Contribution
Overview

Plastic pollution has become a global environmental issue, with types such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) being among the most prevalent. PET is currently the most widely used plastic. However, existing enzymatic degradation technologies for PET are inefficient and difficult to apply on a large scale. Therefore, to improve the degradation and recycling of PET plastics, we aim to enhance degradation efficiency by screening and engineering highly efficient plastic-degrading enzymes, providing innovative solutions for the bioremediation of plastic pollution.

Firstly, we selected polyethylene terephthalate hydrolase (PETase) from marine microbial metagenomics and mono(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate hydrolase (MHETase), which can degrade PET into terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG) (Fig. 1). Molecular docking was employed to assist in validating the key active sites of dsPETase and to mutate these key residues. The concentration of MHET was measured using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), and mutant sites with high enzymatic activity were screened. Finally, the selected mutant dsPETase and MHETase were used in combination. The surface morphological changes of PET films before and after degradation were observed using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and the degradation products, TPA and EG, were quantified by HPLC. The ultimate goal is to develop an enzyme combination with high-efficiency degradation capability for specific plastics like PET, which can be applied in plastic pollution treatment or industrial degradation processes.

1758001182746

Fig 1. Degradation process of PET plastic and key enzymes [1]

During our experiment, we added experimental data and more information about some new parts for iGEM part. These include, for instance, IsPETase(BBa_25RH3V8U), dsPETase(BBa_25S16DKP), MHET(BBa_25ZYO9Z7), pET28a-IsPETase(BBa_25BUBMDI) and soon (Table 1).

Table 1. The parts collection

Part number

Part name

Contribute type

Part type

BBa_25RH3V8U

IsPETase

Old part

Basic part

BBa_25S16DKP

dsPETase

New part

Basic part

BBa_25ZYO9Z7

MHET

Old part

Basic part

BBa_2542VYML

GLY8-GIn

New part

Basic part

BBa_25N2AZ4A

GLY8-Ser

New part

Basic part

BBa_25655FKG

GLY8-Thr

New part

Basic part

BBa_25EL7FQM

GLY8-Cys

New part

Basic part

BBa_25WBHOZ1

GLY8-Asn

New part

Basic part

BBa_2578647W

GLY8-Tyr

New part

Basic part

BBa_25VTOT4S

Arg47-Lys

New part

Basic part

BBa_2543N0QT

Arg47-His

New part

Composite Part

BBa_25BUBMDI

pET8a-IsPETase

New part

Composite Part

BBa_25GLIJTL

pET8a-dsPETase

New part

Composite Part

BBa_2582B9BT

pET8a-MHETase

New part

Composite Part

BBa_25CJBWD2

pET8a-GLY8-GIn

New part

Composite Part

BBa_255I67FC

pET8a-GLY8-Ser

New part

Composite Part

BBa_25I479MZ

pET8a-GLY8-Thr

New part

Composite Part

BBa_25TZZ2LA

pET8a-GLY8-Cys

New part

Composite Part

BBa_25NSRU73

pET8a-GLY8-Asn

New part

Composite Part

BBa_255398BD

pET8a-GLY8-Tyr

New part

Composite Part

BBa_25Y25VK8

pET8a-Arg47-Lys

New part

Composite Part

BBa_25PEQQTG

pET8a-Arg47-His

New part

Composite Part

Part contribution
Add New basic part

Name: IsPETase, BBa_25RH3V8U

Base Pairs: 879bp

Origin: Ideonella sakaiensis

Properties:

A bacterial strain Ideonella sakaiensis capable of efficiently degrading PET has been discovered. At the same time, a hydrolase secreted by this bacterium with the ability to degrade PET, named PETase, has also been reported. This enzyme can hydrolyze PET into bis-2-hydroxyethyl-terephthalate (BHET), mono-2-hydroxyethyl-terephthalate (MHET), and TPA [1].

Usage and Biology:

In the existing literature, Ideonella sakaiensis is known to thrive under mild environmental conditions, and accordingly, its enzyme IsPETase exhibits optimal activity at ambient temperature. Although IsPETase demonstrates generally higher PET degradation activity compared to other known enzymes, it suffers from relatively poor stability [2]. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 hours, the enzyme nearly loses all activity [3], and operates only at temperatures well below the glass transition temperature of PET. These limitations restrict its degradation efficacy and hinder its practical application in industrial settings. For instance, under conditions of 30 °C and pH 7.0, when 50 nmol/L of IsPETase was reacted with low-crystallinity PET film for 18 hours, only approximately 300 μmol/L of degradation products were detected [4]. Furthermore, IsPETase shows efficient degradation mainly toward low-crystallinity PET substrates, while exhibiting minimal activity against high-crystallinity PET materials.

