Every year, millions of women courageously undergo mastectomies to combat breast cancer, reclaiming their right to life. However, for many, the loss of breasts is far beyond physical change, it’s also a challenge to self-identity, leaving invisible scars that are deeply felt and hard to heal. Especially, even after successful surgery, the shadow of cancer lingers: although following hospital check-ups could diagnose relapses, they often bring new anxiety. All the sleepless nights before examination and the agonizing wait for results make it extra hard for many to truly embrace life again even as a survivor.
Synthetic biology is, after all, serving for human well-being, and our project ABCS is born to protect women’s health and relieve their anxiety. To achieve this goal, we know that science alone is not enough. This year, we actively engaged with diverse stakeholders such as industry experts, researchers, legal professionals and patient communities, whose insights inspired the initial concept of the project, guided us in refining its design, strengthening our modeling approaches, addressing ethical concerns and beyond. This iterative process ensured that ABCS truly resonates with society’s needs.
Map of stakeholders
We believe that truly meaningful social practice should be scientific, inclusive, and ethically grounded. Throughout the project, we have gradually refined and integrated a set of complementary frameworks and approaches. We believe these tools has helped us align goals between technology development and society needs, as well as achieve shared value among stakeholders more systematically and effectively, putting technology to good use and serving society.
Frameworks for project practice
-
For the outer track, we gather authentic feedback through social surveys and interviews with public health professionals, bringing real-world needs directly into the lab. To be specific, we engaged in public Interviews, attended conferences, applied the BEAM ethical model, interviewed patients, and explored paths toward commercialization.
-
For the inner track, we collaborate closely with scientists, clinicians and other core stakeholders, continuously refining and deepening the project based on their lab and clinical expertise. In particular, We established the AFT, defined both input and output parameters, introduced AAV as the delivery vector, and simulated the GFB mechanism.
Dual-Track Framework: Connecting the Lab with Society
Concentric Stakeholder Engagement
Patients and high-risk groups Core Layer
Core requirement: non-invasive, convenient, and real-time monitoring method
Interactive strategy: collecting pain points through community interviews
Clinicians and administrators Core Layer
Core requirement: accuracy of test results
Interactive strategy: expert interview to optimize technical pathways
Expert in biotechnology Middle Layer
Core value: provide crucial technical support
Interactive strategy: participation in academic conferences and expert interviews
Ethicists and jurists Middle Layer
Core value: assessing the ethical risks of synthetic biology technology
Interactive strategy: building an ethical risk assessment model
The public Outer Layer
Core value: understanding the public through
Interactive strategy: designing popular science tools to lower the cognitive threshold of the public towards technology
Policy makers and disease control institutions Outer Layer
Core value: providing epidemiological data
Interactive strategy: participation in public health conferences and promote the inclusion of the proiect into the local "Supplementary Screening Program for Two Types of Cancer"
Investors and business partners Outer Layer
Core value: providing commercialization path design
Interactive strategy: participation in relevant professional conferences to learn business knowledge
Practitioners in the aesthetic medicine industry Outer Layer
Core value: engineered fat cells are compatible with existing breast augmentation/reconstruction surgeries
Interactive strategy: optimizing cell culture and transplantation through interviews
-
Weighted Calculation using a Structural Equation Model (SEM).
-
Probability Assessment through Bayesian Network–based risk quantification.
-
Model Building by gathering public views on synthetic biology risks.
-
Application & Validation through feedback collection and validation tests.
Buiding BEAM
-
Serves as a clear, step-by-step guide to applying the BEAM model—from distributing Likert-scale questionnaires to calculating initial risk scores and selecting inference methods.
-
Shares details of the model’s core dimensions and their sub-dimensions, ensuring transparency in our ethical risk quantification.
BEAM usage instructions
Deeply rooted in the fertile soil of these frameworks and tools, our human practices branched out and thrived.
Insight growth tree
At this stage, we conducted surveys and interviews in Changchun communities, identifying breast cancer as a key public health concern and recognizing the need for more accessible, patient-friendly diagnostic techniques. A visit to the Yanbian CDC reinforced the urgency of long-term recurrence monitoring, inspiring us to explore a breast cancer surveillance system with in vivo monitoring and in vitro readout. We then gained further insights at the MedTech Summit 2025, where experts emphasized in vitro diagnosis (IVD) and real-time early warning, and finally confirmed the clinical relevance of this direction through our interview with Dr. Guang Sun.
Listening to the Community
S (Situation) At the beginning, we aimed to define a research direction with both scientific value and social impact.
