We use the following assumptions to make the modeling easier:
The goodness of fit is tested using statistical parameters such as AIC, BIC and log-Likelihood. We investigate the distribution of residuals to test whether an effect is missed.
A simple ODE for oxalate synthesis could look like this:
We included an oscillating function to compensate for translational and stochastic variability and possible leakiness of oahA, as we use little data. We implement data for TCA metabolites from literature for model fitting [Shirai et al, 2007], [Graf et al, 2020], [Reimer et al, 2014]. With this we end up with a non-autonomous ODE, as the rightern side is time dependent. By plotting this ODE (Fig. 1) we see the fit isn't bad, however it can still be improved. Looking into the residuals (Fig. 2), one can say that they are approximately normal.
This is however for now, only a descriptive model. For future research, we must improve the model using more own and literature data to conduct also a predictive model, which could help in estimating the magnitude in applications.
1. Shirai, T. et al. (2007). Study on roles of anaplerotic pathways in glutamate overproduction of Corynebacterium glutamicum by metabolic flux analysis. Microb Cell Fact, 6, 19. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-6-19
2. Graf, M. et al. (2020). Revisiting the Growth Modulon of Corynebacterium Glutamicum Under Glucose Limited Chemostat Conditions. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 8. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.584614
3. Reimer, L. C. et al. (2014). High-Throughput Screening of a Corynebacterium Glutamicum Mutant Library on Genomic and Metabolic Level. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e86799 URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086799