Experimental data:

In order to construct the plasmid pET28a-IsPETase, the target gene IsPETase was amplified by PCR with primer IsPETase-F(5’-catatgaattttcccagggcttcaagactaatg-3’) and IsPETase-R(5’-ctcgaggctgcagttcgcggtgcg-3’). In Fig 2, it is clear to see that our sample are mainly in the range between 500 bp and 1000bp, which accurately matched with theoretical length, indicating a successful polymerase chain reaction.

图片21

Fig 2. The gel electrophoresis of IsPETase nucleic acids. The length nucleic acids of 879bp

Name:dsPETase, BBa_25S16DKP

Base Pairs: 816bp

Origin: Hydrothermal vent metagenome

Properties: A novel halophilic PET plastic-degrading enzyme with high activity derived from the hydrothermal vent metagenome (of deep-sea origin) was reported. Meanwhile, a hydrolase with PET-degrading activity, namely PETase, secreted by this bacterium was also reported. This enzyme can hydrolyze PET into bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET), mono(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (MHET), and terephthalic acid (TPA) [5]

Usage and Biology: This highly active new salt-loving PET plastic degradation enzyme originating from deep-sea sources’s degradation rate of PET film reached 83 percent in three day, which is 44 times the activity of the reported IsPETase plastic degradation enzyme. But the content about research on dsPETase enzyme activity is little[5].

Experimental data:

To construct the expression plasmid dsPETase, firstly, the gene encoding dsPETase was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primer. dsPETase-F(5’-gaattcatgacaaatcccggggggggaggcgga-3’) and dsPETase-R(5’-ctcgagttagttaatgcctttacgacgcacgtcccagtca--3’). As shown in Fig 3, compared with the DNA marker, a significant band was seenin the range between 500 bp and 1000bp, indicating a successful polymerase chain reaction.

图片2

Fig 3. The gel electrophoresis of dsPETase nucleic acids

dsPETase Mutant:

Name: Gly8-GIn(BBa_2542VYML), Gly8-Ser(BBa_25N2AZ4A), Gly8-Thr(BBa_25655FKG), Gly8-Cys(BBa_25EL7FQM), Gly8-Asn(BBa_25NSRU73), Gly8-Tyr(BBa_2578647W), Arg47-Lys(BBa_25VTOT4S), and Arg47-His(BBa_2543N0QT)

Base Pairs: 816 bp

Origin: Hydrothermal vent metagenome

Properties: Derived from the hydrothermal vent metagenome, a highly active novel halophilic PET plastic-degrading enzyme from the deep sea has been reported, along with the hydrolytic enzyme PETase secreted by this bacterium, which can hydrolyze PET into bis-2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET), mono-2-hydroxyethyl terephthalate (MHET), and TPA. The Gly8-GIn, Gly8-Ser, Gly8-Thr, Gly8-Cys, Gly8-Asn, Gly8-Tyr, Arg47-Lys, and Arg47-His are all mutants of dsPETase, exhibiting the same functionality.

Usage and Biology: The highly active novel halophilic PET plastic-degrading enzyme from the deep sea achieves a degradation rate of 83% for PET films within 3 days, which is 44 times the activity of the previously reported IsPETase plastic-degrading enzyme. There is relatively little research on the enzyme activity of dsPETase. Gly8-GIn, Gly8-Ser, Gly8-Thr, Gly8-Cys, Gly8-Asn, and Gly8-Tyr are mutations of the eighth amino acid of dsPETase to similar amino acids (Fig. 4), while Arg47-Lys and Arg47-His are mutants of dsPETase (Fig. 5), where Arg at position 47 is mutated to Lys and His, showing high homology[5].

图片5

Fig 4. The Mutant of GLY8-GIn,GLY8-Ser,GLY8-Thr,GLY8-Cys,GLY8-Asn,GLY8-Tyr

图片6

Fig 5. The Mutant of Arg47-Lys and Arg47-His

Name:MHETase,BBa_25ZYO9Z7

Base Pairs: 1818bp

Origin: Ideonella sakaiensis

Properties:

Mono-2-hydroxyethyl terephthalate (MHET) is an intermediate with a competitive inhibitory effect in the degradation process of PET, which can be hydrolyzed from terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG) catalyzed by MHET degradation enzymes.

