Appearance
Overview
The rapid growth of the global coffee industry has led to enormous volumes of spent coffee grounds (SCG), creating pressing challenges for urban waste management. While SCG are nutrient-rich, they contain caffeine, a natural phytotoxin that inhibits plant growth and limits their direct use as fertilizer. Our project addresses this issue with synthetic biology. We genetically engineered E. coli to integrate genes involved in caffeine degradation, aiming to remove the residual caffeine from SGG during fermentation while producing valuable biofertilizers. This innovation directly contributes to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) by reducing municipal solid waste, SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) by enabling responsible resource circulation, and SDG 13 (Climate Action) by offering a low-carbon alternative to traditional disposal methods. Furthermore, our work synergistically promotes SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure) and SDG 15 (Life on Land).
Crucially, our design has been shaped through extensive stakeholder engagement. We consulted coffee shops, large corporations (e.g., Yum China), agricultural biologists, bio-fertilizer enterprises, and gardening communities. Their feedback on practical challenges, market needs, and regulatory landscapes has ensured that our solution meets real-world needs and sustainability challenges.
1. Background, Current Situation, and SDG Alignment
1.1. Current Challenges: Carbon Emissions and SCG Waste
Globally, annual coffee production generates approximately 6-8 million tons of spent coffee grounds, the majority of which are discarded as waste [1]. The conventional management of this organic waste stream creates some problems:
1) Greenhouse Gas Emissions: In most cities, SCG are treated as municipal solid waste and end up being landfilled or incinerated, which both pathways result in greenhouse gas emissions [2]. Landfill produces methane (CH₄) — the second most abundant anthropogenic GHG after carbon dioxide (CO₂). Incineration, another common disposal method, directly releases CO₂. These practices contribute directly to climate change.
2) Resource Waste and Pollution: SCG are rich in organic nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, making them a potential high-quality raw material for organic fertilizers [3]. However, their direct application is infeasible due to the presence of caffeine, a natural phytotoxin that severely inhibits seed germination and root development in plants [4]. So it limits SCG reuse potential and leaves most SCG discarded.
1.2. Existing Solutions and Their Limitations
Current approaches for managing SCG are insufficient and often create new challenges, yet none are fully sustainable:
1) Landfilling and Incineration: As outlined above, these dominant methods contribute to climate change through methane and CO₂ emissions (contradicting SDG 13). They also embody a linear “take-make-dispose” mode that wastes valuable nutrients and burdens urban waste management systems (contradicting SDG 11.6 — reducing the per capita environmental impact of cities and SDG 12.5 — substantially reducing waste generation).
2) Chemical Solvent Extraction: This method uses organic solvents such as dichloromethane or ethyl acetate to remove caffeine from SCG (contradicting SDG 12.4 — environmentally sound management of chemicals and waste). While capable of achieving high removal rates, the process introduces risks of toxic solvent residues contaminating both the environment and the end product [5]. In addition, nutrient loss is common, diminishing the agricultural value and undermining efforts toward sustainable production of the treated SCG.
3) Supercritical CO₂ Decaffeination: A technically advanced method, supercritical CO₂ extraction is highly selective and avoids chemical solvent residues. However, it is energy-intensive and costly, requiring specialized high-pressure equipment that is unsuitable for large-scale fertilizer production or application in developing countries [6]. (contradicting SDG 12.a — supporting developing countries in strengthening scientific and technological capacity and SDG 9.4 — upgrading infrastructure and promoting sustainable industrialization), since the technology remains inaccessible for global adoption.
4) Home Composting: While inexpensive and eco-friendly, this process is slow. Degradation can take several months, during which caffeine may not be fully removed, resulting in unstable fertilizer quality that can still harm plants [7]. Moreover, home composting is not scalable for addressing the millions of tons of SCG generated globally, limiting its contribution to broader sustainability goals.
These inadequate solutions highlight a critical gap in the sustainable management of organic urban waste, and we aim to mitigate these issues.
Key Sustainability Problems to Address
● Excessive urban waste (SCG) generation from coffee consumption (SDG 12).
● Significant greenhouse gas emissions from landfill and incineration (SDG 13).
● Persistent municipal waste management challenges, with limited infrastructure for organic waste recycling (SDG 11.6).
● Limited public awareness and trust regarding sustainable biotechnology (SDG 12.8 & SDG 13.3).
