Loading...

This study focuses on the early identification and prevention of postharvest decay in strawberries, constructing a comprehensive synthetic biology system comprising three components: detection, reporting, and response. First, by screening VOC-responsive promoters, we established a biosensing module capable of recognizing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released during the decay process, enabling sensitive capture of spoilage signals. Second, we integrated the highly responsive promoter PgrpE with the violacein chromogenic pathway (vioABCDE) to develop a detection system that converts invisible spoilage gas signals into visible color changes. Finally, we constructed a synergistic antimicrobial module combining Chitinase and β-1,3-Glucanase to achieve active defense against fungal infection. Through step-by-step validation of these three experimental modules, we realized a closed-loop design spanning from signal perception and colorimetric reporting to active prevention, providing a biological foundation and technical support for the intelligent monitoring and preservation of strawberries and other perishable fruits.

A Diagram

Figure 1. Integrated Synthetic Biology System for Strawberry Spoilage Detection and Inhibition

I. Screening of VOC-Responsive Promoters

Experimental Objective

This experiment aims to screen for VOC-responsive promoters that can be used to detect early spoilage signals in postharvest perishable fruits such as strawberries.

Strawberries are susceptible to fungal infections (e.g., Botrytis cinerea) during harvesting, transportation, and storage. During growth and metabolism, fungi release characteristic volatile organic compounds (VOCs), such as 1-octanol, 1-octen-3-ol, and phenylethyl alcohol. These VOCs can serve as early molecular indicators of fruit spoilage. By evaluating the activation of four VOC-responsive promoters (PsoxS, PlasI, PrecA, PgrpE) in response to these three VOCs, using red fluorescent protein (RFP) as a reporter gene for visual and quantitative analysis, we aim to identify the promoter with the strongest response to spoilage-related VOCs and the lowest background noise. This will provide a foundation for constructing a VOC detection and fruit spoilage early-warning system.

Experimental Methods

Genetic Engineering Construction

Four VOC-responsive promoters (PsoxS, PlasI, PrecA, PgrpE) were synthesized and cloned into the standard iGEM plasmid pSB1A3 vector using seamless cloning technology. These promoters were placed upstream of the reporter gene mRFP to construct a "promoter-RFP" expression detection system. Escherichia coli DH5α (Beyotime, D0351) was used for plasmid amplification, and positive clones were selected using ampicillin (100 μg/mL, Amp) resistance screening. Single colonies were picked for plasmid extraction and sent for sequencing verification (Tsingke, Beijing). After confirming the correct construction, the plasmids were transformed into the expression strain BL21(DE3) (Beyotime, D1009S) for subsequent VOC response experiments. The final engineered strains were stored at -80°C with 25% (v/v) glycerol as a cryoprotectant.

Experimental Methods Diagram

Figure 2. Plasmid Construction and Transformation Verification

Bacterial Culture and VOC Induction

Verified engineered strains were inoculated into LB liquid medium (10 mL, in 50 mL conical flasks) containing ampicillin and cultured at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm. The OD₆₀₀ was monitored in real-time to ensure the cells were in the logarithmic growth phase. When the OD₆₀₀ reached 0.6, the bacterial culture was aliquoted into a 96-well plate, with 90 μL per well as the detection system. VOC stock solutions (1-octanol, 1-octen-3-ol, phenylethyl alcohol) were prepared as 0.1% (v/v) aqueous solutions and then diluted 10³-fold to the experimental concentration. In the experiment, 10 μL of different VOC solutions were added to each well, ensuring the final system simulated the actual VOC concentrations during strawberry spoilage. A control group without VOCs was included, and the total experimental system volume was 100 μL. The 96-well plate was incubated statically at 37°C for 4 hours to allow full diffusion of VOCs and interaction with the engineered bacteria, activating the promoters and inducing RFP expression.

Fluorescence Measurement and Promoter Screening

After incubation, two indicators were measured using a microplate reader:

  • Fluorescence Intensity: Red fluorescence of RFP (excitation wavelength 584 nm, emission wavelength 607 nm) was detected to reflect the degree of promoter activation.
  • OD₆₀₀ Value: Cell density was measured simultaneously to correct for growth differences between wells.The standardized fluorescence ratio (Fluorescence/OD₆₀₀) was calculated to eliminate interference from variations in bacterial cell numbers, providing accurate data on promoter response strength. The three VOC treatment groups were compared with the control group, and normalized fluorescence histograms were plotted to analyze the response patterns of each promoter under different VOC stimuli. The promoter with the highest sensitivity to the target VOCs and the lowest background signal was selected as the core component for the subsequent VOC detection system, enabling early detection and warning of VOCs during fruit spoilage.
Experimental Methods Diagram

Figure 3. Screening Process for VOC-Responsive Promoters

Experimental Results

1. PCR and Agarose Gel Verification

We first performed PCR validation on the reporter gene mRFP and the four recombinant plasmids containing different promoters. Target fragments were amplified using specific primers, and the PCR products were analyzed by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis, revealing clear single bands (Figure 1). The results showed that the mRFP fragment size matched the expected size (approximately 678 bp), while the amplified fragments of the four "promoter + mRFP" constructs also corresponded to their theoretical sizes: PrecA-mRFP (~802 bp), PgrpE-mRFP (~776 bp), PsoxS-mRFP (~740 bp), and PlasI-mRFP (~835 bp). All bands were at the correct positions with no significant non-specific amplification. To further confirm the accuracy of the constructs, positive clones were subjected to Sanger sequencing, which confirmed that the sequences were fully consistent with the design, with no frameshift or premature termination mutations detected. In conclusion, all four target plasmids were successfully constructed and are suitable for subsequent functional validation experiments.

Experimental Results Diagram

Figure 4. Verification of PCR results by agarose gel electrophoresis

2. Response of PlasI to VOCs

Experimental Results Diagram

Figure 5. Construction and Validation of PlasI+mRFP

Experimental results showed that the PlasI reporter strain exhibited differentiated response patterns after 4-hour exposure to different VOCs (Figure 4). The control group (CK) demonstrated the lowest normalized fluorescence value, representing the baseline expression level of the PlasI reporter strain in the non-responsive state.

