PROOF OF CONCEPT


Introduction

A good seed coating is biodegradable, biocompatible, and colourful. Moreover, they can be used to enhance crop yield in many ways. Certain seed coatings improve germination by attracting water in dry soils1, or provide nutrients to the germinating seed2. Farmers considered the colour and the delivery of active compounds as the most important properties of seed coatings. Active compounds help protect the plant during its earliest developmental phases. This strong establishment phase leads to the development of a sturdy crop with increased yields. During the development of BCoated, we demonstrated that bacterial cellulose (BC) is not just biodegradable3, but also biocompatible. We realised the applicability by developing a novel coating procedure. Additionally, we demonstrated that BCoated coatings fulfil all criteria needed for seed coatings, and can do more.

Coating approaches

Seed coatings are traditionally powdered, solubilised and then applied to the seed4. This method is theoretically easier to scale, but in the lab we lacked the required machinery. We couldn’t mill the BC, which makes it more difficult to dissolve. We assume milled BC can be dissolved in N-methyl morpholine-N-oxide. This solvent no longer dissolves cellulose when sufficient water is supplied, which will prevent damage to the cellulose in the seeds5,6. On a small scale, we have coated seeds with BC dissolved in water with 20% glycerol. This process is also interesting on a large scale, as the BC needs less treatment after its production. This means that its properties, as induced during the functionalisation, are maintained better.

We also worked on a second coating method, the in situ coating procedure. With this procedure, seeds were coated inside the culture medium while the BC is produced7 (Figure 1). This method turned out to be a successful way to coat seeds. A pre-treatment step is added to the coating protocol to increase the coating efficiency. Seeds are treated with polydopamine, meant to affix bacteria to the seed surface, and/or mechanical scarification, meant to increase surface area for BC attachment. With pre-treatment, the coating efficiency reached 80% (Figure 2).

Successfully in situ coated seeds. Sorghum bicolor var. Teshale encased in bacterial cellulose (BC) produced by K. sucrofermentans. (A) wet freshly coated seeds, (B) washed and dried seeds.
Effects of seed coating treatment on coating success rate with the optimised protocol. Non-treated seeds, scarified (S), polydopamine (PDA) treated, or PDA+S treated seeds were coated in situ (n=32). Asterisks denote levels of significance as denoted using a logistic regression, followed by a Fishers exact test for pairwise comparisons: n.s. is not significant > 0.05; *p < 0.05.

Biocompatibility test

Following successful coating, the effect of the coating on germination efficacy was investigated. BC is a generally biocompatible material3, but we had to establish that the coatings do not negatively impact the seeds. In a germination assay, we compared the germination rates of seeds with and without coating. To prevent germination during the coating step, seeds were osmoprimed beforehand. Osmoprimed and coated seeds germinate well, reaching higher germination rates than untreated seeds (Figure 3). From this data it can be concluded that BCoated coatings will not harm germination.

Effects of seed osmopriming at different osmotic potentials on germination rate after in situ coating (n=15) measured three days post-inoculation (DPI). Osmopriming is a pre-treatment in which seeds are soaked in a controlled, low-water solution to help them better tolerate stress during germination. The osmotic potential, expressed in megapascals (MPa), indicates how much water is available to the seed where lower (more negative) values correspond to drier conditions that make water uptake more difficult. Sterilised seeds were not coated and serve as a baseline for germination performance. n.s. = not significant (p > 0.05).

Tailored coatings

In the functionalisation phase of our project, we investigated biological methods to change the properties of BC. We changed the water holding capacity of BC through an enzymatic treatment. By establishing a conjugation method, we opened the door for genetic modifications of BC-producer K. sucrofermentans, which can be used to alter properties such as porosity and biodegradability. These properties are important to fine-tune the delivery of active compounds8. In the use case about Striga, we demonstrated that BC is a suitable material for the slow release of active components.

Through our human practices, we identified a gap in the availability of active compounds. This drove us to add proteins to our BC matrix. We tested the incorporation of the insecticidal protein Cry3Aa to protect seeds from the wireworm, a major cause of crop losses in Europe. We designed and produced proteins with a cellulose binding domain (CBD) in the lab. We mixed the proteins with BC and tested the binding affinity before and after washing. Finally, we tested the effect of adding Cry3Aa to mealworm feed on their viability. The parts developed for these experiments are the first part of the part collection.

