Loading...

Engineering Success

Our project, "ProBabyotics," is founded on a systematic and iterative engineering strategy. We aimed to develop a modular platform to enhance infant nutrition by producing three key functional biomolecules: the human milk oligosaccharide 2'-fucosyllactose (2'-FL) for immune support, the protease trypsin for improved protein digestibility, and the enzyme β-galactosidase to combat lactose intolerance.

We rigorously applied the Design-Build-Test-Learn (DBTL) cycle to tackle the challenges inherent in each module. For our most complex system, the de novo biosynthesis of 2'-FL, we executed a four-stage engineering cycle that progressively identified and solved key bottlenecks. This iterative process, which involved pathway completion, chassis optimization, and targeted protein engineering, resulted in a more than 34-fold increase in final product titer, from an initial 8.10 mg/L to a final 279.47 mg/L. For our other two modules, we successfully demonstrated complete "gene-to-function" pipelines, validating the expression and high catalytic activity of our engineered enzymes.

Engineering Success Diagram - Overview
Click for detailed version
Engineering Success Diagram - Detailed

Figure 1: Abstract figure for the three DBTL systems


This page documents our engineering journey, demonstrating how each DBTL cycle provided critical data and insights that informed the design of the subsequent iteration, leading to a robust and successful outcome for all three project goals.


System 1: De Novo Biosynthesis of 2'-Fucosyllactose (2'-FL)

Our primary engineering goal was to create a highly efficient microbial cell factory for the low-cost production of 2'-FL. We achieved this through a four-part DBTL cycle.

Cycle 1.1: Proof-of-Concept with a Minimal Pathway (manB+manC)

Design

Our initial design was to establish a proof-of-concept for the 2'-FL biosynthetic pathway. We hypothesized that the first two enzymes, phosphomannomutase (manB) and mannose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferase (manC), would be sufficient to initiate the synthesis of 2'-FL by converting endogenous precursors and exogenous lactose(Li et al., 2018). We designed a minimal genetic circuit containing the manB and manC genes, cloned into a pET28a vector under the control of an inducible T7 promoter.


Cycle 1.1: Proof-of-Concept with a Minimal Pathway (<em>manB+manC</em>) Diagram

Figure 2: Construction of BL21-manB+manC. (A) The plasmid map of pET28a-manB+manC. (B) The gene circuit of BL21-manB+manC.


Build

The manB and manC genes were synthesized and cloned into the pET28a vector. The resulting plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3). Successful construction of the recombinant plasmid was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis, which showed a distinct band at the expected size of 1947 bp(Figure 3).


Cycle 1.1: Proof-of-Concept with a Minimal Pathway (<em>manB+manC</em>) Diagram

Figure 3: (A)Flow chart of bacterial culture; (B)the agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of the manB+manC gene fragment

Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis confirming the successful cloning of the manB+manC gene fragment (1947 bp).


Test

The engineered BL21-manB+manC strain was cultured in M9 minimal medium with glycerol and yeast extract. Production was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG and 8 g/L lactose. After 72 hours of fermentation, the 2'-FL concentration in the supernatant was quantified using a commercial detection kit. The engineered strain was compared against control strains (wild-type BL21 and BL21 with an empty pET28a vector)(Figure 4, A).


Cycle 1.1: Proof-of-Concept with a Minimal Pathway (<em>manB+manC</em>) Diagram

Figure 4: Comparison of 2'-FL yield in BL21-manB+manC after 72-hour fermentation


The BL21-manB+manC strain produced 8.10 ± 1.03 mg/L, while control strains showed negligible production(Figure 4, B).


Learn

The results provided a crucial proof-of-concept. The co-expression of manB and manC was sufficient to initiate 2'-FL synthesis. However, the modest yield strongly indicated that the downstream steps—the synthesis of the GDP-L-fucose donor and the final fucosylation reaction—were the primary metabolic bottleneck(Byun et al., 2006). This learning directly informed our next design iteration: to construct the complete synthesis pathway.