Under the treatment of 1-octanol and phenylethyl alcohol, the normalized fluorescence value of PlasI significantly increased, approximately 2-fold higher than CK, indicating that PlasI could be markedly induced by 1-octanol and phenylethyl alcohol. The fluorescence value of the 1-octen-3-ol treatment group was about 1.5 times higher than CK, showing a moderate response. Comprehensive comparison revealed that the sensitivity of PlasI to the three VOCs followed the order: 1-octanol > phenylethyl alcohol > 1-octen-3-ol, with 1-octanol and phenylethyl alcohol being the most effective inducer molecules.

Experimental Results Diagram

Figure 6. Response of the PlasI reporter strain to different VOCs (4h)

3. Response of PrecA to VOCs

Experimental Results Diagram

Figure 7. Construction and Validation of PrecA+mRFP

Experimental results demonstrated that the PrecA reporter strain exhibited differentiated response patterns after 4-hour exposure to different VOCs (Figure 2). The control group (CK) showed the lowest normalized fluorescence value, representing the baseline expression level of the PrecA reporter strain in the non-responsive state.

Among the three VOC treatment groups, the PrecA reporter strain displayed comparable response intensities under 1-octanol and phenylethyl alcohol treatments, both approximately 1.5-fold higher than CK, indicating that the PrecA response system could be significantly induced by these two VOCs. The response intensity of the 1-octen-3-ol treatment group was slightly lower than the other two groups, showing a moderate response. Comprehensive comparison revealed that the sensitivity of PrecA to the three VOCs followed the order: 1-octanol > phenylethyl alcohol > 1-octen-3-ol, with 1-octanol being the most effective inducer molecule.

Experimental Results Diagram

Figure 8. Response of the PrecA reporter strain to different VOCs (4h)

4. Response of PgrpE to VOCs

Experimental Results Diagram

Figure 9. Construction and Validation of PgrpE+mRFP

Experimental results showed that the PgrpE reporter strain exhibited differentiated response patterns after 4-hour exposure to different VOCs (Figure 2). The control group (CK) demonstrated the lowest normalized fluorescence value, representing the baseline expression level of the PgrpE reporter strain in the non-responsive state.

Under the treatment of 1-octanol and phenylethyl alcohol, the normalized fluorescence value of the PgrpE promoter significantly increased, approximately 2.3-fold higher than CK, indicating that PgrpE could be markedly induced by 1-octanol and phenylethyl alcohol. The fluorescence value of the 1-octen-3-ol treatment group was slightly lower than the other treatment groups, but still exhibited relatively strong response intensity. Comprehensive comparison revealed that the sensitivity of PgrpE to the three VOCs followed the order: 1-octanol > phenylethyl alcohol > 1-octen-3-ol, with 1-octanol and phenylethyl alcohol being the most effective inducer molecules.

Experimental Results Diagram

Figure 10. Response of the PgrpE reporter strain to different VOCs (4h)

5. Response of PsoxS to VOCs

Experimental Results Diagram

Figure 11. Construction and Validation of PsoxS+mRFP

Experimental results demonstrated that the PsoxS reporter strain exhibited differentiated response patterns after 4-hour exposure to different VOCs (Figure 2). The control group (CK) showed the lowest normalized fluorescence value, representing the baseline expression level of the PsoxS reporter strain in the non-responsive state.

Under 1-octanol treatment, the normalized fluorescence value of the PsoxS reporter significantly increased, approximately 3-fold higher than CK, indicating that PsoxS could be strongly induced by 1-octanol. The fluorescence values of the 1-octen-3-ol and phenylethyl alcohol treatment groups were also higher than CK, with comparable levels between them, showing an increase of approximately 1.2-fold compared to CK. This suggests that PsoxS could also respond to these two VOCs, though the response intensity was significantly lower than that to 1-octanol. Comprehensive comparison revealed that the sensitivity of PsoxS to the three VOCs followed the order: 1-octanol > phenylethyl alcohol ≈ 1-octen-3-ol, with 1-octanol being the most effective inducer molecule.

Experimental Results Diagram

Figure 12. Response of the PsoxS reporter strain to different VOCs (4h)

6. Comparison of Response Fold Changes of Different Promoters to VOCs

Objective

To compare the response intensities of VOC-responsive systems constructed with four different promoters and screen for the promoter most sensitive to VOC signals released during spoilage processes. Through this experiment, we aim to identify the optimal responsive element, providing a foundation for subsequent construction of chromogenic reporter systems, thereby enabling efficient detection and visualization of strawberry spoilage signals.

Methods

Correctly constructed VOC-responsive strains with four different promoters were inoculated into LB liquid medium containing ampicillin (10 mL, in 50 mL conical flasks) and cultured in a shaker at 37°C and 250 rpm. The OD₆₀₀ value was monitored in real-time to ensure cells were in the logarithmic growth phase. When OD₆₀₀ reached 0.6, the bacterial suspension was aliquoted into a 96-well plate, with 90 μL per well as the detection system. VOC stock solutions (1-octanol, 1-octen-3-ol, phenylethyl alcohol) were first prepared as 0.1% (v/v) aqueous solutions, then diluted 10³-fold to the required experimental concentrations. During the experiment, 10 μL of different VOC solutions were added to each well, enabling the final system to simulate the actual VOC concentrations during strawberry spoilage. A control group without VOCs was established, with a total system volume of 100 μL. The 96-well plate was statically incubated at 37°C for 4 hours to allow sufficient VOC diffusion and interaction with the engineered bacteria, activating the promoters and inducing RFP expression.

After incubation, the 96-well plate was placed in a microplate reader to detect two parameters:

  • Fluorescence intensity: Detection of RFP red fluorescence (excitation wavelength 584 nm, emission wavelength 607 nm), reflecting the degree of promoter activation
  • OD₆₀₀ value: Simultaneous measurement of cell density for correcting growth differences between wells

The RFP reporter systems driven by four different promoters were incubated for 4 hours under three VOC conditions simulating strawberry spoilage (1-octanol, 1-octen-3-ol, phenylethyl alcohol), followed by RFP fluorescence measurement with OD₆₀₀ correction. Results were expressed as normalized fluorescence values (Fluorescence/OD) and plotted in Figure 2-6.

Calculation of Normalized Fluorescence Value:

Experimental Results Diagram

To compare the response intensities of four promoters (PsoxS, PlasI, PrecA, PgrpE) to three VOCs (1-octanol, 1-octen-3-ol, phenylethyl alcohol), we calculated response fold changes at the 4-hour incubation time point. This is a commonly used quantitative indicator for evaluating the relative degree of promoter activation by VOCs. Response fold change can reflect promoter sensitivity and specificity - higher fold changes indicate stronger promoter response to specific VOCs.

