Loading...
Engineering

Overview


This project aims to develop a precise, red light–inducible, tumor-targeted probiotic therapeutic platform for colorectal cancer (CRC). By integrating multiple engineered modules — including the NETMAP optogenetic control system, PD-L1 nanobody for immune checkpoint blockade, Coagulase for localized vascular occlusion, INP-HlpA anchoring system for tumor-specific adhesion, and the PBAD–MazF safety module for biosafety and dormancy control — we constructed a comprehensive, modular bacterial therapy system.


Each cycle of the design progressively refined a key functional component:


  • Cycle 1 (NETMAP–mRFP) established a reliable red light–controlled gene expression system using 660 nm light.
  • Cycle 2 (PD-L1 nb / Coagulase) implemented immune activation and vascular blockade modules for dual therapeutic action.
  • Cycle 3 (INP–HlpA) enabled tumor-specific localization and adhesion to colorectal cancer cells.
  • Cycle 4 (MazF/P___SUB___BAD___) introduced a robust biosafety mechanism allowing dormancy and inducible suicide control.

Overview Diagram

Figure 1. Engineering success cycles of the RectomeDy FotoZymogen system, illustrating 7 iterative Design–Build–Test–Learn (DBTL) loops


Together, these modules form a next-generation spatiotemporally controllable bacterial therapy, achieving precise activation at tumor sites, minimal off-target effects, and enhanced clinical safety - laying the groundwork for intelligent, light-controlled cancer biotherapeutics.



Cycle 1 NETMAP-mRFP

Design


Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cancer in China, and current treatment methods lack precision and controllability. Inspired by a recent 2024 Nature article titled “Engineered bacteria for near-infrared light-inducible expression of cancer therapeutics”, we recognized the potential of red light to precisely control the release of cancer therapeutics. This insight led us to develop a system based on NETMAP (Nano Engineered Temporal Modulation Activation Platform), which can be activated by red light. The system is designed to allow controlled therapeutic expression, triggered exclusively by red light exposure, ensuring spatial and temporal precision in therapeutic delivery.


Upon exposure to red light, PadC, a photosensitive protein, absorbs the light and undergoes a conformational change. This change facilitates the conversion of intracellular GTP into the second messenger c-di-GMP, effectively turning the light signal into a chemical signal. As the concentration of c-di-GMP rises, it activates the c-di-GMP response protein MrkH, which binds to the downstream specific promoter PMrkA. This, in turn, drives the expression of therapeutic genes, allowing precise control over the timing and location of cancer therapeutics release. This optogenetic mechanism enables non-invasive, light-controlled therapeutic applications with minimal off-target effects.


Design Diagram

Figure 2. Mechanism of action of the NETMAP System


Build


The NIR light-induced promoter NETMAP was synthesized by gene synthesis (Generalbiol, China). The NETMAP system consists of two plasmids. Plasmid A, based on the pSB4C5 backbone, contains chloramphenicol resistance, constitutively expresses YhjH and MrkH using the tac promoter, and carries PmrkA-mRFP. Plasmid B, based on the pSB1A3 backbone, contains ampicillin resistance and constitutively expresses PadC4 and BphO using the lac promoter. The above-synthesized sequences were cloned upstream of the mRFP coding sequence in the pSB1A3 vector via the one-step cloning method (Seamless Cloning Kit, D7010, beyotime). Subsequently, the recombinant plasmids were transformed into E. coli DH5α and BL21 by the heat shock method (42°C, 1 min). Positive clones were screened on LB (Luria Bertani) solid plates (supplemented with 1.5% agar) containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin (Amp) and 30 μg/mL chloramphenicol (Cm), and verified by sequencing (Tsingke, Beijing), resulting in the acquisition of recombinant engineered strains DH5α-NETMAP-mRFP and BL21-NETMAP-mRFP. The strains were stored at -20°C with 25% (v/v) glycerol used as an antifreeze agent. The engineered strains were cultured at 37°C with shaking at 150 rpm. Inoculation and expansion culture were performed in LB broth (G3102, Servicebio, China) containing 100 μg/mL Amp.


Build  Diagram

Figure 3: Construction of NETMAP (A1) The plasmid map of pSB4C5-YhjH-MrkH. (A2) The plasmid map of pSB1A3-PadC4-BphO. (A3) The plasmid map of NETMAP. (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis of BphO (591 bp), PadC4 (2037 bp), MrkH (705 bp), and YhjH (768 bp). (C) The gene circuit of NETMAP.


Test

We chose 660 nm red light because it is a more common wavelength for LED lights, making it more cost-effective and easier to implement in hardware, although the reference literature used 710 nm. Using 660 nm avoids the need for custom LED lights, reducing both the experimental timeline and overall hardware costs.


Response of the NETMAP Promoter to 660 nm NIR Light

The experiment began with the optimization of the light irradiation environment (as shown in Figures A and B). Initially, an attempt was made to use an LED for light irradiation inside a clean bench (Figure A). However, due to stray light interference in the environment, obstruction of light by the test tube rack, and difficulty in maintaining a constant temperature of 37°C, the initial induction effect was unsatisfactory. Therefore, an optimized method was adopted: the LED light source was fixed inside a closed incubator (Figure B) to ensure complete isolation from external stray light. The uniformity and utilization efficiency of light were enhanced through the reflection of the stainless-steel inner wall, while the culture temperature was precisely controlled at 37°C, ensuring that all subsequent functional verification experiments were conducted under optimal and stable conditions.


