Global Regulation Module
We designed and validated a quorum sensing (QS)-coupled feedback inhibition element to achieve autonomous density-dependent control of gene expression in engineered bacteria. The system was constructed by integrating a LuxI/LuxR-based QS module with a TetR-mediated repression module, creating a closed-loop circuit where bacterial population density directly regulates downstream gene expression.
Experimental validation using an AmCyan fluorescent reporter demonstrated the system's functionality: fluorescence intensity showed a characteristic activation-repression dynamic, peaking and then stabilizing at a lower baseline, as shown in Figure 1. Quantitative analysis confirmed a strong correlation (R2 = 0.9078) between experimental results and ODE model simulations.

This proof of concept establishes that QS-coupled feedback inhibition can effectively translate population density signals into precise transcriptional control, providing a robust foundation for implementing autonomous regulation circuits in synthetic biology applications.
BioPROTAC
HemorrEaser incorporates a novel bioPROTAC(VHH-VHL) designed to mediate ubiquitin-dependent degradation of non-hydroxylated HIF-1α under hypoxic conditions, thereby inhibiting angiogenesis in hemorrhoidal tissues. The VHH-VHL construct consists of four components: a nuclear localization signal (NLS), an HIF-1α-binding nanobody (VHH212), an E3 ubiquitin ligase recruiter (pVHL) and linker peptides.
Functional validation was performed through integrated dry-lab and wet-lab approaches. Computational assessments included molecular docking (HADDOCK/HDOCK) of the HIF-1α-bioPROTAC-ubiquitin complex, Amber molecular dynamics simulations, and Gaussian 16 transition-state analysis. Results indicated a feasible ubiquitination energy barrier of approximately 8.20 kcal/mol, supporting reaction viability.

(A) Binding interface between VHH212 and HIF-1α; (B) Conformation of bioPROTAC; (C) Structural diagram of the ubiquitinated complex following molecular dynamics simulation; (D) Energy-bar chart.
Experimental validations confirmed that the VHH-VHL construct maintains stable binding to HIF-1α, as demonstrated by yeast two-hybrid assays and protein co-purification assay. Furthermore, in vitro ubiquitination assays confirmed specific polyubiquitination of HIF-1α in the presence of bioPROTAC, collectively verifying its dual binding and degradation functionality.

(A) Yeast two-hybrid assay; (B) Protein co-purification assay; (C) In vitro ubiquitination assay.
Collectively, these findings validate the rational design of VHH-VHL as an effective degrader of HIF-1α under hypoxia, providing a mechanistic foundation for its anti-angiogenic function in hemorrhoid therapy. You can read more at Results
OMV Delivery Module
To verify that Escherichia coli outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) can effectively load therapeutic molecules and achieve targeted transport, we first constructed a physical model to determine whether OMVs can be spontaneously internalized by small intestinal villus epithelial cells.
The core of the model lies in comparing the total energy difference of OMVs in two states—outside the cell membrane and inside the membrane—by evaluating the relative magnitudes of interface energy and membrane bending elastic energy to determine whether the process satisfies the thermodynamic spontaneous condition (ΔG < 0).
Specifically, the model divides the system into the initial state and the final state: in the initial state, the OMV is partially inserted into the membrane, forming a hemispherical protrusion that involves three types of interface energies — OMV-external fluid, OMV-membrane, and membrane-cytosol. In the final state, the OMV is completely wrapped to a spherical vesicle, with energy contributions from OMV-membrane interface energy, membrane-cytosol interface energy, and membrane bending elastic energy (based on Helfrich theory). By establishing a geometric relationship between the two states through volume conservation, the expression for ΔG was derived, yielding a dimensionless criterion: if a combined parameter (including interface tension, OMV radius, and membrane bending modulus) > 1, endocytosis proceeds spontaneously.
After substituting physiological parameters (R2=50×10-9 m, σ1=10-3 N/m, σ2=0.8×10-3 N/m, σ3=0.5×10-3 N/m, k=10-19 J), the ratio reached 15.3—far greater than 1—indicating that OMV transmembrane endocytosis is thermodynamically favorable. Robustness verification further showed that even with smaller OMV size or higher membrane rigidity, spontaneous uptake conditions are still satisfied. This model thus provides theoretical support for the feasibility of OMVs as drug delivery carriers at the physical mechanism level.

