July 14, 2025 - cDNA Synthesis
Protocol Overview
Used the ProtoScript® II First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit for reverse transcription.
Materials and Reagents
All reagents were taken out from -20°C and kept on ice throughout the procedure.
Procedure
Initial Mix (for each sample)
- RNA
- Oligo(dT)₂₀ primer
- dNTP Mix (10 mM each)
- Nuclease-free water
Tubes were given a quick spin in the centrifuge to bring everything down. No heat block or ice incubation was used after mixing — tubes were kept chilled while moving on.
Reverse Transcription Mix
Added the following components directly into the same tubes:
- 10X Reaction Buffer
- 0.1 M DTT
- RNase Inhibitor (40 U/µL)
- ProtoScript® II Reverse Transcriptase (200 U/µL)
- Nuclease-free water to bring total volume
Thermocycler Program
Mixed the reaction gently by pipetting and did another quick spin in the centrifuge. Placed tubes in the thermocycler and ran:
- X°C for X minutes
- X°C for X minutes
July 16, 2025 - ASO Plate Setup
Objective
Set up plates with ASO for protein knockdown experiments.
Procedure
Dosage Calculations
We wanted a final dose of 5 micromolar of ASO. ASO is originally a 10x mix, and we calculated that we would need to add 2.5 microliter of ASO to get our final dose.
Master Mix Preparation
- Made a master mix of 100 microliters of OPTI-MEM and 1 microliter of Lipo 3000
- Added 7.5 microliters of ASO for every 300 microliters of Master Mix
- Let it incubate for 10 minutes
- Added 100 microliters of ASO master mix to each well
- Wait for 5 days, then image the results. We will check on the cells after 24 hours, because lipofection can be toxic to the cell.
Observations
Initial Cell Confluence
When we started, we observed that there was around 70% confluence of cells in the wells (the cells covered approximately 70% of the plate).
ASO Master Mix Quality
While making our ASO master mix, we noted that after our 10 minute incubation period:
- Less cloudy (potential concern): E7, D11, F10, and F2 ASOs were not that cloudy
- Cloudy (optimal): F8 and E9 were cloudy
This could affect the results of our experiment, as increased cloudiness correlates to more effective formation of complexes.
Upcoming Plans
We will finish setting up a qPCR plate and run the qPCR. Once that is complete, we will do some data analysis and get some imaging done.
July 17-18, 2025 - qPCR Setup and Execution
July 17: Preparation for qPCR Plate
Sample Assessment
When we observed the samples, we recorded that samples 1, 3, 4 (maybe), 5, 9, 11, 22 (maybe) may be uneven in sample size but we are proceeding with the qPCR.
Volume Calculations
Completed all calculations for plating. Using the amount of cDNA (245 µM) calculated previously, we were able to determine how much µL of ddH₂O each of the replicates required for both the +dox and -dox samples.
Reaction Composition
We are going to pipette 10 µL in each reaction:
- 4.5 µL is going to be ddH₂O + cDNA
- 5.0 µL is Poner Syber MM
- 0.5 µL is forward and reverse primers at 10 µM
- 0.25 µL Forward + 0.25 µL Reverse
cDNA Dilution Calculation
Using M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ we were able to determine that 0.14694 µL is required to dilute the 245 ng of cDNA into 4.5 µL of 8.0 ng/µL cDNA.

