Hardware Header
Contents

HARDWARE Prototype 1.0

Low-cost annular photobioreactor: modular, affordable, reproducible hardware to cultivate microalgae for REE recovery.

~18 L

Annular volume

$632

Total cost

0.3–0.4

g·L⁻¹·day⁻¹ (approx. by [3])
Open-source ≤ 650 $ Modular DIY-friendly
Rotate/Zoom: Drag with mouse + scroll • Touch and pinch to zoom
Assembly
Assembly Panorama – Complete Build
Schematic assembly structure of our bioreactor design (generated in blender)

Introduction

Synthetic biology depends not only on DNA assembly and molecular techniques but also on robust cultivation systems that make biological processes reproducible, scalable, and accessible. For our project, which focuses on the recovery of rare earth elements (REEs) using microalgae, we needed a photobioreactor that could support growth under controlled conditions and enable downstream recovery experiments.

Commercial photobioreactors are often expensive and designed for industrial production. To bridge this gap, we developed a low-cost, modular acrylic-based annular photobioreactor, inspired by established designs in literature [6], [3], [1]. Our reactor provides stable illumination, aeration, and monitoring at a fraction of the cost of commercial systems (approx. 600-650 $ per unit).

By combining accessible off-the-shelf components (LED tubes, aquarium pumps, fans, and inexpensive sensors) with a simple but effective annular design, our device enables reliable algal cultivation. Beyond our project, this hardware contributes to iGEM’s vision of making synthetic biology more affordable, reproducible, and globally accessible.

Learn more about design process and engineering cycles on our Engineering Page.

Engineering Page

Design Principles

1Affordability
The system costs < 650 $ using aquarium pumps, LED tubes, and acrylic.
2Reproducibility
Annular geometry with short light path (~4–5 cm)
3Modularity
Flexible pumps, CO2, sensors, filtration; autotrophic and mixotrophic.
4Simplicity & Safety
Acrylic + silicone adhesive; aquarium aeration; fan cooling; basic tools.

Construction and Components

Outer tube: Ø 200 mm (194 mm inner)
Inner tube: Ø 120 mm (114 mm inner)
Height: 1.5 m
Annulus: ~18 L

This creates an illuminated annular cultivation chamber of ~18 L.

Illumination & Temperature

  • 6× LED tubes, 18 W for uniform light, serving as the only heat source.
  • Fans switch on to keep temperature in range.

Aeration & CO2 Control

  • Aeration and CO2 via perforated base tubing.

Monitoring & Sensors

  • Digital pH + temperature measurements enabling automation; Raspberry Pi for logging/automation.
  • Digital control improves reproducibility.
LoggingAutomation-ready

Cost Overview

ComponentCost
CO2 valve$41
Acryl Tubes $207
Air pump $25
Analog → Digital converter $7
Breadboard + GPIO conncection $15
Fan $6
LED tubes (x6) $76
pH Probe + calibration media $40
Raspberry Pi 5 $88
Resistor 4.7k Ohm $6
Temperature probe $8
Water pump $56
Wooden Legs & screws $20
Safety Circuit Breaker $6
Power Cable $4
Cable Connection Clamp $15
LED tube sockets $12
Total $632
Significantly lower than commercial reactors (several thousand USD).

Operation and Control

Our reactor is operated under continuous illumination (24 h). The emitted heat from the light module serves as the only heat source for the reactor system. To ensure stable temperatures for algal cultivation, a temperature probe and a regulated fan are used. Aeration is provided by a standard aquarium air pump. CO2 is fed into the gas line via standard CO2 tanks used for beer dispensing and brewing. The resulting mixture is infused via perforated base tubing. CO2 serves as the only carbon source. This autotrophic setting helps inhibit microbial contamination.

24 h lightCO₂ injectionControlled fan cooling~4 g DW/day @18 L

Application in Our Project

Cultivation phase. Growth in phosphate-rich medium; continuous CO2.
Harvest & washing. Drain, filter, wash repeatedly.
Lanthanide uptake. Transfer to lanthanide-enriched and phosphate-depleted medium for bioaccumulation.
Downstream recovery. Filter, wash, process (e.g., thermal) → REE-rich residue.

Accessibility and Reproducibility

  • Off-the-shelf parts: aquarium hardware, acrylic tubes, LED tubes.
  • Affordable: total cost ~$632.
  • Easy construction: silicone adhesives + basic tools.
  • Open-source: CAD files, schematics, and photos in our wiki and guide.

Outlook and Future Improvements

  • Automation with Raspberry Pi (light, aeration, pH).
  • Scaling via scalable reactors.
  • Plug-and-play OD sensors.
  • Two-stage strategies (e.g., phosphorus starvation).

Impressions from the Assembly


R3 Parts (Interactive 3D Previews)

Reactor Base

File: reactor-3-0-reactor-base-stl.json

Tripod

File: reactor-3-0-tripod-stl.json

Outer Lid

File: reactor-3-0-outer-lid-stl.json

Inner Lid

File: reactor-3-0-inner-lid-stl.json

Top Cap

File: reactor-3-0-top-cap-stl.json

Top Rod

File: reactor-3-0-top-rod-stl.json

LED Module (Lower)

File: reactor-3-0-l-led-module-stl.json

LED Module (Upper)

File: reactor-3-0-u-led-module-stl.json

RPI5 Case

File: reactor-3-0-rpi5-case-stl.json

RPI5 Lid

File: reactor-3-0-rpi5-lid-stl.json

Nodes

File: reactor-3-0-nodes-stl.json

Downloads

For further information on assembly read the following guide.

Guide

The following 3D files’ extensions had to be masked with a .json extension to allow the upload on the wikipage. For usage, download the file and change the extension to .stl .


Sources
  1. Abiusi, F.; Moñino Fernández, J.; Canelli, G.; & Wijffels, R. H. (2021). Algal Research 2021, 54, 102202.
  2. Al-Dailami, A.; Koji, I.; Ahmad, I.; & Goto, M. (2022). J. Adv. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2022, 27, 32–44.
  3. Canelli, G.; Abiusi, F.; Vidal Garcia, A.; Canziani, S.; & Mathys, A. (2023). Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2023, 84, 103287.
  4. Firsching, F. H.; & Brune, S. N. (1991). J. Chem. Eng. Data 1991, 36 (1), 93–95.
  5. Kajjumba, G. W.; Vacek, S.; & Marti, E. J. (2025). Sustainability 2025, 17 (15), 6734.
  6. Ranglová, K.; Bureš, M.; Manoel, J. C.; Lakatos, G. E.; & Masojídek, J. (2022). J. Appl. Phycol. 2022, 34 (1), 31–41.