Low-Gravity Bioreactor: Requirements + Design

The low gravity simulator is responsible for exploring bacteria behaviour and growth under low-gravity conditions found on Mars and in space. A key component of our research and conceptualization was considering how the project would be validated as it is difficult to measure acceleration in dynamics environment without having biased data. Our final concept is based off an RPM machine that spins in two axes.

Background and Motivation

Terrestrial research on cyanobacteria has revealed much about their physiology, growth dynamics, photosynthetic behavior, and bioproduct accumulation under 1 g. However, when using cyanobacteria in extraterrestrial settings (e.g. for in situ resource utilization on Mars), the gravitational difference introduces several uncertainties. Mars has about 0.38 g (roughly one-third Earth gravity), and this reduction is expected to modulate many transport and fluid phenomena, e.g. sedimentation, diffusion, convection, buoyant flows, and boundary layer formation.

Because cyanobacteria are being considered for production of living building materials and regolith cementation, it becomes essential to understand how reduced gravity could affect both their biological performance and the mechanical / material quality of their outputs. For example:

Expanded Objectives & What We Can Learn

Below is a more detailed articulation of the objectives and possible insights from such a system.

  1. Growth kinetics and biomass yield
  1. Pigment and photosynthetic metrics
  1. Mass transfer, nutrient diffusion, and gas exchange
  1. Physical structure, aggregation, and morphology
  1. Material / mechanical properties of the biomass output
  1. Engineering / design feedback
  1. Uncertainty quantification and risk mitigation

Though the simulator does not perfectly replicate all aspects of Martian gravity (e.g. a direct 0.38 g field), it allows one to probe mechanistic trends and trade-offs in a controlled, repeatable, and economical way. The insights can reduce design risk and guide the roadmap toward actual extraterrestrial bioreactor deployment.

Approaches to Simulating Low Gravity on Earth

To achieve this, various technologies and strategies have been developed in the literature to simulate reduced or microgravity conditions. Some of these are:

For example, Ketteler et al. developed a simulated microgravity biofilm reactor (SMBR) with integrated microfabricated sensors to explore biofilm formation under low gravity—like conditions. [5]

In the cyanobacteria field, Ellena et al. used a ground analog (RPM) for oxygenic cyanobacteria, finding slower growth under low-shear simulated microgravity, increased thickness of diffusion boundary layers, and proteomic differences. [2]

Additionally, general reviews of simulated microgravity devices note that numerous stem cell and microbial studies have used clinostats, RPMs, and rotating walls to study altered gravity responses. [6]

Connecting to Mars / Low-Pressure / Extraterrestrial Cultivation Constraints

Simulating reduced gravity is one dimension, but real Martian cultivation also implies other non-terrestrial constraints (low ambient pressure, atmospheric composition, CO₂ / N₂ ratios, radiation, temperature swings, etc.). Some relevant observations:

1. Space Cell Biology - NASA [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Oct 1]. Available from: https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/esdmd/hhp/space-cell-biology/
2. Ellena G, Fahrion J, Gupta S, Dussap CG, Mazzoli A, Leys N, et al. Development and implementation of a simulated microgravity setup for edible cyanobacteria. npj Microgravity [Internet]. 2024 Oct 25 [cited 2025 Oct 1];10(1):99. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-024-00436-x
3. Joeris K, Keulen M, Kollmer JE. Controlled Partial Gravity Platform for Milligravity in Drop Tower Experiments [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Oct 1]. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12391
4. Vashi A, Sreejith KR, Nguyen NT. Lab-on-a-Chip Technologies for Microgravity Simulation and Space Applications. Micromachines (Basel) [Internet]. 2022 Dec 31 [cited 2025 Oct 1];14(1):116. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9864955/
5. Ketteler HM, Johnson EL, McGlennen M, Dieser M, Foreman CM, Warnat S. A simulated microgravity biofilm reactor with integrated microfabricated sensors: Advancing biofilm studies in near-space conditions. Biofilm [Internet]. 2025 June 1 [cited 2025 Oct 1];9:100263. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207525000115
6. Nishimura Y. Technology using simulated microgravity. Regenerative Therapy [Internet]. 2023 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Oct 1];24:318—23. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320423000767
7. Verseux C, Ramalho TP, Bohuon E, Kunst N, Lang V, Heinicke C. Dependence of cyanobacterium growth and Mars-specific photobioreactor mass on total pressure, pN2 and pCO2. npj Microgravity [Internet]. 2024 Nov 2 [cited 2025 Oct 1];10(1):101. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-024-00440-1
8. Fahrion J, Mastroleo F, Dussap CG, Leys N. Use of Photobioreactors in Regenerative Life Support Systems for Human Space Exploration. Front Microbiol [Internet]. 2021 June 29 [cited 2025 Oct 1];12. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.699525/full