










-
For the outer track, we gather authentic feedback through social surveys and interviews with public health professionals, bringing real-world needs directly into the lab. To be specific, we engaged in public Interviews, attended conferences, applied the BEAM ethical model, interviewed patients, and explored paths toward commercialization.
-
For the inner track, we collaborate closely with scientists, clinicians and other core stakeholders, continuously refining and deepening the project based on their lab and clinical expertise. In particular, We established the AFT, defined both input and output parameters, introduced AAV as the delivery vector, and simulated the GFB mechanism.



Patients and high-risk groups Core Layer
Core requirement: non-invasive, convenient, and real-time monitoring method
Interactive strategy: collecting pain points through community interviews

Clinicians and administrators Core Layer
Core requirement: accuracy of test results
Interactive strategy: expert interview to optimize technical pathways

Expert in biotechnology Middle Layer
Core value: provide crucial technical support
Interactive strategy: participation in academic conferences and expert interviews

Ethicists and jurists Middle Layer
Core value: assessing the ethical risks of synthetic biology technology
Interactive strategy: building an ethical risk assessment model

The public Outer Layer
Core value: understanding the public through
Interactive strategy: designing popular science tools to lower the cognitive threshold of the public towards technology

Policy makers and disease control institutions Outer Layer
Core value: providing epidemiological data
Interactive strategy: participation in public health conferences and promote the inclusion of the proiect into the local "Supplementary Screening Program for Two Types of Cancer"

Investors and business partners Outer Layer
Core value: providing commercialization path design
Interactive strategy: participation in relevant professional conferences to learn business knowledge

Practitioners in the aesthetic medicine industry Outer Layer
Core value: engineered fat cells are compatible with existing breast augmentation/reconstruction surgeries
Interactive strategy: optimizing cell culture and transplantation through interviews
-
Weighted Calculation using a Structural Equation Model (SEM).
-
Probability Assessment through Bayesian Network–based risk quantification.
-
Model Building by gathering public views on synthetic biology risks.
-
Application & Validation through feedback collection and validation tests.

-
Serves as a clear, step-by-step guide to applying the BEAM model—from distributing Likert-scale questionnaires to calculating initial risk scores and selecting inference methods.
-
Shares details of the model’s core dimensions and their sub-dimensions, ensuring transparency in our ethical risk quantification.
BEAM usage instructions
Deeply rooted in the fertile soil of these frameworks and tools, our human practices branched out and thrived.










S (Situation) At the beginning, we aimed to define a research direction with both scientific value and social impact.
C (Complication) Before engaging the community, we lacked clarity on which health issues were most urgent and relevant to the public.
Q (Question) What specific needs should our project address?
A (Answer) Community surveys and interviews highlighted strong demand for breast cancer education and easier follow-up.
I (Implementation) We produced a breast health handbook and set our project focus on improving breast cancer diagnostic techniques.
Questionnaire on Public Health Needs









S (Situation) After identifying breast cancer as our focus, we sought to understand challenges in different regions.
C (Complication) Before visiting Yanbian, we were unsure how regional health disparities affected breast cancer follow-up.
Q (Question) What obstacles exist in breast cancer care in resource-limited areas?
A (Answer) Local CDC staff revealed the lack of reliable, long-term monitoring tools.
I (Implementation) We adopted a technical model with long-term in vivo monitoring and convenient in vitro readout.


S (Situation) With our technical model in place, we needed to refine the approach through industry insights.
C (Complication) Before the summit, we struggled to identify which technologies could best meet patient needs and stand out in the field.
Q (Question) Which solutions are practical and patient-friendly?
A (Answer) Experts’ insights inspired us of integrating IVD with implantable sensing to enable real-time early warning.
I (Implementation) We refined our design by incorporating real-time warning functions and prioritizing patient comfort.



