Loading Progress
0%

Our idea and design - Tellurium



Tellurium is a scarce but strategically important element, notably for thin-film photovoltaics. Its recovery from waste streams is challenging because physicochemical remediation is often inefficient and costly. Therefore, we propose bacterial bioremediation of tellurite as an alternative strategy.

We chose Pseudomonas putida S12 as a source for the genetic parts of our system. P. putida S12 is a soil bacterium widely used as a model in microbiology, known for its metabolic versatility and solvent tolerance (Han et al, 2024). This strain harbors a large megaplasmid pTTS12 (~583 kb), which encodes multiple resistance functions, including the terABCD tellurite resistance operon (Kusumawardhani et al, 2022; Kottara et al, 2020). By building on this natural capacity, we aim to improve tellurite recycling by cloning this operon into a plasmid and overexpressing it in E. coli (BL21).

Megaplasmid pTTS12 schematic with terZABCDE operon in Pseudomonas putida S12
Figure 1: Representation of the megaplasmid containing the terABCD operon of interest. The megaplasmid pTTS12, found in the Pseudomonas putida S12 strain, carries genes involved in solvent resistance and detoxification, as well as the terABCD tellurium resistance operon. This operon provided the genetic parts used in our experiments.

Our E. coli engineered strains are designed with genetic modules to:

Schematic representation of bacterial tellurite reduction to elemental tellurium
Figure 2: Schematic representation of tellurite reduction by bacteria. Bacteria first capture and take up soluble, toxic tellurite ions. Inside the cell, reductive agents convert tellurite (TeO₃²⁻) into elemental tellurium (Te⁰). The resulting tellurium is insoluble and accumulates as dark deposits. The reduction of soluble tellurite into elemental tellurium is a pivotal step, since it transforms a toxic and mobile compound into a recoverable solid.

Rationale for Gene Selection


The terZABCDE operon has been shown to confer resistance to tellurite (Whelan et al, 1995). In particular, genetic analyses indicate that terA, terB, terC, and terD are the core genes required for effective tellurite resistance and reduction (Valková et al, 2007). In contrast, terZ and terE act as accessory elements with minor contributions to resistance, potentially increasing the metabolic burden without significantly improving activity (Chasteen et al, 2009).

In Pseudomonas putida S12, this operon is located on the megaplasmid pTTS12, a 583 kb plasmid carrying multiple resistance determinants (Kusumawardhani et al, 2022). By focusing on terABCD, we simplify the cloning strategy, reduce plasmid size, and minimize the metabolic load on our chassis while maintaining resistance functionality.

Gene Collection


Table 1: Schematic representation of the tellurite resistance genes. The table lists the collection of the tellurite resistance genes, with the respective original terABCD DNA sequence source and a link to iGEM terABCD composite part. Displayed in the last row, a schematic representation of the terABCD gene cluster we cloned in the E.coli DH5α and BL21 strains. All genes are preceded by a ribosome binding site (not shown).

Gene Name Graphical DNA representation Link iGEM parts Original Publications
terA Graphical DNA representation of terA BBa_252F55NC Kusumawardhani et al.
terB Graphical DNA representation of terB BBa_258KVW5Q Kusumawardhani et al.
terC Graphical DNA representation of terC BBa_258V49XQ Kusumawardhani et al.
terD Graphical DNA representation of terD BBa_25EIPUVH Kusumawardhani et al.
terABCD Graphical DNA representation of the terABCD operon BBa_252NUJ3X Kusumawardhani et al.

AlphaFold Predictions of Ter Proteins


AlphaFold prediction of TerA–D
Figure 3: Structural predictions of the TerABCD proteins. The structures were predicted using the AlphaFold server based on the translated amino acid sequence of terA, terB, terC and terD. A. TerA possesses two TerD domains (shown in pink). B. TerB structural prediction, it is predicted to contain six α-helices. C. TerC contains cytoplasmic domains (shown in pink), transmembrane domains (shown in green) and extracellular domains (shown in blue). D. TerD structural prediction. Domain characterization was performed with Pfam, and domain coloring was applied using ChimeraX.