Usage and Biology:

MHET hydrolase is mainly used for degrading plastics. Studies on its enzymatic properties indicate that the optimal pH and temperature for this enzyme are 7.5 and 40 °C, respectively, and it is relatively stable under conditions of pH 7.5−10.0 and 30−45 °C; the kinetic parameters measured with MHET as the substrate show kcat of (24.2±0.5) s–1 and Km of (1.8±0.2) μmol/L.[8]

Experimental data:

DNA encoding MHETase was optimised according to the codon preference of E. coli and synthesised. To construct the plasmid for MHETase, the gene encoding MHETase was amplified using polymerase chain eaction (PCR) with primer MHETase-F (5’-catatgcaaacgactgtaacaacaatgttactag-3’) and MHETase-R (5’-ctcgagcggaggggctgcg--3’).Fig. 6shows representative photos of the DNA encoding MHETase .And the gel electrophoresis results showed that our sample are in the range between 500 bp and 1000bp, suggesting that MHETase was successful polymerase chain reaction.

图片4

Fig. 6 The gel electrophoresis of MHETase nucleic acids

Add new composite part
Part 1: Polyethylene terephthalate hydrolase (PETsae)

Engineering Principle:

PETase is a hydrolase enzyme that can hydrolyze PET into bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET) and mono(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (MHET). PETase from different sources exhibits varying enzyme activity characteristics, with proper protein folding having a significant impact on enzyme activity. Therefore, firstly, PETase from Ideonella sakaiensis and hydrothermal vent metagenome was screened using data blocks, and molecular docking was employed to assist in verifying key active sites of PETase and mutating those key sites. Furthermore, HPLC was used to determine the content of MHET and high-activity mutant sites were screened. Finally, the selected mutant dsPETase and MHETase were used in conjunction, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to observe the changes in surface morphology of PET films before and after degradation, along with HPLC measurements of the degradation products which are terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG), calculating the degradation rate. Ultimately, this demonstrates a high efficiency in degrading specific plastics (such as PET), which could be applied to plastic pollution management or industrial degradation processes (Fig 7).

图片10

Fig. 7.The engineering schematic diagram of the project design

  1. pET28a- IsPETase(BBa_25BUBMDI)
  2. Construction Design:

    Selection of PETase from Ideonella sakaiensis was conducted in NCBI database, named IsPETase. The genes encoding IsPETase fused with 6×His-tag at its C-terminus were optimized and chemically synthesized. The plasmid map was constructed by snapgene software(Fig. 8), and inserted into the expression vector pET28a by homologous recombination method, the recombinant plasmids pET28a-IsPETase were further transformed into E.Coli DH5α.

    图片7

    Fig 8. The plasmid map of pET28a-IsPETase

    Experimental Approach:

    Fig. 9.The electrophoresis, plate Assay, and sequencing of IsPETase. Note: IsPETase:879bp; pET28a:5323bp

    The pET-28a plasmid vector was linearized for the construction of the expression plasmid. The plasmid containing the IsPETase gene was constructed using homologous recombination, followed by confirmation of successful construction via agarose gel electrophoresis. The Fig 9A showed that the IsPETase gene is between 500bp and 1000bp markers. The results are showed in Fig 9B, the linearized plasmid pET28a is highlighted 5000bp. The expansion length of gene is consistent with the DNA encoding and indicate the succeed of amplification. The Fig 9C showed that the recombinant plasmids was transformed into processed E.coli DH5α to copy the plasmids. As shown in Fig 9D, the sequencing results revealed a perfect match to the target gene sequence without any mutations, demonstrating the successful construction of the plasmid pET28a-IsPETase.

  3. pET28a-dsPETase(BBa_25GLIJTL)
  4. Construction Design:

    The genes encoding dsPETase fused with 6×His-tag at its C-terminus were optimized and chemically synthesized. The plasmid map was constructed by snapgene software(Fig 10), and inserted into the expression vector pET28a by homologous recombination method, the recombinant plasmids pET28a-dsPETase were further transformed into E.Coli DH5α.