1.3. Our Goal and Core SDG Contributions
Our project is designed to directly address these failures by providing a biological, scalable, and circular solution by engineering E. coli to degrade caffeine in SCG, transforming it into safe, nutrient-rich organic fertilizer. Through this approach, we make measurable contributions to:
● SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production – reducing waste, enabling the complete resource circularity of SCG (Target 12.5) through a process that avoids the use of hazardous chemicals, ensuring environmentally sound management (Target 12.4).
● SDG 13: Climate Action – cutting greenhouse gas emissions (Target 13.2) from waste disposal while improving public awareness and institutional capacity for climate action (Target 13.3).
● SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities – reducing the municipal solid waste burden on cities, improving waste management, and mitigating associated environmental impacts (Target 11.6)
1.4. A Circular Logic: From Waste to Sustainability
Our intervention follows a closed-loop sustainability logic: urban coffee consumption generates massive waste (SDG 11 Problem) → we provide a green biotechnology to transform this waste into a valuable organic fertilizer (SDG 12 Solution) → this process avoids polluting chemical decaffeination methods and reduces greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to climate action (SDG 13 Impact 1) → finally, the process feeds back into sustainable cities by alleviating municipal waste burdens and enhancing urban–rural circularity (SDG 11 Impact 2).
3. Key Stakeholders and Feedback
We actively engaged with diverse stakeholders — from waste generators to end-users. Their invaluable feedbacks ensure our solution effectively addresses real-world challenges, making it a viable sustainability initiative.
| Stakeholder | Role | Key Interest / Relevance | Feedback | Our Response /Future Plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coffee Shops (e.g., Manner, Starbucks) | Main SCG producers; face daily waste disposal pressure | Need simple, visible recycling solutions that align with sustainability branding | ● Most SCG still discarded; ● Support centralized collection and awareness if practical. | ● Collected SCG directly from shops for educational activities; ● Exchanged “Recycle Grounds, Cut Carbon” stickers; ● Visualized outputs on the Coffee Grounds Hotspot Map linking coffee shops to community recycling. |
| Yum China (KCOFFEE) | Large-scale corporate SCG generator (>3,000 tons/yr) | ESG compliance, scalable and safe recycling | ● Existing pilots limited to Shanghai; ● Emphasized need for regulation, safety, and consumer trust. | ● Designed project roadmap emphasizing biosafety, scalability, and policy compliance; ● Plan for future pilot cooperation; ● Aligns with China’s Circular Economy Promotion Law. |
| Dr. Tong Zhou (Agricultural Biologist) | Expert in agricultural biotechnology | Validation of biological decaffeination and carbon impact | ● Caffeine identified as phytotoxin; ● Advised measuring carbon reduction from landfill diversion. | ● Embedded biological caffeine removal in process; ● Added carbon accounting and public data visualization to quantify avoided emissions. |
| Tianrenxue Agr-Tech (Biofertilizer Enterprise) | Industrial fertilizer producer | Industrial scalability and biosafety | ● Concerned about strain stability, fermentation scale, and microbial inactivation. | ● Incorporated post-fermentation sterilization and quality control; ● Consulted regulations under BiosafetyLaw (2020) to ensure compliance and safety. |
| Paques–Skion Water (Environmental Tech Co.) | Waste treatment and circular economy expert | Integration with existing waste systems | ● Supported biological recycling but noted infrastructure limits and long adoption period. | ● Integrated project with municipal waste infrastructure and proposed stepwise scale-up through industrial partnerships. |
| Gardening Community | End-users of organic fertilizers | Interest in safety, affordability, and ease of use | ● Support eco-products but skeptical about biosafety and effectiveness. | ● Organized community workshops (DIY soaps, eco-bags, gardening) to demonstrate product safety; ● Distributed eco-handbooks and posters; built trust via education and pledges. |
3.1. Coffee Shops (e.g., Manner, Starbucks)
Role:
As the primary source of Spent Coffee Grounds (SCG), they face the direct operational and environmental burden of waste management.
Feedback:
● We interviewed several coffee shops (e.g., Manner and Starbucks) and summarized that there are currently four main ways coffee shops handle coffee grounds: 1) Giving them to customers; 2) Staff taking them home; 3) Some NGOs collecting them; 4) If none of the above options are available, they are simply discarded as wet waste (the vast majority).
