Mining and metal recovery are essential to modern industries, but conventional methods are energy-intensive, environmentally destructive, and generate toxic byproducts [1–3]. Metlock aims to develop a safe, efficient biomining system using engineered E. coli to selectively gather zinc from ores, industrial waste, and polluted environments/water sources. By synthetically regulating high-affinity zinc transport systems, Metlock demonstrates an iterative engineering approach to create a modular platform for sustainable metal recovery [4–6].
Metlock took on a challenging set of design goals: develop a library of synthetic genetic parts useful in biomining and remain modular for future contributions. Our final objective is for Metlock to expand to encompass several designer strains targeted for a variety of metals, accomadating both our current amount of talent and resources, this year we focused on the following design goal: design a fine-tunable system to maximize zinc influx while avoiding cytotoxicity. This will allow us to pilot workflows, develop our skills with the necessary molecular methods, and expand our dry lab skillset for our more advanced project goals. Following strain identification, this system could then be tuned for profitable yield in-lab and eventually deployed in simulated industrial settings.
To implement our goal of a tunable zinc uptake system, E. coli’s endogenous ZnuABC operon was redesigned in-silico to no longer be repressed by Zur and placed under the induction of the BBa_K1960004 cassette – a part originally designed by Shijia Qi 2016 [7,4,6]. This allows for the tuning of expression of ZnuABC across an AHL gradient to tune expression as well as across copy number in clonal vectors [8–9,10]. The individual components of ZnuABC serve the following functions: ZnuA is the periplasmic solute-binding protein that captures Zn²⁺, ZnuB is the inner-membrane permease that translocates Zn²⁺, and ZnuC is the cytosolic ATPase that powers transport by hydrolyzing ATP [5].
Downstream of pLuxR, ZnuABC is expressed only in the presence of AHL, tying expression of this active metal transporting complex to the formation of AHL/LuxR complexes [8–9,10]. In this configuration, the titration of AHL into media containing bacteria transformed with this iteration of Metlock would theoretically lead to tunable expression of znuABC.
To validate the tunable zinc import system, we plan to utilize a colorimetric uptake assay using the Zn-specific dye Zincon (Z002), which forms a blue Zn–complex measurable at λ_max = 620 nm (ε ≈ 23,000 M⁻¹cm⁻¹) under alkaline conditions (pH ~9) [11].
Goal: Quantify Zn²⁺ import as a function of AHL induction of your Zur-independent iZnuABC cassette (LuxR/pLuxR control) using a colorimetric readout of residual extracellular Zn²⁺ with Zincon at λₘₐₓ ≈ 620 nm in pH 9 buffer [11,12,13,14].
Rationale: ZnuA/B/C is the high-affinity ABC Zn²⁺ importer (ZnuA: periplasmic binder; ZnuB: permease; ZnuC: ATPase), and Δznu mutants show impaired Zn acquisition phenotypes under Zn limitation which is ideal for controls [15,16,17,5].
Empty-vector control.
(pLuxR/LuxR cassette ref: BBa_K1960004 [7,8].)
For a cyanide-free workflow in clean matrices, use a straightforward microplate adaptation at pH 9 with calibration and spike-recovery checks [11,14].
Do not add EDTA to measurement tubes; it chelates Zn²⁺ and will depress the Zincon signal [21].
Grow strains in Zn-depleted M9 (Chelex-treated) overnight; back-dilute 1:100 into fresh Zn-depleted M9 ± AHL; grow to OD₆₀₀ ≈ 0.3–0.4, then induce/express iZnuABC for ~90–120 min; wash and resuspend in Zn-free uptake buffer to OD₆₀₀ = 0.5 [7,8,18–20].
Mix cells with 25–50 µM ZnSO₄ in uptake buffer (e.g., 1.0 mL tubes or 200 µL wells at 30–37 °C).