After establishing a stable environment, functional verification was initiated: the engineered strain carrying the NETMAP-mRFP gene circuit (BL21-NETMAP-mRFP) was inoculated at a ratio of 1:100 into 5 mL of LB liquid medium containing 100 μg/mL Amp, and activated and cultured overnight (12 hours) in a shaker at 37°C and 180 rpm. To ensure the accuracy of subsequent experimental controls, all culture tubes were wrapped with tin foil to achieve complete light shielding. On the next day, the activated bacterial culture was transferred at a 1% inoculation rate into 500 μL of fresh Amp⁺ LB medium in a 48-well plate, followed by continued culture at 37°C and 180 rpm until the bacterial density reached an OD600 of approximately 0.5. Once the predetermined OD value was achieved, the samples in the experimental group were transferred to a closed incubator and irradiated with a 660 nm NIR light LED for 3 hours. The samples in the dark control group were continuously cultured under complete light-shielded conditions. After the induction period, bacterial samples from both groups were collected simultaneously. A microplate reader was used to measure the OD600 and mRFP fluorescence intensity (excitation wavelength: 584 nm, emission wavelength: 607 nm) of the bacteria synchronously. Subsequently, the normalized fluorescence intensity (fluorescence intensity divided by OD600) was calculated to eliminate potential differences in bacterial density among different samples, ensuring accurate and fair quantitative comparison of the actual induction efficiency of the NETMAP promoter.


Test Diagram

Figure 4: Experimental Optimization of the NIR Light-Induced System. (A) Schematic diagram of light irradiation for the NETMAP system in the initial clean bench environment. (B) Optimized light irradiation environment for the NETMAP system in a closed incubator.


We first compared the growth of the BL21-NETMAP-mRFP strain under dark and 660 nm red light induction conditions, using OD600 as an indicator. The results indicated no significant difference in OD600 values between the two groups, suggesting that 660 nm near-infrared light had no measurable impact on bacterial growth rate. This finding rules out the possibility of near-infrared light exerting inhibitory toxicity on bacterial growth.

Test Diagram

Figure 5: Effect of NIR on bacterial growth


We further compared the fluorescence intensity of the engineered bacteria under dark and red light conditions. The fluorescence intensity was calculated as fluorescence value/OD600, with units in A.U. The results showed that the fluorescence intensity in the red light-induced group was approximately 24.5 A.U., significantly higher than the 5.8 A.U. observed under dark conditions. This demonstrates that 660 nm near-infrared light effectively activates the NETMAP promoter, inducing gene expression.


Test Diagram

Figure 6: Fluorescence intensity of BL21-NETMAP-mRFP under dark and NIR conditions


Flow Cytometric Analysis of Single-Cell Fluorescence Distribution


The engineered strain BL21-NETMAP-mRFP was cultured until the OD600 reached approximately 0.5, after which one group was placed in the dark and the other was continuously irradiated with 660 nm NIR light for 3 hours. Referring to standard flow cytometry techniques, after the induction, 100 μL of the culture was taken and transferred to a 96-well plate or flow tube for dilution and sample preparation. Subsequently, a flow cytometer (FlexStation 3, Molecular Devices, USA) was used for single-cell fluorescence detection to assess the fluorescence changes of the engineered strain under dark conditions and 660 nm light excitation. Data were collected and analyzed via the PC5.5-A channel (the mRFP fluorescence channel, corresponding to signals near the emission wavelength of 607 nm), and the fluorescence distribution characteristics of the cell population were ultimately presented in the form of a fluorescence intensity distribution histogram.


The flow cytometric analysis chart (as shown in the figure) clearly illustrates the fluorescence intensity distribution of the cell population. The fluorescence distribution of the dark control group (gray peak) was concentrated in the region of low fluorescence intensity, indicating an extremely low basal expression level of mRFP in the absence of light induction. In contrast, the fluorescence distribution of the 660 nm NIR light-induced group (red peak) showed a significant and uniform shift toward the right (high fluorescence intensity). Flow cytometric analysis confirmed the excellent quality of the NETMAP light-controlled gene switch. 660 nm NIR light not only increased the average expression level of mRFP but also achieved efficient and uniform induction of the cell population. Light irradiation enabled the entire cell population to uniformly transition from a low-expression "off" state to a high-expression "on" state, indicating that the NETMAP system exhibits good induction stability and low biological noise at the single-cell level.

Test Diagram

Figure 7: Flow cytometric analysis of fluorescence distribution of BL21-NETMAP-mRFP in the dark and under NIR


Effect of Induction Time on the Dynamic Response of the NETMAP System


The engineered strain BL21-NETMAP-mRFP was cultured until the OD600 reached approximately 0.5. One group was placed in a closed incubator and irradiated with a 660 nm LED NIR light, while the other group served as the dark control. A light irradiation time gradient ranging from 0 to 8 hours was set. At predetermined time points (e.g., 1 h, 3 h, 5 h, 8 h), samples were collected simultaneously from the light-irradiated group and the dark control group. After sampling, a microplate reader was used to measure the OD600 and mRFP fluorescence intensity of the bacteria synchronously. All data were calculated as normalized fluorescence intensity to analyze the change curve of mRFP expression over time. The maximum induction time was set to 8 hours, considering the avoidance of fluorescence quenching of the reporter protein mRFP under prolonged red light irradiation.


