We inoculated overnight-cultured transformed E. coli BL21(DE3) into 50ml LB liquid medium containing 50μg/ml kanamycin at a rate of 1%. IPTG was added to 1mM when the OD600 of the culture system reached 0.6-0.8. After 14 hours of 24℃, 220rpm shaking culture, the bacteria was ultrasonic crushed, and total bacterial protein was extracted.

We use Ni-NTA prepacked column to purify our target protein since they are anchored with 6xHisTag, which can combine Ni-NTA column. Related samples underwent SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining to testify the purification procedure.

5

Fig 2.2-6: pET28(a)-mCherry-SpyCatcher E. coli BL21(DE3) expressing red fluorescence.

5

Fig 2.2-7: SDS-PAGE results of mCherry-SpyCatcher(~40.2kDa).

We incubated mCherry-SpyCatcher with the biofilm formed by pHT01-TasA-SpyTag B. subtilis 168 and \(\textit{sinR}^-\textit{tasA}^-\) B. subtilis 168, and take picture of it under fluorescence microscope. The results show that SpyCatcher can successfully bind to TasA-SpyTag on cell wall.

5

Fig 2.2-8: mCherry-SpyCatcher incubated B. subtilis 168 under excitation laser of DsRed. (a) control (\(\textit{sinR}^-\textit{tasA}^-\) B. subtilis 168) (b) pHT01-TasA-SpyTag.

Adhesion Function Examination

Since we plan to incubate Mfp5-SpyCatcher protein with transformed B. subtilis to test its adhesion ability, we need to extract and purify the Mfp5-SpyCatcher protein. We conducted SDS-PAGE analysis on the purified protein, demonstrating that the protein was successfully purified.

5

Fig 2.2-9: SDS-PAGE results of Mfp5-SpyCatcher(~22.8kDa).

We incubated B. subtilis 168 with polystyrene balls and Mfp5-SpyCatcher protein, and performed gradient dilution coating to measure the colony-forming units(CFU) per volume of polystyrene balls' eluent. The result revealed that SpyTag-SpyCatcher system exhibit an even better adhesion ability than fusion protein.To further verify and quantify the adhesion ability of our system, we also use crystal violet staining to indicate the small fluctuate of bacteria concentration between eluent from different bacteria incubated-polystyrene balls.

5

Fig 2.2-10: 100x dilution spread plate results of related B. subtilis 168.

5

Fig 2.2-11: Quantified results of adhesion function examination. (a) histogram of eluent's colony-forming units; (b) histogram of crystal violet staining.

We speculate that the adhesion effect of TasA-SpyTag/Mfp5-SpyCatcher is better than that of TasA-Mfp5, which may be due to the smaller molecular weight of TasA-SpyTag, making it easier to express and secrete, and displaying more TasA-SpyTag molecules on bacterial surfaces. To this end, we will compare the amount of TasA fusion protein fibers expressed on the surface of TasA-SpyTag and TasA-Mfp5 using Congo red staining. As expected, TasA-SpyTag expression secretes more TasA fusion protein, resulting in a stronger adhesion effect than TasA-Mfp5.

5

Fig2.2-12 Comparison of Congo red staining between Mfp5-SpyTag and SpyCatcher-Mfp5

Conclusion

By anchoring binding proteins with TasA, we successfully constructed a platform that can easily bind to the target material. To improve the modularity of our project, we introduced SpyTag-SpyCatcehr system between TasA and binding protein, which surprisingly improved the adhesion ability of TasAnchor. But sadly, due to time limitation, we simply tested the adhesion ability of TasAnchor with Mfp5 and PS-Tag. In future experiments, we will introduce more binding proteins to TasAnchor to verify the availability as well as flexibility of this platform. We also plan to integrate this system into the chromatin of \(\textit{sinR}^-\textit{tasA}^-\) B. subtilis 168 to eliminate the negative effect from our plasmids.

