Yes, the team has presented a logical and strategic product development plan supported by clear milestones, realistic timelines, and structured resource allocation. The plan moves from laboratory validation to commercial readiness, ensuring both scientific feasibility and entrepreneurial scalability. In the short term (0–6 months), the focus is on confirming peptide expression and validating the probiotic’s safety and efficacy through lab assays to establish a proof of concept required by accelerators such as IndieBio or Y Combinator. During this period, the team is also working with the FSU Office of Commercialization and FSU College of Law to secure intellectual property through a provisional patent, which includes filing an invention disclosure, reviewing ownership terms, submitting the provisional patent, and later transitioning to a utility patent once data is validated. In the medium term (6–12 months), the plan includes improving the proof of concept, gaining mentors and sponsors within the respective fields, and applying to accelerator programs like IndieBio, YC, or IGNITE FSU to gain resources, mentorship, and seed funding. In the long term (24–30 months), the team plans to evaluate its overall progress and hopefully transition from academic research to early-stage commercialization through the development of a market-ready capsule or supplement product. During this phase, the team will also explore regulatory steps, pursue additional sponsorships and grants, and strengthen relationships with investors and industry partners to support growth. Alongside product development, the team has also created backup plans to commercialize both the brand and the science in parallel by building public awareness campaigns, digital outreach, and educational content around the health impact of microplastics, as well as preparing early branding materials for potential supplement or awareness-based product lines. Furthermore, if a market-ready product cannot be achieved in the short term, the team has identified a realistic alternative pathway through sublicensing or co-licensing its patent and research data to established biotech or nutraceutical companies. This would allow the intellectual property and research outcomes to generate value and impact even without direct product commercialization. These dual commercialization routes—direct development and strategic sublicensing—ensure long-term flexibility and sustainability. Risks such as delays in expression, IP negotiations, and regulatory barriers are recognized, with contingency strategies in place through partnerships, legal guidance, and phased proof-of-concept milestones. Overall, the plan is ambitious yet realistic, integrating patent development, accelerator readiness, brand growth, and alternative commercialization strategies that position the project for continued advancement and tangible post-competition success. [Business Plan pages 25-30]