The experimental results clearly demonstrate the dynamic response of the NETMAP system. The normalized fluorescence intensity of the dark control group remained extremely low throughout the 8-hour period, further confirming the system’s excellent low-background characteristic. In contrast, the normalized fluorescence intensity of the 660 nm light-irradiated group increased rapidly over time, with expression levels continuously rising during the initial 0 to 5 hours. The fluorescence intensity reached its peak at 5 hours, with a normalized fluorescence intensity of approximately 32.4 A.U. After 5 hours, the expression level slightly decreased, which may be attributed to the degradation of the reporter protein, fluorescence quenching, or increased cellular metabolic stress. These results show that the NETMAP system exhibits a clear time-dependent response to 660 nm red light, with a controllable induction process. The expression level of the mRFP reporter protein accumulates with prolonged light exposure, and the optimal induction time is determined to be 5 hours, at which the maximum normalized fluorescence output is achieved.


Test Diagram

Figure 8: Relationship between induction time and fluorescence Intensity of the BL21-NETMAP-mRFP


Effect of Chassis Strains on the Performance of the NETMAP NIR Light-Induced System


The recombinant plasmid carrying the NETMAP-mRFP gene was transformed into E. coli DH5α and BL21 strains, respectively. Both engineered strains were induced when the OD600 reached approximately 0.5 and simultaneously irradiated with 660 nm NIR light for 3 hours in a closed, constant-temperature environment, with respective dark control groups set up. After induction, a microplate reader was used to measure the OD600 and mRFP fluorescence intensity of all samples. Data processing included: calculating the normalized fluorescence intensity of each sample to evaluate the absolute expression intensity; and calculating the induction fold (normalized fluorescence intensity of the light-irradiated group / normalized fluorescence intensity of the dark control group) of each strain to evaluate the switch sensitivity.


When comparing the responses of the two chassis strains to the NETMAP system, two key parameters were analyzed: absolute output intensity and induction fold (FC).


As for the absolute output intensity,after 3 hours of 660 nm red light irradiation, the normalized fluorescence intensity of the BL21-NETMAP-mRFP strain in the light-irradiated group (approximately 24.5 A.U.) was higher than that of the DH5α-NETMAP-mRFP strain (approximately 16.5 A.U.), indicating that BL21 has a advantage in the fluorescence intensity. However, this advantage is accompanied by a significant drawback: under dark conditions, the basal background leakage of the BL21 strain (approximately 13.6 A.U.) was much higher than that of the DH5α strain (approximately 3.7 A.U.). This high background leakage directly affects the quality of the “switch” and lowers the overall performance of the system.


Test Diagram

Figure 9: Comparison of normalized fluorescence intensity of different chassis strains in the dark and under 660 nm NIR


The comparison of induction folds further highlighted the difference between the two strains. The DH5α strain exhibited a significantly higher induction fold (approximately 4.5-fold) compared to the BL21 strain (approximately 1.8-fold). This difference is primarily attributed to the extremely low background leakage in DH5α, leading to a higher ratio of light-irradiated to dark conditions, thus improving the signal-to-noise ratio and demonstrating superior switch sensitivity. Consequently, the selection of chassis strain plays a crucial role in the performance of the NETMAP system. Given the system’s need for precise control, the DH5α strain is better suited as a chassis strain due to its enhanced switch sensitivity and lower basal leakage.


Test Diagram

Figure 10: Comparison of fluorescence induction folds (FC) of different chassis strains


Learn


Building on the insights gained from the optimization of the NETMAP system, we concluded that careful selection of chassis strains and optimization of experimental conditions are critical for maximizing the system’s performance. The DH5α strain, with its low background leakage and high switch sensitivity, was identified as the ideal chassis for achieving precise and efficient control of gene expression. Additionally, we determined that the optimal induction time for the NETMAP system is 5 hours, at which the maximum fluorescence output is achieved without significant degradation of the reporter protein. The 660 nm red light was found to effectively activate the NETMAP system, providing a reliable, non-invasive method for controlling gene expression. These findings have laid a solid foundation for further optimizing the system for therapeutic applications, particularly for drug delivery in colorectal cancer (CRC) therapy. The next step will focus on leveraging these insights to design and test drug-loaded bacteria capable of responding to red light-induced signals for precise and controlled release of cancer therapeutics.


Cycle 2-1 PD-L1 nb

Design


The PD-L1 nanobody (PD-L1 nb) is a single-domain antibody fragment derived from camelid heavy-chain antibodies. It specifically targets the Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1) receptor on immune cells and its ligand, PD-L1, which is often upregulated in various types of cancer, including colorectal cancer (CRC). PD-L1 plays a crucial role in tumor immune evasion by binding to PD-1, effectively inhibiting T cell activation and allowing the tumor to escape immune surveillance. Therefore, targeting PD-L1 with a nanobody is an attractive therapeutic strategy to enhance anti-tumor immunity by blocking this immune checkpoint. PD-L1 nanobodies are advantageous due to their small size, high specificity, and stability, making them ideal for targeted therapy. Their small size allows for deeper tissue penetration and more efficient targeting of tumors, while their stability ensures longer shelf life and improved performance in therapeutic applications. In this cycle, we aim to design and construct a system that expresses PD-L1 nanobodies in engineered probiotics, which can be triggered by red light for precise and controlled release, allowing for localized and non-invasive cancer immunotherapy.


Design Diagram

Figure 11: Mechanism of action of PD-L1 nanobody


Build


Codon optimization was performed on the PD-L1 nb-encoding gene for E. coli, and restriction enzyme sites (EcoRI, XbaI, SpeI, PstI, NdeI, and XhoI) were removed to meet the RFC#10 standards and pET28a (m) cloning requirements. Subsequently, the target gene was cloned into the pET28a (m) vector via the NdeI and XhoI restriction enzyme sites. The recombinant plasmid was transformed into competent E. coli BL21 strain by the heat shock method (42°C, 1 min). Transformants were screened on LB solid plates containing 100 μg/mL kanamycin (Kana). After verification of positive clones by sequencing, the recombinant engineered strain BL21-PD-L1 nb was obtained and stored in a culture medium containing 25% (v/v) glycerol (-20°C).