Response Fold Change Calculation Formula:

For each promoter and each VOC:

Response Fold Change = (Normalized fluorescence value of VOC treatment group) / (Normalized fluorescence value of no-VOC control group)

Evaluation Criteria for Promoter Response to VOCs:

The response intensities of the four promoters to VOCs were ranked and visually represented using corresponding numbers of "+" symbols. The top-ranked promoter is indicated by "++++", while the lowest-ranked promoter is indicated by "+", with others following this pattern.

Experimental Results:

As shown in the results, fluorescence fold change measurements after 4 hours revealed that the grpE promoter performed most prominently when detecting the three target VOCs (1-octanol, 1-octen-3-ol, and phenylethyl alcohol). When exposed to 1-octanol, the "fluorescence value/OD₆₀₀" of BL21-grpE-mRFP strain was significantly higher than the control group (CK) and other promoter strains, with the highest response fold change, indicating that grpE had the strongest activation effect for this VOC. Under 1-octen-3-ol treatment, grpE similarly showed the strongest response, with both fluorescence output values and response fold changes significantly leading other promoters, demonstrating grpE's high sensitivity to this VOC. For phenylethyl alcohol, although there were some differences in responses among promoters, grpE still maintained high fluorescence levels, exhibiting good response stability. In contrast, the soxS promoter showed weaker responses. After most VOC treatments, its "fluorescence value/OD₆₀₀" showed limited improvement, indicating low correlation between soxS and these VOCs, making effective response difficult. lasI and recA promoters showed some response under certain VOC conditions, but their overall levels were significantly lower than grpE, indicating limited sensing capabilities. In summary, the grpE promoter demonstrated the highest sensitivity and stability in responses to all three target VOCs, making it the most suitable candidate promoter as the core element for subsequent biosensor construction.

Experimental Results Diagram

Figure 12 Characterization of Response Properties of Four Promoters to VOCs at 4-hour Time Point

(A) Comparison of induction fold changes for each group relative to no-VOC control group (4h). Error bars represent ± standard deviation (n=3 biological replicates). Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test;(B) Evaluation of promoter responses to VOCs. The number of "+" symbols is proportional to induction fold change

Discussion:

From the experimental results, it is evident that the four VOC-responsive promoters exhibited significant differences in their responses to different target volatile organic compounds. Among them, the grpE promoter demonstrated the highest fluorescence output and response fold change under all three VOC treatment conditions (1-octanol, 1-octen-3-ol, and phenylethyl alcohol), indicating its highly sensitive and stable response characteristics to multiple VOCs. This finding aligns with the biological function of the grpE promoter in bacterial stress response. grpE typically participates in protein folding and stress regulation processes, enabling rapid initiation of downstream gene expression when exposed to external chemical stimuli, which may explain its strong induction under various VOC stimulations.

In contrast, the soxS, lasI, and recA promoters showed relatively lower response capabilities, suggesting that their regulatory mechanisms may not be directly associated with VOC signals, or that their sensing pathways have limited activity in the E. coli BL21 background. Particularly for soxS, its limited response enhancement implies that it is more inclined to sense oxidative stress signals rather than volatile organic compounds.

Comprehensive analysis indicates that the grpE promoter combines the advantages of high response sensitivity, stable signal output, and low background noise, making it the most suitable candidate as the core sensing element for subsequent VOC detection systems. These results provide a solid foundation for the construction of chromogenic modules in this project and validate the feasibility of optimizing detection sensitivity through promoter screening. Future work could further investigate the dynamic response characteristics of grpE across different VOC concentration gradients and explore the regulatory mechanisms at the cellular level to provide additional basis for system optimization.

7. Response of the PgrpE Reporter Strain to Mixed VOCs

Objective

Based on previous screening that identified the PgrpE promoter as having the strongest response to individual VOCs, this experiment aimed to further evaluate the response characteristics of the PgrpE reporter strain to a VOC mixture simulating the strawberry spoilage environment (phenylethyl alcohol:1-octanol:1-octen-3-ol = 6:1:1). By measuring response fold changes, we validated the sensitivity and applicability of the PgrpE promoter in complex VOC environments, providing experimental evidence for constructing an early strawberry spoilage detection system.

Methods

Strain and Culture

The experiment used Escherichia coli DH5α carrying the PgrpE promoter-RFP reporter system (construction method as previously described). The strain was inoculated into 10 mL of LB liquid medium containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin (in 50 mL conical flasks) and cultured at 37°C with 250 rpm shaking. OD₆₀₀ was monitored, and subsequent experiments were conducted when the bacterial culture reached mid-logarithmic growth phase (OD₆₀₀ ≈ 0.6).

VOC Mixture Preparation

According to the typical composition ratio of VOCs during strawberry spoilage, a mixed VOC solution was prepared with phenylethyl alcohol:1-octanol:1-octen-3-ol = 6:1:1. VOC stock solutions (0.1% v/v aqueous solution) were mixed proportionally and diluted 10³-fold to simulate early spoilage VOC concentrations. For induction experiments, 90 μL of bacterial culture was aliquoted into each well of a 96-well black microplate (Corning, USA), and 10 μL of mixed VOC solution was added, making the total system volume 100 μL. Control wells received 10 μL of sterile water.

Fluorescence Measurement

After mixing, samples were taken at time points 0 h (before treatment), 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, and 12 h to detect fluorescence intensity and OD600, calculating normalized fluorescence values. A multifunctional microplate reader (FlexStation 3, Molecular Devices, USA) was used to measure RFP fluorescence intensity (excitation wavelength 584 nm, emission wavelength 607 nm) and OD₆₀₀ to correct for cell density. Each group had three biological replicates, with two technical replicates each.

Data Processing and Statistical Analysis

Calculation of normalized fluorescence value:

Experimental Results Diagram

Using the NormFluo of the CK group at corresponding time points as baseline, calculate induction fold change (FC):

Experimental Results Diagram

Each time point included three independent biological replicates, with results expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way ANOVA was used to compare differences in FC across time points, followed by Tukey's post-hoc test, with significance threshold set at p<0.05.

