Human Practices

Building a scientific ecosystem from the ground up

Introduction

Our National Context

Ecuador is a country of just 283,561 km², with four unique geographic regions —Coast, Highlands, Amazon, and Galápagos Islands— that host immense biodiversity and unparalleled cultural diversity. In such a diverse territory, biotechnology and, in particular, synthetic biology are only beginning to emerge. The absence of a consolidated ecosystem motivated us to form a national team, bringing together representatives from more than five universities across the country.

Map of Ecuador showing the locations of the iGEM Ecuador team members

Map of Ecuador's regions with the distribution of our team members, illustrating our national scope.

We Start from Four Realities

Challenges and Opportunities

What at first seemed like a limitation —the distance between members— became a strength: the team's organization and commitment not only overcame every obstacle but also allowed us to integrate infrastructure, knowledge, and networks throughout Ecuador, reaching more communities and responding to the real needs of Ecuadorians. From this experience, our conviction was born: to design local solutions for local problems.

  1. The weak biotechnology and synthetic biology ecosystem in Ecuador.
  2. The lack of scientific culture across much of society.
  3. The distrust of the public and private sectors toward academia, especially toward young scientists.
  4. Our conviction to start transforming this landscape by strengthening the national and regional ecosystem.

With this framework, we organized a symposium within our team to present proposals for projects to develop in the competition. After two months of work, we decided to tackle a key challenge: avian influenza, which since 2022 has caused million-dollar losses and driven hundreds of poultry-farming families into bankruptcy.

AREA + STIR Framework

Integrating Ethics and Responsibility

At the beginning, we envisioned our Human Practices approach around two widely recognized frameworks for responsible research: AREA (Anticipate, Reflect, Engage, Act) and STIR (Socio-Technical Integration Research). These frameworks, previously applied by other teams in past years —such as Imperial College 2016, Glasgow 2017, and Munich 2024—, offer a roadmap for anticipating social impacts, reflecting ethically on decisions, engaging stakeholders, and adapting technology in response to dialogue.


Guided by this approach, we began our work in early May 2025.


The AREA framework allowed us to organize our process in a cyclical and iterative way:

AREA Diagram.

AREA Diagram.

Anticipate

Through literature (scientific articles, news, press releases, national reports), we analyzed the ecological, social, and economic impacts of avian influenza on rural communities and on sensitive ecosystems such as the Galápagos Islands.

Anticipate — Detailed log
Reflect

We questioned the technical and ethical assumptions of our solution, such as unequal access to biotechnology and the risks of technocentrism.

Reflect — Detailed log
Engage

We conducted interviews and field visits with poultry farmers, NGOs, industry representatives, and experts in immunology and genetic engineering.

Engage — Detailed log

Turning Point

The Importance of Communication

However, by early July 2025 we encountered a critical alert in our methodology. When we engaged directly with small-scale producers—the poultry farms for whom the project had been conceived from the start—we discovered that they did not actually understand what we were talking about.

Avian influenza? They had never heard of it.

Probiotics? To them, it sounded like human health supplements.

When we asked: "What is the first thing you do when a disease appears in your animals?" they answered:

"We try home remedies or antibiotics, to see if they survive. In the worst case, if the authorities show up, we're forced to cull them all."

We felt that in each interview, although they nodded in agreement or said they understood, they were actually pretending. Instead of creating a space for genuine reflection and participation, the dynamic became unilateral.

That was the breaking point that led us to restructure our approach.

Our Contribution: Beyond AREA / STIR

From Consultation to Co-Creation

Our work is inspired by the AREA and STIR frameworks, but we decided to take a step further. We propose a new paradigm we call “Democratization of Science.” It reframes responsible innovation so that local knowledge, cultural practices, and scientific rigor coexist on equal footing.

This means that communities are not merely consulted but become co-creators of knowledge. We opened the scientific process so that farmers, rural students, and local technicians could actively participate in defining problems, setting priorities, and shaping solutions.

This adaptation seeks not only to comply with research ethics frameworks but also to redistribute epistemic power, reinforce cognitive justice, and build solutions that are truly sustainable and context-driven.

Democratization of Science: A Proposal from Latin America

Reframing Responsible Innovation

Instead of asking only “How can we do good science?”, we decided to ask:

Who defines what “good science” is? And who is it good for?

While researching avian influenza in Ecuador, we realized something that often remains outside the laboratory: biotechnological solutions are not always born from the needs of those who need them most.

Inspired by the reflective work of teams such as Imperial College 2016 and Munich 2024, which used frameworks like STIR to integrate the social dimension at the heart of technical decisions, we wanted to take that logic one step further.

