Team Brainstorming
During the project advancement, we have attached great importance to in-depth communication and interaction with potential stakeholders. These stakeholders cover diverse fields such as academia, industry, and the public. Finally, we have created an exclusive stakeholder map that clearly presents our contact strategy. The map divides stakeholders into three core modules: one-way information output, one-way information input, and two-way information interaction, and are arranged in layers spreading from the inside out according to the degree of influence.
To better carry out the HP activities, we have developed a three-phase process framework consisting of "Insight" ,"Initiate" and "Improve" .This framework systematically organizes communication methods with enterprises, universities, and the public, and ultimately led to the creation of a phased promotion flowchart.
Guided by this model, a series of iHP activities were subsequently conducted.
Furthermore, as a former iGEM Principal Investigator, Professor Liu also offered valuable advice on competition rules, team collaboration, and experimental progress.
How can we improve its market competitiveness?
They highlighted common challenges in scale-up, such as unstable strain performance and manual regulation causing variability. Wastewater management and environmental compliance are also major concerns, requiring strict adherence to relevant laws. Moreover, early-stage decisions on raw material logistics and site selection directly affect long-term costs. Even with good technology, failing to align with industry needs can prevent successful commercialization.
Shineking experts noted that Shandong offers flexible raw material supply, while Heilongjiang provides a cost advantage.
Furthermore, in-depth collaboration with various university teams served as a powerful catalyst for refining and enhancing our project. We regularly organized cross-university online and offline seminars, facilitating the exchange of knowledge in areas like experimental design and data analysis. These interactions sparked innovative ideas and allowed us to leverage the respective expertise of each institution, fostering mutual progress among all teams. We actively participated in leading conferences in the biological sciences and sought guidance from experts across diverse fields. This allowed us to explore the most advanced theoretical achievements and sophisticated models within the synthetic biology industry. After acquiring valuable knowledge and feedback, we skillfully integrated these cutting-edge concepts into our project design. This process involved refining classical techniques and incorporating new technologies, which we then cycled back to the broader community, contributing to scientific advancement and driving continuous progress. For details, please see collaboration.