Protein production

No successful protein secretion in BC producing bacteria has been reported9. This is one of the motivations to develop a consortium for BC production. This consortium also contains S. cerevisiae, which is highly efficient in protein production and secretion10. In our production platform, we developed a consortium of K. sucrofermentans and S. cerevisiae. Our wet and dry lab efforts both show that the two organisms can live together. This allows for the production of proteins directly in the bioreactor.

Protein binding

An important challenge is ensuring that the proteins secreted by S. cerevisiae bind to the BC matrix. In this context, CBD can be fused to the proteins, allowing, through non-covalent bonds, a more efficient attachment to the BC11.
CBD binding affinity was tested by fusing it to a green fluorescent protein (GFP). The fusion protein was produced in the lab and incubated with BC to allow binding. The fluorescence was tested directly after incubation, again after washing, and a third time after freeze-drying and re-solubilising. BC with CBD-GFP showed a significantly higher fluorescence than BC treated with normal GFP in all three measurements (Figure 4). With this we demonstrated that we can sucessfully bind proteis to BC for additional functionalities.

Average fluorescence of the BC treated with CBD-GFP, GFP, or water. Error bars denote standard deviation. ** denotes values differ significantly (p < 0.05).

Insecticide coating effect

To test the effect of Cry3Aa on the mealworm, we used CBD-Cry3Aa to coat wheat bran. Wheat bran is a common food source for the mealworm, and is rich in cellulose12. We therefore hypothesised that the CBD also will allow Cry3Aa binding to bran and act as a proof-of-principle. This method could be performed in a higher-throughput manner. The wheat bran is incubated with CBD-Cry3Aa, washed and freeze-dried. The treated bran was fed to the mealworms, and growth was measured after one week (Figure 5). The bran coated with the insecticidal protein caused a significant starvation effect in mealworms. Due to their taxonomic group, this will likely be translatable to the wireworms and other coleopteran larvae that threaten agricultural yields.

Average growth rates of the mealworms after one week of feeding on the treated wheat bran. Only live mealworms were included in the growth rate calculations. Error bars denote standard deviation, n=6 for all treatments, with the exception of the pesticide control (deltamethrin) where n=5 due to one of the samples having a 100% mortality rate. * denotes values do not differ significantly (p > 0.05). ** denotes values do differ significantly (p < 0.05). p-values were determined using a Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by a Dunn's test with no p-value correction.

Colour

As users see the colour of seed coatings as a factor to determine quality, we also set out to change the colour of the seed coatings. Initially, we coloured the BC post-production with natural colourants. The BC can be made red, pink or green with red beet powder, freeze-dried strawberry powder or spirulina (Figure 6). After this, we also attempted to colour the BC with the addition of proteins. We made fusion proteins that contain a CBD, a blue or yellow chromoprotein and a secretion tag. Similar fusion proteins with a fluorescent protein instead of a chromoprotein have also been made for simpler detection. These fusion proteins are part of our part collection, with proteins that add functionalities to BC. The proteins have been produced in S. cerevisiae. The fluorescent proteins have also been detected in the supernatant, which shows that the proteins are indeed secreted. This means that the chromoproteins can be used to colour the BC simultaneously with the production.

BC coloured with the natural colourants, from left to right, red beet powder, freeze-dried strawberry powder and spirulina. Solubilised BC is shown in the Eppendorf tube, with in the plate a piece of washed BC.

Conclusion

BC’s ability to carry proteins for entirely new applications of seed coatings was confirmed. We additionally showed that the protein retained its activity after washing and freeze-drying. The coating has a custom water holding capacity to control germination. Active ingredients can be incorporated and released, the rate of which can be altered in the future with biodegradability and porosity. Lastly, by adding colour we comply to industry standards without a need for chemical colourants. Although our initial goal was to show this effect on actual seeds, due to time constraints, we were not able to develop a high-throughput seed coating protocol in time. However, we believe that these experiments put together show that our solution has the potential to make tailored seed coatings.