● Several coffee shops have indicated that recycling coffee grounds is a valuable resource development initiative. A staff member from Manner Coffee stated that the brand places great emphasis on environmental sustainability. Should a new centralized collection and processing solution for coffee grounds be developed, the company would likely participate.
● A Starbucks employee stated that they have implemented some methods for reusing coffee grounds, such as recycling them into notebook covers and cup sleeves. However, this form of recycling remains very uncommon, with direct disposal still accounting for the majority of waste.
Conclusion:
● A significant volume of SCG is still discarded as wet waste, representing an unsolved municipal waste management challenge (SDG 11.6).
● Many coffee shops expressed strong goodwill in environmental protection and partnerships for recycling solutions. This informs our strategy to design a centralized collection model, directly contributing to substantially reducing waste generation through recycling (SDG 12.5).
3.2. Large Corporation (Yum China - KCOFFEE)
Role:
Yum China, China's largest restaurant company, operates the coffee brand KCOFFEE. With approximately 17,000 coffee-related restaurants nationwide, Yum China generates over 3,000 tons of coffee grounds annually.
Feedback:
● Mr. Chen, the relevant responsible person, confirmed the large-scale SCG generation problem and stated that while some pilot recycling initiatives exist (e.g., converting SCG into straws or tableware), the majority of grounds are still disposed of. They have established five coffee grounds recycling and disposal centers nationwide to repurpose coffee grounds as a resource. However, collection efforts are currently concentrated in Shanghai, with nationwide expansion still underway.
● He emphasized that the company’s ESG commitments motivate them to explore more impactful recycling pathways. However, they stressed that solutions must be scalable, safe, and cost-effective to be adopted at an industrial level.
● Mr. Chen also noted that collaboration with research-oriented teams like ours could help them pilot new sustainable technologies, provided that biosafety, regulatory approval, and public trust are well established. He reminded us that building broad policy support and consumer acceptance would be critical to achieving large-scale implementation.
Conclusion:
● Yum China’s existing ESG-driven recycling efforts, while meaningful, remain limited in scale and maturity, leaving most SCG still treated as waste—contradicting sustainable resource utilization goals (SDG 12.2).
● Their commitment to ESG objectives and willingness to collaborate directly support our project's strategy of pursuing scalable and secure biotechnological recycling solutions. This significantly reduces waste generation and aids municipal authorities in solid waste management (SDG 12.5 & SDG 11.6).
● Moving forward, successful expansion of such recycling systems will depend not only on technological readiness but also on regulatory endorsement and municipal partnership, ensuring alignment with China’s Circular Economy Promotion Law and supporting sustainable waste management (SDG 12.5 & SDG 11.6).
3.3. Agricultural Biologist (Dr. Tong Zhou)
Role:
An expert in modern agriculture and bio-technology, with over 100 scientific and technological invention patents in the fields of synthetic biology and others.
Feedback:
● Dr. Tong unequivocally identified caffeine as a natural phytotoxin that inhibits plant growth, making effective decaffeination the essential first step for any SCG fertilizer.
● He suggested quantifying our climate impact by calculating the carbon emissions avoided by diverting SCG from landfills.
Conclusion:
● The nutritional richness yet phytotoxic nature of SCG underscores the necessity of biological caffeine removal to avoid chemical methods, to ensure environmentally sound management (SDG 12.4).
● His emphasis on carbon accounting directly links to climate action and reminds us to integrate climate initiatives into future planning (SDG 13.2).
3.4. Bio-fertilizer Enterprise (Tianrenxue Agr-Tech)
Role:
Shaanxi Tianrenxue Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd., engaged in large-scale fertilizer production and agricultural technology innovation, with experience in scaling microbial technologies.
Feedback:
● The company representative highlighted key industrialization challenges: ensuring the genetic stability of our engineered bacteria, scaling up fermentation, and designing a process for mixing bacteria with bulk SCG.
● They suggested practical measures such as post-process microbial inactivation to eliminate risks associated with engineered bacteria.
Conclusion:
● They recognized the potential of our solution but needed to ensure its biosafety and compliance with relevant regulations to facilitate industrialization (SDG 9.4).