3. Function Test Module

3.1 epcadR-pcadR-mcherry Sensing Functional Module

Construction and Verification of the pHT01-epcadR-pcadR-mcherry Plasmid

Using mcherry as the reporter gene, the plasmid pHT01-epcadR-pcadR-mcherry was constructed to evaluate the response of the epcadR-pcadR module to environmental cadmium ion concentrations. Sequencing results confirmed the successful assembly of all functional elements.

5

Fig 3.1-1: Plasmid map of pHT01-epcadR-pcadR-mcherry.

5

Fig 3.1-2: Sequencing result of pHT01-epcadR-pcadR-mcherry.

The pHT01-epcadR-pcadR-mcherry plasmid was introduced into the ΔtasAΔsinR Bacillus subtilis 168 strain using a competent cell preparation kit. Colony PCR confirmed the successful introduction of the recombinant plasmid.

5

Fig 3.1-3: Colony PCR was performed to verify the successful introduction of the pHT01-epcadR-pcadR-mcherry recombinant plasmid.

Growth Curves of Plasmid-Free Knockout Strains and Engineered Strains under Different Cadmium Ion Concentrations

5

Fig 3.1-4: Growth curves of the two strains under different cadmium ion concentrations.

The results indicate that, at cadmium ion concentrations measured in mg/L, both strains exhibited rapid growth, suggesting minimal inhibitory effects at these levels. The strongest inhibition was observed at 1.5 mg/L, while 0.5 mg/L and 0.25 mg/L showed relatively weak inhibition with little difference between them. Overall, cadmium ions at the 0-1.5 mg/L scale exert only minor effects on the growth of the engineered strain, which is capable of robust growth under the experimental cadmium concentrations. Furthermore, comparison of the two strains indicates that the introduction of the exogenous plasmid has negligible impact on the cadmium tolerance of the engineered strain.

Fluorescence Response Curves of Engineered Strains to Different Cadmium Ion Concentrations over Time

5

Fig 3.1-5: Time-course of fluorescence intensity in engineered strains under different cadmium ion concentrations.

Under treatments with 0, 1, and 2 mmol/L cadmium ions, fluorescence intensity in the pHT01-epcadR-pcadR-mcherry strain showed a significant positive correlation with both cadmium concentration and incubation time. The strongest fluorescence was observed at 2 mmol/L, reaching a peak at 25 h, while the 0 mmol/L control group maintained a consistently low fluorescence level (less than 30 FU), demonstrating that cadmium ions effectively induce fluorescence expression.

3.2 tasA-smtA Adsorption Functional Module

Construction and Verification of the pHT01-tasA-smtA Plasmid

We first used the pHT01-tasA plasmid as a template for reverse PCR to obtain the vector backbone. Subsequently, the smtA fragment was joined to this backbone via Gibson assembly, resulting in the successful construction of the pHT01-tasA-smtA recombinant plasmid. Sequencing results confirmed the correct assembly of all functional elements.

5

Fig 3.2-1: Plasmid map of pHT01-tasA-smtA.

5

Fig 3.2-2: Sequencing result of pHT01-tasA-smtA.

The pHT01-tasA-smtA plasmid was introduced into the ΔtasAΔsinR Bacillus subtilis 168 strain using a competent cell preparation kit. Colony PCR confirmed the successful introduction of the recombinant plasmid.

5

Fig 3.2-3: Colony PCR was performed to verify the successful introduction of the pHT01-tasA-smtA recombinant plasmid.

Effects of Cadmium Ions on Biofilm Formation in Engineered Strains

5

Fig 3.2-4: Results of Crystal Violet Staining of Biofilms Formed by Engineered Strains under Different Cadmium Ion Concentrations.