C (Complication) Before engaging the community, we lacked clarity on which health issues were most urgent and relevant to the public.
Q (Question) What specific needs should our project address?
A (Answer) Community surveys and interviews highlighted strong demand for breast cancer education and easier follow-up.
I (Implementation) We produced a breast health handbook and set our project focus on improving breast cancer diagnostic techniques.
Questionnaire on Public Health Needs
Understanding Public Health Needs in Yanbian
S (Situation) After identifying breast cancer as our focus, we sought to understand challenges in different regions.
C (Complication) Before visiting Yanbian, we were unsure how regional health disparities affected breast cancer follow-up.
Q (Question) What obstacles exist in breast cancer care in resource-limited areas?
A (Answer) Local CDC staff revealed the lack of reliable, long-term monitoring tools.
I (Implementation) We adopted a technical model with long-term in vivo monitoring and convenient in vitro readout.
Strengthening Our Idea at the MedTech Summit 2025
S (Situation) With our technical model in place, we needed to refine the approach through industry insights.
C (Complication) Before the summit, we struggled to identify which technologies could best meet patient needs and stand out in the field.
Q (Question) Which solutions are practical and patient-friendly?
A (Answer) Experts’ insights inspired us of integrating IVD with implantable sensing to enable real-time early warning.
I (Implementation) We refined our design by incorporating real-time warning functions and prioritizing patient comfort.
Interview with Dr. Guang Sun, Breast Surgery Department
S (Situation) After shaping our technical framework, we sought suggestions from clinical experts.
C (Complication) We lacked the professional expertise to confirm that our focus matched urgent clinical needs.
Q (Question) How do clinicians view the key gaps in breast cancer monitoring?
A (Answer) Dr. Sun stressed recurrence monitoring and long-term prognosis management as top priorities.
I (Implementation) We confirmed our project direction aligns closely with frontline clinical challenges.
Building on these insights, we began to translate clinical needs into technical solutions.
Expert interviews refined our project direction. Dr. Wan Wang confirmed adipocytes as feasible carriers via mature fat grafting. Dr. Lianbo Zhang broadened our vision by suggesting cosmetic fat augmentation as an additional application. Dr. Bin Yang guided us to prioritize Gaussia luciferase over melanin for better psychological acceptance and stressed the need to monitor high-risk groups between check-ups. Professor Walter Bodmer highlighted rigorous biomarker validation through both literature review and database analysis. These insights grounded our design in clinical practice while expanding its impact to wider populations.
Interview with Dr. Wan Wang, Breast Surgeon
S (Situation) Postoperative breast cancer patients face both the psychological pressure of recurrence monitoring and stressful traditional hospital check-up.
C (Complication) It was unclear how to integrate our diagnostic system into routine medical procedures to meet these needs.
Q (Question) Could our system be integrated into standard treatment processes, and is adipose tissue a suitable carrier?
A (Answer) Dr. Wan Wang affirmed that autologous fat transplantation technology in China is mature and could be effectively used.
I (Implementation) We chose adipose cells as carriers and planned to implant engineered adipocytes during breast reconstruction surgery.
Interview with Dr. Lianbo Zhang, Plastic Surgeon
S (Situation) When planning the project audience, we always paid attention to the suggestion of Dr. Wan Wang that non-reconstruction patients should also benefit from our project.
C (Complication) Limiting our technology to this specific patient group would significantly narrow its clinical value and potential impact.
Q (Question) How could we expand the system’s use to a wider group?
A (Answer) Dr. Lianbo Zhang noted that autologous fat transplantation for cosmetic breast augmentation is both clinically safe and increasingly in demand.
I (Implementation) We expanded our project design to include women undergoing breast augmentation.
-
Lack of an efficient natural secretion signal peptide.
-
Large molecular weight, limiting secretion into the extracellular space and blocking passage through the glomerular filtration barrier.
Output determination (Gluc)
Output determination (skin melanin)
Interview with Dr. Bin Yang, Breast Surgeon
S (Situation) We needed to evaluate the possible output strategies, Gaussia luciferase and melanin.
C (Complication) Both strategies had pros and cons in terms of psychological acceptance, convenience, and technical feasibility.
Q (Question) Which output signal has the best balance of feasibility and acceptance?
A (Answer) Dr. Bin Yang suggested that the melanin approach could worsen body image concerns, and Gaussia luciferase was more feasible.
I (Implementation) We kept Gluc as our main output.