Science made with the community, not just for the community.

What we propose is simple in words, but transformative in practice:

  • That community knowledge should not only validate science, but also ground it, nurture it, and guide it from the very beginning.

We call this approach Democratization of Science.

This model recognizes that, in our territories, the relationship with science has historically been unequal: many farmers, students, and rural technicians have been treated as objects of study, not as epistemic allies. We chose to change that.

Model Application

Impact on the Project

How did we apply this model?

Each pillar below shows how the Democratization of Science framework shaped our decisions alongside community partners.

1) Co-definition of problems

Before designing any genetic construct, we organized workshops with poultry farmers from rural areas. They defined the barriers they face: cold chain, costs, and lack of access to diagnostics. See Education & Inclusivity page

2) Situated science

Our technical design—a stable, accessible, easy-to-apply probiotic vaccine—emerged directly from that dialogue. We refused to impose solutions from the lab and chose to build them from the territory. See SDGs page

3) Education as shared power

Instead of “teaching science,” we designed modules where we shared tools while they shared experience. The rural school also became a laboratory. See Education & Inclusivity page

4) Horizontal listening

We replaced the vertical model of “science outreach” with real dialogues involving NGOs, companies, ministry technicians, and academics. Project decisions went through their hands. See Entrepreneurship page

Interviews with Stakeholders

Voices from the Territory

We conducted interviews with various stakeholders, from scientists to poultry producers and rural merchants. Their perspectives gave us a deep understanding of local needs and concerns.