Build  Diagram

Figure 12: Construction of the PD-L1 nb System and Gene Circuit. (A) Plasmid map. The figure shows the plasmid map of the gene circuit used for PD-L1 nb expression. (B) Schematic diagram of the gene circuit of the PD-L1 nb system.


Test


Induced Expression and Collection of Proteins: The bacterial culture frozen at -80°C was inoculated at a ratio of 1:100 into a centrifuge tube containing 5 mL of LB broth (supplemented with 100 μg/mL Kana) and cultured overnight at 37°C with shaking at 150 rpm. Subsequently, 1% (v/v) of the culture was re-inoculated into 30 mL of fresh LB broth and continuously cultured at 37°C with shaking at 180 rpm for 1-2 hours. When the OD600 reached 0.2, 0.5 mM IPTG was added to the medium to induce the expression of the target protein. The culture temperature was then adjusted to 16°C, and cultivation was continued for 20 hours to promote the formation of soluble proteins.


Extraction and Quantification of Intracellular Proteins: 5 mL of the fermentation broth was centrifuged (10,000×g, 5 min), and the bacterial pellet was resuspended in PBS. Ultrasonic disruption was performed on ice using an ultrasonic disruptor (ultrasonication for 1 s, interval of 3 s, 70 W, 20 min). The sonicated lysate was centrifuged at 10,000×g for 30 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected as the intracellular protein sample. The protein concentration was determined using the Bradford kit (P0006).


Western Blot (WB) Verification: The intracellular protein samples were separated using a 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel prepared with the one-step PAGE gel rapid preparation kit (PG113). The separated proteins were transferred to a 0.22 μm PVDF membrane via the wet transfer method. The membrane was blocked with protein-free rapid blocking solution (ED0024) at room temperature for 20 min, followed by incubation with a 1:1000-diluted mouse His-tag antibody (AH367) (primary antibody) at 4°C overnight. Finally, the membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (A0216) (secondary antibody) at room temperature for 1 hour. Chemiluminescence analysis was performed using a protein blotting imaging system.


Western Blot analysis results showed that after IPTG induction and low-temperature cultivation for 20 hours, a clear specific band was successfully detected in the intracellular protein sample of the BL21-PD-L1 nb strain. The molecular weight of this band was consistent with the expected molecular weight of PD-L1 nb (between approximately 15-20 kDa) and was specifically recognized by the His-tag antibody. This confirms the successful expression of the target gene.


Test Diagram

Figure 13: Protein expression of PD-L1 Nanobody


Learn


From the expression and verification of the PD-L1 nanobody in the BL21 strain, we concluded that the target protein was successfully expressed, as confirmed by Western Blot analysis, with the molecular weight matching the expected range of 15-20 kDa. This indicates that the gene for PD-L1 nb was efficiently expressed in the engineered strain.


However, during the expression process, we observed a relatively low amount of the PD-L1 nanobody in the extracellular space. While some studies have suggested that PD-L1 can be delivered without a signal peptide, our experiments showed that the extracellular secretion of the protein was insufficient. Based on this observation and previous research(Gao et al., 2024), we decided to incorporate a YopE1-15 signal peptide into the design, as suggested in the literature. This modification will be tested in the next cycle to enhance the secretion of the PD-L1 nanobody for more efficient therapeutic applications.


Cycle 2-2 YopE1-15-PD-L1 nb

Design


In this cycle, we focus on enhancing the extracellular secretion of the PD-L1 nanobody by incorporating the YopE1-15 signal peptide into the gene construct. The YopE1-15 signal peptide is a short peptide derived from the Yersinia pestis YopE protein, which is well-known for its role in facilitating the secretion of proteins across bacterial membranes. The signal peptide is typically used to direct the target protein to the Sec pathway, leading to its secretion into the extracellular space.


The addition of the YopE1-15 signal peptide to the PD-L1 nanobody gene aims to improve the yield of the nanobody in the extracellular environment, allowing for easier collection and purification of the protein. This strategy is based on its well-established use in promoting protein secretion in E. coli and has been successfully implemented in several other systems. By fusing the YopE1-15 signal peptide to the N-terminus of the PD-L1 nanobody, we expect to enhance the overall efficiency of the system, making it more suitable for large-scale therapeutic applications.


Design Diagram

Figure 14: Mechanism of action of the NETMAP-YopE1-15-PD-L1 nb


Build


First, the sequence encoding YopE1-15-fused PD-L1 nb was synthesized by gene synthesis (Generalbiol, China). This sequence was codon-optimized for E. coli, and common BioBrick restriction enzyme sites (EcoR I, Xba I, Spe I, and Pst I) were removed to ensure compliance with RFC#10 standards and facilitate subsequent cloning. Subsequently, the one-step cloning method (Seamless Cloning Kit, D7010, beyotime) was used to replace the mRFP reporter gene in the previously constructed NIR light-induced biosensor with this YopE1-15-PDL1 nb sequence, thereby placing the expression of PDL1 nb under the control of the NETMAP promoter. The obtained recombinant plasmid was transformed into the preferred chassis strain E. coli DH5α by the heat shock method (42°C, 1 min). Transformants were screened on LB solid plates containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin (Amp) and 30 μg/mL chloramphenicol (Cm). Positive clones were finally confirmed by sequencing verification (Tsingke). The obtained DH5α-NETMAP-PDL1 nb engineered strain was stored at -20°C with 25% (v/v) glycerol and inoculated and expanded at 37°C with shaking at 150 rpm.