To experimentally validate OMV function, gene sequences containing ompA-CAR, ompA-amCyan, and srp-TagRFP were constructed on the pET-28b(+) vector. Two plasmid combinations (ompA-amCyan + srp-TagRFP) ompA-CAR + srp-TagRFP) were co-transformed into E. coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) strains.
OMV precipitates were obtained through differential centrifugation (DC). Subsequently, the OMV marker OmpA (≈38.2 kDa) was used as a key indicator in a 12% SDS-PAGE assay. A distinct OmpA band was clearly visible in the gel electrophoresis results, confirming the successful extraction and enrichment of OMVs.

(A) Differential centrifugation (DC) results; (B) 12% SDS-PAGE results (M: protein marker; DC: differential centrifugation extract; DGC: density-gradient centrifugation extract).
In future work, fluorescence confocal microscopy will be used to confirm the co-localization of amCyan and TagRFP, verifying the successful loading of engineered OMVs. Finally, a cell scratch assay will be conducted to evaluate the role of CAR in promoting cell migration, validating the targeting ability of engineered OMVs.
Anti-VEGF Nanobody
To inhibit hemorrhoidal vascular proliferation by specifically binding vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and blocking its interaction with the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), we designed an anti-VEGF nanobody modified with a P17 peptide at the N-terminus and fused to a shielding peptide at the C-terminus can be cleaved by matrix metalloproteinase-3 in the hemorrhoidal microenvironment.
First, we sought to validate the successful expression of P17-Nanobody, which was initially verified in Escherichia coli SHuffle. The P17-nanobody, tagged with 6×His, was constructed into the pET-28b(+) plasmid containing a lactose operon. The IPTG-induced P17-Nanobody was purified using a Ni²⁺-NTA affinity chromatography column and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot. The SDS-PAGE and Western blot (Figure 6.A, Figure 6.B) results demonstrated that P17-Nanobody was successfully expressed in Escherichia coli SHuffle. We next evaluated the capacity of the purified P17-nanobody to inhibit proliferation of VEGFR2-positive cells and block VEGF signaling. In a cell proliferation assay using VEGFR2 positive HUVECs and VEGFR2 negative HEK293 cells, the nanobody significantly inhibited HUVEC growth in a dose-dependent manner after 24 hours, with inhibition rates of 40-50% (P < 0.05, Figure 6.C). In contrast, no significant inhibition was observed in HEK293 cells at any concentration tested.

(A) 15% SDS-PAGE results(M:Protein Marker; lane 1-2 were unpurified periplasmic protein , and lane 3-6 were purified sample); (B) Western Blot of purified sample(M:Protein Marker; lane 1-4 were purified sample); (C) The antiproliferative activity of Anti-VEGF monovalent nanobody on HUVEC cells.
The P17 peptide significantly enhances the stability and solubility of anti-VEGF nanobodies. We used Protein-sol to predict the solubility of the P17-fused nanobody. The results showed that the P17 peptide improved the solubility both during and after expression(Figure 7.). Specifically, solubility increased by 27.8% during the expression phase, which facilitates robust protein production.

To validate the feasibility of the masking peptide, we analyzed all docking complexes with the Anti-VEGF antibody using Rosetta InterfaceAnalyzer, and identified several sequences with relatively weak interface energies. The representative complex was further examined using PRODIGY, yielding a binding free energy of -9.3 kcal·mol⁻¹ and a dissociation constant of Kd ≈ 2.6 × 10⁻⁷ M (260 nM), indicative of moderate affinity. The binding interface was dominated by hydrophobic (apolar-apolar, 16) and polar-apolar (10) contacts, while charged-charged (5) and polar-polar (1) interactions contributed less. The nonpolar interface area (41.0%) exceeded the charged area (23.1%), suggesting that binding is mainly driven by a hydrophobic core rather than electrostatic interactions.

The reasonable range for packstact is 0.6-0.8, indicating the degree of binding. The green band represents cyclic peptides that may dissociate.
To assess the dissociation process, steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations were performed with GROMACS to generate the unbinding pathway, followed by umbrella sampling and WHAM analysis to compute the potential of mean force (PMF).
The resulting binding free energy (plateau-minimum) was -9.8 kcal·mol⁻¹, corresponding to Kd ≈ 1.22 × 10⁻⁷ M at 310 K. These results indicate that the masking peptide binds with moderate affinity and reversible stability, consistent with its expected functional behavior.

