Education
Overview
Carbon dioxide emissions have become a severe global issue, subtly influencing people’s daily lives, calling for an urgent, sustainable solution. Our project works on enhancing the efficiency of carbon dioxide consumption through cyanobacteria, an organism capable of reducing the chemical compound. To raise awareness of our project and the significant role of synthetic biology, we held multiple educational activities both on and off campus. Through these activities, we not only introduce the basics of synthetic biology, but also show how this technology can be applied to daily-life challenges. By combining scientific knowledge with interactive learning activities, we focus on promoting public consciousness and engagement with global issues.
Taitung Camp
Introduction and Purpose
As part of our mission to make synthetic biology education more inclusive, our team wanted to extend our outreach beyond urban schools to rural indigenous communities. In collaboration with the Taitung Bunun Summer Camp, we prepared a lesson plan for Bunun indigenous youth (grades 5-6). Indigenous communities in Taiwan are often underserved in opportunities for science education(KSU and TSMC Charity Foundation Launch S., 2018). Consequently, we took this opportunity during iGEM to provide exposure to core biological concepts. This initiative was built on our earlier workshop with middle school students at our own school. By simplifying complex ideas of DNA and inheritance into interactive lessons, we aimed to create an education experience that was meaningful to communities outside the ones we were part of. With guidance from an elementary education specialist Ms. Principe, we were able to apply her suggestions of creating more interactive activities and connecting inherited traits to observable features students could see in themselves and their families through a scavenger hunt and DNA decoding games.
Lesson Design
Our lesson plan was designed around four main learning goals:
- Distinguish living from non-living things using the 7 functions of life
- Understand inherited traits and their role in family resemblance
- Recognize the role of DNA as an “instruction manual” for life
- Explore the difference between bacteria, viruses, and human cells
To achieve these goals, we paired short lectures and videos with interactive activities and a reflection worksheet. This blended structure ensured that students not only received information but also practiced applying it to their own observations.
Interactive Education Tools
Fig 1. Scavenger hunt: Students collected objects from their surroundings and categorized them as living or non-living. After the lesson on the functions of life, they re-classified their items to demonstrate their understanding.
Fig 2. Trace the traits matching game: Students matched baby animals to parents using physical traits, reinforcing the idea of inherited characteristics
Fig 3. DNA Decoding: Using alphabet to represent DNA sequences, students decoded “DNA sequences” that corresponded to specific traits, allowing them to understand how genetic instructions determine appearance
Impact and Feedback
The survey feedback from the teachers indicates that the lesson had a positive impact on student engagement and learning. Teachers observed medium to high engagement, with students particularly enjoying hands-on activities like photo matching and scavenger hunts that connected science to their everyday environment. While younger students found abstract DNA concepts and distinguishing “good” versus “bad” bacteria challenging, worksheets showed strong understanding of key concepts, including the six functions of life, inheritance, and DNA as a manual for our traits. Feedback from the teachers suggested simplifying and shortening teaching videos and incorporating more real-life props to further enhance learning. Overall, the lesson successfully made biology interactive, relevant, and curiosity-driven, with potential for adaptation in future classes.
Reflection and Challenges
Developing this lesson plan challenged us to balance accuracy with accessibility, simplifying core synthetic biology concepts for different levels. Our initial draft included detailed organelle functions, but after consultation with elementary teachers, we refocused on broader life functions and inheritance, making the content more manageable for younger learners. Although we could not deliver the lesson in person, collaborating with the summer camp team allowed us to extend synthetic biology outreach to students who might not otherwise encounter it. This experience highlighted the importance of adapting to community needs, simplifying content without losing meaning, and listening to feedback to improve inclusivity.
Grade 7-8
7th and 8th Grade Education Workshop 1 (June 5, 2025)
Introduction and Purpose
Since the iGEM program in our school has always been offered only to high school students, we thought it would be a great chance to introduce knowledge about both iGEM and synthetic biology to middle school students. By doing so, they can have an opportunity to learn about iGEM and synthetic biology earlier and possibly grow an interest in them.
