3.1 Market Research
•Current Market Overview
The global food pathogen detection market is expected to grow from 15.28 billion US dollars to 16.47 billion US dollars in 2023-2024, and is projected to continue growing at a compound annual growth rate of 8.21%, reaching 26.56 billion US dollars by 2030. In 2025, the global food bacteria testing market is expected to be approximately 3.28 billion US dollars, maintaining a double-digit growth rate of 8.9% over the next five years. The growth rate of the Chinese market is even more prominent, reaching 14%.
•Potential Market Growth
The market growth of nano-flower bacteria food detection technology is driven by many factors, and its potential can be seen from the perspectives of policy, consumption and industry.
In terms of policy, the "Regulations on the Supervision and Administration of Food Production and Business Enterprises' Implementation of Food Safety Primary Responsibility" to be implemented in 2025 requires food enterprises to frequently monitor microbial indicators at all stages from raw material acceptance, production process to finished product delivery. They also need to establish a mechanism for daily control, weekly inspection and monthly dispatch. This has led enterprises to have a stronger demand for rapid and accurate bacterial detection technologies, and the nano-flower detection technology can precisely meet this demand, becoming a suitable choice for enterprises to comply with regulatory requirements.
The changes at the consumer end are also quite obvious. As people pay more and more attention to food safety, consumers hope to verify whether the food they purchase, especially commonly eaten categories such as infant food and ready-to-eat fresh produce, have microbial safety issues. The demand for rapid testing at the household level is constantly increasing. The nano-flower detection technology can be made into portable detection cards, which are easy to operate and can show the results without professional equipment, precisely meeting consumers' demands for convenient and professional detection methods.
At the industrial end, food enterprises are confronted with issues of testing efficiency and cost. The sensitivity of traditional colloidal gold detection is insufficient. Although PCR technology is accurate, the equipment is expensive and the operation is complex, making it unsuitable for large-scale screening by enterprises. The characteristics of nano-flower materials can enhance the sensitivity of detection and reduce the cost of batch preparation, providing food processing enterprises with an accurate and economical detection solution. In scenarios such as pre-prepared food factories and central kitchens where batch sampling is required, they play an irreplaceable role, and market demand will continue to rise.
3.2 Target Client
To ensure the scalability and market adoption of our bacterial detection device, we have identified two key client segments across the food value chain:
•Industrial Quality Control Users
These include dairy farms, food processing plants, central kitchens, and third-party testing laboratories, all of which require timely microbial analysis to support fast-paced production. For example, raw milk must be tested and accepted within 40 minutes of arrival at collection points, leaving little room for delay. Current microbial testing methods, such as the GB 4789.2 standard plate count, typically take 24 to 48 hours to generate results, rendering them impractical for real-time decision-making. Even advanced automated instruments are costly and require trained personnel, while manual methods are prone to inconsistencies and human error.
Our nano-structured kit with smartphone-readout delivers results in 30 minutes, with low user complexity and strong compatibility with existing workflows. It presents an efficient, scalable solution for real-time quality control and operational cost reduction.
•Consumer-Level Users
This group includes families with infants, elderly members, or pregnant women, as well as urban professionals who frequently consume takeout or pre-cooked meals. Their growing concern about food safety is not matched by access to reliable testing tools. Without professional knowledge, they are often forced to make food decisions based on appearance, smell, or online rumors.
Consumers need a fast, easy, and portable detection system that is safe and scientifically reliable. Our smartphone-compatible kit allows users to perform real-time bacterial screening in household environments without any technical background, offering peace of mind and personal control over food safety.
3.3 Competitors Research
Figure 2 Competitors Analysis
The key advantage of our technology lies in its unique multi-stage signal amplification mechanism, which achieves PCR-level ultra-high sensitivity. Simultaneously, by integrating smartphone APP analysis, it eliminates the reliance on specialized equipment and reduces detection costs. This innovation strikes a balance between "laboratory-level accuracy" and "on-site convenience" for small and medium-sized enterprises as well as household applications, making it particularly suitable for food safety, environmental monitoring, and medical POCT fields.