Future focus

To achieve a functional production process, a few steps still have to be taken. All parts of the process have been developed in different microbial cultures. All the achievements will have to be combined into the same microbial production consortium. Additionally, new coating properties can continuously be developed to assist arable farmers and see companies in the many struggles they face. The modularity of BCoated is then still its strength, allowing for flexibility to move with the developments in agriculture. All the while providing tailored coatings for tomorrow’s crops.

(1)
Su, L.; Li, J.; Xue, X.; others. Super Absorbent Polymer Seed Coatings Promote Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Caragana Korshinskii in Drought. Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B 2017, 18, xxx–xxx. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1600350.
(2)
Tsvigu, A.; Soropa, G.; Mtangi, W.; Mashavakure, N. Nutrient Delivery to Crops Through Fertiliser-Coated Seed: A Systematic Review. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science 2025, 75 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2025.2470170.
(3)
Betlej, I.; Zakaria, S.; Krajewski, K. J.; Boruszewski, P. Bacterial Cellulose - Properties and Its Potential Application. Sains Malaysiana 2021, 50 (2), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2021-5002-20.
(4)
Javed, T.; Afzal, I.; Shabbir, R.; Ikram, K.; Zaheer, S.; Faheem, M.; Haider Ali, H.; Iqbal, J. Seed Coating Technology: An Innovative and Sustainable Approach for Improving Seed Quality and Crop Performance. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 2022, 21 (4), 536–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2022.03.003.
(5)
Maia, J. C. C.; Perez, S. Crystal Structure of n-Methylmorpholine-n-Oxide Monohydrate. Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Crystallography and Crystal Chemistry 1982, 38 (5), 1077–1081. https://doi.org/10.1107/S056774088200421X.
(6)
Sen, S.; Martin, J. D.; Argyropoulos, D. S. Review: Physical Characterization of Cellulose and Its Derivatives in n-Methylmorpholine-n-Oxide (NMMO). Cellulose 2013, 20 (2), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc400085a.
(7)
Rühs, P. A.; Böni, L.; Fuller, G. G.; Inglis, R. F.; Fischer, P. In Situ Multilayer Bacterial Cellulose Coatings for Advanced Biofunctionalization. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (2), 2179–2190. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b09956.
(8)
Skrzypczak, D.; Jarzembowski, Ł.; Izydorczyk, G.; Mikula, K.; Hoppe, V.; Mielko, K. A.; Pudełko-Malik, N.; Młynarz, P.; Chojnacka, K.; Witek-Krowiak, A. Hydrogel Alginate Seed Coating as an Innovative Method for Delivering Nutrients at the Early Stages of Plant Growth. Polymers 2021, 13 (23), 4233.
(9)
Goosens, V. J.; Walker, K. T.; Aragon, S. M.; Singh, A.; Senthivel, V. R.; Dekker, L.; Caro-Astorga, J.; Buat, M. L. A.; Song, W.; Lee, K.-Y.; Ellis, T. Komagataeibacter Tool Kit (KTK): A Modular Cloning System for Multigene Constructs and Programmed Protein Secretion from Cellulose Producing Bacteria. ACS Synthetic Biology 2021, 10 (12), 3422–3434. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00358.
(10)
Zhao, M.; Ma, J.; Zhang, L.; Qi, H. Engineering Strategies for Enhanced Heterologous Protein Production by Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Microbial Cell Factories 2024, 23, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-024-02299-z.
(11)
Yang, F.; Jin, E.-S.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, S.; Zhu, W.; Jin, Y.; Song, J. A Mini-Review on the Applications of Cellulose-Binding Domains in Lignocellulosic Material Utilizations. BioResources 2015, 10 (3). https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.10.3.Yang.
(12)
Prückler, M.; Siebenhandl-Ehn, S.; Apprich, S.; Höltinger, S.; Haas, C.; Schmid, E.; Kneifel, W. Wheat Bran-Based Biorefinery 1: Composition of Wheat Bran and Strategies of Functionalization. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2014, 56 (2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2013.12.020.