    PhD. Washington Cárdenas
    Biomedical Research Laboratory, ESPOL
    PhD. Washington Cárdenas from Biomedical Research Laboratory, ESPOL
    Expert Profile
    We consulted with Prof. Washington Cárdenas, full professor at ESPOL and head of the Laboratory for Biomedical Investigations (BIOMED). He has extensive expertise in virology, molecular immunology, and vaccine development. Over his career he has led projects including the design of a COVID-19 vaccine prototype in Ecuador, encompassing antigen engineering, recombinant expression, and preclinical evaluation. His deep understanding of antigenic variation, mucosal immunization strategies, and viral neutralization mechanisms makes him particularly well suited to guide AvianGuard.
    Initial Consultation - May 2025
    During our first meeting in May 2025, we presented our initial project concept: developing a probiotic-based vaccine against H5N1 avian influenza. We shared the foundational research papers that inspired our approach and explained the underlying technology.
    Passive Immunity Challenges
    Through these discussions, we identified critical technical hurdles: (1) Purification bottleneck – efficiently purifying cyclobodies from our bacterial expression system at an industrial scale while ensuring economic viability. (2) Expression system selection – we initially considered L. lactis, but Prof. Cárdenas clarified a key limitation: Gram-positive bacteria lack the defined periplasmic space that Gram-negative bacteria possess, which is essential for proper cyclobody cyclization and disulfide bond formation. Decision: we pivoted to identifying optimal E. coli strains to provide the necessary periplasmic environment for protein folding and cyclization.
    Impact on Project Design
    Prof. Cárdenas' guidance shaped our project by refining antigen design with tandem configurations, validating the decision to use live probiotics despite regulatory complexity, redirecting our expression system strategy, and highlighting scale-up and purification as critical success factors for passive immunity.
    PhD. Nardy Diez
    Biotechnological Research Center of Ecuador
    PhD. Nardy Diez from Biotechnological Research Center of Ecuador
    Introduction
    We engaged Dr. Nardy Diez from CIBE (Centro de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas del Ecuador, ESPOL) to refine our probiotic delivery strategy. Dr. Diez holds a PhD in Biology from Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, completed postdoctoral training at INIA Madrid and Universidad de Alcalá, and has over 10 years of experience in proteomics. Her research includes work on traditional fermented foods from Ecuador with a focus on microbial diversity, making her expertise highly relevant for our project.
    Consultation Timeline - Late July 2025
    In late July 2025 we contacted Dr. Diez to obtain guidance on formulating an effective delivery system for our probiotic consortium. Her experience with commercial probiotics provided invaluable insights for translating our laboratory concept into a feasible product.
    Literature Validation
    Following her suggestion, we conducted a literature review confirming the viability of microencapsulation: enhanced survival of L. lactis in alginate-chitosan capsules, pH-responsive release in the intestine, and improved immune response compared to unprotected probiotics.
    Impact on Project Design
    Her consultation shifted our approach from simple lyophilization to microencapsulation technology, identified alginate-chitosan matrices as our primary method, maintained a unified delivery system, and generated a novel hypothesis on cyclobody encapsulation and dosing. This strategy ensures survival and functionality of probiotics in the poultry digestive system while balancing feasibility with practical implementation.
    PhD. Eduardo Alava
    Agricultural Experimental Farm (Chicken Hatchery)
    PhD. Eduardo Alava from Agricultural Experimental Farm (Chicken Hatchery)
    Expert Profile
    To align with the realities of Ecuador's poultry industry, we consulted Dr. Eduardo Alava from ESPOL’s Agricultural Experimental Farm. He is a Professor in Agricultural and Biological Engineering at ESPOL's Faculty of Life Sciences, with expertise in poultry production systems and operational challenges in Ecuador.
    The Ecuadorian Poultry Context
    Dr. Alava emphasized Ecuador's dual poultry reality: large industrial operations vs. small-to-medium producers. In 2022, Ecuador produced 495,000 tonnes of poultry meat from 263 million birds, yet small producers often rely on intermediaries or local markets, lacking access to larger distribution chains.
    The Price Imperative
    In Ecuador's competitive market, price is the decisive factor. Producers operate on razor-thin margins, and any increase in production costs faces rejection. Small producers, without economies of scale, are especially price-sensitive.
    Viral Outbreak Management
    Dr. Alava highlighted how smallholder farmers manage outbreaks, often relying on improvised or informal solutions, challenging some of our project's assumptions.
    Gladys Quirola (Projects Director)
    San Isidro Poultry (AVISID)
    Industry Perspective
    AVISID inaugurated Latin America's most modern poultry plant with a $45 million investment, increasing capacity from 5,000 to 16,000 birds per hour. As a B2B producer and exporter, AVISID focuses on efficiency and certification rather than direct consumer branding.
    Key Interest
    Academic-industry collaboration for competitive advantage. Export markets value biosecurity certifications, and AVISID seeks technologies that provide efficiency, reduce costs, and support international standards.
    AVISID Priorities
    Production efficiency, cost reduction, meeting biosecurity standards, early adoption advantage, and ongoing R&D collaboration with ESPOL.
    Ulises Ulloa (Social Development Manager)
    PRONACA
    Ulises Ulloa (Social Development Manager) from PRONACA
    Industry Perspective
    PRONACA, founded in 1957, leads Ecuador's consumer food market with brands like Mr. Pollo. The company emphasizes sustainability, social responsibility, and community initiatives.
    Key Interest
    For PRONACA, consumer perception matters. Investing in locally-developed technology against disease strengthens brand loyalty when paired with visible media coverage.
    PRONACA Priorities
    Positive brand narrative around innovation, corporate social responsibility, support for local academic innovation, and opportunities for media visibility.
    Karina Sánchez
    i3lab Entrepreneurship and Innovation Center, ESPOL
    Karina Sánchez from i3lab Entrepreneurship and Innovation Center, ESPOL
    Commercialization Pathways
    At ESPOL's i3LAB we explored options for translating AvianGuard into a marketable spin-off. IdeaCamp supports projects where intellectual property (IP) belongs to ESPOL, but our case involved multi-university collaboration.
    The IP Challenge
    Distributed ownership across institutions created legal complexity that prevented participation in IdeaCamp. This highlighted the importance of IP frameworks in collaborative projects.
    Key Learnings
    Ownership models define licensing ease. Strategies include (1) patent core technology while releasing peripheral elements openly, (2) adopting open biology licenses (BioBrick, OpenMTA), or (3) hybrid approaches. Commercialization is not one-size-fits-all.
    Next Steps
    We are exploring multi-university spin-off models, licensing frameworks for distributed ownership, and alternative commercialization pathways (university-backed or independent startup).
    Local Producers
    Agricultural Communities (Pedro Carbo)
    Local Producers from Agricultural Communities (Pedro Carbo)
    Community Perspective
    In August 2025 we consulted Analía Quispe, a leader from Pedro Carbo parish in Guayas. Her family has decades of experience in poultry and livestock, offering firsthand insights into challenges faced by rural producers.
    Disease Management Practices
    She highlighted patterns: (1) producers act reactively, investing only after outbreaks; (2) lack of biosecurity knowledge due to household-farm overlap; (3) acceptance of some losses as inevitable; (4) reliance on informal networks for disease information sharing.
    Value Proposition Redesign
    We reframed our value beyond H5N1 prevention to emphasize broad immune support, productivity improvement, and economic protection against catastrophic losses.
    Delivery Practicality
    The product must be stable at ambient temperature, easily mixed with feed/water, show visible health benefits, and remain cost-competitive.
    Martha Yamberla
    Rural Commerce
    Introduction
    By July 2025 we realized that small-scale producers, our target users, often did not fully understand our scientific framing.
    Beyond AREA / STIR
    Inspired by AREA and STIR frameworks, we developed a new paradigm: Democratization of Science. Communities become co-creators, actively shaping problems and solutions. This redistributes epistemic power, reinforces cognitive justice, and ensures context-driven sustainability.
    Producer Response
    When asked what they do during outbreaks, farmers responded: 'We try home remedies or antibiotics. In the worst case, authorities may force culling.'