Cycle 1.2: Pathway Completion and Full Pathway Validation

Design

Based on the learnings from Cycle 1.1, we designed a complete de novo synthesis pathway. We hypothesized that adding the three downstream genes—GDP-D-mannose-4,6-dehydratase (gmd), GDP-L-fucose synthase (fcl), and α-1,2-fucosyltransferase (futC)—would overcome the previously identified bottleneck and significantly increase the 2'-FL yield(Bonin

et al., 1997). The new composite part (Part: BBa_25DDSHWK) integrates all five genes into a single operon under the control of the T7 promoter(Figure 5).


Cycle 1.2: Pathway Completion and Full Pathway Validation Diagram

Figure 5: Construction of BL21-manB+manC+gmd+fcl+futC. (A) The plasmid map of pET28a-manB+manC+gmd+fcl+futC (B) The gene circuit of BL21-manB+manC+gmd+fcl+futC.


Build

The gmd, fcl, and futC genes were sequentially cloned into the pET28a-manB+manC plasmid, creating the final five-gene construct. The plasmid was then transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3). The successful integration of the new gene fragments was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis, which showed distinct bands at the expected sizes for gmd (1119 bp), fcl (963 bp), and futC(1095 bp)(Figure 6).


Cycle 1.2: Pathway Completion and Full Pathway Validation Diagram

Figure 6: (A)Flow chart of bacterial culture; (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis confirming the successful cloning of the gmd, fcl, and futC gene fragments.


Test

With the full pathway constructed, we conducted a comprehensive series of tests to quantify yield, verify product identity, and understand the system's dynamics.

Yield Enhancement: We first performed a comparative fermentation experiment under the same conditions as Cycle 1.1. The new five-gene strain (BL21-manB+manC+gmd+fcl+futC) showed a final yield of 19.66 ± 2.62 mg/L, a significant 2.4-fold increase over the 8.11 ± 1.04 mg/L produced by the initial two-gene strain. This confirmed that completing the pathway dramatically boosted production(Figure 6).


Cycle 1.2: Pathway Completion and Full Pathway Validation Diagram

Figure 6: (A)Flow chart of 2'-FL content assay; (B)Yield comparison of 2 '-fucosyllactose after 72 hours of fermentation of BL21 recombinant strain


The strain with the complete pathway (BL21-manB+manC+gmd+fcl+futC) produced significantly more 2'-FL than the initial strain (BL21-manB+manC) and controls(Figure 6).


Product Identity Verification by HPLC: To unambiguously confirm that our engineered strain was producing the correct molecule, we analyzed the fermentation broth using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). The chromatogram revealed a prominent peak at a retention time of 4.25 minutes, which perfectly matched the retention time of a pure 2'-FL analytical standard run under identical conditions. This result provided definitive evidence that our system was successfully synthesizing 2'-FL(Figure 7).


Cycle 1.2: Pathway Completion and Full Pathway Validation Diagram

Figure 7: (A)Mechanism of HPLC; (B)HPLC analysis of fermentation products of BL21.


Fermentation Dynamics: To understand the relationship between substrate consumption and product formation, we conducted a 72-hour dynamic fermentation study. We monitored cell growth (Dry Cell Weight), lactose concentration, and 2'-FL concentration over time. The results showed a clear inverse correlation: as the cells grew, the lactose concentration in the medium steadily decreased, while the concentration of 2'-FL consistently increased. This confirmed that our engineered pathway was actively converting the lactose substrate into the target product(Figure 8).


Cycle 1.2: Pathway Completion and Full Pathway Validation Diagram

Figure 8: (A)(B)(C)Experimental Flowchart; (D) Changes in 2'-FL yield, Lactose Content, and Cell Dry Weight Over Time in BL21-manB+manC+gmd+fcl+futC.


Learn

This round of experiments successfully transformed our proof-of-concept into a fully functional and validated production pathway. We gained three critical insights:

Pathway completion is essential: The 2.4-fold yield increase proved that the downstream enzymes were a primary bottleneck.

The product is authentic: HPLC analysis provided definitive confirmation that our system was producing genuine 2'-FL, validating all our quantitative measurements.

The system functions as designed: The dynamic fermentation data showed a clear link between lactose consumption and 2'-FL production.