TasA is a key structural protein involved in biofilm formation and a major component of the extracellular matrix; therefore, the metal ion adsorption capacity of the TasA-SmtA fusion protein is closely associated with the biofilm formation status of the engineered strain. To ensure that this adsorption module functions under normal biofilm conditions, we examined the effects of different cadmium ion concentrations on biofilm formation in the engineered strain. Strains carrying pHT01-tasA-smtA were cultured under varying cadmium ion concentrations, and after 36 h of incubation, the formed biofilms were stained with crystal violet. Biofilm production was quantified by measuring OD₅₇₀. The results showed that within the cadmium concentration range of 0-9 mg/L, biofilm formation of the pHT01-tasA-smtA strain was not significantly affected. These findings indicate that the TasA-SmtA module can stably form biofilm across a wide range of environmental cadmium concentrations.

Adsorption-desorption Curves of Cadmium Ions by Engineered Strains

SmtA protein forms reversible complexes with Cd²⁺ ions through metal-coordinating sites such as thiol and carboxyl groups. Under high pH conditions, these sites are deprotonated, facilitating Cd²⁺ adsorption, whereas under low pH conditions, protonation promotes Cd²⁺ desorption, enabling controlled release of the metal ions. Based on this mechanism, adsorption-desorption curves of the engineered strain were measured in 9 mg/L and 5 mg/L Cd²⁺ solutions, demonstrating its potential for repeated use.

5

Fig 3.2-5: Adsorption-desorption Curves of Cadmium Ions by the pHT01-tasA-smtA Engineered Strain.

The engineered strain underwent sequential adsorption-desorption cycles, repeated three times over a total of two rounds. As shown in the figure, for the 9 mg/L Cd²⁺ solution, the pHT01-tasA-smtA strain maintained high and stable adsorption capacity throughout the cycles. The initial adsorption nearly achieved 100% removal of cadmium ions. Although desorption did not remove all bound Cd²⁺, the engineered strain still exhibited substantial adsorption efficiency.

For the 5 mg/L Cd²⁺ solution, the initial adsorption efficiency was relatively low; however, the strain demonstrated 100% desorption efficiency during the cycles, indicating good regenerability. Moreover, adsorption efficiency increased noticeably after the first desorption, which may be attributed to activation of SmtA proteins displayed on the cell surface under low pH conditions.

The cadmium ion adsorption efficiency of the pHT01-tasA-smtA engineered strain was evaluated using a 9 mg/L Cd²⁺ solution. The results showed that during the initial adsorption, the strain achieved a 100% removal rate, effectively adsorbing all Cd²⁺ in the solution. After two rounds of desorption under low pH conditions, the adsorption efficiency decreased but remained at approximately 32%. These findings indicate that the engineered strain not only efficiently removes cadmium ions from the environment but also retains substantial adsorption activity after multiple desorption cycles, demonstrating strong potential for regeneration and reuse.

3.3 epcadR-pcadR-mcherry-tasA-mfp5 Sensing-adhesion Functional Module

Construction and Verification of the Sensing-adhesion Composite Plasmid

To enable the engineered strain to adhere to biofilter materials and perform cadmium ion sensing, a dual-module “sensing-adhesion” expression plasmid was constructed. Preliminary experiments indicated that among various candidate adhesion proteins, Mfp5 exhibited the most favorable surface-binding performance. Compared with the SpyTag-SpyCatcher system, the TasA-Mfp5 system offered a simpler construction process without requiring additional protein purification steps. Based on these advantages, the TasA-Mfp5 adhesion module was integrated with the epcadR-pcadR-mcherry sensing module to evaluate the cadmium-responsive capability of the engineered strain in an attached state.

To enhance overall expression efficiency, the strong constitutive promoter p43 was used to replace the original promoter sequence. Subsequently, the recombinant plasmid pHT01-p43-epcadR-mcherry-p43-tasA-mfp5 was successfully obtained via homologous recombination. This plasmid endows the host strain with stable adhesion to polystyrene microspheres and enables a fluorescent response in the presence of exogenous cadmium ions.

Sequencing verification confirmed the correct construction of the target plasmid, providing an experimental foundation for subsequent quantitative detection and characterization of cadmium ion responsiveness.