Perspectives on Vaccine Innovation in Ecuador

Avian influenza in Ecuador: Lessons learned from a recent outbreak

Ecuador suffered an outbreak of avian influenza a few years ago, which, although it did not reach the mortality levels recorded in other countries in the region, did have a significant impact on poultry production, public perception, and how we apply biosecurity.

Dr. Marco Cisneros Tamayo, PhD and professor at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science at the Central University of Ecuador, shared his perspective on what happened and the lessons this event left for science and society in an interview conducted as part of the iGEM Ecuador project.

Media and commercial impact

Dr. Cisneros highlights that the most significant impact of the outbreak was in terms of the media. News reports associating avian influenza with zoonotic risks caused alarm among citizens, leading customers to stop buying meat and eggs. This resulted in immediate economic losses for poultry producers, even though the virus did not spread massively or with high pathogenicity in the country.

A biosecurity "drill"

Rather than being merely a negative episode, the emergency was used as a catalyst to strengthen biosecurity practices in the poultry industry. Producers carried out more rigorous actions such as health monitoring of birds, supervision of the entry of people and materials, and the use of disinfectants. The use of vaccines with strict diagnostic controls was allowed in provinces such as Cotopaxi, Tungurahua, and Chimborazo, although these measures were implemented on a localized basis.

Challenges for small producers

Uncertainty was the main obstacle for small farmers. The lack of clear information and the fear of losing their birds without official compensation caused concern. Paradoxically, over time the price of eggs rose and did not fall again, which ended up benefiting producers economically in the medium term.

Vaccines and limitations

The professional explained that inactivated vaccines have their limitations, given that they are dependent on a match between the vaccine strain and the circulating viral strain, which makes it even more necessary to work towards strengthening epidemiological surveillance and rapid diagnosis systems in order to prevent rather than react.

Education and international cooperation

According to Cisneros, the key lies in the socialization of knowledge. Only when producers have assimilated the reality of the problem are they able to adopt other methods and technologies. He also suggested establishing links with international organizations, such as OMSA (formerly OIE) and specialized research centers capable of combining scientific knowledge with global reference frameworks.

Advice for young researchers

Finally, Dr. Cisneros urged young researchers to take action or carry out work with a pragmatic approach that allows them to be connected to the environment in which they are working. At the same time, he stressed the importance of building on existing knowledge and avoiding duplicating efforts already made. He also emphasized the need to strike the right balance between the use of technological tools and connection to practical problems in the field.

The avian influenza outbreak in Ecuador not only highlighted the weaknesses of the diagnostic and surveillance system, but also opened up an opportunity to strengthen biosecurity, education, and international cooperation. For projects such as iGEM, these lessons are an essential starting point in the search for innovative biotechnological solutions to emerging health threats.

Evidence Gallery

Interview Evidence 1 Interview Evidence 2 Interview Evidence 3

Avian influenza in Ecuador: Analyzing the first outbreak of H5N1 in South America

Ecuador faced its first outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b in late 2022, marking a turning point for veterinary health, genomic surveillance, and public awareness in the country.

Dr. Alfredo Bruno Caicedo, PhD in Veterinary Sciences and researcher at the Phytosanitary and Animal Health Regulation and Control Agency (Agrocalidad), together with Dr. Miguel Ángel García, PhD in Molecular Biology and co-author of the genomic study "Phylogenetic analysis reveals that the H5N1 avian influenza A outbreak in poultry in Ecuador in November 2022 is associated with the highly pathogenic clade 2.3.4.4b," shared their perspective on the lessons this event left for science and public policy in Ecuador.

Response and diagnostic capacity

According to Dr. Bruno, the detection and confirmation of the virus using RT-PCR and genomic sequencing was possible thanks to coordination between Agrocalidad and national laboratories. "The outbreak was detected in Cotopaxi and confirmed by RT-PCR and H5 subtyping in a matter of days. This reflects a solid diagnostic capacity, although containment in the field still poses a challenge due to resource and logistical constraints," he explained.