With the product identity confirmed and its synthesis from lactose established, our analysis shifted towards metabolic efficiency. The dynamic fermentation data showed continuous lactose consumption, prompting the question: was all the lactose being used for 2'-FL synthesis? We hypothesized that a significant portion was being diverted by the host's native metabolic pathways. This led us to identify the lacZ gene in the E. coli BL21 chassis as a prime suspect for creating a competitive pathway that hydrolyzes our key substrate. This insight directly informed our next design cycle: to optimize the host chassis by eliminating this substrate competition.


Cycle 1.3: Chassis Optimization to Eliminate Substrate Competition

Design

In analyzing the metabolism of our E. coli BL21(DE3) chassis, we identified a critical flaw: the native β-galactosidase enzyme, encoded by the lacZ gene, directly competes for our lactose substrate by hydrolyzing it into glucose and galactose(chin et al., 2021). We hypothesized that this substrate competition was a major bottleneck. To test this, we designed an experiment to compare our system's performance in BL21 versus E. coli DH5α, a common lab strain that is naturally lacZ-deficient(Figure 9).


Cycle 1.3: Chassis Optimization to Eliminate Substrate Competition Diagram

Figure 9: Methods for Exploring the effect of two different strains(BL21/DH5α) on 2'FL yield. (A)Experimental Methods; (B)Experimental Flowchart


Build

The pET28a-manB+manC-gmd-fcl-futC plasmid containing our complete five-gene operon was transformed into chemically competent E. coli DH5α cells, creating a new engineered strain for a direct head-to-head comparison.

Test

We conducted a comparative fermentation experiment, culturing both the DH5α-based strain and the original BL21-based strain under identical conditions. After 72 hours, the final 2'-FL concentration was quantified.

Cycle 1.3: Chassis Optimization to Eliminate Substrate Competition Diagram

Figure 10: Comparison of 2'-FL production in BL21 vs. DH5α chassis.


The lacZ-deficient DH5α strain produced 158.26 ± 21.67 mg/L, a ~19-fold improvement over the 8.23 ± 1.86 mg/L from the BL21 strain(Figure 10).


Learn

The dramatic ~19-fold increase in yield powerfully validated our hypothesis. Substrate competition from the native lacZ gene was a major limiting factor. By simply switching to a more suitable chassis, we successfully redirected metabolic flux towards our product. This critical learning established DH5α as our optimized chassis for all subsequent work and highlighted the importance of host selection in metabolic engineering.


Cycle 1.4: Enhancing Key Enzyme Solubility with a Fusion Tag

Design

Having optimized the chassis, we focused on the final rate-limiting enzyme, futC, which is of human origin. We hypothesized that its heterologous expression in E. coli led to poor solubility and misfolding, limiting the amount of active enzyme(Du et al., 2021). To solve this, we designed a new construct where a Thioredoxin A (TrxA) solubility-enhancing tag was fused to the N-terminus of futC(Figure 11).


Cycle 1.4: Enhancing Key Enzyme Solubility with a Fusion Tag Diagram

Figure 11: Methods for the effect of TrxA tag fusion futC on 2 '-fucosyllactose yield. (A)Experimental Methods; (B)Experimental Flowchart; (C) The gene circuit of DH5α-manB+manC+gmd+fcl+TrxA-futC.


Build

Using standard molecular cloning, we replaced the original futC gene in our plasmid with the newly designed TrxA-futC fusion gene. The resulting plasmid was transformed into our optimized E. coli DH5α chassis.

Test

A comparative fermentation was conducted between the DH5α strain expressing the untagged futC and the new strain expressing the TrxA-futC fusion. Final 2'-FL yields were measured after 72 hours.

Cycle 1.4: Enhancing Key Enzyme Solubility with a Fusion Tag Diagram

Figure 12: Comparison of 2'-FL production with and without the TrxA fusion tag.


The TrxA-futC strain yielded 279.47 ± 22.09 mg/L, a 56% increase over the untagged version (179.27 ± 11.58 mg/L)(Figure 12).


Learn

The significant 56% increase in yield conclusively demonstrated that the solubility of the futC enzyme was indeed a major bottleneck. Our protein engineering strategy was successful. This final optimization completed our DBTL cycle for the 2'-FL module, resulting in a robust, high-yielding production strain and a clear, logical engineering workflow.