5

Fig 3.3-1: Plasmid map of pHT01-p43-epcadR-mcherry-p43-tasA-mfp5.

5

Fig 3.3-2: Sequencing result of pHT01-p43-epcadR-mcherry-p43-tasA-mfp5.

The pHT01-p43-epcadR-mcherry-p43-tasA-mfp5 plasmid was introduced into the ΔtasAΔsinR Bacillus subtilis 168 strain using a competent cell preparation kit. Colony PCR confirmed the successful introduction of the recombinant plasmid.

5

Fig 3.3-3: Colony PCR was performed to verify the successful introduction of the pHT01-p43-epcadR-mcherry-p43-tasA-mfp5 plasmid into the ΔtasAΔsinR Bacillus subtilis 168 strain.

Verification of Fluorescence Expression under the Adherent State

In the experiment, we incubated the polystyrene globules with the SYG film-forming medium of the engineered bacteria for 30 h, then used the incubated globules for cadmium ion adsorption experiments, and then incubated with 2mmol/L cadmium ion solution for 16h, and then observe fluorescence under a microscope.

5

Fig 3.3-4: Fluorescence Microscopy Observation of ΔtasAΔsinR Bacillus subtilis 168 Strain Carrying pHT01-p43-epcadR-mcherry-p43-tasA-mfp5 and the ΔtasAΔsinR Bacillus subtilis 168 Strain.

5

Fig 3.3-5: Observation of Polystyrene Microspheres under Yellow Light (leftmost: ΔtasAΔsinR Bacillus subtilis 168 carrying pHT01-p43-epcadR-mcherry-p43-tasA-mfp5; second from left: ΔtasAΔsinR Bacillus subtilis 168).

Polystyrene microspheres with adhered pHT01-p43-epcadR-mcherry-p43-tasA-mfp5 cells exhibited pronounced red fluorescence under a fluorescence microscope after induction with 2 mmol/L cadmium chloride, the concentration producing maximal fluorescence. The fluorescence was concentrated on the bacterial cells. From a macroscopic perspective, under yellow light, microspheres carrying the pHT01-p43-epcadR-mcherry-p43-tasA-mfp5 strain appeared redder compared to those with the ΔtasAΔsinR strain.

These results demonstrate that the pHT01-p43-epcadR-mcherry-p43-tasA-mfp5 strain can simultaneously adhere to polystyrene microspheres and respond to cadmium ions by expressing fluorescence, confirming the successful construction of the engineered strain with a dual “sensing-adhesion” functional module.

3.4 Verification of Adsorption-adhesion Function Modules

In order to enable engineered bacteria to finally adhere to the biological filter material to play the function of adsorbing cadmium ions, we plan to construct an expression plasmid pHT01-p43-tasA-smtA-p43-tasA-mfp5 with a dual module of "adsorption-adhesion". However, we found that the co-expression of two TasA fusion proteins would seriously affect the growth of the strains, and the transformation efficiency of the strains was low and the growth was very slow, making it difficult to carry out experimental operations.

In the experiment, we incubated the polystyrene globules with the SYG film-forming medium of the engineered bacteria for 30 h, then used the incubated globules for cadmium ion adsorption experiments, and then incubated with 9mg/L cadmium ion solution for 15h, and then measured the cadmium ion concentration to calculate the adsorption capacity of the polystyrene globules loaded with engineering bacteria for cadmium ions.

5

Fig 3.4-1: Adsorption efficiency of cadmium ions in polystyrene spheres incubated by pHT01-tasA-smtA engineering bacteria.

The experimental results showed that some pHT01-tasA-smtA engineered bacteria could stably attach to the surface of polystyrene spheres and exert the adsorption function of Cd²⁺, and their treatment capacity for Cd²⁺ was higher than that of the control group. We speculate that if engineered bacteria expressing TasA-Mfp5 protein are used, the adsorption effect may be further increased because of its stronger adhesion effect and larger bacterial volume.