Medicine-Food Collaboration
The suicide system comprises a riboswitch regulating the toxin gene ccdB, suppressing CcdB expression upon ligand binding and activating bacterial clearance in its absence. Using a TPP riboswitch-controlled vector and modeled optimal TPP concentration, toxicity assays in 96-well plates showed that at the IC₅₀ dose, the system strongly suppressed bacterial growth (Figure 9.), confirming effective riboswitch-controlled bactericidal activity by CcdB.

Considering the differences between topical and oral administration scenarios, we further integrated a expiry-date circuit to meet the practical requirements of oral application. The simulation results are presented below.

References
Hu C, Yi X, Liu Z, et al. Distribution characteristics and clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor in hemorrhoid mucosa [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Shi Yan Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014;31(6):1334-1336,Volume 4.
Lohsiriwat V. Hemorrhoids: from basic pathophysiology to clinical management. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(17):2009-2017.
Palumbo VD, Tutino R, Messina M, et al. Altered Gut Microbic Flora and Haemorrhoids: Could They Have a Possible Relationship?. J Clin Med. 2023;12(6): 2198. Published 2023 Mar 12.
Liang J, Su J, Li X. Effects of modified PPH on connective tissue circumferential mixed hemorrhoids and serum levels of HIF-1α, VEGF, and MMP-9 [in Chinese]. Hebei Med. 2020;26(6):994-998.
PAN Qiu-Sha, SU Shi-Bing, ZHAO Ming. Advances in functional studies of probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917. Microbiology China, 2019, 46(11): 3133-3139.
T.A.H. Järvinen, E. Ruoslahti, Target-seeking antifibrotic compound enhances wound healing and suppresses scar formation in mice, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(50) (2010) 21671-21676
Samokhin A, Korel A, Blinova E, Pestov A, Kalmykova G, Akulova N, Betz V, Tkachenko V, Litvinova E. Delivery of B. subtilis into Animal Intestine Using Chitosan-Derived Bioresorbable Gel Carrier: Preliminary Results. Gels. 2023 Feb 1;9(2):120.
E. Mercier, W. Holtkamp, M.V. Rodnina, W. Wintermeyer, Signal recognition particle binds to translating ribosomes before emergence of a signal anchor sequence, Nucleic Acids Res 45(20) (2017) 11858-11866.
Gong, X., Liu, S., Xia, B. et al. Oral delivery of therapeutic proteins by engineered bacterial type zero secretion system. Nat Commun 16, 1862 (2025).
H. Liu, Q. Zhang, S. Wang, W. Weng, Y. Jing, J. Su, Bacterial extracellular vesicles as bioactive nanocarriers for drug delivery: Advances and perspectives, Bioactive Materials 14 (2022) 169-181.
https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5332002
Serra R, Gallelli L, Grande R, et al. Hemorrhoids and matrix metalloproteinases: A multicenter study on the predictive role of biomarkers. Surgery. 2016;159(2): 487-494.
Tran, Kha Mong et al."Genetic "expiry-date" circuits control lifespan of synthetic scavenger bacteria for safe bioremediation."Nucleic acids researchvol. 53,14 (2025): gkaf703.
Lohsiriwat V. Hemorrhoids: from basic pathophysiology to clinical management. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 May 7;18(17):2009-17.
Cao D, Hou M, Guan YS, Jiang M, Yang Y, Gou HF. Expression of HIF-1α and VEGF in colorectal cancer: association with clinical outcomes and prognostic implications. BMC Cancer. 2009 Dec 10;9:432.
Bakleh MZ, Al Haj Zen A. The Distinct Role of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in Hypoxia and Angiogenesis. Cells. 2025 May 4;14(9):673.
Békés M, Langley DR, Crews CM. PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022 Mar;21(3):181-200.
Lim S, Khoo R, Peh KM, Teo J, Chang SC, Ng S, Beilhartz GL, Melnyk RA, Johannes CW, Brown CJ, Lane DP, Henry B, Partridge AW. bioPROTACs as versatile modulators of intracellular therapeutic targets including proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 17;117(11):5791-5800.