3.4 PEST Analysis
•Political Factors
National food safety standards (such as GB 4789) are shaping the regulatory environment and promoting adopting compliance technologies. Regulatory agencies such as the FDA, local market supervision, and administration bureaus are raising the bar for product access. Government subsidies and policy support are increasing access to technology for low-income groups and accelerating the marketization of products. Overall, policies and compliance requirements are accelerating the implementation and promotion of innovative testing technologies.
•Economic Factors
The global food safety testing market has reached $24 billion, offering broad commercial potential for related testing products. POCT market has an average annual growth rate of 15.7%, demonstrating significant growth potential. The cost is significantly lower than that of specialized testing instruments like PCR, creating a substantial cost advantage and facilitating widespread adoption.
•Social Factors
Public awareness of food safety remains insufficient, and there is an urgent need to strengthen public awareness and increase acceptance. Furthermore, there is a strong demand for convenient testing products among special groups, such as older people and the visually impaired. Public welfare testing at the community level is gradually expanding, and corporate social responsibility has become essential to brand building. Humanized, user-friendly product design enhances the user experience and helps develop the product's user base and market acceptance.
•Technical Factors
The nanoflower structure's dual signal amplification technology significantly improves detection sensitivity, with a minimum detectable concentration of 10¹ CFU/mL, an industry-leading level. The smartphone app-based analysis platform meets the portability and real-time requirements of POCT scenarios. The high specificity of bacteriophage proteins further enhances detection accuracy and their applicability. Furthermore, continuous technological innovation has established a technological barrier for the company, helping it maintain its leading position in the market.
3.5 Porter's five analysis
| Competitive Forces |
Analysis Content |
| Bargaining power of suppliers: Medium-low |
Dependent on raw materials such as gene fragments and chemical reagents, there is sufficient competition among suppliers with transparent prices and abundant alternative options, making it difficult for suppliers to monopolize pricing. Only after large-scale production, special materials may face certain bargaining pressure from a few suppliers, with little impact at present. |
| Threat of potential competitors entering: Medium |
Existing competitors include PCR equipment manufacturers, traditional reagent companies, etc. The project's technology is innovative, requiring significant investment to replicate, but we need to apply for patents as soon as possible. |
| Bargaining power of buyers: Medium-high |
Target customers include hospitals, food enterprises, etc. Currently, detection methods such as PCR detection method dominate the market. Buyers have high switching costs, are price - sensitive, and large customers have relatively large bargaining space. However, the product advantages meet the needs of rapid screening in hospital emergency departments and production line sampling inspection in food enterprises and other non - laboratory scenarios, which can reduce the bargaining power of buyers to a certain extent. |
| Threat of substitutes: Low |
PCR relies on equipment, and immunochromatographic test strips have low sensitivity; other POCT technologies may become substitutes if improved. However, the project integrates ultra-sensitivity, speed, portability and low cost, filling the technical gap and reducing the threat of substitutes. |
| Degree of internal industry competition: Medium |
The overall bacterial testing industry is highly competitive, but the "ultra-sensitive + portable POCT" segment is still a blue ocean. PCR and immunochromatography occupying high and low-end markets respectively. The project targets the "middle market" with innovative technology suitable for non-laboratory scenarios, resulting in relatively low competitive pressure. |
3.6 SWOT analysis
Strengths
Ultra-high sensitivity and efficiency: It detects tiny amounts of foodborne pathogens much faster than traditional methods.
Innovative and versatile: Merges nanomaterials and biomolecular recognition, with potential in food safety, environmental monitoring, and clinical diagnosis.
Cost and portability: Lower cost than large instruments (e.g., PCR) and easy to integrate into portable devices for on-site testing.
Weaknesses
Sample interference: Food matrices (fats, proteins) may block detection sites, requiring preprocessing that slows testing.
Opportunities
Growing food safety demand: Frequent foodborne outbreaks drive demand for rapid detection, supported by policies (e.g., China’s Food Safety Law).
Nano-biotech integration: Research funding favors such innovations Portable device potential: Can be integrated with smartphone APP for on-site "sample-test-upload" systems.
Threats
Competition from alternatives: Mature technologies (digital PCR, CRISPR) and low-cost kits (colloidal gold strips) dominate markets.
Regulatory and safety concerns: Unclear nanomaterial biosafety could lead to restrictive regulations; public distrust may hinder adoption.