Interview with Professor Walter Bodmer, Fellow of the Royal Society
S (Situation) We were reviewing public databases to find genes differentially expressed between cancer-associated adipocytes (CAAs) and normal adipose tissue (NAT).
C (Complication) Direct comparison datasets were limited and sample sizes too small, reducing statistical power.
Q (Question) How could we obtain valid data to find the high expression genes in CAAs?
A (Answer) Professor Walter Bodmer recommended starting with a thorough literature review to confirm the specific link between candidate genes and breast cancer.
I (Implementation) We first verified the specificity of candidate genes through literature review, then moved on to database screening and validation.
Expert interviews shaped our project’s technical and clinical direction. The DIRUI project manager stressed accuracy in biomarker selection, leading us to adopt a combined strategy and finally choose LIF and PLOD2. We consulted Dr. Hongyu Wu, who guided us to use adeno-associated virus (AAV) for safer, long-term expression. Our Model group built a model assessing the renal clearance efficiency of Gluc, and refined it with advice from professionals. Professor Haoran Yu suggested parameter inference for missing renal data, enabling reliable simulations of Gluc clearance, and Senior Researcher Rui Yin recommended adding a steric hindrance correction, which improved our diffusion model’s accuracy.
Together, these insights ensured that our system is scientifically rigorous, clinically feasible, and user-friendly.
Interview with Project Manager at DIRUI
S (Situation) Our team needed to select suitable cancer biomarkers.
C (Complication) Without clear selection criteria, choosing among the many potential candidates was difficult.
Q (Question) What standards should guide the choice of our biomarkers for breast cancer?
A (Answer) A project manager at DIRUI, a medical technology company, emphasized that accuracy is the top priority, and suggested exploring combinations of markers.
I (Implementation) We screened candidate genes through literature review, tested their combinations in our model group, and eventually selected LIF and PLOD2.
Interview with Research Scientist Hongyu Wu
S (Situation) We initially planned to use adenovirus as a vector to achieve long-term stable expression of our target genes in adipocytes.
C (Complication) Although adenovirus shows high infection efficiency, it cannot maintain stable expression over time.
Q (Question) Was adenovirus the right choice, or should we consider a better option for sustained and safe gene delivery?
A (Answer) Dr. Hongyu Wu suggested using adeno-associated virus (AAV), which has lower immunogenicity and stronger potential for long-term expression.
I (Implementation) We shifted our design to AAV, while also planning adipose cell-specific optimization and validation experiments.
Interview with Professor Haoran Yu, Department of Mathematics
S (Situation) We needed to evaluate Gluc’s renal clearance, but data on its filtration rate was missing.
C (Complication) While modeling, we found no data on the basement membrane’s pore size.
Q (Question) We asked Professor Haoran Yu how to estimate these unknown parameters.
A (Answer) He suggested using normal distribution modeling, optimization, and data from similar membranes.
I (Implementation) With his guidance, we filled the data gap and advanced our Gluc clearance model.
Interview with Senior Researcher Yin Rui
S (Situation) We were studying the renal clearance efficiency of Gluc and reviewed that the glomerular filtration barrier (GFB) is typically divided into three layers.
C (Complication) However, we found major inconsistencies in the reported physical parameters of the third layer across different studies.
Q (Question) We asked Senior Researcher Yin Rui why such discrepancies existed.
A (Answer) He explained that many papers define the third layer differently and that it can actually be divided into the Podocyte Layer and the Split Membrane.
I (Implementation) Following his advice, we refined our model by reconstructing the traditional three-layer GFB into a four-layer structure to better simulate Gluc’s renal clearance.
To address the growing need for scientific evaluation of complex ethical issues in synthetic biology, we designed the BEAM ethical risk assessment model. At the beginning, we faced two main challenges, unbalanced subjective judgment and objective criteria in quantitative assessment, and a lack of systematic depth in existing frameworks caused by the multi-dimensional complexity of ethical risks.
To move our model forward, we interviewed Professor Yunsheng Dong, whose idea of scenario-based evaluation inspired us to break down the ethical issues in our project and establish specific risk indicators for each. To overcome the bottleneck of quantification, we followed the advice of Professor Wenbin Chen and introduced a Bayesian network model, allowing us to integrate multi-dimensional information through probabilistic reasoning and carry out dynamic risk assessment.
Building on this, we applied a structural equation model (SEM) to further refine the framework. We conducted an online public survey to gather data for validation and analysis. This allowed us to identify key risk patterns and design tiered response strategies. Eventually we developed a systematic, data-driven ethical risk assessment solution that is adaptable across multiple scenarios.