S (Situation) After shaping our technical framework, we sought suggestions from clinical experts.
C (Complication) We lacked the professional expertise to confirm that our focus matched urgent clinical needs.
Q (Question) How do clinicians view the key gaps in breast cancer monitoring?
A (Answer) Dr. Sun stressed recurrence monitoring and long-term prognosis management as top priorities.
I (Implementation) We confirmed our project direction aligns closely with frontline clinical challenges.






S (Situation) Postoperative breast cancer patients face both the psychological pressure of recurrence monitoring and stressful traditional hospital check-up.
C (Complication) It was unclear how to integrate our diagnostic system into routine medical procedures to meet these needs.
Q (Question) Could our system be integrated into standard treatment processes, and is adipose tissue a suitable carrier?
A (Answer) Dr. Wan Wang affirmed that autologous fat transplantation technology in China is mature and could be effectively used.
I (Implementation) We chose adipose cells as carriers and planned to implant engineered adipocytes during breast reconstruction surgery.




S (Situation) When planning the project audience, we always paid attention to the suggestion of Dr. Wan Wang that non-reconstruction patients should also benefit from our project.
C (Complication) Limiting our technology to this specific patient group would significantly narrow its clinical value and potential impact.
Q (Question) How could we expand the system’s use to a wider group?
A (Answer) Dr. Lianbo Zhang noted that autologous fat transplantation for cosmetic breast augmentation is both clinically safe and increasingly in demand.
I (Implementation) We expanded our project design to include women undergoing breast augmentation.
-
Lack of an efficient natural secretion signal peptide.
-
Large molecular weight, limiting secretion into the extracellular space and blocking passage through the glomerular filtration barrier.





S (Situation) We needed to evaluate the possible output strategies, Gaussia luciferase and melanin.
C (Complication) Both strategies had pros and cons in terms of psychological acceptance, convenience, and technical feasibility.
Q (Question) Which output signal has the best balance of feasibility and acceptance?
A (Answer) Dr. Bin Yang suggested that the melanin approach could worsen body image concerns, and Gaussia luciferase was more feasible.
I (Implementation) We kept Gluc as our main output.



S (Situation) We were reviewing public databases to find genes differentially expressed between cancer-associated adipocytes (CAAs) and normal adipose tissue (NAT).
C (Complication) Direct comparison datasets were limited and sample sizes too small, reducing statistical power.
Q (Question) How could we obtain valid data to find the high expression genes in CAAs?
A (Answer) Professor Walter Bodmer recommended starting with a thorough literature review to confirm the specific link between candidate genes and breast cancer.
I (Implementation) We first verified the specificity of candidate genes through literature review, then moved on to database screening and validation.









S (Situation) Our team needed to select suitable cancer biomarkers.
C (Complication) Without clear selection criteria, choosing among the many potential candidates was difficult.
Q (Question) What standards should guide the choice of our biomarkers for breast cancer?
A (Answer) A project manager at DIRUI, a medical technology company, emphasized that accuracy is the top priority, and suggested exploring combinations of markers.
I (Implementation) We screened candidate genes through literature review, tested their combinations in our model group, and eventually selected LIF and PLOD2.



S (Situation) We initially planned to use adenovirus as a vector to achieve long-term stable expression of our target genes in adipocytes.
C (Complication) Although adenovirus shows high infection efficiency, it cannot maintain stable expression over time.
Q (Question) Was adenovirus the right choice, or should we consider a better option for sustained and safe gene delivery?
A (Answer) Dr. Hongyu Wu suggested using adeno-associated virus (AAV), which has lower immunogenicity and stronger potential for long-term expression.
I (Implementation) We shifted our design to AAV, while also planning adipose cell-specific optimization and validation experiments.



S (Situation) We needed to evaluate Gluc’s renal clearance, but data on its filtration rate was missing.
C (Complication) While modeling, we found no data on the basement membrane’s pore size.
Q (Question) We asked Professor Haoran Yu how to estimate these unknown parameters.
A (Answer) He suggested using normal distribution modeling, optimization, and data from similar membranes.
I (Implementation) With his guidance, we filled the data gap and advanced our Gluc clearance model.