Build  Diagram

Figure 15: Construction of the PD-L1 Nanobody Expression System. (A) Plasmid map. The figure shows the plasmid map of the gene circuit used for PD-L1 nanobody (nb) expression. The core regulatory elements of the NETMAP system are all integrated into the pSB1A3 backbone. The reporter gene has been replaced with the sequence of YopE1-15-fused PD-L1 nb, whose expression is regulated by the PmrkA promoter. (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis of the YopE1-15-PD-L1 nb gene fragment.


Test


Strain Activation and Cultivation: The DH5α-NETMAP-PDL1 nb engineered strain was inoculated at a ratio of 1:100 into 5 mL of LB medium containing 100 μg/mL Amp. A 15 mL centrifuge tube was wrapped with tin foil, and the strain was cultured at 37°C with shaking at 180 rpm for 12 hours. Subsequently, the bacterial cells were inoculated at a 1% rate into a 48-well plate containing 500 μL of Amp⁺ Cm⁺ LB medium and continuously cultured at 37°C with shaking at 180 rpm until the OD600 reached 0.5.


NIR Light Induction and Protein Sample Preparation: When the OD600 of the bacterial culture reached 0.5, a light-emitting diode (LED) lamp was used to initiate NIR light (660 nm) irradiation of the samples for 5 hours. Immediately after the induction, the supernatant of the engineered bacterial culture was collected. The supernatant was centrifuged at 12,000×g for 10 min at 4°C and then filtered through a 0.22 μm filter membrane to remove cells. Subsequently, the BeyoGold™ ultrafiltration tube (15 mL, 5 kDa MWCO, PES, FUF505, Beyotime) was used for protein concentration by centrifugation at 4,000×g for 40 min at 4°C. The protein concentration of the concentrated protein sample was determined using the Bradford kit (P0006, Beyotime).


Western Blot (WB) Analysis: The concentrated supernatant protein samples were separated by electrophoresis using a 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel prepared with the one-step PAGE gel rapid preparation kit (PG113, Yamei). Subsequently, the proteins were transferred to a 0.22 μm PVDF membrane (WJ001S, Yamei) via the wet transfer method. The membrane was blocked with protein-free rapid blocking solution (ED0024, Sikejie) at room temperature for 20 min. After blocking, the membrane was incubated with a 1:1000-diluted mouse His-tag antibody (AH367, Beyotime) (primary antibody) at 4°C overnight. Finally, the membrane was incubated with HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (A0216, Beyotime) (secondary antibody) at room temperature for 1 hour. Chemiluminescence analysis was performed using a protein blotting imaging system (ChemiDoc MP, BioRad).


Western Blot (WB) analysis results showed that after 5 hours of induction with 660 nm NIR light, a clear specific band was successfully detected in the concentrated supernatant sample of the DH5α-NETMAP-PDL1 nb experimental group. The molecular weight of this band was consistent with the expected size of YopE1-15-PD-L1 nb(approximately 18 kDa).


Test Diagram

Figure 16: WB experimental results of YopE1-15-PD-L1 nb


Learn


Through the construction and expression of YopE1-15-fused PD-L1 nanobody, we successfully enhanced the extracellular secretion of the PD-L1 nanobody, as confirmed by Western Blot analysis. The molecular weight of the detected band matched the expected size of approximately 18 kDa, indicating successful protein expression. This was an important achievement as it showed that the YopE1-15 signal peptide effectively promoted the secretion of the nanobody.


However, we observed that the extracellular yield, although improved, was still not as high as desired. This indicates that further optimization is required, particularly in enhancing secretion efficiency for large-scale therapeutic applications. In the next step, we plan to incorporate Coagulase (Coa), a therapeutic protein, into the system, to explore its potential as an additional payload for targeted cancer therapy.


Cycle 2-3 Coagulase

Design


Coagulase (Coa) is an enzyme capable of converting fibrinogen into fibrin, thereby inducing localized blood coagulation. This reaction results in the formation of fibrin clots, which block local blood flow. In cancer therapy, such localized coagulation mechanisms have emerged as a novel strategy to selectively block tumor vasculature, leading to the interruption of oxygen and nutrient supply and causing ischemic necrosis of tumor tissue, effectively “starving” tumor cells. In addition, the localized coagulation process forms a natural biological barrier that prevents engineered bacteria or therapeutic molecules from entering the bloodstream, further improving treatment precision and biosafety.


Design Diagram

Figure 17: Mechanism of action of coagulase (Coa)


The Coa used in this project is a truncated and optimized protein fragment that enables efficient expression in E. coli while maintaining complete coagulation activity. Unlike the full-length version, this engineered fragment does not induce angiogenesis, ensuring a higher level of biosafety for therapeutic applications. Moreover, Coa can be effectively secreted through the natural secretion pathway of E. coli into the extracellular tumor microenvironment. In this cycle, we will independently verify the coagulation activity of Coa, evaluating its potential in localized vascular occlusion and tumor microenvironment modulation. In the future, we plan to integrate Coa with the NETMAP red light-inducible system and the PD-L1 nanobody module, aiming to establish a precision colorectal cancer therapy that combines optogenetic immune activation with localized tumor blockade.


Design Diagram

Figure 18: Schematic illustration of the ideal therapeutic mechanism combining red light induction, PD-L1 nanobody activation, and coagulase-mediated vascular blockade


Build

After codon optimization of the Coagulase-encoding gene and removal of restriction enzyme sites (EcoRI, XbaI, SpeI, PstI, NdeI, and XhoI), the gene was cloned into the pET28a (m) vector via the NdeI and XhoI restriction enzyme sites. The recombinant plasmid was transformed into competent E. coli BL21 strain by the heat shock method (42°C, 1 min). Transformants were screened on LB solid plates containing 100 μg/mL kanamycin (Kana) to obtain the recombinant engineered strain BL21-Coa.