Collect cell-free supernatant at 0, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60 min (quick pellet or filter). Keep on ice. (No EDTA in these aliquots.) [12,11,13,21]
ΔznuB knockout (low uptake), empty vector, heat-killed cells (adsorption), no-cell blank, Zn standards (5–100 µM; R² > 0.99), and spike-recovery samples; optional post-run EDTA “surface-strip” on pellets (not for Zincon readout) [12,11,13,16,17,5,21].
Convert A620 to [Zn] via the standard curve; compute Uptake(t) = ([Zn]₀ − [Zn]ₜ)×V; normalize by OD₆₀₀ (or mg protein). Report initial rate (0–10 min slope; pmol Zn·OD₆₀₀⁻¹·min⁻¹) and plot uptake vs AHL to obtain induction curves (Hill fit optional) [11,12,13,14].
Induced iZnuABC shows AHL-dependent increases in uptake; ΔznuB remains near baseline; empty-vector minimal. This pattern reflects high-affinity ZnuABC transport under Zn limitation [5,15,16,17].
Clonal Vector Ordering: We ordered our parts using the clonal vectors offered by the Twist Bioscience iGEM Sponsorship, cloning our iZnuABC (LuxR/pLuxR-driven, Zur-independent znuABC) into the pUPD3 vector [15, 16].
Transformations: We transformed the plasmid by heat-shock into E. coli BL21, DH5α, and TOP10 strains as test chassis; our pUC19 positive-control transformation succeeded, but we observed no expression from the ordered clonal vector from its antibiotic resistance cassette - resulting in no viable cells to continue our experiments with [17–23].
Objective: Demonstrate that LuxR/pLuxR-induced, Zur-independent iZnuABC increases Zn²⁺ import, quantified by Zincon supernatant-depletion across an AHL gradient [11–14,5,15–17].
Observed block: pUC19 transformed successfully, but no colonies from the pUPD3::synthetic ZnuABC clonal vector on chloramphenicol plates (correct selection for pUPD3 is Chloramphenicol) [22].
Functional readout (after QC passes): Perform the Zincon uptake assay as specified (Zn-depleted medium, AHL 0–300 nM, 25–50 µM ZnSO₄, supernatant @ 620 nm in pH 9 buffer; exclude EDTA from read tubes; include ΔznuB and empty-vector controls) and report initial uptake rate (0–10 min slope; pmol Zn·OD₆₀₀⁻¹·min⁻¹) and AHL dose–response [11–14,18–21].
Expected outcome: With verified constructs on Chloramphenicol and a confirmed induction window, iZnuABC shows AHL-dependent increases in uptake; ΔznuB remains near baseline; empty-vector minimal [5,15–17].
Why we modeled now: While we troubleshoot the clonal build, we advanced learning by computationally characterizing our circuit, so the wet-lab assay starts with informed AHL set-points, promoter choices, and expected magnitudes. We used our Plot2Curve (P2C) workflows: the AHL induction model (LuxR/pLuxR Hill fit) and the Anderson-family promoter panel to turn sequences into predicted transcription rate (k_tx) to mRNA to protein output curves, then translate those outputs into assay-ready expectations for Zn-uptake readouts [46, 44–45].
sfGFP-first baseline (establish instrument & model scale)
Sequence-aware CDS modeling
Promoter benchmarking with the Anderson panel
What we learned
Delierables we will generate alongside wet-lab
[1] Jaiswal, M., & Srivastava, S. (2024). A review on sustainable approach of bioleaching of precious metals from electronic wastes. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances, 14, 100435.
[2] Cozma, P., Simion, I.-M., Filote, C., Roșca, M., Hlihor, R. M., & Gavrilescu, M. (2024). Bio-recovery of metals through biomining within circularity-based solutions. Processes, 12(9), 1793.
[3] Mervine, E. M., Valenta, R. K., Paterson, J. S., Mudd, G. M., Werner, T. T., Nursamsi, I., & Sonter, L. J. (2025). Biomass carbon emissions from nickel mining have significant implications for climate action. Nature Communications, 16(1), 481.