S (Situation) We were studying the renal clearance efficiency of Gluc and reviewed that the glomerular filtration barrier (GFB) is typically divided into three layers.
C (Complication) However, we found major inconsistencies in the reported physical parameters of the third layer across different studies.
Q (Question) We asked Senior Researcher Yin Rui why such discrepancies existed.
A (Answer) He explained that many papers define the third layer differently and that it can actually be divided into the Podocyte Layer and the Split Membrane.
I (Implementation) Following his advice, we refined our model by reconstructing the traditional three-layer GFB into a four-layer structure to better simulate Gluc’s renal clearance.






S (Situation) As we began building an ethical evaluation framework, we realized synthetic biology applications involve complex ethical risks.
C (Complication) Before consulting experts, we struggled to balance subjective judgments and objective criteria, leaving the framework unreliable.
Q (Question) How can ethical evaluation be both systematic and context-sensitive?
A (Answer) Prof. Dong stressed that ethical risks vary by scenario and must be assessed with tailored indicators.
I (Implementation) We refined our model into a scenario-based system with differentiated dimensions for clinical, monitoring, and cosmetic applications.



S (Situation) We had established a multi-dimensional evaluation system using SEM to weigh influencing factors.
C (Complication) Before this interview, we lacked a method to transform these weights into a practical tool for assessing uncertain risks.
Q (Question) How can structural weights be linked to probabilistic risk assessment?
A (Answer) Prof. Chen recommended using a Bayesian network to model causal and probabilistic relationships.
I (Implementation) We integrated SEM with Bayesian reasoning, creating BEAM—a framework that enables dynamic, quantitative ethical risk assessment.


S (Situation) After identifying scenario-specific issues, we needed data beyond expert perspectives.
C (Complication) Without public input, our framework risked being overly technical and disconnected from social expectations.
Q (Question) What ethical concerns does the public prioritize in synthetic biology?
A (Answer) The survey revealed public concerns about privacy, safety, fairness, and new applications like home monitoring and cosmetic uses.
I (Implementation) We used this data as a core input for model training, ensuring our framework reflected both experts' advice and needs of the public.
Survey on Ethical Perceptions of Synthetic Biology


S (Situation) With BEAM established, we needed to test its applicability to our own project.
C (Complication) Before conducting a targeted survey, we did not know how different stakeholders would evaluate our system’s risks and benefits.
Q (Question) How do patients, clinicians, and the public perceive the ethical risks of our project?
A (Answer) The survey showed experts focused on biosafety, while patients emphasized privacy, medical safety, and affordability.
I (Implementation) We developed the ABCS Ethical Risk Assessment, a tailored tool aligned with BEAM, bridging universal theory with project-specific practice.
Ethical Risk Assessment of the ABCS Project






S (Situation) We planned to interview breast cancer patients to improve the ABCS. To ensure the process was ethical and protected patient rights, we consulted Jun Wei.
C (Complication) Unstandardized interviews can cause misunderstandings about the purpose, privacy, or other details, leading to trust issues or legal risks.
Q (Question) What steps should be taken before the interview, and what documents should be signed to ensure patients are fully informed, their privacy is protected, and the interview is legal and compliant?
A (Answer) Mr. Wei advised that a written informed consent form is required. It should clearly explain the interview’s purpose, content, privacy protection, and participants’ rights before the interview starts.
I (Implementation) We created an informed consent form.
Informed Consent Form



S (Situation) We sought guidance on how to ensure our patient interviews respected participant autonomy and encouraged equal dialogue.
C (Complication) During interviews, patients' autonomy may be overlooked, and the interviewer's role might make them feel “scrutinized,” making it difficult to get honest feedback.
Q (Question) How can we design interviews to make patients feel respected and heard, not just “investigated”?
A (Answer) Prof. Jia recommended the life history interview method based on narrative cognitive theory, using three-dimensional questions and narrative coding to focus on the patient’s experience and autonomy.
I (Implementation) We developed a communication style that encourages equal dialogue, better meeting patients’ real needs and strengthening the humanistic care in our project.