    图片1001

    Fig 10. The plasmid map of pET28a-dsPETase

    Experimental Approach:

    Fig. 11.The electrophoresis, plate Assay, and sequencing of dsPETase

    The construction of the dsPETase plasmid employed an identical strategy to that of the IsPETase plasmid, with both based on the method of homologous recombination. As shown in Fig 11A, the dsPETase gene migrated between 500 and 1000 bp. This is consistent with its actual length of 816 bp, which was determined by sequencing. The linearized pET28a line is around 5000bp and its original length is 5329bp. We was transformed the pET28a-dsPETase plasmid into E.coli in the Fig 11C. In Fig 11D, sequencing of the plasmid confirmed that the inserted DNA fragment matched the target gene sequence, demonstrating successful ligation into the vector.

  5. dsPETase mutant: pET28a-GLY8-GIn, ET28a-GLY8-Ser, pET28a-GLY8-Thr, pET28a-GLY8-Cys, pET28a-GLY8Asn, pET28a-GLY8Tyr, pET28a-Arg47Lys and pET28a-Arg47His
  6. Construction Design:

    To identify key active sites in dsPETase for mutagenesis, we constructed a three-dimensional protein structure of dsPETase and performed molecular docking with the chemical structure of PET(Fig 12). The docking score (binding energy) serves as an indicator to evaluate the affinity between PET and protein dsPETase. A stronger affinity results in tighter binding and more stable molecular interactions. A more negative docking score corresponds to a stronger affinity between the molecules.

    图片3

    Fig 12. Docking results of dsPETase with the PET molecule; Red represents the PET molecule.

    图片2

    Fig 13. Schematic diagram of the active site of dsPETase with the PET molecule.

    The optimal binding mode between the PET molecule and dsPETase is shown in Figs 12 and 13. The molecular docking binding energy was calculated to be −3.249 kcal/mol, with stabilization primarily achieved through hydrogen bonding (Table 1). Key amino acid residues forming hydrogen bonds with the PET molecule were glycine at position 8 (Gly8) and arginine at position 47 (Arg47), which enhanced the stability of the PET molecule within the binding pocket.The molecular docking results validated the feasibility of selecting Gly8 and Arg47 for mutagenesis, a decision initially made based on expert opinions during the experimental design phase. However, experimental validation is required to confirm the degradation efficiency of the mutants and ensure the reliability of the result.

    Based on the advice of biology Professor Yao, we performed site-directed mutagenesis on the active site residues glycine (Gly8) and arginine (Arg47). Specifically, Gly8 was mutated to amino acids with similar properties—namely, polar neutral R-group residues such as glutamine (Gln), serine (Ser), threonine (Thr), cysteine (Cys), asparagine (Asn), and tyrosine (Tyr). This strategy helps minimize structural perturbations that could lead to loss of protein activity. The arginine at position 47 was mutated to amino acids with similar properties, specifically basic R-group residues such as lysine (Lys) and histidine (His). The resulting mutants were designated as Arg47-Lys, Arg47-His, Gly8-Gln, Gly8-Asn, Gly8-Cys, Gly8-Ser, Gly8-Thr, and Gly8-Tyr. As shown in Table 1, the docking scores of these mutants were significantly improved compared to that of wild-type dsPETase, indicating stronger binding affinity with PET.

Table 1. Docking scores (binding energy, kcal/mol) of PET with dsPETase and mutants.

Name

dsPETase

Gly8-GIn

Gly8-Ser

Gly8-Thr

Gly8-Cys

Gly8-Asn

Gly8-Tyr

Arg47-Lys

Arg47-His

docking score

-3.249

-5.103

-4.932

-5.151

-4.945

-5.002

-5.204

-5.096

-5.012

The plasmid map was constructed by snapgene software(Fig 14), and inserted into the expression vector pET28a by homologous recombination method, the recombinant plasmids were further transformed into E.Coli DH5α.

图片9

Fig 14. The plasmid map of pET28a-IsPETase

Cultivation, Purification and SDS-PAGE:

  1. Mutant Arg47-Lys and Arg47-His
  2. 图片34

    Fig 15. Molecular interactions between the protein and the ligand within the binding pocket. Note: The protein structures of the Arg47-Lys and Arg47-His mutants are depicted in blue. The PET molecule is shown in orange.

    The binding energies between the PET molecule and the mutant proteins Arg47-Lys and Arg47-His were −5.076 kcal/mol and −5.012 kcal/mol, respectively, indicating strong molecular interactions. As shown in Fig 15, the PET molecule interacts with the Arg47-Lys mutant primarily through hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions. Hydrogen bonds were formed with LEU-70 and ALA-71, while hydrophobic interactions occurred with VAL-43, LEU-70, ALA-71, and ARG-68. In the Arg47-His mutant, the PET molecule was involved in hydrophobic interactions with the specific residues PHE-44, TYR-118, and THR-117 (Fig 15).