System 2: Production of Functional Recombinant Trypsin

This system involved a complete "gene-to-function" engineering cycle to produce an active protease for improving protein digestion.

Design

Our goal was to produce active trypsin. To avoid the toxicity of an active protease to the host cell, we designed a system to express its inactive precursor (Choi & Lee et al., 2004), trypsinogen (Part: BBa_25FE8YUB, TRYP). The porcine TRYP gene was codon-optimized for E. coli and cloned into a pET-28a vector for IPTG-inducible expression in the BL21(DE3) host(Figure 13).


System 2: Production of Functional Recombinant Trypsin Diagram

Figure 13: Construction of BL21-TRYP. (A) The plasmid map of pET28a-TRYP; (B) The gene circuit of BL21-TRYP; (C) The flow chart of Construction of BL21-TRYP; (D)the agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of the TRYP gene fragment


Build

The pET-28a-TRYP vector was successfully constructed and transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3). High-level expression resulted in the formation of insoluble inclusion bodies. We therefore developed and optimized a multi-step downstream process(Figure 14):

Inclusion Body Isolation: Cells were lysed, and insoluble protein aggregates were collected by centrifugation.

Denaturation & Refolding: Inclusion bodies were solubilized in 8M urea and then refolded by rapid dilution into a redox buffer containing a cystine/cysteine pair to facilitate correct disulfide bond formation (Burgess et al., 2009).

Autocatalytic Activation: The refolded, inactive trypsinogen was transferred to an activation buffer where it autocatalytically cleaved its propeptide to become fully active trypsin.


System 2: Production of Functional Recombinant Trypsin Diagram

Figure 14: This is a flow chart of "Trypsin Expression and Refolding".


Test

We validated our system at both the protein and functional levels.

Protein Expression: Western Blot analysis confirmed the successful expression of the His-tagged TRYP protein at its expected molecular weight of ~26 kDa(Figure 15).


System 2: Production of Functional Recombinant Trypsin Diagram

Figure 15: (A)The flow chart of Western Blot; (B)SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant TRYP overexpression in E. coli


Enzymatic Activity: We performed a functional assay using the substrate N-Benzoyl-L-Arginine-Ethylester (BAEE). The absorbance change at 253 nm was measured to quantify activity(Figure 16). Enzymatic activity of the constructed engineered strain was determined to be 1748 U/mg.

System 2: Production of Functional Recombinant Trypsin Diagram

Figure 16: (A)The flow chart of "Trypsin Activity Assay"; (B)Comparison of BAEE cleavage activity of intracellular proteins between BL21 (DE3) and TRYP-overexpressing strains


Learn

The results provided a powerful demonstration of a complete gene-to-function workflow. We successfully expressed the target gene, established an effective protocol to recover active protein from inclusion bodies, and confirmed the high catalytic activity of the final product. This validated our design and provided a functional enzyme ready for its intended application in hydrolyzing casein.



System 3: Functional Characterization of β-Galactosidase (lacZ)

This cycle focused on producing and validating the function of β-galactosidase to address lactose intolerance(Kumar et al., 2022).

Design

Our objective was to produce active β-galactosidase (lacZ) using the existing BioBrick part BBa_I732005 (Juers et al., 2012). We designed a system to express this part by cloning the lacZ gene into the pET-28a vector for high-level expression in E. coli BL21(DE3)(Figure 17).


System 3: Functional Characterization of β-Galactosidase (<em>lacZ</em>) Diagram

Figure 17: Construction of BL21-LacZ. (A) The plasmid map of pET28a-LacZ; (B) The gene circuit of BL21-LacZ; (C)The flow chart of Construction of BL21-LacZ; (D) the agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of the lacZ gene fragment


Build

The lacZ gene was successfully cloned into the pET-28a vector and transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3).

Test

We validated our system at both the protein and functional levels.

TestProtein Expression: Western Blot analysis confirmed the expression of a protein at the expected size of β-galactosidase (~116 kDa). The expression of the full-length protein was verified (Figure 18).


System 3: Functional Characterization of β-Galactosidase (<em>lacZ</em>) Diagram

Figure 18: (A) This is a flow chart of Western Blot; (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant lacZ overexpression in E. coli.