Build  Diagram

Figure 19: Construction of the Coagulase Expression System and Gene Circuit. (A) Plasmid map. The figure shows the plasmid map of the gene circuit used for Coa expression. (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis of the Coa gene fragment. (C) Schematic diagram of the Coa system gene circuit.


Test

Verification of Coagulase Expression by Western Blotting


After overnight culture of the BL21-Coa strain in LB broth containing Kana, it was inoculated at a ratio of 1:100 into 10 mL of fresh medium and cultured at 37°C with shaking at 180 rpm until the OD600 reached 0.5-0.8. At this point, 0.5 mM IPTG inducer was added, and the culture temperature was adjusted to 16°C, with cultivation continued for 20 hours. After fermentation, the supernatant was discarded by centrifugation (5,000×g, 10 min), and the bacterial pellet was resuspended in 10 mL of PBS. Ultrasonic disruption was performed on ice using an ultrasonic disruptor (ultrasonic power: 70%; ultrasonic cycle: 1 s on, 3 s off; total ultrasonic time: approximately 15 min). Subsequently, centrifugation was conducted at 5,000×g for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected as the crude protein sample. The concentration was determined using the Bradford kit. For Coa protein purification and WB verification: The protein purification kit (Beyotime, P2226) was used for nickel column affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA) purification to obtain purified Coa protein. The collected purified protein fractions were analyzed for purity by SDS-PAGE, and the expression of the target protein was verified by Western Blot: The protein samples were separated using a 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel prepared with the one-step PAGE gel rapid preparation kit. The proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane, and after blocking with protein-free rapid blocking solution, the membrane was sequentially incubated with a 1:1000-diluted mouse His-tag antibody (primary antibody) and HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody. Finally, chemiluminescence analysis was performed using a protein blotting imaging system. The concentration of the final purified protein was determined using the Bradford kit.


SDS-PAGE and Western Blot results showed that after IPTG induction, low-temperature cultivation, and nickel column affinity chromatography, the purified Coa protein exhibited a clear and single main band on the gel, consistent with the expected molecular weight (approximately 40 - 55 kDa). WB results confirmed the successful expression and purification of the target protein.


Test Diagram

Figure 20: WB experimental results of Coa-his tag


Coagulase Coagulation Activity


Non-anticoagulated blood samples were used. Subsequently, 50 μL of purified Coa protein solutions with different concentrations were mixed with 50 μL of blood samples in EP tubes or 96-well plates, with a total reaction volume of 100 μL. The concentration gradient of the Coa protein solution included 100%, 80%, 60%, 40%, and 20%, and a mixture of 0% Coa solution (i.e., buffer) and 50 μL of blood sample was used as the negative control. Meanwhile, 100 μL of water and 100 μL of 100% Coa solution were set as blank controls without blood. All mixtures were incubated in a 37°C incubator, and photos were taken every 5 minutes to record the coagulation status for 30 minutes. A final photo was taken at 60 minutes when complete coagulation was achieved. The main observation and analysis indicators included thrombosis formation time, thrombus morphology, and coagulation intensity.


The Coa protein exhibited concentration-dependent coagulation activity: the 100% and 80% concentration groups showed the fastest coagulation rate, with stable thrombus formation expected within 5-10 minutes and the highest coagulation intensity. As the Coa concentration decreased gradiently, the coagulation time was significantly prolonged. The coagulation rate and intensity of the negative control group (0% Coa) were much lower than those of the Coa experimental groups. The in vitro coagulation assay results confirmed that the purified Coagulase protein has coagulation activity, and its coagulation effect is positively correlated with the protein concentration.


Test Diagram

Figure 21: Coagulation Experiment


Learn


Through the expression, purification, and functional verification of the Coagulase (Coa) protein, we successfully confirmed that the truncated Coa fragment can be efficiently expressed in E. coli and retains its biological coagulation activity. The SDS-PAGE and Western Blot analyses verified the correct expression and purity of the target protein, while the in vitro coagulation experiments demonstrated that Coa exhibits clear concentration-dependent clotting ability, forming stable thrombi within minutes at higher concentrations.


These results indicate that the engineered Coa fragment maintains its functional integrity and provides a solid foundation for its integration into subsequent NETMAP red light–inducible therapeutic systems. In future work, we will combine Coa with the PD-L1 nanobody module to construct a dual-function therapeutic platform capable of both immune checkpoint blockade and tumor vascular occlusion, aiming to achieve a more effective and localized colorectal cancer treatment strategy.


Cycle 3 INP-HlpA

Design


To achieve precise spatial localization of engineered bacteria within colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues, we designed a tumor-targeting anchoring system based on the fusion of HlpA (Histone-like Protein A) and INP (Ice Nucleation Protein). CRC cells are characterized by the high surface expression of heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), adhesive glycoconjugates that play a key role in tumor cell adhesion and extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions. Leveraging this biological feature, we selected HlpA, a well-characterized heparin-binding protein with strong affinity toward HSPGs. This enables engineered bacteria to achieve specific adhesion to tumor tissues through biochemical recognition rather than passive accumulation, thereby enhancing targeting efficiency and localization accuracy.


