The genesis of our inquiry traces back to an ordinary moment when one of our team members, while conversing with a friend, noticed the friend's refusal of an invitation to share milk tea. Upon further inquiry, the friend revealed that he had lactose intolerance. This surprising discovery of a lactose-intolerant individual in our immediate circle sparked our investigation. Lactose intolerance arises from insufficient lactase production in the intestines, leading to excessive lactose accumulation in the gut. This disrupts the intestinal microbiota, causing symptoms such as bloating and diarrhea. Furthermore, it may impair the absorption of vitamins and calcium, hinder development, and potentially serve as a contributing factor to colon cancer. Globally, approximately 70% of adults are or have been affected by lactose intolerance. In Central Asia, this figure can exceed 90%, while in densely populated East Asia, it stands at around 70%. A survey conducted in the United States reported a prevalence rate of 30%, indicating that nearly 100 million individuals in the U.S. alone require assistance. Current treatment approaches for lactose intolerance also face significant challenges. According to a U.S.-based study, 70% of healthcare providers recommend reducing or avoiding dairy consumption—a strategy that fails to address the root cause and necessitates additional nutritional guidance to mitigate potential deficiencies. While oral lactase supplements offer temporary relief, they do not provide a long-term solution. Moreover, they impose additional financial burdens and diminish quality of life due to the need for frequent medication. As for lactose-free dairy alternatives, they often alter the original flavor profiles and cannot comprehensively cover all lactose-containing foods—particularly those integral to the cultural heritage of ethnic minorities.
To effectively decompose excess lactose in the patient's gut, we aimed to engineer a synthetic biology-based system using engineered bacteria. A highly efficient lactose metabolism system is crucial for this purpose. We introduced the bgaB gene, encoding lactase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus, into the engineered bacteria to enhance their lactose-metabolizing capacity. Additionally, to prevent limited lactose uptake from hindering the decomposition process, we incorporated the LacY protein to improve lactose absorption. This ensures rapid breakdown of dietary lactose in the patient's intestine. Through dry lab simulations, we further optimized the lactase enzyme to enhance therapeutic efficiency. Our computational models successfully generated a more efficient variant of lactase, promising even greater performance. For detailed insights, please refer to the Model section of our work.
In this section, we aim to model the diffusion of lactose within the intestine, the transport of lactose by LacY, and the metabolic process mediated by lactase, with the goal of identifying key parameters that limit our metabolic efficiency.
To enable targeted colonization of the engineered bacteria in the patient's intestines, we designed an adhesion system. This system consists of two modules:A constitutive promoter driving the expression of the BreR transcription factor、A MucBP adhesion protein, whose expression is specifically regulated by BreR. The BreR transcription factor, produced continuously under the constitutive promoter, binds to the engineered TFBS upstream of the MucBP gene, inhibiting its transcription. However, upon binding to deoxycholic acid—a bile acid specifically present in the gut—BreR releases its inhibition, allowing MucBP expression. MucBP then mediates adhesion to epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and extracellular matrix proteins. This system enables site-specific colonization in the intestines and enhances the survival of Bifidobacterium, which naturally exhibits weak adhesion, thereby improving the efficiency and efficacy of our therapeutic system.
To prevent potential disruption of the gut microbiota due to enhanced competitiveness of the engineered bacteria, we designed a population control mechanism. This system leverages the AI-2 quorum sensing pathway, combined with the ccdB toxic protein, to maintain stable population density. The constitutive promoter drives the expression of LuxS, an enzyme responsible for AI-2 synthesis, linking population density to extracellular AI-2 concentration. The plsrA promoter, which exhibits threshold-dependent activation by AI-2, regulates the expression of the ccdB protein. Under low AI-2 concentrations (low population density), plsrA activity remains minimal, avoiding excessive bacterial death. As AI-2 levels rise with increasing density, ccdB expression is induced, effectively controlling population growth. This mechanism has been mathematically modeled and validated in our dry lab studies.
In terms of biosafety, Lacbutler utilizes Bifidobacterium longum as the engineered chassis. As an obligate anaerobe, this bacterium struggles to survive outside the gut environment, significantly reducing the risk of environmental release and ensuring containment.
[1] Keith, Jeanette MD1; Hullett, Sandral MD, MPH2. Lactose Intolerance Diagnosis and Solutions (LIDS) Survey Identifies Challenges in the Clinical Management of Lactose Intolerance: 348. American Journal of Gastroenterology 108():p S104, October 2013.
[2] Johnson, A. O., Semenya, J. G., Buchowski, M. S., Enwonwu, C. O., & Scrimshaw, N. S. (1993). Correlation of lactose maldigestion, lactose intolerance, and milk intolerance. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 57(3), 399-401. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/57.3.399
[3] Storhaug, C. L., Fosse, S. K., & Fadnes, L. T. (2017). RETRACTED: Country, regional, and global estimates for lactose malabsorption in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2(10), 738-746. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30154-1
[4] Dahlqvist, A., Hammond, J. B., Crane, R. K., Dunphy, J. V., & Littman, A. (1963). Intestinal Lactase Deficiency and Lactose Intolerance in Adults: Preliminary Report. Gastroenterology, 45(4), 488-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(19)34844-9
[5] Savaiano, D. (2011). Lactose Intolerance: An Unnecessary Risk for Low Bone Density. In R. A. Clemens, O. Hernell, & K. M. Michaelsen (Eds.), Milk and Milk Products in Human Nutrition (Vol. 67, pp. 161-171). Nestlé Nutrition Institute Workshop Series. Basel: S. Karger AG. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(19)34844-9
[6] Di Stefano, M., Miceli, E., Mazzocchi, S., Tana, P., Moroni, F. and Corazza, G.R. (2007), Visceral hypersensitivity and intolerance symptoms in lactose malabsorption. Neurogastroenterology & Motility, 19: 887-895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.00973.x
[7] Nicklas, T. A., Qu, H., Hughes, S. O., He, M., Wagner, S. E., Foushee, H. R., & Shewchuk, R. M. (2011). Self-perceived lactose intolerance results in lower intakes of calcium and dairy foods and is associated with hypertension and diabetes in adults. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 94(1), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.110.009860
{% raw %}[8] Ridolo, E., Baiardini, I., Meschi, T., Peveri, S., Nouvenne, A., Dall Aglio, P., & Borghi, L. (2013). HRQoL questionnaire evaluation in lactose intolerant patients with adverse reactions to foods. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 8(6), 493-496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-011-0630-7