Compared to neighboring countries, the diagnostic response was timely; however, the magnitude of the losses highlighted the need to improve biosecurity and the speed of control actions on farms.

Socioeconomic and productive impact

Dr. García pointed out that the outbreak highlighted the fragility of the poultry sector in developing economies.

"If the virus were to become endemic, the consequences would not only affect production, but also food security and employment. We could see a sustained increase in the prices of chicken meat and eggs and the disappearance of small producers," he warned.

Both researchers agree that strengthening continuous genetic surveillance programs is essential to prevent future economic disruptions.

Zoonotic mutations and public health risk

The team identified genetic mutations associated with antigenic drift, immune escape, and changes in host specificity.

From a public health perspective, Dr. Bruno expressed particular concern about mutations that could favor the virus's adaptation to mammalian receptors.

"That's where the zoonotic risk really lies," he said. "Our priority must be to monitor molecular markers that indicate a possible change in host specificity. Clade 2.3.4.4b found in Ecuador was closely related to a red fox and a hawk, demonstrating its ease of zoonosis."

Biodiversity at risk

Ecuador's unique biological diversity, especially in the Amazon and the Galapagos Islands, is a cause for additional concern.

Dr. García highlighted the risk of the virus being transported by migratory seabirds, particularly pelicans and gulls along the Pacific coast.

"A single introduction into the Galapagos could have devastating ecological consequences. Although authorities have strengthened port controls, surveillance targeting endemic and migratory species is still needed," he explained.

Risk of recombination and farms as reservoirs

"Clade 2.3.4.4b has an extraordinary capacity for genetic recombination," explained Dr. Bruno. "Densely populated farms act as ideal environments for co-infection and reassortment, which could give rise to new subtypes."

Both researchers reemphasized the importance of maintaining continuous genomic surveillance, as well as implementing strict biosecurity measures on farms to detect any emerging variants before they spread.

Public health and the "One Health" approach

In their opinion, the most urgent reform for the country is the creation of an integrated One Health surveillance system that connects animal, human, and environmental health.

"We must decentralize diagnostic capacity, promote rapid reporting, and ensure fluid communication between Agrocalidad, the Ministry of Health, and local communities," said Dr. García.

According to both experts, this investment would significantly reduce the risk of zoonotic transmission.

Migration connectivity and regional circulation

Phylogenetic analysis showed a close relationship between the isolates from Ecuador and those detected in a red fox in Canada and a hawk in Mexico.

"This pattern confirms the role of migratory birds in introducing the virus to South America," explained Dr. Bruno.

However, the clustering of Ecuadorian isolates with those from pelicans in Peru suggests that the virus is already circulating locally in the region, beyond simple seasonal reintroductions.

Sentinel species for surveillance

When asked which wild species should be prioritized for surveillance, Dr. García mentioned three: the Peruvian pelican (Pelecanus thagus), the Dominican gull (Larus dominicanus), and the neotropical cormorant (Nannopterum brasilianum).

"These species have proven to be effective sentinels for early detection of viral activity along the Ecuadorian coast," he said.

Vaccination and logistical challenges

Although the World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed a candidate vaccine strain based on clade 2.3.4.4b, both experts recognize significant challenges to its implementation.

These include distribution logistics, the need for a precise match between the vaccine strain and the circulating strain, and acceptance by small producers.

"Vaccination without adequate genomic surveillance may actually favor the emergence of immune escape variants, so vaccines should be updated as new variants emerge," warned Dr. Bruno.

Scientific contribution and legacy

Finally, the researchers highlighted the main novelty of their work: it was the first study to genomically document the presence of H5N1 in South America, with complete sequences deposited in GISAID and relevant mutations annotated for zoonotic surveillance.

"This contribution allows the international community to understand the evolutionary trajectory of the virus on our continent," concluded Dr. García.

The avian influenza outbreak in Ecuador not only highlighted weaknesses in diagnostic and surveillance systems, but also opened up an opportunity to strengthen biosecurity, scientific education, and international cooperation. For projects such as iGEM Ecuador, these lessons are an essential component in the search for innovative biotechnological solutions to emerging health threats.

Gallery Evidence

Evidence of avian influenza research and interviews

Significance for iGEM

We believe iGEM can incorporate the democratization of knowledge

We propose that this approach should not remain only in Ecuador. We believe iGEM can incorporate the democratization of knowledge as a “new standard of excellence in Human Practices,” especially for teams in the Global South.

Just as Imperial College 2016 proposed integrating ethical reflection into engineering, we propose “ reconfiguring the relationship between science, power, and community. ”