Upcoming plans
Now that we finished labeling and setting up our qPCR plate, we are going to pipette samples and run the experiment
July 18: Running qPCR Experiment
Sample Volume Verification
First we needed to redo our calculations and also account for the discrepancies in the samples of cDNA that had less than ideal amounts. Using a pipette, we measured how many µL of cDNA were actually in the following samples:
Sample 1: 11 µL

Sample 3: 11 µL

Sample 4: 12 µL

Sample 5: 15 µL

Sample 9: 13 µL

Sample 11: 8 µL

Sample 22: 10 µL

We are assuming that all the other samples have around 20 µL of cDNA.
Calculation Example (Sample 14)
Based on our qPCR setup with METTL3, YTHDF2, and a control group, we calculated how much cDNA and DDH₂O each reaction contained.
For example, the first group, 14, testing METTL3, cryptic exon, full exon, and GAPDH:
- Has 3 technical replicates → total of 15 reactions
- Added 3 extra reactions for pipetting error → 18 reactions total
- 8 ng cDNA per reaction × 18 reactions = 144 ng total cDNA needed
- 5.0 µL Poner Syber MM × 18 = 90 µL
- 0.5 µL primer × 18 = 9 µL
Calculating cDNA volume needed:
144 ng ÷ 245 ng/µL × 20 µL = 11.75 µL of cDNA stock
Total reaction volume calculation:
10 µL × 18 reactions = 180 µL total
180 µL - 90 µL (MM) - 9 µL (primer) - 11.75 µL (cDNA) = 69.25 µL of DDH₂O
We repeated the above for all the wells in the chart and accounted for the lower amounts of cDNA in the listed numbers above.
Next Steps
Next visit, finish adding the ddH₂O based on the calculations on the spreadsheet.
July 21-24, 2025 - RNA Extraction and Processing
July 21: Extract RNA and Complete qPCR
What we did: Extract RNA and complete qPCR
July 22: Nanodrop Analysis
How to Use a Nanodrop
- Add blanks on all 8 spots (the blank is the same solution the RNA was diluted in)
- Clean all spots with ddH₂O on a kim wipe
- Add 1 microliter of each sample to each of the 8 wells, close the nanodrop, and let the system run
- Ratios 260/280 and 230/280 indicate the purity of the sample; anything above 1.90 indicates low contamination
- Repeat for all samples
Pipetting Amounts for ProtoScript® II Kit
Determine pipetting amounts:
- Record all the concentrations determined from the nanodrop
- Determine total well amount that will result in >1 microliter pipetted for each sample (in this case, it was 265 microliters)
Pipetting amounts per sample:
- RNA: 265/concentration (should be >1 microliter, varies per sample)
- ddH₂O: 6 - RNA volume
- Master mix: We accounted for 2 extra wells for pipetting error
- 26×2 microliters of Oligo(dT)₂₀ primer
- 26×2 µL dNTP Mix (10 mM each)
- 26×10 microliters of reaction buffer

Adding Primer to qPCR Plate
- There are 13 reactions being tested for each protein in rows 1-5, so we multiplied 14 (to account for pipetting error) by 5.5 µL of —- to calculate a total of 77 µL for each: METTL3, TDP43, full exon, cryptic exon, and GAPDH
- We repeated this process for rows 6-10, only replacing METTL3 for YTHDF2, and pipetted another 5.5 µL of — in each corresponding well
- For rows 11-22, the control group, we are testing 23 reactions for each protein (METTL3, YTHDF2, TDP43, full exon, cryptic exon, and GAPDH), so we multiplied 24 reactions (account for pipetting error) by 5.5 µL of — to calculate a total of 132 µL for each proteins — of which we added 5.5 into each corresponding well
- Using a multichannel pipette, we added 5.5 of the respected protein’s—- to each corresponding well
We then ran the qPCR and will analyze the results
July 23: Prepare for qPCR Plate
Updated Calculations
Completed all calculations for plating. Using the amount of cDNA (265 µM) calculated previously, we determined dilution requirements.
Reaction composition (10 µL total):
- 4.5 µL ddH₂O + cDNA
- 5.0 µL Poner Syber MM
- 0.5 µL primers (0.25 µL Forward + 0.25 µL Reverse) at 10 µM
Updated cDNA dilution:
Using M₁V₁ = M₂V₂: 0.135849 µL is required to dilute the 265 ng of cDNA into 4.5 µL of 8.0 ng/µL cDNA.