4. Safety Module

Quorum Sensing Induced Suicide Systems

In order to ensure the biosafety of Bacillus subtilis applied in heavy metal wastewater treatment, we designed a density-controlled suicide system based on the quorum-sensing pathway ComQXPA and the toxin-antitoxin pair mazEF. This regulatory circuit allows the engineered strain to survive and function at high cell density on fillers, while automatically initiating self-elimination when cells detach and enter a low-density environment.

4.1 ComQXPA Induction System

According to the literature, the ComQXPA system of B. subtilis can regulate gene expression in response to extracellular signaling peptides ComX. When cell density is high, accumulated ComX activates the ComP-ComA cascade, inducing the \(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\) promoter.

4.1.1 pHT01-\(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\)-mCherry Plasmid construction

Using mCherry as a reporter gene, we constructed a plasmid pHT01-\(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\)-mCherry to validate the response of the \(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\) to quorum-sensing signals in Bacillus subtilis. This plasmid allows fluorescence reporting of promoter activity controlled by the endogenous quorum-sensing system ComQXPA.

5

Fig 4-1: Plasmid of pHT01-\(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\)-mCherry.

5

Fig 4-2: Sequence results of pHT01-\(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\)-mCherry.

Sequencing results confirmed the successful assembly of all functional elements.

Interestingly, a single point mutation (AAA → AAG) was detected within the coding sequence; however, as both codons encode lysine, this is a synonymous mutation that does not affect protein function. Therefore, the construction of pHT01-\(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\)-mCherry was considered successful, and the plasmid was used in subsequent experiments to evaluate \(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\) responsiveness and activity.

4.1.2 \( \text{P}_{\text{srfA}} \) Activation Threshold Analysis

To determine the threshold at which our density-dependent system is activated, we measured the response of the \(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\) to endogenous quorum-sensing signals generated by the ComQXPA system of Bacillus subtilis. Since ComX, the signaling peptide, is naturally secreted and accumulated during cell growth, no exogenous inducers were added in this experiment.

Furthermore, colony PCR verification confirmed that the recombinant plasmid was successfully transformed into Bacillus subtilis.

5

Fig 4-3: Colony PCR result of mCherry validation, 1-11: fragments of mCherry.

Then we cultured 100 mL of B. subtilis harboring pHT01-\(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\)-mCherry in shaking flasks at 37℃ and monitored \(\text{OD}_{600}\) and fluorescence intensity every hour. As results shown, the fluorescence began to rise significantly when \(\text{OD}_{600}\) reached approximately 0.8-1.0, suggesting that the \(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\) promoter was activated at this population density. The fluorescence then peaked when \(\text{OD}_{600}\) approached 1.2, corresponding to the stationary phase, and gradually decreased thereafter, consistent with the quorum-sensing activation pattern.

5

Fig 4-4: Growth curve and fluorescence dynamics of B. subtilis harboring pHT01-\(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\)-mCherry.

The results indicate that the \(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\) promoter has a density activation threshold, which enables the suicide circuit to respond precisely to bacterial population changes within the reactor. This threshold aligns with our system design goal: allowing cells to survive and function under high-density biofilm conditions while triggering the self-elimination module when cell density drops.

4.2 MazF Toxin Proteins

MazF is a toxic protein in the mazF/mazE toxin-antitoxin system, and it is function as mRNA endonuclease. In our experimental design, we utilized the MazF protein as the toxin component in a suicide system to validate its feasibility and effectiveness in Bacillus subtilis. We evaluated the function of MazF protein by designing a validation gene circuit to characterize it.

4.2.1 pHT01-mazF Plasmid Construction

The expression of mazF is regulated using IPTG induction in the prophase and metaphase of characterization validation. pHT01-mazF plasmid in the genetic circuit consists of the lazO/lacI system, \(\text{P}_{\text{Grac}}\), and mazF. We constructed the pHT01-mazF plasmid and demonstrated the expression of the mazF toxin protein in the chassis as well as the characterization of its bactericidal function through IPTG induction experiments.