[4] Patzer, S. I., & Hantke, K. (2000). The zinc-responsive regulator Zur and its control of the znuACB zinc uptake system in Escherichia coli. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275(32), 24321–24332.
[5] Ammendola, S., Pasquali, P., Pistoia, C., Petrucci, P., Petrarca, P., Rotilio, G., & Battistoni, A. (2007). High-affinity Zn²⁺ uptake system ZnuABC is required for bacterial zinc homeostasis and virulence. Infection and Immunity, 75(12), 5867–5876.
[6] Kandari, D., Joshi, H., & Bhatnagar, R. (2021). Zur: Zinc-sensing transcriptional regulator in a diverse set of bacterial species. Pathogens, 10(2), 165.
[7] Qi, S. (2016). Part: BBa_K1960004 (Low-level LuxR and lux pR cassette) [Web page]. iGEM Parts Registry.
[8] Part: BBa_R0062 (pLuxR promoter) [Web page]. (n.d.). iGEM Parts Registry.
[9] Part: BBa_C0062 (LuxR) [Web page]. (n.d.). iGEM Parts Registry.
[10] Shiner, E. K., Reddy, S., Timmons, C., Li, G., Williams, S. C., & Rumbaugh, K. P. (2004). Construction of a bacterial autoinducer detection system in mammalian cells. Biological Procedures Online, 6, 268–276.
[11] Dojindo. (n.d.). Zincon (Z002) product page.
[12] National Environmental Methods Index. (n.d.). Standard Methods 3500-Zn B: Zinc by Zincon Method (method summary).
[13] American Public Health Association. (1992). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater: 3500-Zn ZINC (Zincon method) [EPA-hosted text].
[14] Hach Company. (2007). Zincon Method for Zinc (Method 8009) [PDF].
[15] Patzer, S. I., & Hantke, K. (1998). The ZnuABC high-affinity zinc-uptake system and its regulator Zur in Escherichia coli. Molecular Microbiology, 28(6), 1199–1210.
[16] Yatsunyk, L. A., Easton, J. A., Kim, D., Sugar, F. J., Bennett, B., Breece, R. M., Hafeez, A. K., Gibney, B. R., & Rosenzweig, A. C. (2008). Structure and metal-binding properties of ZnuA, a periplasmic zinc transporter from E. coli. Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, 13(2), 271–288.
[17] Gabbianelli, R., Scotti, R., Ammendola, S., Petrarca, P., Nicolini, L., & Battistoni, A. (2011). Role of ZnuABC and ZinT in Escherichia coli O157:H7 zinc acquisition and interaction with epithelial cells. BMC Microbiology, 11, 36.
[18] Bio-Rad Laboratories. (n.d.). Chelex® 100 and Chelex 20 chelating ion exchange resin (Technical Bulletin LIT200) [PDF].
[19] Bio-Rad Laboratories. (n.d.). Chelex® 100 Resin [Product page].
[20] Bio-Rad Laboratories. (n.d.). Sample preparation with Chelex® Resin (Bulletin 1825) [PDF].
[21] Nyborg, J. K., & Peersen, O. B. (2004). That zincing feeling: The effects of EDTA on zinc-binding proteins. Biochemical Journal, 381(2), e3–e4.
[22] Addgene. (n.d.). pUPD3 (GoldenBraid/GB2.0 domestication vector), Plasmid #118043 [Vector description and map].
[23] Cooke, M. B., Ballinari, P., Goyal, N., Shetty, R., Giannella, P., Chevreux, B., Smedley, M., & Glipsch, K. (2025). GoldenBraid2.0 E. coli: A comprehensive and characterized toolkit for enterics. Synthetic Biology, 10(1), ysaf015.
[24] New England Biolabs. (n.d.). Competent E. coli: High-efficiency transformation protocol.
[25] New England Biolabs. (n.d.). NEB® 5-alpha competent E. coli (high efficiency).
[26] Thermo Fisher Scientific. (n.d.). One Shot™ TOP10 chemically competent E. coli.