Results

The results showed that under mixed VOC treatment, the induction fold change of the PgrpE-mRFP reporter strain exhibited a continuous upward trend over time (Figure X). At 2 hours post-treatment, FC was approximately 1.3-fold, indicating the system could detect VOC signals within a short time. By 4 hours, FC increased to 2.6-fold; reaching 3.2-fold at 6 hours, and maintaining around 3.5-fold at high levels after 10 hours. This demonstrates that PgrpE has rapid response and high signal amplification effects to mixed VOC signals, further supporting its selection as the superior promoter.

Therefore, through testing with individual VOCs such as 1-octanol and their mixtures, the fluorescence signal mediated by grpE was significantly stronger than lasI, recA, and soxS, and could generate sustained responses to mixtures, confirming it as a superior VOC-responsive promoter.

Experimental Results Diagram

Figure 13 Response fold changes of the PgrpE reporter strain to mixed VOCs at different time points. According to VOC composition distribution, the mixed VOCs had phenylethyl alcohol:1-octanol:1-octen-3-ol = 6:1:1.

Discussion

High Sensitivity of PgrpE to Mixed VOCs

The experimental results show that the induction fold change of the PgrpE-mRFP reporter system rapidly increased within a short time under VOC mixture treatment, peaking around 12 hours. This indicates that PgrpE can not only respond to individual VOCs but also maintain high comprehensive sensitivity in mixed gas environments.

Application Significance

The results demonstrate that the PgrpE reporter strain can generate detectable response signals within 1-2 hours and maintain detection effectiveness for a considerable duration, making it highly suitable for use as an early spoilage monitoring sensor. In practical fruit transportation or storage scenarios, the detection cycle could be set at 2-4 hours to achieve real-time early warning.

II. Construction and Optimization of the Violacein Production System

2.1 Establishment of the Absorption Spectrum and Standard Curve for Violacein

Objective

Before detecting violacein production levels, it is first necessary to determine its characteristic absorption wavelength and establish a standard curve for quantitative detection to ensure the accuracy and comparability of subsequent experimental data.

Method

Chemically synthesized violacein standard was used to prepare a series of gradient concentration solutions (0–20 μg/mL) in 50% anhydrous ethanol. A spectrophotometer was used to scan the wavelength range of 300–700 nm to determine the maximum absorption peak wavelength of violacein in 50% anhydrous ethanol solution. The absorbance of each gradient concentration solution was measured at the maximum absorption wavelength, and a concentration-absorbance standard curve was plotted and linearly fitted.

2.1 Establishment of the Absorption Spectrum and Standard Curve for Violacein Diagram

Figure 10 Establishment of the Absorption Spectrum and Standard Curve for Violacein

Result

The results indicate that violacein has a maximum absorption peak at 575 nm, and there is a good linear relationship between its absorbance and concentration. The linear regression equation is: Y = 1.733X + 0.08867 (R² = 0.99), where A represents the absorbance value and C represents the concentration (μg/mL).

2.1 Establishment of the Absorption Spectrum and Standard Curve for Violacein Diagram

Figure 11 Scanning Spectrum and Standard Curve of Violacein in 50% Anhydrous Ethanol Solution

Discussion

The established standard curve can be used for quantitative determination of violacein concentration in subsequent experiments. The high correlation coefficient (R² = 0.99) of the linear fit indicates that this method has good accuracy and reproducibility, meeting the requirements for quantitative analysis.

2.2 Analysis of Violacein Production in Engineered Bacteria

Objective

This experiment aims to evaluate the violacein synthesis capability and dynamic changes in engineered bacteria during fermentation when using violacein as a reporter gene. Due to its distinct advantages in visible color output and quantitative detection, violacein holds potential as a signal output in VOC (volatile organic compound) response systems. Therefore, by analyzing the relationship between violacein production and bacterial growth, the stability and visualization effect of this reporter gene expression in engineered bacteria can be assessed, providing experimental evidence for the design and optimization of subsequent VOC sensing systems.

Methods

Construction of the Violacein-Producing Engineered Strain

The violacein biosynthesis gene cluster (BCG) comprising vioAB and vioCDE was synthesized. A constitutively expressed promoter PJ23100 and a medium-strength RBS B0034 were added upstream to drive gene expression. Codon optimization was performed for E. coli, and EcoRI, XbaI, SpeI, and PstI restriction sites were eliminated to comply with the RFC#10 standard. The cluster was then cloned into the pSB1A3 vector via EcoRI and XbaI, yielding the recombinant plasmid pSB1A3-vioABCDE. The recombinant plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21 as previously described.

2.2 Analysis of Violacein Production in Engineered Bacteria Diagram
  1. Culture ConditionsThe engineered strain harboring the violacein synthesis genes was inoculated into M9 medium containing glucose as the carbon source in conical flasks and cultured at 37°C with 220 rpm shaking in a constant-temperature incubator. Samples were taken at various time points during fermentation (1, 3, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h) for determination of dry cell weight (DCW) and violacein production.
  2. Violacein ExtractionTo ensure complete recovery of violacein, ethanol-based extraction was performed separately on the cells and culture supernatant:
  3. Cell Fraction: After centrifugation to collect the cells, an appropriate amount of anhydrous ethanol was added. Ultrasonication (40 kHz, 10 min) was used to disrupt the cell walls and release violacein, followed by centrifugation to collect the supernatant.
  4. Supernatant Fraction: An equal volume of anhydrous ethanol was directly added to the culture supernatant, mixed thoroughly, and centrifuged to collect the ethanol extract containing violacein.The two extracts were combined for unified quantitative analysis.

Quantitative Detection of Violacein

A spectrophotometer was used to measure the absorbance of violacein at 575 nm, and its concentration (mg/L) was calculated using the standard curve. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the average values were calculated.

2.2 Analysis of Violacein Production in Engineered Bacteria Diagram

Results

(1) Biomass Dynamics

The dry cell weight (DCW) increased slowly within the first 8 hours (from 0.05 g/L to 0.12 g/L), indicating an adaptation phase and early exponential growth phase. After 12 hours, the culture entered a rapid growth phase, reaching 0.85 g/L at 24 hours and peaking at 1.1–1.2 g/L during 36–48 hours. The biomass stabilized after 60 hours.

