Our wetlab team split their work across two different labs. The life science lab (LSL), where we had access to a programmable growth chamber, CO2 and our REE salts, and the Zeeman Lab where we had access to some advice from a PHD student working on C.reinhardtii and an authorisation for doing gene editing. Therefore, our GMOs stayed in the Zeeman Lab, while the investigation of growth conditions and REE absorbance happened in the LSL.
We tried to assemble our huge plasmid into a bacterial vector as a first step and to use for cloning. For this we first tried to assemble it without a vector to introduce it later, so that we would have the flexibility of having a reserve of an already transformation-ready vector and a backup in our bacteria. This was however very heavy on experimental steps and also caused problems about the location of the cut for the vector introduction.
Then we changed the plan and adapted the plasmid to do one big golden gate assembly that would put together the whole plasmid with a bacterial vector. The conclusion drawn was that the bacterial stock is crucial and that the vector can be cut off quite easily by exonucleases if designed properly. For this golden gate assembly to work we had to do a nuclease digestion of one of our parts to introduce it in a different part of the plasmid, reinserting the Type II S cut site by running a PCR with an overhang. This overhang allowed us to append the needed sequence on our digested parts for the following steps.
This golden gate assembly ran into multiple problems as the separation of appended and digested parts did not yield a pure product under gel electrophoresis. Gel extraction allowed us to still isolate our product which was used for the assembly. Bacterial transformation was successful, confirmed by the expression of mCherry from the bacterial backbone, however after DNA purification and isolation, the sequencing showed that the plasmid assembly was not complete and some of our parts were missing in the final product.
The whole workflow has been repeated a few times but with no successful final assembly. A final sequencing of our starting material was then done.
We made some specialised growing medium for C.reinhardtii (TAP Medium) and investigated the optimal growing conditions for growth. In a specialised growth room we tested different humidities and day/night cycles to find the sweet spot for biomass production in our medium. Then we tried to generate autolysin of our culture. To do this the algae have to be deprived of nitrogen for gamete formation, which additionally induces the production of autolysin. The cultures were subjected to the TAP-N medium to induce gamete formation. While mating the algae cells release autolysin which can be harvested by centrifugation after ensuring high mating activity under the microscope. Usually, for autolysin production, specialized strains are used that show high mating activity and lowered cell death upon nitrogen depletion. With the first trials, this was confirmed to be a source for errors, as our strains were not ideally suited to extract autolysin at a high enough rate.
In a second phase another growth medium was tested for growth with CO2 as only carbon source. The importance of this medium comes from the fact that it limits the risk of contamination, as most bacteria cannot grow in these conditions. This being the medium that will be used in our bioreactor, we need to understand how our algae behaves in these new environment.
It is also in these conditions that the wild type absorption of rare earth elements in algae was investigated. For this the phosphate precipitation of REE has to be avoided and this goes through a primary growth of our algae in the typical CO2 medium, followed by a transfer in a phosphate deprived medium that contains the REE. In addition to reducing the risk of contamination, the CO2 medium helps us to create an acidic environment that keeps the REE in solution. After a given growth time in this medium the algae is processed for analysis and the dry weight REE content is analysed. This data and the analysis of the wild type REE bioaccumulation process is crucial to understand the way our transformed organism will perform, and to highlight the advantages of our method.
This protocol describes how to prepare Px6 Medium, a specialized culture medium designed for CO₂-dependent growth. It consists of three main stock solutions:
25× Salt Solution
500× Phosphate Solution
333× Trace Elements
The protocol includes the preparation of these stock solutions, the final medium assembly, sterilization, and handling instructions.
Component | Amount (Stock) | Notes/Concentration |
---|---|---|
A) 25× Salt Solution (100 mL) | ||
Prepare 100 mL (use 40 mL per 1 L medium) | ||
Sodium nitrate (NaNO₃) | 9.56 g | |
Magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (MgSO₄·7H₂O) | 1.48 g | |
Calcium chloride dihydrate (CaCl₂·2H₂O) | 0.44 g | |
Ultrapure water | up to 100 mL | |
B) 500× Phosphate Solution (20 mL) | ||
Prepare 20 mL (use 2 mL per 1 L medium) | ||
Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (K₂HPO₄) | 7.664 g | |
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH₂PO₄) | 2.450 g | |
Ultrapure water | up to 20 mL | |
C) Trace Elements (333×, 30 mL each) | ||
Use 3 mL of each per 1 L final medium | ||
Pre-Stocks: | ||
- Disodium EDTA dihydrate (EDTA-Na₂·2H₂O) | 4.65 g / 100 mL (Pre-1) | 125 mM, adjust pH to 8 with KOH |
- Potassium hydroxide (KOH) | ~1.7 g | For pH adjustment of Pre-1 |
- Sodium selenite (Na₂SeO₃) | 0.173 g / 100 mL (Pre-3) | 1 mM |
- Sodium molybdate (Na₂MoO₄) | 0.242 g (dihydrate) or 0.206 g (anhydrate) / 100 mL | 10 mM |
Trace Element Stocks (1000×, 10 mL each, dilute 1:3 to 333×) | ||
TE1 - EDTA-Na₂ | 2.00 mL Pre-1 + water to 10 mL | Dilute 1:3 to 30 mL |
TE2 - Molybdenum (Mo) | 0.20 mL Na₂MoO₄ + water to 10 mL | Dilute 1:3 to 30 mL |
TE3 - Selenium (Se) | 1.00 mL Pre-3 + water to 10 mL | Dilute 1:3 to 30 mL |
TE4 - Zinc·EDTA | 7.2 mg Zinc sulfate heptahydrate (ZnSO₄·7H₂O) + 220 µL Pre-1 + water to 10 mL | Dilute 1:3 to 30 mL |
TE5 - Manganese·EDTA | 11.9 mg Manganese chloride tetrahydrate (MnCl₂·4H₂O) + 480 µL Pre-1 + water to 10 mL | Dilute 1:3 to 30 mL |
TE6 - Iron·EDTA | 82 mg EDTA-Na₂ + 23.2 mg Sodium carbonate (Na₂CO₃) + 54 mg Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl₃·6H₂O) + water to 10 mL | Dilute 1:3 to 30 mL; add FeCl₃ last |
TE7 - Copper·EDTA | 3.4 mg Copper chloride dihydrate (CuCl₂·2H₂O) + 160 µL Pre-1 + water to 10 mL | Dilute 1:3 to 30 mL |
A) Prepare 25× Salt Solution (100 mL)
B) Prepare 500× Phosphate Solution (20 mL)
C) Prepare Trace Elements Pre-Stocks and Stocks
D) Final Medium Preparation (1 L)
(Reference: ScienceDirect Article - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749125005433?via%3Dihub)
Condition | REE Present | REE Concentration | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Control | None | 0 mg/L | No added REE |
REE-Cocktail | Ce + Gd + Er | 3 × 100 mg/L | Pure REE mixture |
Red Mud | Ce + Gd + Er | 3 × 100 mg/L | Simulated Red Mud extract |
Time (Days) | Time (Hours) | Label |
---|---|---|
0 | 0 h | T₀ |
0.5 | 12 h | T₁₂h |
1.5 | 36 h | T₃₆h |
3 | 72 h | T₇₂h |
Sample Collection
Washing Steps
Measurement
Drying (Optional for Gravimetric Analysis)