Our project aims to engineer Caulobacter crescentus as a living platform for enzymatic surface display to support sustainable mine tailing remediation. By leveraging its crystalline S-layer system and resilience in harsh environments, we developed tools for displaying carbonic anhydrase (CA) and other functional proteins to enable calcium carbonate precipitation and biocementation in polluted sites.
Introduction
Remediation of Mine Tailings
The composition of waste material (tailings) produced from mines depends on the type of ore being extracted, but generally consists of a mix of residual minerals and chemical byproducts that leach into the soil, and consequently the surrounding environment[1]. Although the application of biocementation is a viable and sustainable remediation approach, few microbes can survive in these locations and existing studies have limited information on the practical implementation of this strategy. Some studies suggest the use of immobilized carbonic anhydrase (CA) to cement tailings, particularly through enzymatic display, which has emerged as a promising waste remediation platform[2]. While there are many bacterial candidates that can support whole cell enzymatic display, our project targets Caulobacter crescentus due to its ability to tolerant harsh living conditions and its robust surface display system[3].
C. crescentus is a Gram-negative, non-pathogenic, freshwater bacterium that has been extensively studied as a model organism for its dimorphic life cycle[4]. It divides into genetically identical but morphologically distinct progeny cells: a stalked cell that grows a holdfast structure to adhere to surfaces, and a swarmer cell with flagellum and pili structures for motility[4]. These features, along with its resilient stress adaptions, enable it to survive in low nutrient conditions.
While E. coli strains can be used for surface display of CAs in this context, Caulobacters have several characteristics that make it more desirable for use in meduCA. One factor is that C. crescentus is an obligate aerobe, which allows for more cost-effective cultivation in bioreactors. In comparison, E. coli switches from aerobic respiration to fermentation when oxygen levels become too low, which leads to rapid consumption of feedstock, acidification of the culture medium and ends the culture run in a bioreactor[5].
The Model Organism for Surface Display
Caulobacters produce a crystalline S-layer composed of a monomer, RsaA, that assembles into hexagonally packed structures that span the cell membrane[6]. This S-layer is anchored to the cell via long side chains connected to the lipopolysaccharides (LPS) on the outer membrane[6]. Uncommon to other S-layer harbouring organisms, the surface layer protein (Slp) of C. crescentus is secreted by the Type 1 mechanism[6]. This makes it an ideal host for adaptation of the S-layer for heterologous protein display, as the Type 1 pathway is more flexible in terms of the physical and chemical properties of the proteins secreted[7]. This system has been proven to display foreign peptides up to 200 amino acids in length and has potential to tolerate even larger peptides which was necessary for displaying CAs, as they can range from 260 to 459 amino acid residues [8]. Additionally, C. crescentus doesn’t secrete other proteins (in fact RsaA takes up to about 10 - 12% of all protein synthesis) so it’s easier to purify its the Slp compared to other systems.
Surface display mechanism in Caulobacter
RsaA contains a cell anchoring sequence in its N terminus, RTX (repeats in toxin) motifs, and a secretion signal in its C terminus. The middle domain is rich in glycine-aspartate amino acids which bind calcium ions and helps the S-layer form the crystalline lattice[5]. Heterologous proteins can be inserted at any site in this protein, but previous studies have identified specific locations that maximize display efficiency.
Previous work
Another appealing aspect of working with Caulobacters was the available support provided by the Hallam Lab, where the UBC-Vancouver team is based. Beth Davenport, a PhD student in the lab that specializes in Caulobacter bioremediation applications, provided valuable guidance throughout our cloning process. She previously displayed metal-binding proteins for bioremediation and established the groundwork for our display system.
Additionally, our team has displayed proteins on Caulobacter in two previous projects, although we weren’t able to recover a lot of previous work to build off of from 2014 and 2016. While other teams have explored Caulobacter for applications such as developing functional biofilms and producing glue from its polysaccharide proteins, there has been limited research on culturing this organism. Our team aimed to address this gap and provide tools for displaying proteins in Caulobacter.