S (Situation) To better empathize with breast cancer patients, we hoped to understand the common psychological challenges they face.
C (Complication) Breast cancer patients often experience complex psychological challenges due to the disease and treatment process. Interviews could potentially increase this psychological burden.
Q (Question) What are the common psychological states among breast cancer patients? What communication skills should be employed during interviews to facilitate effective communication?
A (Answer) Dr. Zhou pointed out that breast cancer patients often feel incomplete after having their breasts removed, and the anxiety about recurrence can make follow-up examinations stressful.
I (Implementation) We conducted practice sessions with AI simulations before interviewing real patients.


S (Situation) Before interviewing real patients, we worried our approach might cause unintended emotional harm, so we utilized Doubao AI to evaluate our presupposed interview questions.
C (Complication) Sensitive questions could trigger distress or misunderstandings.
Q (Question) How can we gather genuine patient needs while minimizing emotional risk?
A (Answer) The AI evaluation revealed potential pitfalls in our interview style.
I (Implementation) We will avoid sensitive questions in real interviews.


S (Situation) We planned in-person interviews to learn patients’ real needs. Before starting, we got ethical approval from the hospital to ensure informed consent and protect participants’ rights.
C (Complication) Without face-to-face, in-depth communication, it is difficult to capture patients’ potential concerns about ABCS.
Q (Question) What is the overall patient acceptance of the ABCS concept, and what are their primary concerns and expectations regarding its cost and related services?
A (Answer) Overall, patient acceptance was high. Their main concerns were the safety of cell modification, urine test accuracy, and risks of physical burden or false results.
I (Implementation) Regarding the patients’ concerns about safety, we planned to strengthen the safety verification of the project and improve the accuracy of urine testing.
Ethical Approval Document





S (Situation) To ensure our final product meets patient needs, our project required extensive feedback on different potential testing methods.
C (Complication) If the product’s form was determined solely based on our internal design, we might overlook the actual needs of patients.
Q (Question) Which potential product format do patients prefer for at-home monitoring?
A (Answer) Approximately 68% of the patients prefer the test kit approach, due to its similarity to familiar pregnancy tests, convenience for at-home use, the safety of sterile disposable tools, and lower cost.
I (Implementation) Based on this feedback, we prioritized the development of the test kit as our primary product format.






S (Situation) In biomedicine, new technologies face many challenges moving from lab research to clinical use and commercialization.
C (Complication) Our team needed to understand potential issues ABCS might face in practice to prepare effective solutions.
Q (Question) How to bridge the gap in the “R&D-clinical-commercialization” process?
A (Answer) From the symposium, we learned that project commercialization requires efforts in marketing, legal compliance, investment, talent development, and more.
I (Implementation) We consulted experts in various fields to gain commercialization knowledge, helping us design the business plan.





S (Situation) We needed to promote ABCS and explore its clinical application scenarios.
C (Complication) We lacked a clear understanding of the business models, technical needs, and clinical requirements of public hospitals’ plastic surgery departments, making it difficult to identify a focus for project promotion.
Q (Question) How can we find a feasible path for the promotion and clinical application of ABCS?
A (Answer) Dr. Zhang explained the development models of plastic surgery departments in public hospitals, while Dr. Qin’s presentation showed that combining ABCS with breast augmentation offers both body shaping and breast cancer marker monitoring benefits.
I (Implementation) We decided to enhance our connections with public hospitals, refine our cooperation plans based on specific clinical scenarios.



