We established a breast cancer surveillance system with engineered adipocyte. To make cancer surveillance more accurate, real-time, long-term, and user-friendly, thereby maximizing patient safety and enhancing life quality, we set to develop a diagnostic system that integrates the following key advantages:
-
Multi-Marker Sensor: Accurate sensing to ensure reliability and safety.
-
In Vivo Detection: Long-term, real-time monitoring with rapid response.
-
Ex Vivo Output: Simple operation with clear, visible results.
Highlights of ABCS
-
Target Identification & Sensor Design: The optimal combination of biomarker genes of CAA (PLOD2 & LIF) was identified using an Attention-MLP model. RADAR sensors with specific responsiveness were constructed based on predicted RNA secondary structures. See Model for more details.
-
Delivery & Functional Validation: The sensor part was delivered into adipocytes alongside ADAR enzyme (BBa_2574CGF3). Following induced expression of PLOD2 and LIF, the conditioned medium from these adipocytes was collected and luminescence generated from output reporter was measured for functional validation. See Results for more details.
-
Part Contribution: Throughout this process, we designed and registered 20 new parts, expanding the iGEM BioBrick registry. See Parts for more details.
New parts in our project
New ideas of our project
This year, our dry lab group applied computational methods into the evaluation of ethical responsibility innovatively. We created BEAM–BEAMer, a pioneering quantitative ethics assessment tool that combines rigorous mathematical model reasoning with an easy-to-use web application, transforming abstract ethical evaluation into quantitative analysis, which could also help other iGEM teams evaluate ethical risks of their own projects in a convenient and intuitive way.
At the same time, we built DISCERN, a dry lab model that simulates the entire process of RADAR-based detection of target gene expression—from sensing the target genes, to expression and processing of the output signal protain. It gives us a complete framework and strong guidance of wet-lab experiments, while also serving as a safe and efficient alternative to animal experiments to some extent.
BEAM–BEAMer: A Pioneering Tool for Quantitative Ethical Evaluation in Synthetic Biology
BEAM (Bio-Ethical Assessment Model)
BEAM is a methodological breakthrough, which, to our knowledge, is the first quantitative workflow designed to assess the ethical risks of iGEM projects. In today’s ethical assessment practice, we face challenges such as unclear evaluation criteria and difficulty in quantifying complex concerns. BEAM addresses these challenges by combining Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to calculate the weights of ethical dimensions with Bayesian networks to convert these weights into predicted risk probabilities. In this way, BEAM shifts bioethics evaluation from qualitative assessment to quantitative analysis, establishes an adaptable framework, and provides a new practical approach for advancing the ethical aspects of synthetic biology.
BEAM–BEAMer Workflow: Model Construction and Application
Usage process of BEAMer software
Framework
Structure of glomerular filtration membrane
Simulated process
Our Education group didn’t just run outreach—we engineered education. By adopting digital technologies, we advanced educational equity and made learning more accessible. To lower barriers, we created the Virtual Laboratory, offering click-through experiments with step-by-step animations. The Bilingual Education Platform delivers Synthetic Biology in Seven Days in both English and Chinese, with tailored versions for kids, teens, and adults, bridging cultures and age groups. Notably, we developed an AI-assisted Feedback System that not only collected 1,617 responses across five dimensions but also transformed them into systematic evaluations of education quality.
Building on this foundation of accessibility, we also created open resources that turn knowledge into lasting impact. The four Handbooks empower teachers, engage families, tackle public misconceptions, and guide frontier research, while the four Games transform abstract biology into hands-on play. Together, these resources form a ready-to-use toolkit that makes education sustainable and engaging for the iGEM community and beyond.
Virtual Laboratory
To give everyone the chance to practice synthetic biology online, we built the virtual laboratory—an interactive platform with click-through experiments. Users only need to select an experiment to access a full step-by-step animation, learning principles, instruments, and techniques in an intuitive way. We envision that, in the future, more modules will support users in conducting complete experimental workflows entirely online. Thus, we will open-source the platform code on the GitLab repository, enabling the iGEM community to expand it into a shared repository of virtual experiments.
Virtual Laboratory
Education Platform
Education Feedback System
Radar Chart for Educational Activity Evaluation
-
A universal Education activity feedback form, ready for immediate use:Education Feedback Form
-
A step-by-step guide on using our AI-assisted feedback system for any team to efficiently process large-scale feedback and transform data into actionable insights: Instructions for AI-assisted feedback system
-
The Teachers’ Reference Book has already reached 13 schools and nearly 900 students, demonstrating that empowering educators multiplies education impact.
-
Parent-Child Learning Handbook provides interactive activities and simple at-home experiments, enabling families to learn together beyond events.
-
The Myth-Busting Synthetic Biology Handbook united 35 iGEM teams to confront one of the field’s biggest barriers: misconceptions.
-
The White Paper on Functional Nucleic Acids was co-created with six teams, lowering complexity and safety barriers to open exciting new frontiers.
Throughout the year, our Integrated Human Practices engaged deeply with a broad range of stakeholders to ensure our project remained both scientifically sound and socially relevant. In parallel, we carried out extensive public engagement through multi-community interviews, online and offline communications with breast cancer patients, and field study at the Yanbian CDC, ultimately reaching thousands of people and making sure that the voices of those most affected were directly reflected in our project.
Map of Stakeholders
-
SCQAI Framework: Structuring every dialogue into Situation, Conflict, Question, Answer, and Implementation, ensuring purposeful interviews and actionable outcomes. This framework led us from identifying public needs to targeting recurrence monitoring in clinical care, and ultimately to engineering adipose cells as our core solution.
-
Dual-Track Framework: Keeping scientific experimentation and social needs evolving in parallel. This enabled us to capture community perspectives while refining experiments with expert input, steadily strengthening both human responsiveness and technical rigor.
-
Concentric Stakeholder Engagement Framework: Mapping stakeholders by values and interests to tailor engagement strategies. Using this approach, we expanded beyond breast cancer patients to also include women with breast implants, broadening the project’s reach and relevance.