The precise functions and mechanisms of these genes remained unclear. TerB was proposed to act as the central component of tellurite reduction in association with TerC. TerC likely functioned as a membrane protein facilitating tellurite transport into and within the cell (Fig. 3C). TerD appeared to bind tellurite and operate independently of TerC. TerA, a member of the TerD protein family, was believed to bind metal ions and potentially alleviate the metabolic burden associated with tellurite reduction. The uncloned genes terZ and terE were homologous to terA and terD, respectively, and likely shared similar functions (Peng et al., 2022).

Rationale


We separated tasks into a cloning host for reliable plasmid assembly/amplification and an expression host to test tellurite resistance and reduction driven by the terABCD operon identified as the core genes for tellurite resistance.


E. coli DH5α cloning host


Used to assemble and amplify pET28a–terABCD. DH5α offers high transformation efficiency, clean colony morphology, and stable maintenance of medium-copy plasmids ideal for Gibson assembly, colony PCR, and Sanger verification prior to expression.


E. coli BL21 (DE3)


Used for IPTG-inducible expression of terABCD under the T7–lacO system and for all tellurite resistance and reduction assays. BL21(DE3) carries chromosomal T7 RNA polymerase, enabling strong expression of the operon to drive Te(IV) → Te⁰ reduction in liquid culture assays.

For both E. coli strains, we used a plasmid containing: the terABCD operon, an inducible T7 promoter with terminator, the lacI repressor with lacO binding site, and a kanamycin resistance marker (Figure 4).


Both strains carried the same vector: pET28a–terABCD with kanamycin resistance. The construct features a T7 promoter with lacO, lacI repressor, an optimized RBS, and a T7 terminator; we kept the backbone elements used elsewhere in the project for consistency (Figure 4). This design allowed rapid cloning in DH5α and high, tunable expression in BL21(DE3).

Plasmid designs for E. coli BL21 showing the terABCD operon and control elements
Figure 4: Schematic overview of the plasmids designed for the tellurite resistance project. KanR (kanamycin resistance), Ori (origin of replication), LacI promoter + lac operator (IPTG-inducible control), T7 promoter (drives terABCD expression), RBS (ribosome binding site), terA, terB, terC, terD forming the terABCD operon, T7 terminator (transcription termination), rop (plasmid copy number regulator), bom (mobilization sequence). The figure shows the pET28a-terABCD plasmid construct used in E. coli BL21 (DE3). Created in https://BioRender.com

To benchmark activity, we included one negative control and one positive control:


We propose on-site, ex-situ treatment of tellurite-impacted soils or sludges using a sealed, gently rotating, aerated rotary drum bioreactor (RDB). The RDB keeps soil, microbes, oxygen, and moisture in continuous contact, allowing our engineered bacteria to reduce soluble Te(IV) to insoluble Te⁰ uniformly across the matrix. The resulting Te⁰ can be flocculated, separated, and sent for refining, creating a circular Te stream. A closely related RDB setup has already achieved ~82% metal removal in polluted soils (Bravo et al, 2020), validating the unit operations and the ex-situ bioaugmentation approach.

RDB schematic
Figure 5: Ex-situ rotary drum bioreactor (RDB) for bioremediation of tellurite-contaminated soil and recovery of elemental tellurium. Tellurite-polluted agricultural soil (left) is fed into a sealed, slowly rotating, aerated drum (air inlet shown). Inside the reactor, engineered E. coli BL21 carrying the terABCD operon catalyzes the reduction of soluble tellurite (TeO₃²⁻) to insoluble elemental tellurium (Te⁰) under aerobic conditions. After treatment, the soil exits the reactor (right) as bioremediated soil; a downstream solid–liquid separation step (not depicted) flocculates/filters Te⁰ for recovery. Abbreviations: TeO₃²⁻, tellurite; Te⁰, elemental tellurium; terABCD, tellurite-resistance operon. Schematic, not to scale. (Concept adapted from an RDB soil-bioremediation approach; see Bravo et al., 2020.)

Strain and control strategy


We would deploy our terABCD pathway under constitutive control to avoid inducers and ensure activity during the entire cycle. If E. coli is not ideal for site permitting or soil stresses, the same operon can be ported to a soil-hardy chassis (e.g., Pseudomonas putida) while keeping the RDB process unchanged.

Impact


Each ex-situ batch that converts Te(IV) into Te⁰ directly reduces toxicity and mobility, recovers a critical material (Docherty & Docherty, 2023), and offsets primary Te needs for CdTe manufacturing, a lever that both industry and agencies identify as crucial for sustainable scale-up (Docherty & Docherty, 2023).