S (Situation) We needed to understand market demands and technical challenges of private medical aesthetics clinics.
C (Complication) We lacked insight into the market and demands of medical aesthetics clinics, which hindered ABCS promotion in private clinics and our goal of transitioning from technology to market.
Q (Question) How can we promote the actual implementation of ABCS in private medical aesthetics clinics?
A (Answer) Director Zhao provided an overview of the breast augmentation market, highlighting that adipocyte survival rate is a key factor affecting surgical outcomes and customer satisfaction.
I (Implementation) In the future, we intended to strengthen communication with private clinics and accelerate the progress of optimizing cell survival.



S (Situation) We needed to develop a clear roadmap and marketing strategy for our product.
C (Complication) Confused about key marketing elements such as how to identify target customer groups, select promotion channels, and formulate pricing strategies.
Q (Question) How to formulate an effective marketing strategy to drive the commercialization of the project?
A (Answer) Prof. Ren shared professional insights into the ToB and ToC models. Based on this, she advised us to prioritize ToB technical services initially, followed by the rollout of ToC products.
I (Implementation) Our team has developed a customized business canvas for ABCS based on both ToB and ToC models.






S (Situation) We wanted to understand how a biotech startup can attract investment to drive its development.
C (Complication) As a team of students with limited business experience, we were unsure how to translate the project’s technical strengths into highlights that for investors.
Q (Question) How to effectively attract the attention of investment institutions and secure financial support to accelerate our commercialization process?
A (Answer) Mr. Xue suggested that we enhance investor confidence in the project by clarifying its technical advantages, emphasizing its social value and future potential.
I (Implementation) We developed the “ABCS Brand Strategy House”.






S (Situation) Understanding how medical enterprises recruit and develop talent could guide our team building.
C (Complication) We lacked a clear understanding of how medical enterprises build talent systems based on business needs and develop talent for commercialization.
Q (Question) How can we build a talent system adapted to the commercialization process?
A (Answer) Wondfo executives suggested fostering interdisciplinary talent through cross-departmental communication and regular training that combines technical and business knowledge.
I (Implementation) We developed a comprehensive talent development plan and a “dual-channel” development strategy in Chapter 5 of the Business Plan.



S (Situation) The future development and commercialization of the ABCS project would likely involve potential legal risks.
C (Complication) We were short of professional legal knowledge, making it difficult to comprehensively identify potential legal issues.
Q (Question) What legal issues are involved in ABCS? How to ensure the legal and compliant advancement of the project?
A (Answer) Lawyer Bai suggested that we attach importance to intellectual property protection and systematically analyze the legal risks faced by the project.
I (Implementation) We incorporated a patent module into our development plan and designed a risk control scheme in Chapter 6 of our Business Plan.



S (Situation) We sought guidance on how to turn the research project into a real entrepreneurial venture.
C (Complication) Lacking practical entrepreneurial experience, we had gaps in connections, funding, and industry knowledge.
Q (Question) How can we improve the team’s entrepreneurial skills and develop systematic thinking to tackle real-world challenges?
A (Answer) Prof. Zhang suggested creating an entrepreneurial capability matrix by shifting from "technical thinking" to "entrepreneurial thinking."
I (Implementation) We created an iGEM Entrepreneurship Practice Simulation game and held internal workshops to strengthen our practical business skills.
iGEM Entrepreneurship Practice Simulation
These hands-on exercises helped us break out of a purely technical mindset and start looking at the project through a broader lens—considering market trends, capital flow, and risk management. It’s been a valuable way to make up for our lack of business experience and limited exposure to resource integration. Through this process, we’ve gradually built up an entrepreneurship capability matrix, laying the groundwork for facing real-world startup challenges in the future.



ABCS Business Plan
DREAMS Value System
To better fulfill our commercialization mission, we have established a value system centered on DREAMS, encompassing six key dimensions: Dignity-preserving, Responsible innovation, Equitable access, Adaptive to needs, Multistake-holder synergy, and Socially beneficial. This system serves as an all-round guide for ABCS to evolve into an enterprise that is both responsible and beneficial to the world.