(2) Violacein Production Changes

Violacein production was low in the initial phase (1–8 h), ranging from 0.02 to 0.05 mg/L. As the biomass increased rapidly, violacein production rose significantly between 12 and 24 hours, reaching 0.17 mg/L at 24 hours. It continued to increase to approximately 0.23–0.25 mg/L during 36–48 hours and remained at a plateau (around 0.24 mg/L) at 60 hours, closely aligning with the trend of biomass changes.

(3) Synchronization of Product and Biomass

The calculation of violacein/DCW revealed that violacein synthesis increased synchronously with biomass growth throughout the fermentation process, with the highest specific productivity (around 0.20 mg/g) observed during 24–36 hours. This synchronization indicates that violacein expression is directly coupled with the growth of the engineered bacteria, with no significant lag, demonstrating efficient synthesis of the reporter gene and good compatibility with host metabolism.

2.2 Analysis of Violacein Production in Engineered Bacteria Diagram

Figure 16 Expression of vioABCDE driven by the J23100 promoter and B0034 RBS in BL21 using the pSB1A3 vector. DCW: dry cell weight. The medium used was M9 complete medium supplemented with glucose.

Discussion

Violacein, as a reporter gene, demonstrates high efficiency, synchronization, and visualizability, making it suitable for real-time detection and result presentation in VOC response systems. This study provides a solid experimental foundation for subsequent system integration.

2.3 Glycerol Enhancement of Violacein Production

Objective

As the final visual output signal in the VOC response system, the yield of violacein directly affects signal visibility and detection sensitivity. Carbon source composition plays a critical role in metabolic flux distribution and the synthesis of secondary metabolites. To further improve violacein production, this experiment compared the synthesis of violacein in engineered bacteria cultured in M9 minimal medium supplemented with either 5% glucose or 5% glycerol as the primary carbon source. By analyzing the impact of different carbon sources on violacein yield, the most suitable carbon source supplementation strategy was identified to provide a more efficient and intuitive signal output for subsequent VOC response systems.

Methods

(1) Cultural Conditions

The engineered strain containing the violacein synthesis gene cluster (vioABCDE) was used as the experimental subject. Two culture systems were established:

① 5% glucose group;

② 5% glycerol group.

All cultures were incubated at 37°C with shaking at 220 rpm, with a culture volume of 50 mL.

(2) Violacein Extraction and Quantification

Samples were collected after 24 hours of cultivation. Violacein was extracted from both cells and culture supernatant using the previously established ethanol extraction method:

  • Cell fraction: Cells were collected by centrifugation, and intracellular violacein was released by adding anhydrous ethanol followed by ultrasonic disruption.
  • Supernatant fraction: Culture supernatant was directly mixed with an equal volume of anhydrous ethanol for extraction.The combined extracts were measured for absorbance at 575 nm using a spectrophotometer, and violacein concentration was calculated based on a standard curve.

(3) Data Processing

The methodology for data processing was consistent with the violacein quantification described in Section 2.3. All experiments were performed in triplicate, with mean values taken as final results and subjected to statistical significance analysis.

Results

The experimental results demonstrated that different carbon sources significantly influenced violacein synthesis (Table 2, Figure 3). Under 5% glucose cultivation, violacein production ranged from 0.132 to 0.162 mg/L, with an average of 0.146 mg/L. In contrast, under 5% glycerol cultivation, violacein production significantly increased, ranging from 0.245 to 0.323 mg/L, with an average of 0.281 mg/L—approximately 1.9 times higher than under glucose conditions.

2.3 Glycerol Enhancement of Violacein Production Diagram

Figure 17 Comparison of violacein content in BL21-Pj23100-RB0034-VioABCDE after 24 hours of cultivation with different carbon sources.

Discussion

Supplementation with 5% glycerol significantly enhanced violacein production in the engineered bacteria, achieving nearly a 2-fold increase compared to the 5% glucose group, while also improving the stability and intuitiveness of the visual output. Therefore, glycerol is a more suitable carbon source choice for the subsequent construction of VOC-responsive sensing systems.

2.4 Analysis of VOC Response by PgrpE-VioABCDE Reporter Strain

Objective

This experiment aimed to verify whether the PgrpE promoter can drive the expression of the vioABCDE violacein synthesis pathway upon detecting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released during strawberry spoilage, thereby producing visible color changes. By integrating PgrpE with the vioABCDE pathway to construct a complete reporter system, we sought to transform invisible spoilage signals into a visual purple output. This approach aims to provide an instrument-free, low-cost, and real-time method for monitoring strawberry spoilage during cold chain transportation and storage.

Methods

(1) Strain Construction and Cultivation

The composite part PgrpE-vioABCDE was constructed by combining the validated PgrpE promoter with a standard strong ribosome binding site (RBS, BBa_B0034) and the violacein biosynthetic gene cluster (vioABCDE). This construct was cloned into the high-copy-number plasmid pSB1A3.

The recombinant plasmid was subsequently transformed into Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells. Transformed strains were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) liquid medium supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm.

(2) VOC Preparation and Treatment

To simulate volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released during early strawberry spoilage, a mixture of three major spoilage-related compounds - phenylethyl alcohol, 1-octanol, and 1-octen-3-ol - was prepared in a 6:1:1 ratio, reflecting the actual volatile profile during spoilage processes.

In experimental setups, different volumes of the VOC mixture (10 μL, 20 μL, 50 μL, and 100 μL) were added to a 96-well plate, followed by inoculation with 90 μL of bacterial culture at the mid-logarithmic growth phase (OD₆₀₀ ≈ 0.6). Each concentration was tested with three biological replicates.

(3) Sampling and Analysis

Samples were collected at 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24-hour time points. Violacein was extracted using ethanol extraction followed by ultrasonic cell disruption.

Absorbance was measured at 570 nm, and violacein concentrations were determined using a pre-established standard calibration curve.

Control experiments were performed using bacterial cultures grown under identical conditions without VOC exposure.

2.4 Analysis of VOC Response by PgrpE-VioABCDE Reporter Strain Diagram

Figure 18. Experimental workflow of the PgrpE-VioABCDE reporter strain

Results

2.4 Analysis of VOC Response by PgrpE-VioABCDE Reporter Strain Diagram

Figure 19. Response of PgrpE-VioABCDE reporter strain to VOCs.(A) Effect of different VOC concentrations on violacein production;(B) Visual observation of violacein accumulation under different VOC concentrations

Experimental results demonstrated that the PgrpE-vioABCDE reporter strain produced significant violacein accumulation upon VOC detection, with yields showing positive correlation with both VOC concentration and exposure duration (Figure19-A).