To ensure that HlpA is properly exposed on the bacterial surface, we fused it to the outer membrane-anchoring domain of INP, an ice nucleation protein that enables the surface display of heterologous proteins without compromising bacterial viability. The resulting INP-HlpA fusion protein is stably expressed on the E. coli outer membrane, equipping the bacteria with tumor-specific recognition and adhesion capabilities. This fusion structure enhances local bacterial retention within the CRC microenvironment, reduces systemic spread, and increases the concentration of therapeutic molecules such as PD-L1 nanobody and Coagulase at the tumor site. Overall, this design provides a crucial foundation for constructing a red light–controlled, tumor-targeted therapeutic system with improved precision, efficacy, and biosafety.


Design Diagram

Figure 22: Schematic illustration of anchoring module INP-HlpA


Build


The INP−HlpA-encoding gene was synthesized and codon-optimized for E. coli. Restriction enzyme sites (EcoRI, XbaI, SpeI, PstI, NdeI, and XhoI) were removed to meet the RFC#10 standards and pET28a (m) cloning requirements. The INP-HlpA-encoding gene was cloned into the pET28a (m) vector via the NdeI and XhoI restriction enzyme sites. The recombinant plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21 by the heat shock method, and positive clones were screened on LB solid plates containing 100 μg/mL kanamycin (Kana) to obtain the recombinant engineered strain BL21−INP−HlpA.


Build  Diagram

Figure 23: Construction of the INP-HlpA Expression System and Gene Circuit. (A) Plasmid map. The figure shows the plasmid map of the gene circuit used for INP-HlpA expression. (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis of the INP-HlpA gene fragment. (C) Schematic diagram of the INP-HlpA system gene circuit.


Test


Induced Expression and Collection of Proteins: The BL21-INP-HlpA strain was cultured overnight in LB broth containing Kana. Subsequently, it was inoculated at a 1% ratio into 30 mL of fresh LB broth and cultured until the OD600 reached 0.2, at which point 0.5 mM IPTG was added to induce expression. The culture temperature was adjusted to 16°C, and cultivation was continued for 20 hours.


Extraction of Intracellular Proteins and WB Verification: 5 mL of the fermentation broth was centrifuged to collect the bacterial cells, which were then resuspended in PBS. Ultrasonic disruption was performed on ice using an ultrasonic disruptor. After centrifugation of the lysate, the supernatant was collected as the intracellular protein sample, and its concentration was determined using the Bradford kit.


Western Blot (WB) Analysis: The intracellular protein samples were separated using a 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel, and transferred to a PVDF membrane via the wet transfer method. After blocking the membrane, it was sequentially incubated with a 1:1000-diluted mouse His−tag antibody (primary antibody) and HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (secondary antibody). Finally, chemiluminescence analysis was performed using a protein blotting imaging system.


Western Blot analysis results showed that after IPTG induction and low-temperature cultivation for 20 hours, a clear specific band was successfully detected in the intracellular protein sample of the BL21-INP-HlpA strain. The molecular weight of this band was consistent with the expected molecular weight of INP-HlpA and was specifically recognized by the His-tag antibody (approximately 15 - 25 kDa).


Test Diagram

Figure 24: WB experimental results of INP-HlpA-his tag


Adhesion Effect Test


2×10⁵ CT26 cells were inoculated into a 6-well cell culture plate and cultured for 48 hours until the cell confluence reached 80%. Subsequently, the medium was replaced with fresh DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium) supplemented with 50 mg/L Amp. Next, 1×10⁷ CFU of the BL21-INP-HlpA-mRFP engineered probiotic was inoculated and co-cultured with CT26 cells for 2 hours. After co-culture, 100 μL of the supernatant was collected, diluted, and spread on Amp-containing plates. The number of free bacteria was quantified by the CFU counting method, and the number of bacteria adhered to the cells and the adhesion efficiency were calculated accordingly. Subsequently, the CT26 cells were washed twice with sterile PBS to remove non-adherent bacteria. Finally, an inverted fluorescence microscope was used to capture mRFP fluorescence images to visually observe the distribution and adhesion morphology of the bacteria on the surface of CT26 cells.


CFU counting results showed that the BL21-INP-HlpA-mRFP strain had a high adhesion efficiency, confirming the specific adhesion effect mediated by HlpA. Images captured by the inverted fluorescence microscope clearly showed that a large number of engineered bacteria labeled with mRFP adhered tightly to the surface of CT26 cells. The results of adhesion rate calculation via CFU counting showed that the adhesion efficiency of the BL21-INP-HlpA-mRFP strain (83.7%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (26.7%). This result confirms the specific adhesion effect mediated by HlpA, and this engineered strain can efficiently target and adhere to CT26 colorectal cancer cells.


Test Diagram

Figure 25: Adhesion Effect Test. Figure (1) Adhesion effect diagram of the BL21-INP-HlpA-mRFP engineered strain on CT26 colorectal cancer cells. Figure (2) Comparison of adhesion rates of the engineered strain to CT26 cells (scale bar: 5 μm).


Learn


Through the successful expression and verification of the INP-HlpA fusion protein, we demonstrated that the designed anchoring module can be efficiently expressed in E. coli and maintain stable structural integrity. The clear, specific band detected in the Western Blot confirmed that the INP-HlpA construct was correctly expressed and folded, laying the foundation for its subsequent functional validation.


Cycle 4-1 MazF

Design


The MazE/MazF toxin–antitoxin system is a well-characterized bacterial regulatory module that controls growth, dormancy, and programmed cell death. MazF functions as a stable toxin — an mRNA endonuclease that specifically cleaves ACA sequences, thereby blocking protein synthesis and inducing growth arrest or cell death. In contrast, MazE is a labile antitoxin that can bind and neutralize MazF under normal conditions. When MazE is degraded or its synthesis is inhibited, MazF remains active, leading to translational shutdown and cellular dormancy. This system provides a precise, reversible mechanism for controlling bacterial activity.