Functional Assay: We performed an in vitro functional assay to measure the enzyme's ability to hydrolyze lactose. The purified lacZ enzyme was incubated with a 10 mM lactose solution, and the lactose concentration was monitored over an 8-hour period(Figure 19).


System 3: Functional Characterization of β-Galactosidase (<em>lacZ</em>) Diagram

Figure 19: (A) This is a flow chart of measurement of the lactose content lacZ breaks down; (B) Efficacy of recombinant β-galactosidase in lactose degradation


Efficacy of recombinant β-galactosidase in lactose degradation. The enzyme successfully degraded 80% of the initial lactose substrate (from 10 mM to ~2 mM) within 8 hours(Figure 19).


Learn

The results clearly demonstrated that our engineered and purified lacZ protein is highly active and functional. The successful in vitro validation confirms that our recombinant enzyme is a viable candidate for its intended application: breaking down lactose in dairy products. This work also provides valuable new characterization data for the existing BioBrick part BBa_I732005.


We plan to use Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 as the host strain to construct a stable and efficient engineered strain for large-scale production of 2′-FL, trypsin, and lactose. As a GRAS-certified probiotic, Nissle 1917 has good safety and metabolic engineering potential, making it ideal for food production. By optimizing key metabolic pathways, we aim to improve the synthesis efficiency and yield of 2′-FL, trypsin, and lactose, and facilitate the transition from laboratory-scale to industrial production. The goal is to achieve high-purity, cost-effective products that meet the nutritional needs of infants and promote gut health. This platform will also provide a scalable route for the synthesis of other human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs). Currently, we are using BL21 and DH5α strains for our experiments. Though the probiotic strain is safe for food use, like other Gram-negative bacteria, it may produce endotoxins. To ensure the safety of infant formulas, we will reduce endotoxin levels by modifying related genes and optimizing purification steps, establishing a safe and efficient system for the production of 2′-FL, trypsin, and lactose for nutrition and health applications.



Reference

  1. Bonin, C. P., Potter, I., Vanzin, G. F., & Reiter, W. D. (1997). The MUR1 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes an isoform of GDP-D-mannose-4, 6-dehydratase, catalyzing the first step in the de novo synthesis of GDP-L-fucose. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(5), 2085-2090. https://www.sci-hub.se/https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.94.5.2085
  2. Burgess, R. R. (2009). Refolding solubilized inclusion body proteins. Methods in Enzymology, 463, 259–282.
  3. Byun, S., Kim, M., Lee, W., Lee, K., Han, N. S., & Seo, J. (2006). Production of GDP-l-fucose, l-fucose donor for fucosyloligosaccharide synthesis, in recombinant Escherichia coli. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 74(4), 768–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0730-x
  4. Chin, Y. W., Kim, J. Y., Lee, W. H., & Seo, J. H. (2015). Enhanced production of 2′-fucosyllactose in engineered Escherichia coli BL21star (DE3) by modulation of lactose metabolism and fucosyltransferase. Journal of Biotechnology, 210, 107-115. https://www.sci-hub.se/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168165615300547
  5. Choi, J. H., & Lee, S. Y. (2004). Secretory and extracellular production of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 64(5), 625–635.
  6. Du, F., Liu, Y. Q., Xu, Y. S., Li, Z. J., Wang, Y. Z., Zhang, Z. X., & Sun, X. M. (2021). Regulating the T7 RNA polymerase expression in E. coli BL21 (DE3) to provide more host options for recombinant protein production. Microbial cell factories, 20(1), 189. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12934-021-01680-6.pdf
  7. Juers, D. H., Hakda, S., Matthews, B. W., & Huber, R. E. (2012). A structural view of the action of Escherichia coli (LacZ) β-galactosidase. Biochemistry, 51(31), 6086–6098.
  8. Kumar, M., Tomar, S. K., & Singh, A. K. (2022). Lactose Hydrolysis in Dairy Products: A Review. In Enzymes in Food Biotechnology. Springer, Singapore.
  9. Li, L., Kim, S. A., Fang, R., & Han, N. S. (2018). Expression of manB Gene from Escherichia coli in Lactococcus lactis and Characterization of Its Bifunctional Enzyme, Phosphomannomutase. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 28(8), 1293–1298. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1804.04030