● They remind us that in the final stage of the process, we must ensure the inactivation of engineered bacteria to prevent chemical contamination of the environment (SDG 12.4).
3.5. Environmental Technology Company (Paques-Skion Water)
Role:
A company specialized in industrial wastewater and waste treatment, offering an engineering perspective on the feasibility of biological processes.
Feedback:
● They pointed out that current waste management methods (landfilling, incineration, anaerobic digestion) either generate secondary pollution or leave residues requiring further treatment.
● They recognized the potential of synthetic biology-based solutions to achieve true waste valorization, which is more aligned with a circular economy.
● However, they raised concerns about the time and infrastructure needed for large-scale adoption, highlighting practical implementation barriers.
Conclusion:
● Their validation reinforced that biological recycling is environmentally superior (SDG 12.4 & SDG 12.5).
● Their cautious approach to infrastructure deployment reflects the challenges of scaling up implementation, compelling us to consider long-term scalability and driving integration with existing waste management infrastructure (SDG 9.4).
3.6. Gardening Community
Role:
End-user representatives who provide direct feedback on product acceptance, perceived barriers, and communication.
Feedback:
● Community members expressed enthusiasm for eco-friendly, circular products but highlighted concerns about safety, effectiveness, and price competitiveness.
● They also requested transparent labeling and education to understand how biotechnology makes fertilizers both safe and sustainable.
Conclusion:
● Consumers showed strong interest in green solutions, while showing skepticism about biosafety and effectiveness. Their insights informed our strategy to develop public education materials.
4. Actions and Impacts Aligned with SDGs
Our project delivers tangible impact across multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by addressing critical gaps in urban waste management and sustainable agriculture through synthetic biology innovation. Each of our actions directly corresponds to specific SDG targets, forming a cohesive framework that connects research, education, and societal transformation.
4.1. SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production
Target 12.5: By 2030, substantially reduce waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling and reuse
Background & Rationale:
With over 6 million tons of SCG generated annually worldwide, most of which are landfilled or incinerated, existing disposal practices exacerbate municipal waste pressure and squander resource potential.
Our Actions:
● Engaged directly with local coffee shops to collect discarded SCG instead of letting them be thrown away.
● Exchanged “Recycle Grounds, Cut Carbon” stickers displayed at shop counters to raise customer awareness.
● This laid the foundation for a city-wide circular recycling network, reducing waste generation (SDG 12.5) and supporting municipal waste management (SDG 11.6).
Target 12.4: By 2020, achieve the environmentally sound management of chemicals and all wastes throughout their life cycle, in accordance with agreed international frameworks, and significantly reduce their release to air, water and soil in order to minimize their adverse impacts on human health and the environment
Background & Rationale:
Conventional chemical decaffeination methods rely on hazardous solvents such as dichloromethane and ethyl acetate, risking residue contamination and environmental harm. Our microbial biodegradation system replaces these pollutants, achieving safe lifecycle waste management.
Our Actions:
● Demonstrated caffeine’s phytotoxicity in workshops and gardening classes.
● Showed how our engineered bacteria safely remove caffeine to create non-toxic organic fertilizer.
● Promoted public understanding of environmentally sound management through hands-on education.
Target 12.2: By 2030, achieve the sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources
Background & Rationale:
By transforming SCG from waste into organic fertilizer, we unlock the efficient use of its embedded nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium), reducing dependence on virgin resources for synthetic fertilizer production and promoting sustainable natural resource management.
Our Actions:
● Hosted senior gardening classes comparing chemical vs. SCG-based fertilizers.
● Demonstrated biological treatment’s effectiveness and guided participants to adopt sustainable gardening practices.
● Encouraged local reuse of nutrient-rich resources, enhancing community-level circularity.
Target 12.8: By 2030, ensure that people everywhere have the relevant information and awareness for sustainable development and lifestyles in harmony with nature
Background & Rationale:
Through our comprehensive educational initiatives - including community workshops, school presentations, and public awareness campaigns - we ensure people gain relevant knowledge about sustainable development. Our activities promote lifestyles in harmony with nature by demonstrating practical circular economy solutions.
Our Actions (see more in our Education):
● Youth: built eco-bottle terrariums using recycled SCG to visualize resource cycles.
● Adults: made handmade soap and deodorizer bags to learn practical upcycling.
● Seniors: explored sustainable fertilizers and shared knowledge in local gardening communities.
