cover

Engineering Cycle

Iteration 1

Invasion efficiency of Staphylococcus xylosus ATCC 29971

Wet Lab / Cycle 1 / Iteration 1 / Design

Previous studies have indicated that Staphylococcus xylosus isolated from primary tumor tissue possesses a certain level of invasion capability toward TNBC (Fu et al., 2022). Building on this observation, we employed the reference strain Staphylococcus xylosus ATCC 29971 as the chassis strain to verify whether this invasion phenotype could be reproduced in a standard genetic background and to quantitatively assess its invasion efficiency. Specifically, S. xylosus ATCC 29971 (TrojanHorseβ) was engineered to express sfGFP and co-cultured with TNBC cell lines to enable precise bacterial localization and quantification of invasion rates. Here, the invasion rate was defined as the percentage of host cells containing intracellular bacteria, as determined by flow cytometry. It is known that invasion efficiency correlates with the multiplicity of infection (MOI), although the precise relationship remains unclear. We hypothesize that this trend may approximate a bell-shaped distribution: at low MOIs, insufficient bacterial amount may result in reduced invasion efficiency, whereas at high MOIs, excessive metabolic burden could impair bacterial viability, thereby decreasing invasion efficiency. To investigate this, the bacteria were co-cultured with human MDA-MB-231 at various MOIs to determine the optimal invasion ratio.

To enhance the invasion efficiency of Trojanβ and develop a functional intracellular delivery platform, we retained sfgfp as a reporter gene and introduced heterologous expression of the canonical invasion protein FnBPA from Staphylococcus aureus USA300 to promote bacterial internalization. Since the relationship between the MOI and bacterial invasiveness remains undefined, we further assessed the invasion efficiency across a range of MOIs.

To obtain stronger and more stable fluorescence signals for bacterial tracking, we employed the CellTrace™ Far Red Cell Proliferation Kit to label the bacteria. CellTrace™ Far Red is widely used in cell proliferation assays, as the dye can freely penetrate cell membrane and covalently bind to free amines within the cytoplasm, thereby retaining fluorescence through at least six cell divisions over several days to weeks. Moreover, CellTrace™ Far Red has an excitation maximum at 630 nm, which minimizes spectral overlap with the FITC channel and avoids the high background fluorescence typically observed at 488 nm. Collectively, these characteristics make CellTrace™ Far Red particularly suitable for fluorescence-based bacterial tracing and invasion analyses.

Considering that the invasion rate of TrojanHorseβ[Reporter α] may have been underestimated due to the weak and unstable fluorescence of sfGFP, we plan to apply CellTrace™ Far Red staining to this strain to re-evaluate their invasion efficiency toward multiple cell lines.

Given that expression of FnBPA may reduce the tumor-targeting specificity of S. xylosus and increase its off-target invasiveness in healthy tissues, we evaluated whether the engineered bacteria retain selectivity toward tumor cells by comparing their invasion rates between tumor and normal mammary epithelial cell lines.

The fluorescence intensity of the labeled bacteria is sufficiently strong to effectively prevent false negatives at the signal detection level. Nevertheless, other potential sources of bias throughout the experimental workflow must be carefully controlled to ensure data reliability.

Specifically, insufficient bactericidal efficacy during the gentamicin protection assay may allow extracellular bacteria to survive and adhere to host cell surfaces, thereby generating false-positive results. Moreover, engineered bacteria that are internalized by host cells but fail to escape from lysosomes would also produce misleading positive signals, as only bacteria that successfully reach the cytoplasm can evade degradation, establish intracellular colonization, and subsequently release therapeutic molecules.

To rigorously evaluate the robustness and accuracy of our bacterial platform, we designed two complementary experiments aimed at independently validating these two critical steps: (i) verifying the killing efficiency of gentamicin under co-culture conditions, and (ii) assessing the ability of intracellular bacteria to escape from endosomal compartments into the cytoplasm.

Based on previous studies, most researchers have employed temperature-sensitive plasmids (e.g., pBT2) for homologous recombination in Staphylococcus xylosus, allowing integration of the target gene into the chromosome for expression (Brückner, 1997). However, since this method is time-consuming and technically demanding, we selected the shuttle vector pLI50, which can replicate in both Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Staphylococcus possesses a DNA methylation–based restriction–modification (R–M) system that protects against the invasion of foreign DNA. Since the strength of the R–M system in Staphylococcus xylosus ATCC 29971 cannot be determined, we planned to initially disregard the R–M system in our preliminary experiments and introduce the plasmid into Staphylococcus xylosus to test whether it could be directly expressed in the host.