[27] Merck (Novagen). (n.d.). BL21(DE3) competent cells.
[28] New England Biolabs. (n.d.). pUC19 vector.
[29] Thermo Fisher Scientific. (n.d.). One Shot™ TOP10 chemically competent E. coli: Includes pUC19 control DNA [Product documentation].
[30] New England Biolabs. (n.d.). High-efficiency transformation protocol—Outgrowth recommendations.
[31] Barrick Lab. (n.d.). Antibiotic stock solutions and working concentrations.
[32] Addgene. (n.d.). pUPD3 (Plasmid #118043) details and selection (chloramphenicol).
[33] Sarrion-Perdigones, A., Vazquez-Vilar, M., Palací, J., Castelijns, B., Forment, J., Ziarsolo, P., Blanca, J., Granell, A., & Orzaez, D. (2013). GoldenBraid 2.0: A comprehensive DNA assembly framework for plant synthetic biology. Plant Physiology, 162(3), 1618–1631.
[34] New England Biolabs. (n.d.). Tips for successful transformations (troubleshooting guide).
[35] Dower, W. J., Miller, J. F., & Ragsdale, C. W. (1988). High efficiency transformation of E. coli by high voltage electroporation. Nucleic Acids Research, 16(13), 6127–6145.
[36] Hanahan, D. (1983). Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. Journal of Molecular Biology, 166(4), 557–580.
[37] American Society for Microbiology (ASM). (n.d.). Transformation of E. coli made competent by CaCl₂ [Protocol].
[38] Inoue, H., Nojima, H., & Okayama, H. (1990). High efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. Gene, 96(1), 23–38.
[39] Pédelacq, J.-D., Cabantous, S., Tran, T., Terwilliger, T. C., & Waldo, G. S. (2006). Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein. Nature Biotechnology, 24(1), 79–88.
[40] Bernstein, J. A., Khodursky, A. B., Lin, P.-H., Lin-Chao, S., & Cohen, S. N. (2002). Global analysis of mRNA decay and abundance in Escherichia coli at single-gene resolution using two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(15), 9697–9702.
[41] BioNumbers. (n.d.). Rate of translation by ribosome—E. coli (BNID 100059).
[42] Salis, H. M., Mirsky, E. A., & Voigt, C. A. (2009). Automated design of synthetic ribosome binding sites to control protein expression. Nature Biotechnology, 27(10), 946–950.
[43] Laursen, B. S., Sørensen, H. P., Mortensen, K. K., & Sperling-Petersen, H. U. (2005). Initiation of protein synthesis in bacteria. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 69(1), 101–123.
[44] Kelly, J. R., Rubin, A. J., Davis, J. H., Ajo-Franklin, C. M., Cumbers, J., Czar, M. J., de Mora, K., Glieberman, A. L., Monie, D. D., & Endy, D. (2009). Measuring the activity of BioBrick promoters using an in vivo reference standard. Journal of Biological Engineering, 3, 4.
[45] iGEM Registry. (n.d.). Anderson promoter collection.
[46] Bintu, L., Buchler, N. E., Garcia, H. G., Gerland, U., Hwa, T., Kondev, J., & Phillips, R. (2005). Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: Models. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 15(2), 116–124.
[47] MacDonald, C. T., Gibbs, J. H., & Pipkin, A. C. (1968). Kinetics of biopolymerization on nucleic acid templates. Biopolymers, 6(1), 1–25.
[48] BioNumbers. (n.d.). Cell dry weight at doubling time of 30 min—E. coli (BNID 100009); Cell dry weight—E. coli (BNID 100008).
[49] Tomuro, K., Mito, M., Toh, H., Kawamoto, N., Miyake, T., Chow, S. Y. A., Doi, M., Ikeuchi, Y., Shichino, Y., & Iwasaki, S. (2024). Calibrated ribosome profiling assesses the dynamics of ribosomal flux on transcripts. Nature Communications, 15, 7061.