● Conducted school workshops, summer camps, and community booths to foster long-term behavioral change.
Target 12.a: Support developing countries to strengthen their scientific and technological capacity to move towards more sustainable patterns of consumption and production
Background & Rationale:
In China, a rapidly developing coffee market, few established recycling systems exist. As a developing country team, our approach offers new solutions for agricultural innovation. This strengthens scientific and technological capacity for sustainable production patterns globally.
Our Actions:
● Co-hosted the STEMHUB SDG Workshop with three iGEM teams to promote SCG recycling as a circular economy case.
● Introduced synthetic biology as a practical tool for sustainability innovation and education.
4.2. SDG 13: Climate Action
Target 13.2: Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies and planning
Background & Rationale:
Landfilled SCG emit methane, a greenhouse gas 25 times more potent than CO₂. Despite this, waste policies seldom prioritize SCG management. By introducing aerobic microbial degradation, we prevent methane release and offer a practical solution that can be incorporated into municipal carbon reduction strategies.
Our Actions:
● Designed “Recycle Grounds, Cut Carbon" stickers and distribute them to raise public awareness.
Target 13.3: Improve education, awareness-raising and human and institutional capacity on climate change mitigation, adaptation, impact reduction and early warning
Background & Rationale:
Public understanding of how waste contributes to climate change remains limited. Traditional campaigns rarely connect everyday consumption habits like coffee to climate impacts. Through carbon-labeled stickers and workshops, we improved literacy on waste–climate links, empowering communities with knowledge to mitigate climate change.
Our Actions:
● Delivered lectures and experiments in schools and summer camps, linking coffee waste to emissions.
● Explained how biological recycling reduces methane and CO₂ footprints.
4.3. SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
Target 11.6: By 2030, reduce the adverse per capita environmental impact of cities, including by paying special attention to air quality and municipal and other waste management
Background & Rationale:
Our project directly reduces the urban waste management burden by diverting SCG from landfills, thereby mitigating negative impacts such as methane emissions and leachate formation. The hotspot mapping provides cities with a practical framework for organic waste valorization, effectively lowering per capita environmental impact.
Our Actions:
● Collected and visualized data on daily SCG outputs to create a “Coffee Ground Hotspot Map”, identifying potential collection points across the city.
● Proposed integration into city recycling planning as a data-driven model.
Target 11.a: Support positive economic, social and environmental links between urban, peri-urban and rural areas by strengthening national and regional development planning
Background & Rationale:
Cities produce waste while rural areas face declining soil quality from chemical fertilizer dependency, yet current systems rarely connect the two. Our project bridges this urban–rural divide: city coffee shops supply SCG, and rural communities receive sustainable fertilizer. This strengthens regional development planning through mutually beneficial ecological flows.
Our Actions:
● Distributed the Children’s Picture Book to rural schools, connecting urban waste issues to rural environmental education.
● Promoted a vision of shared sustainability through educational storytelling.
4.4. Synergistic Contributions to Subordinate SDGs
SDG 2 (Target 2.4): By 2030, ensure sustainable food production systems and implement resilient agricultural practices that increase productivity and production, that help maintain ecosystems, that strengthen capacity for adaptation to climate change, extreme weather, drought, flooding and other disasters and that progressively improve land and soil quality
Our organic biofertilizer enhances soil health and quality, supporting sustainable food production systems and resilient agricultural practices.
Future Plan:
● Promote SCG-derived biofertilizer to enhance soil fertility and resilience in sustainable farming trials.
SDG 9 (Target 9.4): By 2030, upgrade infrastructure and retrofit industries to make them sustainable, with increased resource-use efficiency and greater adoption of clean and environmentally sound technologies and industrial processes, with all countries taking action in accordance with their respective capabilities
We demonstrate how sustainable infrastructure upgrades can be achieved through biological solutions, promoting resource-efficient and environmentally sound technologies in waste processing industries while increasing resource-use efficiency.
Future Plan:
● Collaborate with Tianrenxue Agr-Tech and Paques-Skion Water to test industrial-scale fermentation and circular processing integration.
SDG 15 (Target 15.3): By 2030, combat desertification, restore degraded land and soil, including land affected by desertification, drought and floods, and strive to achieve a land degradation-neutral world
By improving soil fertility through organic inputs, our fertilizer combats land degradation and helps restore degraded soils.