At the beginning of the project, we planned creative ways to educate the students, and judging from the feedback we got from the students, they came out successful and meaningful, as we were hoping them to be.
Summary
In our first educational workshop for the seventh and eighth graders, there were 27 students who signed up. The workshop was held in two parts: the lecture and the hands-on experience. Since the students only had little understanding of synthetic biology before the workshop, we started out with a lecture on the basic knowledge of DNA and RNA. This way, they could be more involved when we do the experiment later. Then, we did strawberry DNA extraction for the hands-on experiment. We introduced the procedures and also showed them a tutorial video.
Through the experiment, the students got the chance to use some lab equipment and learned about the safety rules. Moreover, they could better visualize the concept of DNA which was introduced in the lecture previously, sparking their interest. In the end, we briefly introduced synthetic biology and its connection with the lesson and experiment. In general, the workshop was a successful start, as the students were more curious about biology and enjoyed the experiment.
↑ Link to the slide
Figure 4: Students listening to the lecture
Figure 5: Students performing the experiment
Figure 6: Students performing the experiment
Feedback Summary
After the workshop, we hoped to receive some feedback from the students to understand which part of the workshop can be improved. Therefore, we sent out a survey to them through the school e-mail. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of our educational event by measuring how clearly the challenging knowledge was taught to the 7th and 8th-grade students, and how much of the taught knowledge was actually learned.
Looking at the graphs below, the 7th and 8th graders' understanding of the knowledge we taught was generally good. Knowledge about DNA and RNA after our event was rated as 4 to 5 out of 5 by the students, which was a significant increase from their knowledge before our event, with the knowledge level varying from 1 to 4. A similar trend could also be observed in Figure 8, where 7th and 8th-graders had an increase in understanding about synthetic biology. Furthermore, our clarity of explanation had an average rating of around 3.9 out of 5, and an average rating of around 4.5 out of 5 for experiment (figure 9). Moreover, the engagement level of our experiment was quite high, implying that the students did learn and apply their new knowledge in experiments.
Figure 7: Student self-evaluation of their understanding of DNA and RNA. The knowledge level was skewed to the right after the educational session, showing an increase in understanding of DNA and RNA.
Figure 8: Student self-evaluation of their understanding of synthetic biology. The knowledge level was skewed to the right after the educational session, showing an increase in understanding of synthetic biology.
Figure 9: Student evaluation of the clarity and engagement of our educational event. The rating is shewed to the right, showing that our educational event was both engaging and clear.
Conclusion
In the first workshop, we taught the students about fundamental biology knowledge and did a strawberry DNA extraction experiment. Not only did the students learn new knowledge and experience new concepts in biology, but we, as a team, learned a lot too. We worked together to design a lecture suitable for middle school students and an experiment that will spark their interest. Through the process, we got to know how to cooperate when teaching a lesson, help each other during experiments, and explain intricate concepts in simple ways. The experience is a new step for us to learn and grow, approaching various ways to educate people about synthetic biology.
7th and 8th Grade Education Workshop 2 (June 19, 2025)
Introduction and Purpose
Through the first workshop experience with the middle school students, we thought of a follow-up session that could make this project more complete and continuous. There were 25 students from the previous workshop who attended. We delved deeper into synthetic biology this time, performing lectures and experiments that were more related to iGEM, making this a good opportunity to introduce them to this project.
Summary
We had our follow-up session for the G7-8 education two weeks after the first workshop, focusing more on synthetic biology. We introduced gel electrophoresis, teaching them the purpose and concept of the experiment (Figure 10). This is an important lab technique that will be used in many experiments related to synthetic biology. Thus, we tried to teach them beforehand and have more understanding of it. We tried to use simple terms and diagrams to explain the complex parts. Moving on to the experiment part, we taught them how to use pipettes and run the agarose gel (Figure 11, 12 and 13). We practiced using the pipettes with water before we worked with the DNA samples.