Post-incubation, cultures exposed to 100 μL VOCs exhibited deep purple coloration, the 50 μL group showed moderate purple, while the 10 μL and 20 μL groups displayed light purple coloration. Control groups remained colorless (Figure B). These findings validate the PgrpE reporter system as an effective visual detection platform for spoilage signals.

Discussion

This study systematically validates the application feasibility of the PgrpE promoter coupled with the violacein biosynthetic pathway (vioABCDE) for early detection of strawberry spoilage:

  • Sensitivity: The PgrpE promoter detected spoilage signals at VOC concentrations as low as 10 μL and effectively drove vioABCDE expression, demonstrating detection capability during initial spoilage stages.
  • Dose and Time Dependency: Violacein production increased proportionally with higher VOC concentrations and extended exposure times, following characteristic dose-response kinetics. This indicates that PgrpE activation levels directly correlate with environmental spoilage signal intensity, enabling spoilage progression assessment.
  • Visualization Advantage: The colorimetric output enables direct naked-eye detection without requiring sophisticated instrumentation, making it particularly suitable for resource-limited scenarios including cold chain logistics and storage facilities.
  • Application Prospects: Considering current strawberry supply chain requirements, this reporter system shows potential for embedded packaging sensors and real-time transport container monitoring. The platform could be extended to monitor spoilage in other fruits such as blueberries and raspberries. Future developments could involve violacein pathway engineering or alternative output genes to achieve multiplexed color outputs or enhanced detection sensitivity.

In summary, the PgrpE-vioABCDE reporter strain successfully converts spoilage-associated VOC signals into visible colorimetric outputs, providing a cost-effective and user-friendly synthetic biology platform for fruit spoilage monitoring. This work establishes a foundation for developing advanced VOC-based food safety detection technologies.

III. Construction and Validation of the Antifungal System

Throughout the post-harvest supply chain—including transportation and storage—strawberries are highly susceptible to fungal infections. Fungal metabolic activities can lead to rapid spoilage, resulting in significant economic losses. The VOC detection module developed in the earlier phase of this study enables real-time monitoring of spoilage-related volatile organic compounds (VOCs), providing early warning and risk indication. While this module successfully detects spoilage, feedback from Human Practices (HP) interviews revealed that detection alone does not fundamentally reduce spoilage rates or economic losses. Without intervention measures, early warning alone may still lead to fruit decay and waste.

To address this limitation, this study further designed an independent antifungal strategy as a supplement to the detection module:

After harvesting and before transportation or cold-chain storage, strawberry surfaces are treated by spraying two hydrolytic enzymes that degrade fungal cell walls—chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase.

The main structural components of fungal cell walls are chitin and β-1,3-glucan, which collectively maintain cell wall integrity and function.

  • Chitinase cleaves chitin molecules, leading to the loosening and disintegration of the cell wall framework.
  • β-1,3-Glucanase degrades β-1,3-glucan, disrupting the supportive network of the cell wall.

Through synergistic action, these two enzymes target and break down the core structure of the fungal cell wall at the molecular level, causing destabilization and functional failure. This ultimately inhibits fungal growth and may lead to cell death.

By applying these enzymes before transportation, a protective barrier can be established on the strawberry surface, effectively suppressing fungal infection. This approach reduces the spoilage rate of strawberries during transit and storage, thereby mitigating economic losses caused by fungal decay.

3.1 Expression Validation of Chitinase and Glucanase

Experimental Objective

This section aims to construct expression systems for chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase, and validate the molecular weights of both enzymes against theoretical values through SDS-PAGE analysis. This ensures the correctness and reliability of the expressed products, while providing high-purity enzyme sources for subsequent antifungal activity assays and strawberry spray validation, thereby establishing a foundation for strawberry spoilage prevention experiments.

Experimental Methods

1. Construction of Antifungal Enzyme Expression Plasmids

To establish the antifungal enzyme expression system, this study selected two target genes capable of degrading major fungal cell wall components: chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase.

  • The chitinase gene is approximately 1.2 kb in length, encoding a theoretical protein molecular weight of 44.6 kDa
  • The β-1,3-glucanase gene spans approximately 1.0 kb, with a theoretical protein molecular weight of 42 kDa

To enhance their expression levels in E. coli, both genes underwent codon optimization for E. coli and were fused with a 6×His-tag at the 5′ terminus to facilitate subsequent protein purification via Ni-NTA affinity chromatography.

The optimized gene fragments were cloned into the pET28a(+) vector using NcoI and XhoI restriction enzyme sites, generating two recombinant plasmids:

  • pET28a-Chitinase: for chitinase expression
  • pET28a-Glucanase: for β-1,3-glucanase expression

The pET28a(+) vector contains a T7 promoter that enables high-level transcription in the host strain E. coli BL21(DE3).

  • In BL21(DE3), the T7 RNA polymerase gene is controlled by the lacUV5 promoter and remains repressed under normal conditions
  • The lacI repressor binds to the lacUV5 promoter, preventing T7 RNA polymerase transcription
  • Upon addition of IPTG (isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside), IPTG mimics lactose and binds to lacI, causing its dissociation from the lacUV5 promoter and lifting repression
  • The derepressed lacUV5 promoter then drives T7 RNA polymerase expression, which subsequently binds to the T7 promoter on the plasmid, strongly activating downstream target gene transcription and enabling high-level protein expression

Following plasmid construction, double restriction enzyme digestion and Sanger sequencing were performed to verify correct gene insertion and sequence integrity.


3.1 Expression Validation of Chitinase and Glucanase Diagram

Figure 17. Construction of pET28a-Chitinase vector


3.1 Expression Validation of Chitinase and Glucanase Diagram

Figure 18. Construction of pET28a-Glucanase vector

2. Transformation and Positive Clone Screening

Recombinant plasmids were introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3) competent cells via chemical transformation.

