From the outset, our team recognized that developing Aechmi: a biological system for real-time sepsis biomarker detection using CRISPR/Cas13a, AI, and Catalytic Hairpin Assembly (CHA), required more than scientific expertise. It demanded ongoing dialogue with people who hold experience, knowledge, or have lived through sepsis. Human Practices in iGEM captures this "bigger picture," ensuring our work is responsible, inclusive, and meaningful.
To illustrate this process, we organized our Human Practices into three main categories:
-
Defining and Understanding Sepsis This category brings together the voices that helped us understand sepsis from different perspectives.
- Through Survivor Eyes: individuals who survived sepsis and shared with us their recovery journey.
- Medical Experts: researchers and healthcare professionals who provided scientific and therapeutic knowledge.
- Clinician Insights: doctors who deal with sepsis in their daily clinical practice and guided us through challenges in diagnosis and treatment.
-
Developing Aechmi Here we grouped all contributions that directly influenced our design choices.
- Designing Experiments: feedback that improved our wet lab experimental design.
- Dry Lab: computational and modeling expertise that strengthened our theoretical framework.
- Building Device: technical and practical suggestions that guided the design of our future device.
-
Connecting with the Public, Confronting the Future This category includes the perspectives that encouraged us to think beyond the lab, reflecting on the broader social and future impact of Aechmi.
- Engaging with the Community: advice on how to reach diverse audiences and communicate our work in an accessible way.
- Bioethics: guidance on ethical issues in diagnostics, patient rights, and safety.
- Entrepreneurial Strategies: input from experts in business and innovation on sustainability and future development of our project.
This structure allowed us to show not only who we consulted, but also how each perspective systematically informed our project. In this way, our Integrated Human Practices became more than just a series of conversations: they turned into a methodology of structured consultation, continuously aligning Aechmi with the medical, social, and ethical realities surrounding sepsis.