  3. Mutant (Gly8-Gln, Gly8-Asn, Gly8-Cys, Gly8-Ser, Gly8-Thr, and Gly8-Tyr)
  4. 图片30

    Fig 16. Molecular interactions between the protein and ligand within the binding pocket. The mutant protein structure is shown in blue, and the PET molecule is depicted in orange.

    The binding energy between the PET molecule and the Gly8-Asn mutant protein was calculated to be −5.002 kcal/mol, indicating strong binding affinity. As shown in Fig 16, the PET molecule interacts with the Gly8-Asn mutant primarily through hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions. Specifically, a hydrogen bond was formed with TYR-106, while hydrophobic interactions were observed with PHE-44, THR-117, and TYR-118.

    The binding energy for the PET molecule with the Gly8-Cys mutant was −4.945 kcal/mol, demonstrating favorable binding interactions. Fig 16 shows that the PET molecule engages in hydrophobic interactions with LEU-103 and LYS-102, as well as electrostatic interactions with LYS-102 and ARG-99 in the Gly8-Cys mutant.

    图片31

    Fig 17. Molecular interactions between the protein and ligand within the binding pocket. The mutant protein structure is shown in blue, and the PET molecule is depicted in orange.

    The binding energies between the PET molecule and the Gly8-Gln and Gly8-Ser mutant proteins were calculated to be −5.103 kcal/mol and −4.932 kcal/mol, respectively, indicating strong binding affinity. As shown in Fig 17, the PET molecule interacts with the Gly8-Gln mutant primarily through hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions. Specifically, a hydrogen bond was formed with TYR-106, while hydrophobic interactions were observed with PHE-44, THR-117, and TYR-118. Fig 17 illustrates that the PET molecule engages in hydrophobic interactions with LEU-103 and LYS-102, as well as electrostatic interactions with LYS-102 and ARG-99 in the Gly8-Ser mutant.

    图片36

    Fig 18. Molecular interactions between the protein and ligand within the binding pocket. The mutant protein structure is shown in blue, and the PET molecule is depicted in orange.

    The binding energies between the PET molecule and the Gly8-Thr and Gly8-Tyr mutant proteins were calculated to be −5.151 kcal/mol and −5.204 kcal/mol, respectively, indicating strong binding interactions. In Fig 18, the PET molecule engages in hydrophobic interactions with PHE-44, TYR-118, and THR-117 in the Gly8-Thr mutant. Fig 18 illustrates that the PET molecule interacts with the Gly8-Tyr mutant primarily through hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions. Specifically, a hydrogen bond was formed with TYR-106, while hydrophobic interactions were observed with PHE-44 and TYR-118.

    图片23

    Fig 19. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of the mutant

    We performed site-directed mutagenesis using PCR. As shown in Fig 19, the DNA fragments migrated between 5000 bp and 7500 bp, with all mutants (Arg47-Lys, Arg47-His, Gly8-Gln, Gly8-Asn, Gly8-Cys, Gly8-Ser, Gly8-Thr, and Gly8-Tyr) exhibiting a consistent length of 6190 bp. The plasmids were subsequently sent for commercial sequencing(Fig 20), and the results confirmed that the introduced mutations matched the expected designs.

    图片36

    Fig 20. The sequencing of the mutant

    As shown in Fig 21, no significant difference was observed between the growth curves of the control group and the dsPETase and mutant strain, indicating robust bacterial growth.

    dsPETase(1)

    Fig 21.The growth curve of dsPETase and mutant

    As shown in Fig 22A, lanes 1–2 exhibited diffuse bands in the crude protein samples, suggesting the presence of a substantial amount of non-specific proteins. Lanes 3–5, which served as blank controls, showed no detectable target band corresponding to dsPETase. In lanes 6–9, clear protein bands were observed within the molecular weight range of 25–35 kDa. These samples were purified by nickel-affinity chromatography, wherein Ni-NTA resin selectively captured His-tagged proteins, wash buffer removed non-specifically bound impurities, and the target protein was subsequently eluted under appropriate conditions. Fig 22B displays the protein expression profiles of various mutants. Band intensity and thickness reflect relative expression levels, with the Gly8-Ser mutant showing the darkest and thickest band, indicating its highest expression among all variants.