Future Plan:
● Conducte soil quality education to promote long-term land regeneration through organic amendments.
5. Implementation Plan
We implement a structured framework to ensure long-term success, scalability, and compliance with environmental and biosafety regulations.
5.1. Regulatory Alignment
● Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution by Solid Wastes (2020 revised): Emphasizes the classification management of solid waste, promotes the recycling and reuse of household waste, advancing resource recovery, developing clean energy, and reducing the generation of solid waste, such as fuel ash aligns directly with our coffee grounds recycling initiative.
● Regulations on the Administration of Safety of Agricultural Genetically Modified Organisms (2017 revised): Guides biosafety assessment for using engineered microbes in controlled environments, ensuring our engineered E. coli strain meets all biosafety requirements.
● Organic Fertilizer Standard (NY/T 525-2021): Sets quality requirements for organic fertilizers, which our final product must fully comply with to ensure agricultural safety and efficacy.
● Circular Economy Promotion Law of the People's Republic of China (2018 revised): Encourages recycling and efficient resource utilization to reduce resource consumption and waste generation throughout production, distribution, and consumption processes, directly supporting SCG's resource value enhancement.
● China's Dual Carbon Goals (2030/2060): Supports projects contributing to carbon emission reduction and circular economy development, aligning with our climate action objectives.
● Our project also incorporates recommendations from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) regarding organic waste management and circular economy principles, supporting global sustainability initiatives.
5.2. Goals and Assessment Methods
Short-term (1 year): Establish pilot SCG collection routes in Shanghai, validate microbial decaffeination efficiency (nearly 100% caffeine removal), and conduct initial fertilizer application tests.
Assessment: Laboratory analysis of caffeine degradation, soil quality improvement trials, and user feedback.
Medium-term (2–3 years): Expand to multiple coffee shop clusters with centralized processing hubs; demonstrate consistent fertilizer performance in peri-urban farms.
Assessment: Waste diversion data (tons of SCG recycled), soil health metrics, crop yield improvements, stakeholder adoption rate, and product quality monitoring.
Long-term (4–5 years): Integrate SCG valorization into municipal waste frameworks; scale model to multiple Chinese cities; establish cross-regional urban–rural resource links.
Assessment: Greenhouse gas reduction estimates (e.g., methane), environmental impact assessment, city-level adoption metrics, farmer surveys, and economic cost–benefit analysis.
5.3. Implementation Phases
Phase 1: Research and Development
● Strain development and laboratory validation of engineered microbes for caffeine degradation.
● Initial fermentation parameter optimization to ensure stable caffeine removal.
● Small-scale efficacy testing to confirm fertilizer safety and nutrient retention.
Phase 2: Pilot Deployment
● Small-scale field trials with gardeners and agricultural partners to validate biofertilizer performance in real soil environments.
● Biosafety certification application following the Regulations on the Administration of Safety of Agricultural Genetically Modified Organisms (2017 revised) to ensure regulatory compliance.
● Community engagement and awareness programs, such as workshops, to establish public trust.
Phase 3: Scale-up and Commercialization
● Industrial-scale fermentation optimization to increase efficiency and lower production costs.
● Market entry and distribution network establishment in collaboration with coffee chains, municipal waste authorities, and agricultural cooperatives.
● Large-scale field validation across diverse soil types and crop systems to confirm broad applicability.
Phase 4: Full Implementation
● National expansion and replication across major Chinese cities with dense coffee shop networks (e.g., Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Hangzhou, Chengdu).
● International technology transfer to other coffee-consuming regions in Asia, Europe, and North America, adapting to local waste management frameworks.
● Continuous improvement and innovation, including exploring additional SCG-derived products (e.g., bioplastics).
● Policy advocacy for organic waste management, contributing to municipal and national circular economy strategies.
5.4. Monitoring Schedule
Quarterly Assessments: Review processing volumes, caffeine degradation rates, product quality metrics, and partner feedback to optimize operations.
Annual Audits: Comprehensive evaluation of environmental impact, economic sustainability, and social acceptance, with public reporting of progress toward SDG targets.
3-Year Strategic Reviews: Major assessment of scalability and replication potential, with adjustments based on technological advancements and market developments.