Literature review revealed that Staphylococcus xylosus ATCC 700404 commonly employs E. coli TG1 for plasmid amplification (Brückner, 1997). Given the genomic similarity between Staphylococcus xylosus ATCC 700404 and Staphylococcus xylosus ATCC 29971, and the limited accessibility of Staphylococcus xylosus ATCC 700404 domestically, we propose that Escherichia coli TG1 could also be applied to Staphylococcus xylosus ATCC 29971 for this purpose. In addition, we identified an alternative protocol for preparing competent cells using glycerol solution washes, which we plan to evaluate.

Database revealed that the restriction–modification system of Staphylococcus xylosus ATCC 29971 specifically recognizes and cleaves methylated DNA sequences, including the dam and dcm methylation sites commonly present in Escherichia coli K-12 strains such as DH5α and TG1. To circumvent interference from this system, the methylation-deficient Escherichia coli JM110 (dam⁻/dcm⁻ double mutant) was employed for plasmid amplification in this study.

Standard washing protocols employing glycerol, sucrose, or a glycerol–sucrose mixture were ineffective for Staphylococcus xylosus. Therefore, we employed a washing procedure using 10% glycine, as described by Dr. Shang Cai (Dong et al., 2022). All steps were performed under strict ice-bath conditions, and plasmid DNA pretreated with E. coli JM110 was introduced at relatively high concentrations.

cycle-1
Figure 1. Preparation Workflow of Staphylococcus xylosus ATCC 29971 Competent Cells

Restriction–modification (R–M) systems are widely distributed among Staphylococcus species, frequently impairing plasmid transformation and thereby complicating genetic manipulation. However, the activity and strength of the R–M system in Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990 (TrojanHorseα) have not yet been characterized. To preliminarily evaluate the feasibility of heterologous gene expression in this strain, the potential impact of R–M systems was not considered in the initial experiments. Instead, an expression plasmid was directly introduced into the host to determine whether it could replicate autonomously and support gene expression. The shuttle vector pLI50 was employed for this purpose, as it possesses a medium copy number in Escherichia coli and a high copy number in Staphylococcus species (Lee et al., 1991), making it an appropriate choice for assessing plasmid replication and expression capability in S. epidermidis.

To facilitate plasmid transformation, the plasmid pLI50 was initially amplified in E. coli DH5α and subsequently extracted. The purified plasmid was then electroporated into electrocompetent Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990 cells that had been pretreated with sucrose. Positive transformants were selected on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) plates containing 10 μg/mL chloramphenicol.

Literature review revealed that Staphylococcus xylosus ATCC 700404 commonly employs Escherichia coli TG1 as a host strain for plasmid amplification (Brückner, 1997). In contrast, reports on genetic manipulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis are limited, and no plasmid amplification strains have yet been identified for direct reference. Therefore, we considered applying this strategy to S. epidermidis ATCC 14990. In addition, we identified a protocol for preparing competent cells through glycerol-wash treatment and plan to evaluate its applicability.

We investigated the R–M system profile of Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990. Literature reports and databases indicate that this strain possesses an intrinsic DNA methylation gene cluster composed of hsdM-hsdS (with partial overlap) and hsdR, which together form a type I R–M system (Lee et al., 2019). Since the recognition sequence of the specificity subunit HsdS remains undefined and no relevant information is available in public databases, direct optimization of the plasmid’s methylation recognition sites was not feasible. To circumvent cleavage by HsdR, we planned to perform hsdM-hsdS Plasmid Artificial Modification (PAM) in an amplification host prior to their introduction into S. epidermidis ATCC 14990.

Given the compatibility of Escherichia coli and its wide use as a plasmid amplification host, we explored strategies to endow it with type I modification capability through lambda red recombination, ensuring plasmids stably maintained across generations. We initially evaluated E. coli JM110, a dam⁻ dcm⁻ strain that lacks the common type IV modification system. However, literature review indicated that JM110 is rarely used for plasmid construction, likely because deletion of dam and dcm increases genomic mutation rates. In addition, JM110 and related strains are often engineered to inactivate recA or other recombination genes to suppress homologous recombination, which could further complicate genomic modification. Eventually, we selected E. coli DH5α (dam⁺ dcm⁺) as the host for modification and planned to replace its native dcm locus with the hsdM–hsdS gene cluster from S. epidermidis ATCC 14990 via λ-Red homologous recombination. The dcm locus was targeted for replacement because the recognition sequence of HsdS is unknown; potential overlap between Dcm and HsdS recognition sites could interfere with methylation, leading to PAM failure. Furthermore, to minimize the risk of plasmid degradation by endogenous type II restriction endonucleases, the native dam methylation system in E. coli DH5α was preserved to maintain protective adenine methylation at recognition sites.