    图片71

    Fig 22. The SDS-PAGE of dsPETase and mutant. M:marker 1,2:rough protein; 3-5:Wash buffer 6-9:purified protein. DsPETase:31.5kDa

    Characterization/Measurement:

    The chromatographic conditions were optimized using a Thermo Scientific C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) with a mobile phase consisting of phosphate buffer (containing 5 mmol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 0.04% phosphoric acid) and methanol in a ratio of 70:30 (v/v). According to the experimental protocol, standard solutions were serially diluted to appropriate concentrations to establish a calibration curve. The peak area was plotted on the Y-axis against the concentration of the reference standard on the X-axis, and regression analysis was performed to obtain the equation for each standard. A good linear relationship was observed within the concentration range of 1–50 mg/L (Table 2).

Table 2. The standard curve of MHET

Concentrations

(mg/L)

Peak area

1

58.41312

2

130.59349

5

357.34796

10

697.24371

20

1393.50171

We incubated 500 mg of PET plastic substrates with IsPETase, dsPETase, and their variants at a final concentration of 1 mg/mL, then collected samples after 48 and 72 hours of degradation at room temperature. The peak area of MHET was measured by HPLC, and its concentration in the experimental samples was calculated based on the standard curve.

As shown in Fig 23A, MHET was detected in the experimental groups of IsPETase, dsPETase, and their mutants at 48-hour, whereas MHET was undetectable in the CK control group. Comparative analysis revealed no significant difference in MHET levels between IsPETase and dsPETase at the 48-hour. In contrast, all tested mutants—namely Arg47-Lys, Arg47-His, Gly8-Gln, Gly8-Asn, Gly8-Cys, Gly8-Ser, Gly8-Thr, and Gly8-Tyr—exhibited significantly higher MHET accumulation compared to dsPETase. Notably, the Gly8-Ser mutant generated markedly elevated MHET levels relative to the other mutants. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in MHET production between the Arg47-Lys and Arg47-His variants.

In Fig 23B, MHET was detected in the experimental groups of IsPETase, dsPETase, and their mutants after 72 hours, while no MHET was observed in the CK control group. The MHET level produced by dsPETase was significantly higher than that of IsPETase at 72h. The MHET concentration of Gly8-Gln, Gly8-Asn, Gly8-Cys, Gly8-Ser, Gly8-Thr, and Gly8-Tyr mutants exhibited markedly higher than dsPETase. In contrast, no significant difference in MHET levels was observed among Arg47-Lys, Arg47-His, and dsPETase. These results suggest that Gly8 may represent a critical active site in dsPETase. Notably, the substitution of Gly8 with Ser significantly enhanced the degradation efficiency of PET.

图片90

Fig 23. MHET content of IsPETase, dsPETase, and mutantsArg47-Lys, Arg47-His, Gly8-Gln, Gly8-Asn, Gly8-Cys, Gly8-Ser, Gly8-Thr, and Gly8-Tyr) at 48 and 72 hours.

Part 2:mono-2-hydroxyethyl- terephthalate MHETase

Construction Design:

Selection of PETase from Ideonella sakaiensis was conducted in NCBI database, and abbreviated as MHETase. The genes encoding MHETase. fused with 6×His-tag at its C-terminus were optimized and chemically synthesized. The plasmid map was constructed by snapgene software(Fig 24), and inserted into the expression vector pET28a by homologous recombination method, the recombinant plasmids pET28a- MHETase. were further transformed into E.Coli DH5α.

图片21

Fig 24. The plasmid map of pET28a- MHETase.

Cultivation, Purification and SDS-PAGE:

图片18

Fig 25.The electrophoresis, plate Assay, and sequencing of MHETase.

Note:the length of MHETase is 1818bp. the length of pET28a is 5324b

The agarose gel electrophoresis result in Fig 25 A and B showed a band of the MHETase gene at approximately 1500 bp and a linearized plasmid band near the 3000 bp marker. After ligation, the recombinant plasmids were transformed into E. coli DH5α competent cells for amplification in the Fig25 C. The subsequent sequencing analysis confirmed the successful insertion of the target gene MHETase into the vector(Fig 25D).

图片60

Fig 26.The growth curve and SDS-PAGE of IsPETase. Note:The size of MHETase is 64kDa.