Construct Design
To engineer C. crescentus to display fusion proteins, our design is inspired by the research done by the Smit Lab at UBC, who extensively characterized the Caulobacter S-layer system. The wild type Caulobacter strain CB2 is a laboratory strain that is commonly used to study the bacterial cell cycle, biofilm formation and other microbial mechanisms. We used the strain CB2A JS4038, a variant of CB2 that does not produce a surface layer because genomic copy of RsaA is non-functional[9], and has a disrupted SapA protease gene to avoid unintended cleavage of the fusion protein. In addition, it contains repBAC operon, enabling stable plasmid replication in . By introducing a plasmid with a functional copy of RsaA, we can recover and control the expression of fusion proteins in this chassis.
We used two plasmids, provided by the Hallam Lab, that were used to display and secrete fusion proteins respectively.
The first vector, henceforth referred to as pCB2A-Display, clones inserts in the middle of the protein. This vector has a dual ori (ColE1 and RSF1010), which enables plasmid replication in both E. coli and C. crescentus strains.
New multiple cloning site in RsaA
The display backbone contains a multiple cloning site at amino acid position 723 of the RsaA surface-layer protein. This position was selected based on findings from [10] whereby insertion of peptides at position 723 enabled protein surface display without disrupting the RsaA protein. We further modified this MCS by appending the flanking SapI recognition sites with additional nucleotides to stabilize enzyme binding during assembly. Moreover, we included a myc tag for protein recognition in downstream surface display and CA activity validation assays. While the original backbones contain an inducible promoter, we modified this to restore the constitutive WT rsaA promoter. Altogether, these features result in a recombinant backbone into which different CA candidates are compatible for insertion. Ultimately, this produces CA-RsaA fusion proteins which are anchored to the outer membrane of CB2A, allowing direct enzyme-substrate interactions at the extracellular interface.
Structure of RsaA-CA fusion, CA is inserted in the middle of RsaA
The secretion construct contains the modified multiple cloning site between the inducible lac promoter and the C-terminus end of RsaA at amino acid position 336. As such, this allows the CA to be inserted directly fused to the C-terminus secretion signal domain. Additionally, the backbone contains the collagenase site (PLGP) which cleaves the protein of interest from the RsaA fragment after secretion. This results in the secretion of soluble CA.
Both display and secretion backbones confer chloramphenicol resistance by introducing the Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase gene. This served as a selectable marker to enable the selective culturing of successfully transformed strains.
Cycle 1: Surface Display Vector Assembly
To surface-display a carbonic anhydrase (CA) fusion protein in <i>Caulobacter crescentus</i> CB2A JS4038, we sought to modify an existing cloning vector for <i>Caulobacter </i>surface display to fuse the CA to the s-layer protein, RsaA.
We recreated the vector in SnapGene, and modified the multiple cloning site to allow modular insertion of our CA into the middle of the RsaA sequence, flanked by SapI recognition sites for Golden Gate cloning. As recommended by our advisors, we added extra base pairs at the end of the SapI recognition sites for stabilized enzyme binding.
We assembled the recombinant backbone via Gibson assembly. Then we transformed the plasmids into <i>E. coli</i> to propagate the plasmid. We validated clones through colony PCR and restriction digest, before sending them for Nanopore sequencing.
After sequencing, we found that the surface display sample contained the original cloning vector instead of the recombinant vector. We reamplified the parts for assembly, then added an additional fragment purification step which led to successful assembly.
We created a new part based on this design, which can be found on the Registry at BBa_258NR5MC.
Cloning in E. coli
To create the display and secretion recombinant backbones, we performed gibson assembly to combine the necessary fragments, including the parent backbones, WT rsaA promoter, and modified MSC.
The assembled recombinant backbones were transformed and cloned in chemically competent DH5α E. coli. Transformants were grown on plates containing chloramphenicol on which only successfully transformed E. coli containing the chloramphenicol resistance gene form colonies. Subsequently, transformants containing the recombinant backbones were extracted via miniprep.
To insert the CA candidates into the recombinant backbones, we performed golden gate assembly using SapI. Transformants were grown on plates containing chloramphenicol and colonies were validated via PCR amplification of the MCS and restriction digest with BsaI.
Cycle 2: RsaA-CA Fusion Protein Design
The original cloning vector included a myc tag in the MCS, which was lost when inserting CA. To simplify protein detection, we modified the plasmid so that any foreign protein could be detected without having to design a new tag for every CA inserted.