The experiment was challenging for the students since it was the first time they used a pipette. Nevertheless, our team members helped when we saw them struggling. In conclusion, they learned about gel electrophoresis, pipettes, and loading PCR products on a gel.
↑ Link to the slide
Figure 10: Student listening to the lecture
Figure 11: Students performing gel electrophoresis experiment
Figure 12: Students loading samples into the gel
Figure 13: Students loading samples into the gel
Feedback Summary
A survey was sent out to the 7th and 8th-grade students after our follow-up educational event. Through analysis of how well complex knowledge was explained to 7th and 8th-grade students, and how much of the knowledge explained was absorbed, we intended to assess how successful our follow-up educational event was. Our explanation and the 7th and 8th-grade students’ take-up of knowledge were overall efficient, as shown by the graphs below. Specifically, in Figure 14, the majority of knowledge levels about electrophoresis after the follow-up educational event fall in the category of 4 to 5, an increase from the knowledge levels before the event. Furthermore, our clarity of explanation scored an average of 4, which showed improvement to the score of our first workshop (Figure 15). Regarding experiment engagement, the majority of students rated it 5 out of 5.
Figure 14: Student self-evaluation of their understanding of gel electrophoresis. The knowledge level was skewed to the right after the educational session, showing an increase in understanding of gel electrophoresis.
Figure 15: Student evaluation of the clarity and engagement of our educational event. The rating is shewed to the right, showing that our educational event was both engaging and clear.
Conclusion
The second workshop delved deeper into synthetic biology and lectured about how gel electrophoresis works. The students also got the chance to use the professional lab equipment, pipette and electrophoresis apparatus, and learned how to use them in experiments. We spread synthetic biology knowledge outside of our team and hopefully attracted more people into the field. This workshop not only benefited both the students and us, but also introduced synthetic biology to numerous young adults who might want to enroll in the iGEM program in high school.
New Team Education
↑ Link to the slide
Introduction and Purpose
The 2026 KCIS XiuGang iGEM team embarked on their journey this school year. To assist their adaptation to the iGEM environment, we delivered an educational lecture that passed on our experience and knowledge, including an introduction to synthetic biology, laboratory equipment, our project, and an experiment on bacterial transformation. By doing so, the junior team got a quick overview of how we built different components of our project and had a chance to ask questions about it. Besides, they could learn practical skills of handling various laboratory equipment that they may not have operated before.
Summary
Our education plan is divided into four parts– synthetic biology and iGEM, laboratory equipment, our project, and experimentation.
To begin, we started our presentation by introducing synthetic biology concepts, including the basic knowledge and concept of synthetic biology, what experiments it relates to, and applications in real life (Figure 16). We incorporated the design cycle to point out similarities and differences between usual experimentation processes and synthetic biology-related ones. After that, we introduced how we did research, listened to lectures, and maintained a habit of jotting notes to establish the basic structure of our project and implement the knowledge to design experiments.
Figure 16: Student listening to the lecture
As for the next section, we demonstrated the usage of some frequently used equipment and machines, as well as the purposes of using them. For instance, we prepared water for students to practise using a micropipette to dilute plasmids (Figure 17 & 18). After getting to know some of the laboratory equipment, we introduced our project to the junior team to provide an overview of the project at the final stage, hoping to receive suggestions from a new perspective to improve (Figure 19).
Figure 17: Students learning how to use a micropipette
Figure 18: Students learning how to use a micropipette
Figure 19: Introducing students to our project
Lastly, we guided them through a bacterial transformation experiment, where they can experience the full process of a synthetic biology-related experiment – including calculations beforehand and material preparation– as well as review the usage of various equipment introduced earlier.
Feedback
To evaluate our performance on leading an experiment for beginners as well as the clarity of our presentation on synthetic biology topics, we asked the junior team members to fill out a survey after the session. We designed some questions regarding how much they understood about synthetic biology, laboratory equipment usage, and PCR, followed by any other parts they were interested in but we did not mention in our lecture.