5

Fig 4-5: Plasmid of pHT01-mazF.

5

Fig 4-6: Sequence of pHT01-mazF.

4.2.2 pHT01-mazF Plasmid Transformation

To validate the function of our constructed plasmid in the chassis organism, we transformed the pHT01-mazF plasmid into B. subtilis and characterized the bactericidal effect of the MazF toxin protein on the host.

5

Fig 4-7: Correct result of Colony PCR. 1-3: fragments of mazF.

4.2.3 MazF Functional Validation

5

Fig 4-8: Results of IPTG gradient plate induction experiments.

We validated the function of mazF through IPTG gradient plate test. The maximum induction concentrations of IPTG on the gradient plates were set at 0.6 mg/mL, 0.8 mg/mL, and 1.0 mg/mL. The experimental results demonstrated a decreasing trend in the number of colony-forming units with increasing IPTG concentrations across the gradient plates, indicating that IPTG-induced expression of mazF exerts a bactericidal effect.

5

Fig 4-9: Results of induction experiments with different concentrations of IPTG plates.

We conducted IPTG plate induction assays at varying concentrations to further investigate the bactericidal effect of the mazF protein under different induction levels. As the IPTG concentration increased, the number of colony-forming units in the chassis showed a significant declining trend. We observed that the mazF toxin began to exhibit a noticeable bactericidal effect at an IPTG concentration of 0.4 mg/mL.

4.3 MazE Antitoxin Proteins

In the practical application of the topic, we need engineering bacteria to survive within a certain range of high density. At this time, MazF may also have a low amount of leakage expression, which means that bacteria need to survive in a low expression state of MazF. For this, we introduced the antitoxin MazE, which allows bacteria to survive when MazF is leaked at low levels by antagonizing MazF.

4.3.1 pHT01-mazF-\(\text{P}_{43}\)-mazE Plasmid Construction

5

Fig 4-10: Plasmid of pHT01-mazF-\(\text{P}_{43}\)-mazE.

5

Fig 4-11: Figure 4-7 Correct result of Colony PCR.
1-12: fragments of mazF-mazE;
13: No-Template Control (NTC).

5

Fig 4-12: Sequence of pHT01-mazF-\(\text{P}_{43}\)-mazE.

As the third circuit of our biosafety design, we successfully constructed the plasmid pHT01-\(\text{P}_{\text{Grac}}\)-mazF-\(\text{P}_{43}\)-mazE. The construction process involved PCR amplification of the p43 promoter and the mazE gene fragment, followed by enzymatic linearization of the plasmid pHT01 -mazF. These fragments were then assembled via multi-fragment homologous recombination, ultimately forming an IPTG-regulated suicide system.

4.3.2 MazE Functional Validation

To validate the toxic effect of mazF and the inhibitory role of mazE against the toxin in pHT01-mazF-\(\text{P}_{43}\)-mazE, we prepared IPTG concentration gradient plates ranging from 0 mg/mL to 1.2 mg/mL across eight gradients. The bacterial culture of Plasmid of pHT01-mazF-\(\text{P}_{43}\)-mazE was diluted to an appropriate concentration, plated, and incubated, after which colony numbers were counted.

The results showed that as IPTG concentration increased, the induction of the \(\text{P}_{\text{Grac}}\) promoter was enhanced, leading to elevated expression of the mazF gene. In contrast, the constitutive expression of mazE mediated by the \(\text{P}_{43}\) promoter provided limited counteracting effects, resulting in an overall increase in colony numbers of the plasmid of pHT01-mazF-\(\text{P}_{43}\)-mazE engineered bacteria.

5

Fig 4-13: Reduction in colony counts by IPTG induction.