To express the target protein, the plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells and induced with 1 mM IPTG, followed by protein extraction and purification. In Fig 26A, no significant difference was observed between the growth curves of the control group and the dsPETase and mutant strain, indicating robust bacterial growth. The SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the purified MHETase protein was approximately 63 kDa, which is consistent with its actual molecular size(Fig 26 B).

Characterization/Measurement:

  1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
  2. Fig. 27. Results of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of PET. A: control group; B:IsPETase+MHETase; C:DsPETase+MHETase; D:Gly8-Ser+MHETase

    Fig 27A shows the PET film from the control group without enzyme addition, exhibiting a smooth surface without cracks or pores. Fig 27B presents the experimental group treated with IsPETase and MHETase, where faint fissures observed on the film surface indicate initial enzymatic activity, though the degradation effect remains suboptimal. In Fig 27C, the sample co-treated with dsPETase and MHETase demonstrates more distinct fissure structures, suggesting enhanced degradation efficacy compared to the IsPETase group. Fig 27D displays the Gly8-Ser variant + MHETase group. Numerous pronounced fissures can be observed on the film surface, demonstrating the superior degradation performance of the Gly8-Ser variant.

  3. HPLC determination of concentration TPA and EG
  4. The experimental instrument parameters were adjusted as follows: the column was a Thermo Fisher C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), with a column temperature of 30°C, flow rate of 1 mL/min, and a mobile phase consisting of phosphate buffer solution (containing 5 mmol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 0.04% phosphoric acid) and methanol at a ratio of 70:30.

    According to the experimental protocol, the standard was diluted to appropriate concentrations to establish a calibration curve. Using the peak area as the ordinate (Y) and the mass concentration of the reference standard as the abscissa (X), regression analysis was performed to derive the equation for each standard. A good linear relationship was demonstrated within the concentration range of 1–50 mg/L. The tested concentrations and corresponding calibration curve are presented in Table 3

    Table 3. The standard curve of TPA

    Concentrations

    (mg/L)

    Peak area

    1

    85.65078

    2

    204.93451

    5

    584.46924

    20

    2220.17896

    50

    6006.84082

    We incubated 1 g PET plastic with 1 mg/mL IsPETase, dsPETase, and the Gly8-Ser variant, along with MHETase at a final concentration of 1 mg/mL. Under the catalytic action of PETase and MHETase, PET can be degraded to TPA, which was quantified using HPLC. As shown in Fig 28, the control group (pET28a vector) showed no peak at 10–12 minutes, whereas distinct peaks were observed for the IsPETase + MHETase, dsPETase + MHETase, and Gly8-Ser variant + MHETase groups.

    图片100

    Fig. 28. Chromatographic peak of TPA

    As illustrated in Fig 29, no TPA was detected in the control (CK) group. The TPA concentrations produced in dsPETase + MHETase and Gly8-Ser + MHETase were significantly higher than IsPETase + MHETase. Furthermore, the TPA concentrations from the Gly8-Ser+ MHETase combination was markedly higher than that of dsPETase + MHETase. These results indicate that the degradation efficiency of dsPETase + MHETase exceeds that of IsPETase + MHETase, and the Gly8-Ser variant in combination with MHETase demonstrated superior performance compared to all other experimental groups. This evidence confirms that site-directed mutagenesis enhanced the enzymatic activity of PETase, thereby significantly improving the overall degradation efficiency.

    图片57

    Fig. 29. The concentration of TPA of CK, IsPETase + MHETase, dsPETase + MHETase, and Gly8-Ser+ MHETase

    EG (Ethylene Glycol) was qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed in complex mixtures using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). The instrument parameters were set as follows:

    Gas Chromatograph: Agilent GC 8860 equipped with CTC PAL3 autosampler

    Mass Spectrometer: Agilent 5977B MSD

    Column: Agilent DB-WAX (30 m × 0.25 μm)

    Carrier Gas: High-purity helium (≥99.99999%)

    Chromatographic conditions:

    Detector temperature: 240°C

    Injector temperature: 220°C

    Flow rate: 1.0 mL/min

    Temperature gradient: Initial temperature 80°C (hold 5 min), then ramp at 5°C/min to 240°C (hold 1 min).

    图片54

    Fig. 30. The chromatographic peak, ratio, mass scharge ratio of EG.