Figure 20: Students evaluating their understanding of synthetic biology
Figure 21: Students evaluating their understanding of laboratory equipment
Figure 22: Students evaluating their understanding of PCR
Looking at Figure 15, about three-quarters of students understood the synthetic biology contents, with the remaining ones thinking they were slightly unclear, and no one had zero understanding. Besides, as supported by the fact that approximately 90% of students were familiar with the usage of laboratory equipment, our introduction was successful (Fig. 16). Moreover, as shown in Figure 17, a majority of students rated themselves 4 out of 5 regarding their understanding of PCR, the experiment they performed after listening to our lecture, followed by 8 of them considering themselves fully understanding the experiment by rating themselves a 5 out of 5. The average score of students’ self-evaluation is relatively high, 3.83 out of 5, implying that while there are still spaces for improvement, we delivered our lecture relatively efficiently.
Figure 23: Students suggesting other parts they wish to learn about
Other than designing multiple-choice questions where answers are limited, we encouraged students to state their opinions on what they are interested in within the synthetic biology field (Fig 18). To our surprise, while most participants did not have doubts about our lecture, we received various suggestions, such as how we developed our project along with its current progress, details about bacterial transformation, and the roles of iGEM members.
We believe that showing more of our project development is a feasible idea. Through presenting our project in more detail and with more supporting data, not only can we promote our project’s aim to mitigate carbon emissions, but also sharpen our skills to deliver speeches and evaluate ourselves on whether our presentation was clear enough for people from various study levels. Furthermore, we can also state each group member’s role to serve as a brief image of how jobs are distributed among us. Responding to the feedback of providing more details about bacterial transformation, we think that it is more appropriate to teach its mechanisms after establishing a basic knowledge of synthetic biology, meaning it is not the best idea to include it in a short lecture.
Conclusion
After this 3-hour lecture, we were grateful for having a chance to share our experience and knowledge of what we have been delving into for the past school year. Although lecturing was smooth, there were minor setbacks while guiding the experiment. We spent extra time on the first few steps of the experiment, which were doing calculations, diluting plasmids, and labelling tubes. For instance, some students did not have a solid chemistry base from their original classes, so they might be miserable when they were asked to calculate the amount of distilled water needed. Despite these unpredictabilities, we still managed to complete all the lessons within the allotted time and were pleased to contribute to tiny parts of their iGEM journey.
Science Fair
Introduction and Purpose
Our school’s annual science fair presented a dual opportunity to present our iGEM project and engage with younger audiences and parents. With middle and high school students showing their projects to attending parents and teachers, the science fair was an ideal opportunity to promote iGEM to lower-grade students and connect with parents who were employed in relevant industries. We prepared a poster and an educational board game for students to learn about enhanced carbon fixation in cyanobacteria (Figure 24). By setting up our booth, we aimed to spark interest among the attending students and seek valuable expertise or feedback for our project (Figure 25).
Summary
In our science fair booth, we did two parts: holding a presentation of our project poster and playing our board game. We started by introducing them to the problem we hope to solve with our device, which is high carbon emissions. Then, we moved on to the technical aspects of our project and the final device we plan to make. For lower grades, we explained the concepts within our project with simpler terms to give them a picture of our project and our goals, while not complicating it.
Figure 24: Science Fair Education Poster
Figure 25. Booth presentations to science teachers
Figure 26: Booth presentations to attending parents
Figure 27: Discussing with a parent in the manufacturing industry about our product design
Figure 28: Parents and students coming to our booth to play our educational board game
Conclusion
At the science fair, we presented our project to students and parents and played our board game. Both attendees and we learned a lot during this event. The parents and students learned about the genetic engineering of organisms, while we gained experience in presenting our project to the public. We also received questions and feedback from parents and students, enhancing our project and enabling us to think of aspects we never thought of.