In our construct design, we moved the myc tag out of the MCS such that if the entire fusion was expressed, the tag would be retained in the middle of RsaA. Additionally, we codon optimized CAs for expression in <i>Caulobacter </i>and <i>E. coli.</i>
We modelled the fusion proteins in Alphafold, to compare the structure of CA and RsaA against the fusion RsaA-CA protein. We also electroporated both codon optimized versions of CA into <i>Caulobacter</i>.
The <i>in silico</i> results predicted that the CAs would have a significantly different structure from the reference, when fused to RsaA. Experimentally, we were only able to validate a colony harbouring the display construct with BtCAII (codon optimized for <i>E. coli</i>) into CB2A. We expected that the protein structure may change due insertion in the middle of the protein and plan to compare protein expression and activity in future experiments.
Electroporation
We modified an existing electroporation protocol based on previous literature and experience from Hallam lab members.
Optimal parameters for electroporation of CB2A
Cycle 3: Electrotransformation of CB2A
We adapted a protocol provided by our advisor, Beth, incorporating additional information from the literature on electroporation parameters and competent cell preparation. In addition, we developed a procedure for plasmid extraction from <i>Caulobacter</i> cells.
We prepared competent cells, and designed electroporation experiments to test recovery time, antibiotic resistance concentration and plating amount to optimize transformation efficiency.
We carried out several electroporation trials, in which we monitored cell yield, morphology and time for colony formation. Then we performed colony PCR and miniprep to validate successful uptake of the sufrace display, secretion and intracellular CA expression vectors.
The secretion and intracellular strains yielded colonies at the expected rate of 2 - 3 days post-electroporation whereas the surface display strain was slow to recover on both solid media and liquid culture. We couldn’t extract sufficient concentration of our construct from the surface display strain for sequencing. However, we found that lowering the chloramphenicol concentration improved culturing time for all strains.
Several constructs yielded colonies after CB2A electrotransformation, but we’ve made furthest progress with RsaA-BtCAII (codon optimized for E. coli). More information about this part can be found on the Registry, at BBa_25EMPHCH!
1. Mahabub MdS, Alahi F, Al Imran M. Unlocking the potential of microbes: Biocementation technology for mine tailings restoration --- a comprehensive review. Environ Sci Pollut Res [Internet]. 2023 Aug 1 [cited 2025 Oct 1];30(40):91676—709. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28937-4
2. Mwandira W, Mavroulidou M, Gunn MJ, Purchase D, Garelick H, Garelick J. Concurrent Carbon Capture and Biocementation through the Carbonic Anhydrase (CA) Activity of Microorganisms -a Review and Outlook. Environ Process [Internet]. 2023 Sept 29 [cited 2025 Mar 10];10(4):56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-023-00667-2
3. Xu Z, Lei Y, Patel J. Bioremediation of soluble heavy metals with recombinant Caulobacter crescentus. Bioeng Bugs [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2025 Feb 21];1(3):207—12. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3026426/
5. Ford MJ, Nomellini JF, Smit J. S-Layer Anchoring and Localization of an S-Layer-Associated Protease in Caulobacter crescentus. Journal of Bacteriology [Internet]. 2007 Mar 15 [cited 2025 May 7];189(6):2226—37. Available from: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jb.01690-06
6. Baneyx F. Protein expression technologies: Current status and future trends [Internet]. Wymondham, Norfolk, U.K.: Horizon Bioscience; 2004 [cited 2025 May 8]. 532 p. Available from: http://www.e-streams.com/es0802/es0802_3940.html
8. Imtaiyaz Hassan Md, Shajee B, Waheed A, Ahmad F, Sly WS. Structure, function and applications of carbonic anhydrase isozymes. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry [Internet]. 2013 Mar 15 [cited 2025 Oct 1];21(6):1570—82. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968089612003288
9. Smit J, Agabian N. Cloning of the major protein of the Caulobacter crescentus periodic surface layer: Detection and characterization of the cloned peptide by protein expression assays. J Bacteriol [Internet]. 1984 Dec [cited 2025 May 8];160(3):1137—45. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC215831/
10. Charrier M, Li D, Mann VR, Yun L, Jani S, Rad B, et al. Engineering the S-Layer of Caulobacter crescentus as a Foundation for Stable, High-Density, 2D Living Materials. ACS Synth Biol [Internet]. 2019 Jan 18;8(1):181—90. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577690