    As shown in Fig 30, the detection results of ethylene glycol (EG) in the samples were obtained using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectrometry (MS). The control group exhibited no detectable peaks, indicating the absence of EG in the sample. Distinct chromatographic peaks were observed in the experimental groups containing IsPETase + MHETase, dsPETase + MHETase, and the Gly8-Ser + MHETase.The concentration of EG in the samples was calculated based on the chromatographic peak areas using the standard curve equation y = 6.306x + 363.8. As shown in Fig 31A, the calibration curve exhibited an excellent fit with a coefficient of determination (R²) greater than 0.99.

    In Fig 31B, the EG concentration obtained with dsPETase + MHETase was significantly higher than that with IsPETase + MHETase. Notably, the Gly8-Ser variant + MHETase combination yielded a substantially greater EG concentration compared to both the dsPETase and IsPETase. These results indicate that the Gly8-to-Ser mutation at position 8 in dsPETase enhances enzymatic activity, significantly improving the conversion efficiency of EG.

    图片81

    Fig 31. The concentration of EG of CK, IsPETase + MHETase, dsPETase + MHETase, and Gly8-Ser+MHETase

Other contributions

This study aims to screen and engineer plastic-degrading enzymes derived from microorganisms, validate their degradation efficiency, and assess their potential for industrial application through modeling analysis. The ultimate goal is to provide technological support and product solutions such as reagent kits for plastic bioremediation. The developed enzyme-based plastic degradation kits/enzymes exhibit high efficiency in degrading specific plastics (e.g., PET) and can be applied in plastic pollution treatment or industrial degradation processes. These resources may also assist other iGEM teams in related research.

Our research holds significant implications for humanity by reducing petroleum resource consumption, decreasing carbon emissions, and enabling the recycling of PET, which effectively mitigates the greenhouse effect. For instance, the production energy consumption of recycled PET is only 30% of that of virgin PET [8]. Furthermore, it helps control white pollution by reducing the accumulation of microplastics in soil and water bodies, thereby protecting ecosystems. Ultimately, we aim to achieve a "plastic → monomers → new plastic" zero-waste circular model that promotes sustainable development. In summary, PET recycling provides critical support for sustainable development through synergistic environmental, economic, and social benefits, while advanced technologies such as enzymatic degradation are accelerating the industrialization of this process [9].

Reference
  1. YOSHIDA S, HIRAGA K, TAKEHANA T, TANIGUCHI I, YAMAJI H, MAEDA Y, TOYOHARA K, MIYAMOTO K, KIMURA Y, ODA K. A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate). Science, 2016, 351(6278): 1196-1199. DOI:10.1126/science.aad6359
  2. WALLACE NE, ADAMS MC, CHAFIN AC, JONES DD, TSUI CL, GRUBER TD. The highly crystalline PET found in plastic water bottles does not support the growth of the PETase-producing bacterium Ideonella sakaiensis. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 2020, 12(5): 578-582. DOI:10.1111/1758-2229.12878
  3. SON HF, CHO IJ, JOO S, SEO H, SAGONG HY, CHOI SY, LEE SY, KIM KJ. Rational protein engineering of thermo-stable PETase from Ideonella sakaiensis for highly efficient PET degradation. ACS Catalysis, 2019, 9(4): 3519-3526. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.9b00568
  4. An engineered PET-depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles. Nature, 580(7802), 216-219.
  5. KANELLI M, VASILAKOS S, NIKOLAIVITS E, LADAS S, CHRISTAKOPOULOS P, TOPAKAS E. Surface modification of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) fibers by a cutinase from Fusarium oxysporum[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2015, 50(11): 1885-1892. DOI:10.1016/j.procbio.2015.08.013
  6. WEI R, OESER T, BILLIG S, ZIMMERMANN W. A high-throughput assay for enzymatic polyester hydrolysis activity by fluorimetric detection[J]. Biotechnology Journal, 2012, 7(12): 1517-1521. DOI:10.1002/biot.201200119
  7. LIU Xinyue, GENG Wenchao, SUN Jinyuan, CHEN Zehua, CUI Yinglu, WU Bian. Structure motif guided mining of MHET hydrolase and development of a two-enzyme cascade for plastics depolymerization at mild temperature[J]. Chinese Journal of Biotechnology, 2024, 40(3): 773-785.
  8. La Mantia, F. P., Titone, V., Botta, L., & Glerean, P. (2025). Mechanical recycling processes of PET in bottle-to-bottle circular manufacturing. Journal of Applied Polymer Science.
  9. Arnal, G., et al. (2023). The diversity of PET degrading enzymes: A systematic review of sequence, structure, and function. Protein Science, 34(10), e70282. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70282