Interview with Professor Yunsheng Dong
S (Situation) As we began building an ethical evaluation framework, we realized synthetic biology applications involve complex ethical risks.
C (Complication) Before consulting experts, we struggled to balance subjective judgments and objective criteria, leaving the framework unreliable.
Q (Question) How can ethical evaluation be both systematic and context-sensitive?
A (Answer) Prof. Dong stressed that ethical risks vary by scenario and must be assessed with tailored indicators.
I (Implementation) We refined our model into a scenario-based system with differentiated dimensions for clinical, monitoring, and cosmetic applications.
Interview with Professor Wenbin Chen
S (Situation) We had established a multi-dimensional evaluation system using SEM to weigh influencing factors.
C (Complication) Before this interview, we lacked a method to transform these weights into a practical tool for assessing uncertain risks.
Q (Question) How can structural weights be linked to probabilistic risk assessment?
A (Answer) Prof. Chen recommended using a Bayesian network to model causal and probabilistic relationships.
I (Implementation) We integrated SEM with Bayesian reasoning, creating BEAM—a framework that enables dynamic, quantitative ethical risk assessment.
Survey on Ethical Perceptions of Synthetic Biology
S (Situation) After identifying scenario-specific issues, we needed data beyond expert perspectives.
C (Complication) Without public input, our framework risked being overly technical and disconnected from social expectations.
Q (Question) What ethical concerns does the public prioritize in synthetic biology?
A (Answer) The survey revealed public concerns about privacy, safety, fairness, and new applications like home monitoring and cosmetic uses.
I (Implementation) We used this data as a core input for model training, ensuring our framework reflected both experts' advice and needs of the public.
Survey on Ethical Perceptions of Synthetic Biology
ABCS Ethical Risk Assessment
S (Situation) With BEAM established, we needed to test its applicability to our own project.
C (Complication) Before conducting a targeted survey, we did not know how different stakeholders would evaluate our system’s risks and benefits.
Q (Question) How do patients, clinicians, and the public perceive the ethical risks of our project?
A (Answer) The survey showed experts focused on biosafety, while patients emphasized privacy, medical safety, and affordability.
I (Implementation) We developed the ABCS Ethical Risk Assessment, a tailored tool aligned with BEAM, bridging universal theory with project-specific practice.
Ethical Risk Assessment of the ABCS Project
We strengthened the ABCS project in both ethics and practice: Director Jun Wei of the ethics committee guided us to ensure compliance through informed consent; philosophical advice from Professor Yujiao Jia helped us design respectful, patient-centered interviews; Dr. Zijun Zhou revealed patients’ psychological challenges and communication needs; AI simulations allowed us to refine questioning; in-person interviews confirmed high acceptance but raised safety and cost concerns; and online surveys showed clear preference for a test kit format. Together, these insights enabled us to align our design with patient needs while maintaining ethical rigor.
Interview with Director Jun Wei of the Ethics Committee
S (Situation) We planned to interview breast cancer patients to improve the ABCS. To ensure the process was ethical and protected patient rights, we consulted Jun Wei.
C (Complication) Unstandardized interviews can cause misunderstandings about the purpose, privacy, or other details, leading to trust issues or legal risks.
Q (Question) What steps should be taken before the interview, and what documents should be signed to ensure patients are fully informed, their privacy is protected, and the interview is legal and compliant?
A (Answer) Mr. Wei advised that a written informed consent form is required. It should clearly explain the interview’s purpose, content, privacy protection, and participants’ rights before the interview starts.
I (Implementation) We created an informed consent form.
Informed Consent Form
Interview with Professor Yujiao Jia
S (Situation) We sought guidance on how to ensure our patient interviews respected participant autonomy and encouraged equal dialogue.
C (Complication) During interviews, patients' autonomy may be overlooked, and the interviewer's role might make them feel “scrutinized,” making it difficult to get honest feedback.
Q (Question) How can we design interviews to make patients feel respected and heard, not just “investigated”?
A (Answer) Prof. Jia recommended the life history interview method based on narrative cognitive theory, using three-dimensional questions and narrative coding to focus on the patient’s experience and autonomy.
I (Implementation) We developed a communication style that encourages equal dialogue, better meeting patients’ real needs and strengthening the humanistic care in our project.
Interview with Dr. Zijun Zhou, a specialist in breast surgery
S (Situation) To better empathize with breast cancer patients, we hoped to understand the common psychological challenges they face.