In our project, the MazE/MazF module is introduced as a biological safety and dormancy control system for the engineered probiotic strain. During the freeze-drying (lyophilization) and storage process, the engineered bacteria enter a dormant state, preserving their viability over long periods. Before use, L-arabinose is supplied externally to induce the expression of MazE, which neutralizes MazF toxicity, ensuring that the bacteria remain alive but inactive. Once administered into the tumor microenvironment, the external arabinose supply is removed, allowing the bacteria to remain in a low-activity, controlled dormant state until activated by red light (NETMAP system). This approach ensures precise temporal control, extended formulation stability, and enhanced biosafety by preventing uncontrolled proliferation while maintaining therapeutic readiness.


Design Diagram

Figure 26: Schematic illustration of safety system


To initially construct a MazF toxin safety system based on the lactose-inducible promoter Plac and the LacI repressor protein, and evaluate its ability to control cytotoxicity under non-inducing conditions.


Build


The MazF toxin gene was synthesized and codon-optimized. The MazF gene was placed downstream of the Plac promoter, and a LacI expression element (PlacI−LacI) was inserted upstream to construct the PlacI−LacI−B0035−Plac−mazF sequence. This sequence was cloned into the pSB1A3 vector and transformed into E. coli DH5α, and an attempt was made to screen positive clones in a medium containing Amp.


Build  Diagram

Figure 27: Construction of the Plac−mazF Suicide System. A: Plasmid construction map of the Plac−mazF suicide system. B: Gene circuit diagram of the Plac−mazF suicide system construction.


Test


No positive clones could be screened out.


Learn


The Plac promoter has unacceptable low-level leaky expression. Due to the strong toxicity of MazF, even with the inhibitory attempt of the LacI protein, the toxin produced by leakage is sufficient to kill all successfully transformed host cells carrying the plasmid, indicating that the Plac/LacI system is not suitable for the safe control of highly toxic genes.


Cycle 4-2 PBAD−MazF

Design


To address the defects of the Plac system, the arabinose-inducible promoter (PBAD) was introduced as a replacement to construct a new MazF safety system, and its tight regulatory ability under non-inducing conditions (i.e., allowing strain survival) was verified. The PBAD promoter is an arabinose-inducible promoter derived from the araBAD operon of Escherichia coli, and is one of the most tightly regulated and tunable promoters in bacterial genetic engineering. Its expression is controlled by the AraC regulatory protein, which acts as both a transcriptional activator and repressor depending on the presence of L-arabinose.


Build


The codon-optimized MazF toxin gene was used. The MazF gene was placed downstream of the PBAD promoter to construct the PBAD−mazF sequence. The PBAD−mazF was cloned into the pSB1A3 vector. The recombinant plasmid was transformed into E. coli DH5α by the heat shock method. Positive clones were screened on solid plates containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin (Amp) and verified by sequencing.


Test


To quantitatively evaluate the function of the PBAD−MazF system under conditions with and without the inducer (arabinose) by monitoring the growth curve, and verify its leak-free safety and induced lethality efficiency.The frozen DH5α−PBAD−MazF strain was activated and inoculated at a ratio of 1:100 into LB medium containing Amp, and the OD600 was adjusted to 0.1. The culture was divided into two groups: the induction group, to which 2% arabinose was added (to induce MazF expression); and the control group, without arabinose addition. At 37°C, a FlexStation 3 was used to continuously monitor the OD600 of the strains in both groups and record the growth curves.


The control group strain showed normal growth. The growth curve of the induction group strain showed severe growth inhibition or complete growth arrest. The normal growth of the control group confirms the high safety (extremely low leakage) of the PBAD system in the non-inducing state.


Test Diagram

Figure 28: Growth Curves of the Control Group and Induction Group Strains


Learn


The growth arrest or inhibition of the induction group confirms the efficient lethality of the MazF toxin, thereby comprehensively verifying that the PBAD−MazF construct is a fully functional and controllable biosafety suicide system.


Reference

  1. Qiao L, Niu L, Wang Z, Deng Z, Di D, Ma X, Zhou Y, Kong D, Wang Q, Yin J, Jin L, Sun J, Feng B, Lu W, Cai F, Guan N, Ye H. Engineered bacteria for near-infrared light-inducible expression of cancer therapeutics. Nat Cancer. 2025 Apr;6(4):612-628. doi: 10.1038/s43018-025-00932-3. Epub 2025 Mar 17. PMID: 40097656.
  2. Zhou T, Wu J, Tang H, Liu D, Jeon BH, Jin W, Wang Y, Zheng Y, Khan A, Han H, Li X. Enhancing tumor-specific recognition of programmable synthetic bacterial consortium for precision therapy of colorectal cancer. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024 Jan 20;10(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41522-024-00479-8. PMID: 38245564; PMCID: PMC10799920.
  3. Gao T, Niu L, Wu X, Dai D, Zhou Y, Liu M, Wu K, Yu Y, Guan N, Ye H. Sonogenetics-controlled synthetic designer cells for cancer therapy in tumor mouse models. Cell Rep Med. 2024 May 21;5(5):101513. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101513. Epub 2024 Apr 11. PMID: 38608697; PMCID: PMC11148564.
  4. Tang, H., Zhou, T., Jin, W., Zong, S., Mamtimin, T., Salama, E. S., ... & Li, X. (2023). Tumor-targeting engineered probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 inhibits colorectal tumorigenesis and modulates gut microbiota homeostasis in mice. Life Sciences, 324, 121709.