  • The transformation mixture was spread on LB plates containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin and incubated at 37°C overnight
  • Single colonies were picked the next day for colony PCR verification
  • After confirming positive clones, glycerol stocks (25% glycerol) were prepared and stored long-term at -80°C

3. Protein Expression and IPTG Induction

Pre-culture

  • Verified positive clones were inoculated into 10 mL LB liquid medium containing kanamycin (50 μg/mL)
  • Cultures were shaken at 37°C, 220 rpm overnight

Main Culture and Induction

  • Overnight cultures were transferred to 50 mL fresh LB medium (with kanamycin) at 1% inoculation ratio
  • Cultures were grown until OD₆₀₀ = 0.6–0.8 (logarithmic growth phase)
  • IPTG was added to a final concentration of 1 mM for induction, while the temperature was reduced to 30°C to promote soluble protein expression
  • Induction continued for 12 hours before cell harvest

4. Protein Extraction and Purification

Cell Harvest and Resuspension

  • After IPTG induction, cells were collected by centrifugation at 8000 g for 10 min
  • Supernatant was discarded, and cell pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 500 mM NaCl)

Ultrasonic Disruption

  • Resuspended cells were placed on ice and disrupted by ultrasonication: 3 sec ON / 5 sec OFF, for 15 min total

Supernatant Collection

  • Lysates were centrifuged at 12000 g for 15 min, and supernatants were collected as crude protein extracts

Ni-NTA Affinity Purification

  • Supernatants were loaded onto Ni-NTA affinity columns, utilizing His-tag binding to nickel ions for target protein capture
  • Target proteins were eluted using an imidazole concentration gradient:
  • 20 mM: Remove non-specifically bound proteins
  • 50 mM: Remove weakly bound contaminating proteins
  • 200 mM: Elute target proteins
  • Elution fractions were collected for subsequent SDS-PAGE analysis

5.SDS-PAGE Electrophoresis Analysis Gel Formulation

  • Separating Gel (12%):
  • 30% acrylamide: 4.0 mL
  • Tris-HCl (pH 8.8): 2.5 mL
  • 10% SDS: 0.1 mL
  • ddH₂O: 3.4 mL
  • 10% APS: 100 μL
  • TEMED: 10 μL
  • Stacking Gel (5%):
  • 30% acrylamide: 1.3 mL
  • Tris-HCl (pH 6.8): 2.5 mL
  • 10% SDS: 0.1 mL
  • ddH₂O: 6.0 mL
  • 10% APS: 50 μL
  • TEMED: 5 μL

Sample Preparation and Loading

  • 20 μL of protein solution was mixed with SDS loading buffer and denatured by heating in a 95°C water bath for 5 min.
  • Prepared samples and molecular weight standard proteins were loaded simultaneously.

Electrophoresis and Staining

  • Electrophoresis was performed at 120 V until the bromophenol blue front reached the bottom of the gel.
  • After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 for 1 hour.
  • Destaining was performed using a methanol/acetic acid destaining solution until the background was clear and target bands were visible.

Protein Size Verification

By comparing the positions of target bands with the molecular weight standard, the molecular weights of the expressed proteins were confirmed to match theoretical values:

  • Chitinase: ~44.6 kDa
  • β-1,3-Glucanase: ~42 kDa
3.1 Expression Validation of Chitinase and Glucanase Diagram

Figure 19. Protein purification workflow

Experimental Results

SDS-PAGE results are shown in Figure 20: After induction, a single clear band for RmChi44 chitinase appeared at 46.66 kDa, consistent with its theoretical molecular weight.

MoGluB β-1,3-glucanase showed the expected band at 45.57 kDa, with good expression levels.

These results indicate that both target proteins were efficiently and solubly expressed in BL21(DE3) and could be purified via His-tag binding to Ni-NTA.

3.1 Expression Validation of Chitinase and Glucanase Diagram

Figure 20. SDS-PAGE of RmChi44 and MoGluB expressed in E. coli.(Lane M: Protein Marker;Lane 1: RmChi44 purified via Ni-NTA column;Lane 2: MoGluB purified via Ni-NTA column)

Discussion

This experiment successfully established prokaryotic expression systems for chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase, with SDS-PAGE confirming correct expression. These enzymes target chitin and β-1,3-glucan in fungal cell walls, respectively, and can synergistically degrade fungal cell wall structures, theoretically exhibiting significant antifungal and bactericidal effects.

The band results demonstrate that both enzymes can be highly expressed in soluble form in E. coli, indicating that the vector design and expression conditions are appropriate. This provides a reliable enzyme source for subsequent fungal inhibition assays and strawberry spoilage model experiments.

3.2 Functional Validation of Chitinase and Glucanase Expression

Objezctive

This experiment aims to validate the in vitro broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity of purified chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase. Using the model fungus Saccharomyces cerevisiae as the target, the inhibitory effects of individual enzymes and their combination on fungal growth are evaluated. Since chitin and β-1,3-glucan are core structural components of the cell walls in most fungi (including strawberry spoilage pathogens such as Botrytis cinerea, Rhizopus spp., and Penicillium spp.), this study provides critical functional evidence for the subsequent application of these enzymes on strawberry surfaces to broadly prevent postharvest spoilage caused by various fungi.

Methods

Strains and Enzyme Preparations:

  • Target strain: Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741. Yeast was selected as the target organism because the main components of its cell wall (chitin and β-1,3-glucan) are highly similar to those of the primary pathogenic fungi responsible for postharvest strawberry spoilage. Furthermore, it is safe to handle, does not produce aerial spores, and is suitable for antimicrobial validation in a laboratory environment.
  • Enzyme preparations: The purified RmChi44 chitinase (~44.6 kDa) and MoGluB β-1,3-glucanase (~42 kDa) obtained via Ni-NTA affinity chromatography in section 3.1 were used. The enzyme solutions were exchanged into PBS buffer (pH 6.0), and their concentrations were determined using the BCA method and standardized to 1 mg/mL.

Yeast Suspension Preparation:

  • A single yeast colony was inoculated into YPD liquid medium and cultured overnight at 30°C with shaking at 200 rpm.
  • Culture from the logarithmic growth phase was taken and subjected to serial gradient dilution with sterile PBS (pH 6.0). The final concentration was adjusted to approximately 1×10⁶ CFU/mL for subsequent use.