5.5. Possible Barriers and Mitigation Strategies
| Barrier | Potential Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Challenges (e.g., enzyme stability) | ● Reduced efficiency in caffeine degradation ● Inconsistent fertilizer quality | ● Continuous strain optimization and enzyme engineering |
| Regulatory Compliance (GMO safety evaluation, fertilizer registration) | ● Slower pilot-to-market transition ● Delayed scaling | ● Engage proactively with environmental and agricultural authorities ● Implement rigorous quality control systems |
| Economic Costs (collection, logistics, processing) | ● High operational expenses could limit scalability | ● Develop shared logistics with municipal waste authorities ● Explore government subsidies under Circular Economy Promotion Law |
| Market Acceptance | ● Farmers may hesitate to switch from familiar chemical fertilizers ● | ● Conduct comparative field trials to demonstrate yield benefits ● Provide free starter samples ● Partner with agricultural cooperatives for adoption support |
| Public Awareness | ● Low citizen participation in SCG recycling, limiting collection scale | ● Develop comprehensive education and outreach programs to build user confidence |
| Competition from Existing Disposal Methods (incineration, landfill, chemical treatment) | ● Resistance from waste operators | ● Advocate for SCG valorization in municipal waste management ● Highlight cost savings in landfill diversion ● Pursue partnerships with waste management companies |
6. Conclusion
Our project demonstrates how synthetic biology can directly advance global sustainability:
Environmentally: Reducing waste and emissions.
Economically: Turning urban waste into agricultural input.
Socially: Empowering citizens to co-create sustainable communities that foster stability, inclusion, and well-being.
By embedding our work in the 11–12–13–11 sustainability loop, we show how science, education, and community engagement can converge to create ideal impact toward the SDGs.
References
[1] Campos-Vega, R., Loarca-Piña, G., Vergara-Castañeda, H. A., & Oomah, B. D. (2015). Spent coffee grounds: A review on current research and future prospects. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 45(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.04.012
[2] Karmee, S. K. (2018). A spent coffee grounds based biorefinery for the production of biofuels, biopolymers, antioxidants and biocomposites. Waste Management, 72, 240-254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.042
[3] Mussatto, S. I., Machado, E. M. S., Martins, S., & Teixeira, J. A. (2011). Production, Composition, and Application of Coffee and Its Industrial Residues. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 4(5), 661-672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0565-z
[4] Ashihara, H., Sano, H., & Crozier, A. (2008). Caffeine and related purine alkaloids: biosynthesis, catabolism, function and genetic engineering. Phytochemistry, 69(4), 841-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.10.029
[5] Al-Dhabi, N. A., Ponmurugan, K., & Maran Jeganathan, P. (2017). Development and validation of ultrasound-assisted solid-liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from waste spent coffee grounds. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 34, 206-213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.05.005
[6] Saldaña, M. D. A., Zetzl, C., Mohamed, R. S., & Brunner, G. (2002). Extraction of Methylxanthines from Guaraná Seeds, Maté Leaves, and Cocoa Beans Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide and Ethanol. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50(17), 4820-4826. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf020128v
[7] Santos, C., Fonseca, J., Aires, A., Coutinho, J., & Trindade, H. (2017). Effect of different rates of spent coffee grounds (SCG) on composting process, gaseous emissions and quality of end-product. Waste Management, 59, 37-47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.020
[8] The People's Republic of China. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China. (2020). Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution by Solid Wastes (2020 revised version). https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/fl/202004/t20200430_777580.shtml
[9] The People's Republic of China. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China. (2017). Regulations on the Administration of Safety of Agricultural Genetically Modified Organisms (2017 revised version). https://zys.moa.gov.cn/flfg/202009/t20200901_6351289.htm
[10] The People's Republic of China. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China. (2025). Agricultural Industry Standard of the People's Republic of China (NY/T 525-2021 Organic Fertilizers). https://www.moa.gov.cn/ztzl/sqxzjcgs/xzjcbz/202506/t20250626_6475161.htm
[11] The People's Republic of China. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China. (2018). Circular Economy Promotion Law of the People's Republic of China (2018 revised version). https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/fl/201811/t20181114_673624.shtml
[12] The People's Republic of China. Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China. (2024). Implementing the “Dual Carbon” Initiatives to Build a Beautiful China. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202404/content_6948005.htm