Nunoshiba T, Hidalgo E, Li Z, Demple B. Negative autoregulation by the Escherichia coli SoxS protein: a dampening mechanism for the soxRS redox stress response. J Bacteriol. 1993 Nov;175(22):7492-4.
Sujay Ray, Angshuman Bagchi,Binding of SoxR protein to two promoter-operator regions to regulate sox gene expression: A detailed molecular insight for structural changes and protein-DNA interactions,Ecological Genetics and Genomics,Volumes 3-5,2017,Pages 34-40,ISSN 2405-9854.
Holden, E. R., & Webber, M. A. (2020). MarA, RamA, and SoxS as Mediators of the Stress Response: Survival at a Cost. Frontiers in microbiology, 11, 828.
Kang G, Hu M, Ren H, Wang J, Cheng X, Li R, Yuan B, Balan Y, Bai Z, Huang H. VHH212 nanobody targeting the hypoxia-inducible factor 1α suppresses angiogenesis and potentiates gemcitabine therapy in pancreatic cancer in vivo. Cancer Biol Med. 2021 Apr 8;18(3):772-87.
https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23100
https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0015
https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034
https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2587001
https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2587003
https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2587002
https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5332002
Webb B, Sali A. Protein Structure Modeling with MODELLER. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2199:239-255.
Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, Evans R, Green T, Pritzel A, Ronneberger O, Willmore L, Ballard AJ, Bambrick J, Bodenstein SW, Evans DA, Hung CC, O'Neill M, Reiman D, Tunyasuvunakool K, Wu Z, Žemgulytė A, Arvaniti E, Beattie C,Bertolli O, Bridgland A, Cherepanov A, Congreve M, Cowen-Rivers AI, Cowie A, Figurnov M, Fuchs FB, Gladman H, Jain R, Khan YA, Low CMR, Perlin K, Potapenko A, Savy P, Singh S, Stecula A, Thillaisundaram A, Tong C, Yakneen S, Zhong ED, Zielinski M, Žídek A, Bapst V, Kohli P, Jaderberg M, Hassabis D, Jumper JM. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature. 2024 Jun;630(8016):493-500.
Honorato RV, Trellet ME, Jiménez-García B, Schaarschmidt JJ, Giulini M, Reys V, Koukos PI, Rodrigues JPGLM, Karaca E, van Zundert GCP, Roel-Touris J, van Noort CW, Jandová Z, Melquiond ASJ, Bonvin AMJJ. The HADDOCK2.4 web server for integrative modeling of biomolecular complexes. Nat Protoc. 2024 Nov;19(11):3219-3241.
Wang Y, Yuan W, Guo S, et al. A 33-residue peptide tag increases solubility and stability of Escherichia coli produced single-chain antibody fragments. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4614. Published 2022 Aug 8.
Chen VB, Arendall WB 3rd, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(Pt 1):12-21.
Davis IW, Leaver-Fay A, Chen VB, Block JN, Kapral GJ, Wang X, et al. MolProbity: all-atom contact analysis for structure validation. Protein Sci. 2007;16(3):631-641.
Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5-32.
Bever CS, Dong JX, Vasylieva N, Barnych B, Cui Y, Xu ZL, Hammock BD. VHH antibodies: emerging reagents for the analysis of environmental chemicals. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016; 408(22):5985-6002.
Noël CJ, Malpertuy A, de Brevern AG. Global analysis of VHHs framework regions with a structural alphabet. Biochimie. 2016;131:11-19.
Asaadi A, Khajeh S, Hasannia S, Khajeh K. A comprehensive comparison between camelid nanobodies and single-chain variable fragments. Biomark Res. 2021;9:75.
Dunbar J, Deane CM. ANARCI: antigen receptor numbering and receptor classification. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(2):298-300.
T.A.H. Järvinen, E. Ruoslahti, Target-seeking antifibrotic compound enhances wound healing and suppresses scar formation in mice, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(50) (2010) 21671-21676.
E. Mercier, W. Holtkamp, M.V. Rodnina, W. Wintermeyer, Signal recognition particle binds to translating ribosomes before emergence of a signal anchor sequence, Nucleic Acids Res 45(20) (2017) 11858-11866.