Antimicrobial Assay Procedure:

  • 100 µL of the aforementioned yeast suspension was thoroughly mixed with 100 µL of enzyme solution from different treatment groups in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube, resulting in a final volume of 200 µL per reaction. The following five experimental groups were set up:
  • Group 1: Wild-type Control: 200 µL sterile PBS buffer (pH 6.0), without yeast suspension, used to confirm the absence of contamination from the medium and aseptic techniques.
  • Group 2: Negative Control: 100 µL yeast suspension + 100 µL of a mixed enzyme solution that had been heat-inactivated by treatment at 95°C for 15 minutes.
  • Group 3: Chitinase Group: 100 µL yeast suspension + 100 µL chitinase solution (final concentration 0.5 mg/mL).
  • Group 4: Glucanase Group: 100 µL yeast suspension + 100 µL glucanase solution (final concentration 0.5 mg/mL).
  • Group 5: Combination Group: 100 µL yeast suspension + 50 µL chitinase solution + 50 µL glucanase solution (final concentration of each enzyme 0.25 mg/mL, total enzyme concentration 0.5 mg/mL).
  • All mixed systems were gently incubated in a shaker at 30°C for 2 hours.
  • After incubation, the reaction mixture from each group was subjected to 10-fold serial dilution (10⁻¹, 10⁻², 10⁻³) with PBS.
  • 100 µL from each dilution was spread onto YPD solid agar plates. Three parallel replicates were performed for each dilution.
  • The plates were inverted and incubated in a constant temperature incubator at 30°C for 36-48 hours.

Data Collection and Analysis

Colonies grown on agar plates were counted to determine the number of colony-forming units per milliliter of the original suspension (CFU/mL).The CFU/mL value of the negative control group (heat-inactivated enzyme treatment) was designated as representing 100% survival, and the relative survival rate (%) of each treatment group was calculated accordingly. All experimental data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (Mean ± SD) of three independent biological replicates. Statistical significance among groups was assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

3.2 Functional Validation of Chitinase and Glucanase Expression Diagram

Figure 21. Workflow for the expression and functional verification of chitinase and glucanase.

Results

Quantitative results of the antifungal assays clearly demonstrated the inhibitory effects of chitinase, glucanase, and their combination against Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Figure 22, Table 1).

In the negative control group (Group 2, heat-inactivated enzymes), the yeast colony count was 7 × 10⁷ CFU/mL, which was set as the baseline survival rate (100%). This confirmed that the non-enzymatic components of the preparation had no effect on yeast growth.

Treatment with chitinase alone (Group 3) reduced the viable cell count to 1 × 10⁷ CFU/mL, corresponding to a relative survival rate of 14.3%, indicating that chitinase alone effectively degraded the fungal cell wall and inhibited cell viability.

The glucanase-treated group (Group 4) exhibited even stronger antifungal activity, with the colony number reduced to 3 × 10⁶ CFU/mL and a relative survival rate of 4.3%.

The combined enzyme treatment (Group 5) produced the most pronounced inhibitory effect, decreasing the viable count to 1.4 × 10⁶ CFU/mL and yielding a relative survival rate of only 2.0%.

This inhibition was significantly greater than that observed with either single-enzyme treatment (p < 0.001), revealing a strong synergistic antifungal effect between chitinase and glucanase.

3.2 Functional Validation of Chitinase and Glucanase Expression Diagram

Figure 22. Synergistic inhibition of S. cerevisiae by the combined action of chitinase and glucanase.

3.2 Functional Validation of Chitinase and Glucanase Expression Diagram

Table 1. Fungistatic activity of chitinase and glucanase against S. cerevisiae.

Note: CFU = colony-forming unit. Relative survival rates were calculated based on the viable count of Group 2. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA; ### p < 0.001 vs. Group 2.

Discussion

Through rigorous quantitative analysis, this study successfully verified the effectiveness of the enzyme formulation developed in this project.

Efficacy validation:

The data clearly demonstrated that both purified enzymes possess strong in vitro antifungal activity, effectively degrading the cell wall of the model yeast and leading to a dramatic decrease in its survival rate. This provides direct evidence that functional proteins were successfully expressed and purified in Escherichia coli.

Synergistic effect:

The performance of the dual-enzyme combination was particularly remarkable. Its antifungal activity was not merely additive but exhibited a clear synergistic effect (1 + 1 > 2). This finding indicates that our strategy—simultaneously targeting two key structural components of fungal cell walls (chitin and β-1,3-glucan)—achieves a more thorough and efficient disruption of cell wall integrity. Such a design represents a highly effective and rational engineering approach.

Application potential:

Given the similarity in cell wall composition between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and pathogenic fungi that infect strawberries, these results strongly support the development of this enzyme mixture as a broad-spectrum and efficient biological preservative. Its application in postharvest strawberry treatment is expected to markedly suppress fungal infection and reduce spoilage losses.

Moreover, this response module seamlessly integrates with the previously developed VOC-sensing and violacein-based reporting modules, together forming a complete synthetic biology system that encompasses sensing, reporting, and responding. This integrated design perfectly embodies the engineering-driven spirit of iGEM—using synthetic biology to provide practical, real-world solutions.

Conclusion

In the sensing module, screening of four VOC-responsive promoters (PsoxS, PlasI, PrecA, and PgrpE) revealed that the PgrpE promoter exhibited the highest induction fold and signal stability in response to multiple spoilage-associated VOCs (1-octanol, phenylethyl alcohol, and 1-octen-3-ol), making it the core sensing element for subsequent system construction.

In the reporting module, the combination of PgrpE with the vioABCDE chromogenic gene cluster successfully achieved a visual conversion of spoilage signals. Experimental results demonstrated that this system could generate a significant color change even at very low VOC concentrations, with color intensity positively correlated with both VOC concentration and exposure time—indicating a highly sensitive and intuitive detection capability.

In the response module, two antifungal proteins—chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase—were successfully constructed and expressed. SDS–PAGE analysis confirmed that their molecular weights matched theoretical values, and functional validation further demonstrated a significant synergistic antifungal effect of the enzyme combination, reducing fungal (S. cerevisiae) survival to below 2%.

Overall, the three modules form a functional synthetic biology loop that progresses from spoilage signal recognition (Sensing) to visual spoilage reporting (Reporting) and finally to fungal inhibition and prevention (Responding).

This integrated system provides a feasible technological framework for real-time detection and prevention of postharvest spoilage in agricultural products. Beyond strawberries, it also lays the foundation for future applications in food safety monitoring and the development of intelligent packaging systems.