C (Complication) Breast cancer patients often experience complex psychological challenges due to the disease and treatment process. Interviews could potentially increase this psychological burden.
Q (Question) What are the common psychological states among breast cancer patients? What communication skills should be employed during interviews to facilitate effective communication?
A (Answer) Dr. Zhou pointed out that breast cancer patients often feel incomplete after having their breasts removed, and the anxiety about recurrence can make follow-up examinations stressful.
I (Implementation) We conducted practice sessions with AI simulations before interviewing real patients.
AI Evaluation of Patient Interview Questions
S (Situation) Before interviewing real patients, we worried our approach might cause unintended emotional harm, so we utilized Doubao AI to evaluate our presupposed interview questions.
C (Complication) Sensitive questions could trigger distress or misunderstandings.
Q (Question) How can we gather genuine patient needs while minimizing emotional risk?
A (Answer) The AI evaluation revealed potential pitfalls in our interview style.
I (Implementation) We will avoid sensitive questions in real interviews.
In-person Patient Interviews
S (Situation) We planned in-person interviews to learn patients’ real needs. Before starting, we got ethical approval from the hospital to ensure informed consent and protect participants’ rights.
C (Complication) Without face-to-face, in-depth communication, it is difficult to capture patients’ potential concerns about ABCS.
Q (Question) What is the overall patient acceptance of the ABCS concept, and what are their primary concerns and expectations regarding its cost and related services?
A (Answer) Overall, patient acceptance was high. Their main concerns were the safety of cell modification, urine test accuracy, and risks of physical burden or false results.
I (Implementation) Regarding the patients’ concerns about safety, we planned to strengthen the safety verification of the project and improve the accuracy of urine testing.
Ethical Approval Document
Online patient interviews
S (Situation) To ensure our final product meets patient needs, our project required extensive feedback on different potential testing methods.
C (Complication) If the product’s form was determined solely based on our internal design, we might overlook the actual needs of patients.
Q (Question) Which potential product format do patients prefer for at-home monitoring?
A (Answer) Approximately 68% of the patients prefer the test kit approach, due to its similarity to familiar pregnancy tests, convenience for at-home use, the safety of sterile disposable tools, and lower cost.
I (Implementation) Based on this feedback, we prioritized the development of the test kit as our primary product format.
To enable ABCS to truly reach every woman who needs it and translate technological breakthroughs into accessible health resources, we further explored the commercialization of the project. This is not only a response to the needs of millions of breast cancer patients worldwide but also a crucial step in bridging the gap between innovative technologies in the laboratory and their clinical application.
Market Positioning and Target Populations
Attending the Symposium on Clinical Research and Overseas Expansion of China’s New Drug R&D in the New Environment
S (Situation) In biomedicine, new technologies face many challenges moving from lab research to clinical use and commercialization.
C (Complication) Our team needed to understand potential issues ABCS might face in practice to prepare effective solutions.
Q (Question) How to bridge the gap in the “R&D-clinical-commercialization” process?
A (Answer) From the symposium, we learned that project commercialization requires efforts in marketing, legal compliance, investment, talent development, and more.
I (Implementation) We consulted experts in various fields to gain commercialization knowledge, helping us design the business plan.
Attending the International Academic Exchange Conference on Plastic Surgery, “China-Korea Plastic Surgery Academic Salon”
S (Situation) We needed to promote ABCS and explore its clinical application scenarios.
C (Complication) We lacked a clear understanding of the business models, technical needs, and clinical requirements of public hospitals’ plastic surgery departments, making it difficult to identify a focus for project promotion.
Q (Question) How can we find a feasible path for the promotion and clinical application of ABCS?
A (Answer) Dr. Zhang explained the development models of plastic surgery departments in public hospitals, while Dr. Qin’s presentation showed that combining ABCS with breast augmentation offers both body shaping and breast cancer marker monitoring benefits.
I (Implementation) We decided to enhance our connections with public hospitals, refine our cooperation plans based on specific clinical scenarios.
Interview with Dr. Zhao, president of the private medical aesthetics clinic Jingdian Medical Beauty
S (Situation) We needed to understand market demands and technical challenges of private medical aesthetics clinics.
C (Complication) We lacked insight into the market and demands of medical aesthetics clinics, which hindered ABCS promotion in private clinics and our goal of transitioning from technology to market.
Q (Question) How can we promote the actual implementation of ABCS in private medical aesthetics clinics?