When the IPTG concentration range was 0-0.4, we found that compared with the MazF control group, we found that the number of colonies in the experimental group expressing MazE was only slightly reduced, indicating that MazE could provide better antagonistic effect when MazF was expressed in the low concentration range. This circuit enables regulated expression of the toxin protein MazF, while the constitutive expression of the antagonist protein MazE ensures bacterial stability under normal working conditions, preventing leaky expression of the toxin gene. Furthermore, it provides a foundational vehicle for the subsequent introduction of the quorum-sensing module in overall biosafety part.

4.4 Overall Biosafety Part

4.4.1 pHT01-\(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\)-mazF-\(\text{P}_{43}\)-mazE Plasmid Construction

5

Fig 4-14: Plamid of pHT01-\(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\)-mazF-\(\text{P}_{43}\)-mazE.

5

Fig 4-15: Correct result of Colony PCR. 1-5: fragments of \(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\)-mazF-\(\text{P}_{43}\)-mazE.

5

Fig 4-16: Sequence results of pHT01-\(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\)-mazF-\(\text{P}_{43}\)-mazE.

As the final and complete part of our biosafety part, we constructed a plasmid with Quorum Sensing Induced promoter \(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\), which will be activated by Endogenous phosphorylation; with toxin protein gene mazF controlled by lacI, and its antagonist protein gene mazE, we finally completed the effect that when the engineered bacteria escape into the environment, the suicide switch is activated without affecting their normal growth in a colony state in the working environment.

To ensure this effect is noticeable, we conducted a 12-hour-trace to form its growth curve between wild type and the engineered bacteria.

5

Fig 4-17: Growth curve for wild type strain and pHT01-\(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\)-mazF-\(\text{P}_{43}\)-mazE strain

We can notice that, compared with WT, pHT01-\(\text{P}_{\text{srfA}}\)-mazF-\(\text{P}_{43}\)-mazE strain indeed show lower trend in growth curve at first 4 hours, which indicates the suicide system performs well when bacteria concentration is low.

5. Outlook

In the TasAnchor experiment, we improved and expanded the surface display system of Bacillus subtilis TasA by fusing it with Mfp5, which has broad binding affinity, and PS tags, which have specific binding affinity to polystyrene. This enhanced the colonization and biofilm formation effects of Bacillus subtilis on polystyrene biofilter filter media, and also verified the feasibility of using the SpyTag-SpyCatcher system for adhesion. Subsequently, we introduced cadmium ion induction and adsorption circuits into the engineering bacteria separately, verifying their adsorption, induction, and elution of cadmium ions. We attempted to combine the adhesion module and cadmium ion treatment module to demonstrate that the engineering bacteria can perform cadmium ion treatment under the condition of being fixed on a polystyrene solid substrate. At the same time, we also designed a biosafety module and validated a density controlled suicide switch to ensure that when bacteria detach from the solid matrix, the suicide switch can be activated to prevent leakage. The components of TasAnchor are modular design, which can address the adhesion of engineered bacteria in different environments by replacing different binding proteins.

In the iGEM competition cycle, the number of repetitions and technical iterations of our experiments is limited. Now we only try to adhere to one material——polystyrene foam filter material, and only use three binding proteins for verification. If we want to further confirm the TasAnchor system, we need to use more materials and binding proteins for verification, and enhance the credibility of the system by simulating actual environments, which is also the direction of our future experiments.

In terms of specific details of the experiment, we found that overexpression of TasA related proteins may affect the normal growth of the strain. Therefore, we used an inducible promoter pGrac, which indicates that in practical use, the system needs to adhere to a solid substrate through pre-treatment under IPTG conditions, and then transfer to a specific environment to exert its function. This may affect the sustainability of the system and limit the application scenarios of engineered bacteria. Through discussions with experts, we will ensure the constitutive expression and stability of protein expression by fusing the binding protein behind the TasA protein on endogenous chromosomes in the future.

Finally, it is currently unclear whether our TasAnchor can grow and function properly in more complex wastewater environments. Therefore, we need to further optimize the stability of each of our solution strategies and design hardware and delivery strategies in conjunction with the actual environment of the sewer system to improve the efficacy of our engineered bacteria.