Human Practices

Experiments Header

Background of the Problem


Every year, 1.3 billion tons of food are wasted globally—over one-third of all food produced. This generates 8-10% of global greenhouse gas emissions, causes about one trillion dollars in economic loss, and deepens inequality as millions face hunger. In Japan, food loss reached 4.64 million tons in 2023. Many fruits and vegetables are discarded despite being edible, often due to minor imperfections or strict retail standards. PreserVEG aims to reduce such waste by enhancing produce safety and visualizing freshness and deterioration.

Excessive Focus on Freshness

Excessive Focus on Freshness

Even when still edible, produce is often discarded over concerns about appearance, freshness, or safety. In Japan, an especially strict demand for freshness further drives this tendency.

Ethylene-induced Ripening Progression

Ethylene-induced Ripening Progression

Climacteric produce like bananas, apples, and tomatoes release ethylene gas during ripening, accelerating deterioration of nearby items and shortening overall shelf life.

Lack of Objective Judgment Criteria

Lack of Objective Judgment Criteria

The lack of simple, objective criteria for judging deterioration forces reliance on appearance and smell, leading to premature or delayed disposal and increased food waste.

Project Overview


To clearly illustrate the progress of our project, we created a roadmap summarizing each phase—from identifying the problem to proposing a solution and considering social implementation. This roadmap visually shows how our idea evolved and was shaped into a project that takes both social and scientific responsibility into account. You can click on each apple pin to jump to the corresponding section.

rotten-fruits Stakeholder identification Understanding the Problem Proposal of Solution1 Proposal of Solution2 Social Implimentation Summary clean-fruits

The AREA Flame Work


The AREA Framework is a structured approach to achieving “Responsible Innovation,” with the aim of effectively integrating stakeholder dialogue and feedback into projects. Originally proposed by Professor Richard Owen, the framework is guided by the principle of promoting science and innovation that are socially desirable and in public interest. It is now widely adopted by research funding agencies and academic projects as a method to support responsible decision-making and has also been employed by numerous iGEM teams in recent years. Notably, the TU Eindhoven 2022 team pragmatically optimized the AREA Framework, restructuring it into the following four phases. Our team followed this approach and redefined each phase as follows to better suit our project:

Reflect → Purpose

Engage → Contribution

Act → Implementation

Anticipate → Outlook

This change aims to provide a clearer and more intuitive understanding of the role each AREA phase played in the actual project. Click on the segmented parts of the circle in the diagram below to see details about each phase.

Act
Anticipate
Engage
Refrect

Following the process described above, we have redefined the four phases of AREA as follows. For example, “Reflect” was a process for deeply exploring the motivation and social significance of the activity. By redefining it as “Purpose,” we made it possible to clearly express why that dialogue was important. Similarly, “Engage” has been reorganized to focus more on the resulting “Contribution” rather than the actual interactions themselves. “Act” demonstrates how the gathered opinions were translated into “Implementation,” while “Anticipate” is now expressed as a “Outlook” for future actions based on anticipated challenges and impacts, linking more directly to concrete steps. Organizing it this way allows the AREA framework to be used not merely as a concept, but as a clear, practical guideline for advancing projects step-by step.

Back to Top

Back to Top