A (Answer) Director Zhao provided an overview of the breast augmentation market, highlighting that adipocyte survival rate is a key factor affecting surgical outcomes and customer satisfaction.
I (Implementation) In the future, we intended to strengthen communication with private clinics and accelerate the progress of optimizing cell survival.
Interview with Professor Ling Ren from the School of Business
S (Situation) We needed to develop a clear roadmap and marketing strategy for our product.
C (Complication) Confused about key marketing elements such as how to identify target customer groups, select promotion channels, and formulate pricing strategies.
Q (Question) How to formulate an effective marketing strategy to drive the commercialization of the project?
A (Answer) Prof. Ren shared professional insights into the ToB and ToC models. Based on this, she advised us to prioritize ToB technical services initially, followed by the rollout of ToC products.
I (Implementation) Our team has developed a customized business canvas for ABCS based on both ToB and ToC models.
Businuss Canvas for ABCS
Interview with Kunyang Xue, Deputy General Manager of Dongguan Binhaiwan Industrial Investment Co., Ltd.
S (Situation) We wanted to understand how a biotech startup can attract investment to drive its development.
C (Complication) As a team of students with limited business experience, we were unsure how to translate the project’s technical strengths into highlights that for investors.
Q (Question) How to effectively attract the attention of investment institutions and secure financial support to accelerate our commercialization process?
A (Answer) Mr. Xue suggested that we enhance investor confidence in the project by clarifying its technical advantages, emphasizing its social value and future potential.
I (Implementation) We developed the “ABCS Brand Strategy House”.
ABCS Brand Strategy House
Interview with the Human Resources Manager of Guangzhou Wondfo Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
S (Situation) Understanding how medical enterprises recruit and develop talent could guide our team building.
C (Complication) We lacked a clear understanding of how medical enterprises build talent systems based on business needs and develop talent for commercialization.
Q (Question) How can we build a talent system adapted to the commercialization process?
A (Answer) Wondfo executives suggested fostering interdisciplinary talent through cross-departmental communication and regular training that combines technical and business knowledge.
I (Implementation) We developed a comprehensive talent development plan and a “dual-channel” development strategy in Chapter 5 of the Business Plan.
Interview with Lawyer Junling Bai
S (Situation) The future development and commercialization of the ABCS project would likely involve potential legal risks.
C (Complication) We were short of professional legal knowledge, making it difficult to comprehensively identify potential legal issues.
Q (Question) What legal issues are involved in ABCS? How to ensure the legal and compliant advancement of the project?
A (Answer) Lawyer Bai suggested that we attach importance to intellectual property protection and systematically analyze the legal risks faced by the project.
I (Implementation) We incorporated a patent module into our development plan and designed a risk control scheme in Chapter 6 of our Business Plan.
Interview with Professor Jinshan Zhang from the School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
S (Situation) We sought guidance on how to turn the research project into a real entrepreneurial venture.
C (Complication) Lacking practical entrepreneurial experience, we had gaps in connections, funding, and industry knowledge.
Q (Question) How can we improve the team’s entrepreneurial skills and develop systematic thinking to tackle real-world challenges?
A (Answer) Prof. Zhang suggested creating an entrepreneurial capability matrix by shifting from "technical thinking" to "entrepreneurial thinking."
I (Implementation) We created an iGEM Entrepreneurship Practice Simulation game and held internal workshops to strengthen our practical business skills.
iGEM Entrepreneurship Practice Simulation
These hands-on exercises helped us break out of a purely technical mindset and start looking at the project through a broader lens—considering market trends, capital flow, and risk management. It’s been a valuable way to make up for our lack of business experience and limited exposure to resource integration. Through this process, we’ve gradually built up an entrepreneurship capability matrix, laying the groundwork for facing real-world startup challenges in the future.
Entrepreneurship development plans
ABCS Business Plan
DREAMS Value System
To better fulfill our commercialization mission, we have established a value system centered on DREAMS, encompassing six key dimensions: Dignity-preserving, Responsible innovation, Equitable access, Adaptive to needs, Multistake-holder synergy, and Socially beneficial. This system serves as an all-round guide for ABCS to evolve into an enterprise that is both responsible and beneficial to the world.
DREAMS Value System
At the end of this journey, what we built was not just a technical construct, but a living “demand–feedback–improvement” loop that connects science with people. Each experiment, interview, and field research became part of a wider rhythm—listening to patients, refining ideas, and sending them back into practice. The loop is therefore not a static framework, but a way of working that continues to grow with every voice we hear and every challenge we meet.
Demand - feedback - improvement cycle