The standard glycerol-wash method proved ineffective for Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990. Therefore, we opted to test several alternative competent cell preparation protocols.

We planned to use protein engineering to identify the most suitable FnBP for introduction into engineered bacteria.

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were employed to study the binding process of FnBP and Fn, and MM/PBSA was applied to quantify binding affinities, with simulation parameters closely aligned with experimental conditions.

To further enhance the experimental success rate of introducing exogenous proteins into engineered bacteria, we decided to incorporate phylogenetic analysis into our modeling. By considering both evolutionary relationships and molecular-level interaction results, we aimed to select FnBPs that are not only effective but also closely related to the host strain, thereby improving feasibility and stability.

We aimed to construct a mathematical model to describe bacterial diffusion, convection and growth within tumor cells, thereby capturing both temporal proliferation and spatial dynamics.

We refined the bacteria term \(R_{b}\) by incorporating Monod nutrient-dependent kinetics and Logistic density limitation.

The substrate term \(R_{c}\) was also modified to couple bacterial growth with substrate utilization.

At the beginning, we only had a broad vision: education should not be limited to one group, but should cover all age groups. Children, youth, middle-aged, and elderly people at different stages of life have different ways of understanding and different life backgrounds, so targeted educational approaches are needed.

We envisioned linking the class through a “problem chain,” pushing knowledge points forward in a continuous question-and-answer sequence rather than simply instilling information. We hoped that students would gradually enter the world of synthetic biology through the process of thinking – answering – thinking again.

We tried to combine “classical Chinese text + science,” using classical literature to inspire children’s thinking about synthetic biology. For example, we selected the story of Yan Shi’s Mechanical Man from Liezi·Tang Wen, which resonates with the themes of artificial life and ethical boundaries.

After the attempts with middle school and the reading club, we planned to enter the high school stage, designing courses with clearer logic and more direct scientific content. We envisioned combining hands-on experiments + critical thinking to let students truly experience the integrity of scientific research.

Reference

  1. Fu, A., Yao, B., Dong, T., Chen, Y., Yao, J., Liu, Y., Li, H., Bai, H., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022). Tumor-resident intracellular microbiota promotes metastatic colonization in breast cancer. Cell 185, 1356-1372.e26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.02.027.

  2. Brückner, R. (1997). Gene replacement in Staphylococcus carnosus and Staphylococcus xylosus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 151, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10387.x.

  3. Dong, T., Fu, A., and Cai, S. (2022). Protocols for genetic labeling and tracing of Staphylococcus xylosus during tumor progression. STAR Protocols 3, 101624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101624.

  4. Lee, C.Y., Buranen, S.L., and Zhi-Hai, Y. (1991). Construction of single-copy integration vectors for Staphylococcus aureus. Gene 103, 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(91)90399-V.

  5. Lee, J.Y.H., Carter, G.P., Pidot, S.J., Guérillot, R., Seemann, T., Gonçalves da Silva, A., Foster, T.J., Howden, B.P., Stinear, T.P., and Monk, I.R. (2019). Mining the Methylome Reveals Extensive Diversity in Staphylococcus epidermidis Restriction Modification. mBio 10, 10.1128/mbio.02451-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02451-19.

  6. Yu, H., Wang, Z., Xu, H., Guo, J., Ma, Q., Mu, X., and Luo, Y. (2018). A method for Absolute Protein Expression Quantity Measurement Employing Insulator RiboJ. Engineering 4, 881–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.09.012.

  7. Costa, S.K., Donegan, N.P., Corvaglia, A.-R., François, P., and Cheung, A.L. (2017). Bypassing the Restriction System To Improve Transformation of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Journal of Bacteriology 199, 10.1128/jb.00271-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00271-17.

  8. Fey, P.D. ed. (2014). Staphylococcus Epidermidis: Methods and Protocols (Humana Press) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-736-5.