Calculation Example (Sample 1)
Sample 1, testing METTL3, cryptic exon, full exon, and GAPDH:
- 3 technical replicates = 15 reactions
- Added 3 extra for error = 18 reactions
- 8 ng cDNA × 18 = 144 ng total
- 144 ng ÷ 265 ng/µL × 20 µL = 10.87 µL cDNA needed
Total volume calculation:
180 µL (10 × 18) - 90 µL (MM) - 9 µL (primer) - 10.87 µL (cDNA) = 70.13 µL DDH₂O
July 24: Thermocycling and Plating
Sample Preparation
Samples 12 and 13 did not have enough master mix so we had to re-mix both samples.
Thermocycle program:
- 25°C for 5 minutes
- 42°C for 1 hour
- 12°C on hold
Detailed Calculation Example (SND-1)
Before beginning plating for the qPCR, we calculated cDNA and ddH₂O amounts for each well.
For SND-1 triplicates (6 reactions + 1 extra = 7 reactions):
- Concentration calculation: 7 reactions × 8 ng/µL = 56 ng/µL total
- Stock volume needed: 56 ng/µL ÷ 265 µL total cDNA = 0.21132075471
- From 20 µL stock: 0.21132075471 × 20 µL = 4.23 µL cDNA
ddH₂O calculation for 7 reactions:
- Total volume: 10 µL × 7 = 70 µL
- Components:
- cDNA: 4.23 µL
- Poner Syber MM: 5.0 µL × 7 = 35 µL
- Primers: 0.5 µL × 7 = 3.5 µL
- ddH₂O: 70 - 35 - 3.5 - 4.23 = 27.27 µL
After completing calculations for all reactions 1-24, we mixed the calculated cDNA with ddH₂O to create diluted cDNA mixes, then pipetted 4.5 µL of diluted mix into each corresponding well.
July 29-30, 2025 - qPCR Completion and Analysis
July 29: Master Mix Preparation
Cyber and Primer Calculations
We finished adding 4.5 µL of diluted cDNA to the remaining wells and moved on to adding the cyber and primer master mix.
Primer counts and calculations:
- SND: 57 wells × 1.1 (10% error) = 63 wells
- Cyber: 5 µL × 63 = 315 µL
- Primer: 0.5 µL × 63 = 31.5 µL
- FAM: Same as SND (315 µL cyber, 31.5 µL primer)
- DAZ: Same as SND (315 µL cyber, 31.5 µL primer)
- GAPDH: 91 wells × 1.1 = 100 wells
- Cyber: 5 µL × 100 = 500 µL
- Primer: 0.5 µL × 100 = 50 µL
Primer Efficiency Curve Setup
We decided to simultaneously run our experiment for establishing a primer efficiency curve to see how well our primers were absorbed to amplify the RNA sequence.
Serial dilutions performed:
Dilution | Concentration (ng) |
---|---|
1 | 8 |
1:2 | 4 |
1:4 | 2 |
1:8 | 1 |
1:16 | 0.5 |
1:32 | 0.25 |
Dilution preparation (using samples 14 and 15):
- Mixed samples 14 and 15: total 16 ng
- 4.5 µL per well × 3 wells = 13.5 µL per primer
- 4 primer sets × 13.5 µL = 54 µL (account for 60 µL)
- Serial dilutions require 60 µL × 2 = 120 µL total
Scaling calculations:
- Scaling factor: 120 ÷ 31.5 = 3.80
- DNA: 4.23 µL × 3.87 = 16.11 µL
- ddH₂O: 27.27 µL × 3.87 = 103.89 µL
July 30: qPCR Run and Results
Execution
We ran the qPCR plate, but the experiment failed.
Issues Encountered
- Got many N/A values for primer efficiency curve readings
- Standard deviations were very high (later redone)
- Possible ddH₂O contamination identified
Materials Note
Used Bio-Rad Microseal B Adhesive Sealer