Note: This section is not meant to be read separately. It directly builds upon and reflects on our work in Human Practices.
What is Sustainability?
The concept of sustainability is multi-dimensional in nature. It refers to the ability of going on without failure [1] and takes into account the intersection between ecological, economic and socio-political domains at both local and global scales. As these issues are highly complex, they require integrated approaches that balance environmental health, human livelihoods, and social and economic equity, while recognising the interconnected dynamics of our global system and their link to nature. They are often referred to as wicked problems as they are complex, interconnected, and continually evolving, thus having no clear solution and impossible to solve through only one perspective or one-dimensional thinking [2]. Hence, sustainability is inherently about systems thinking: the study of how interconnected parts create a coherent whole, with properties emerging from the relationships among the parts rather than their individual characteristics [3]. The Earth is a complex adaptive system, composed of interlinked natural and human subsystems, and a small change in one part of the system can result in unpredictable consequences. It encompasses the ability of systems and processes to persist and function effectively over the long term and reflects the capacity to continue without failure. In ecological sciences, sustainability is often linked to resilience: the ability of systems to adapt to change while maintaining their core structure and function [4]. This concept acknowledges that change is inevitable and emphasises adaptability, diversity, and connectivity, but also that we are part of the natural world and not separate from it.
Therefore, it is not surprising that there is no one single definition for such a complex concept that is interdisciplinary at its core. Every discipline thus involved would need to conceptualise and define it so that it makes sense within its own normative, ontological and epistemic traditions. Otherwise, any definition that would be picked as the “official universal” one is likely to exclude certain disciplines and perspectives, as well as hinder the adaptability of the concept to future priorities and realities. As an example, we can turn to the current most widely accepted definition which is the Brundtland Commission’s 1987 report Our Common Future, which defined sustainable development as "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs" [5]. Sen (2013) mentions several issues including that it is anthropocentric as it solely focuses on the fulfilment of human needs and does not account for general environmental wellbeing and other species [6]. Despite these shortcomings, the Brundtland definition remains one of the most popular ones because it is catchy, simple, and straight-forward. Consequently, it adapts to most contexts, and it is easy to communicate to a vast number of people who do not necessarily have the time, resources or interest to learn more about sustainability.
Another famous way to conceptualise sustainability is through its three pillars: economic, social, and environmental. It seeks to represent an integrated approach to achieving global well-being and equity while maintaining the planet's health. The economic pillar focuses on promoting growth and innovation in a way that ensures long-term prosperity. Its focus is on jobs, industries, infrastructures and investments. The social pillar emphasises the need for inclusive and equitable societies by focusing on human rights, reducing poverty, improving education and healthcare. The environmental pillar focuses on the protection and restoration of ecosystems, decreasing pollution, conserving biodiversity, and addressing climate change. This framework tries to account for the interdependence between economic viability, social equity, and environmental preservation. The focus on the interdependence between dimensions, levels and perspectives is what makes sustainability so useful and powerful.
These widely-used, but differing, ways of defining sustainability are then used to inform policy-making directions, goals and priorities, such as in the case of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These are a set of 17 objectives established in 2015 to address global challenges such as poverty, inequality, and environmental degradation by 2030 [7]. They have been praised for their inclusivity and ambition, but they have also faced criticism (for instance, that their broadness creates a lack of focus, accountability and uneven implementation across countries). Nonetheless, this is the framework used in iGEM to find common ground, understanding and consistency between the work carried out by different iGEM teams.
Our project in relation to Sustainable Development
Throughout our project, we aimed to responsibly explore how synthetic biology could contribute to the UN Sustainable Development Goals, particularly Good Health and Well-being (SDG 3), Responsible Consumption and Production (SDG 12), Reduced Inequalities (SDG 10), and Quality Education (SGD 4). Our work on AbsorBuddy, a potential new supplement for individuals with B12 malabsorption and pernicious anaemia, supports SDG 3 most of all, by seeking to improve accessibility, safety, and patient experience in healthcare. We recognised early on that developing a biomedical innovation also involves social, environmental, and economic dimensions, and we actively integrated these perspectives into our human practices and design choices. We engaged extensively with stakeholders across disciplines (patients, medical professionals, researchers, advocacy groups, and ethicists) to better understand the complexity of B12 deficiency and its treatment landscape. Their feedback helped us refine our project goals, challenge our assumptions, and ground our project in real-world needs. For example, patient and doctor interviews shaped how we reflected on the accessibility and safety objectives of our supplement, while discussions with environmental experts guided our reflection on sustainability and lab-scale environmental impact. Our project also demonstrates a clear awareness of the interconnections among SDGs. By addressing healthcare accessibility, we also contribute to reducing inequalities between patient groups, and by exploring alternatives to waste-intensive injection treatments, we take steps toward more sustainable healthcare systems. Since we have accomplished only the preliminary stages of the development of AbsorBuddy, many questions remain open and much work remains to be done, however, we have transparently documented our work, including its potentials and limitations. In line with the iGEM requirements for the Sustainability Special Prize, we are showcasing on this page our critical reflections on how our project fits with global efforts for Sustainable Development, rather than promising that our work and solution are sustainable in every way. We hope that the reflections that emerged from our work, can be built upon by future iGEM teams and the broader research community.
Good Health and Wellbeing
Target 3.8 - Achieve universal health coverage, including access to quality essential healthcare services and access to safe, effective, quality, and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all
Our project contributes to SDG target 3.8 by exploring new ways to make treatment for vitamin B12 deficiency and pernicious anaemia more accessible, effective, and patient-friendly. The current standard treatment (consisting in lifelong B12 injections) can be painful, costly, and difficult to access, particularly for patients with mobility challenges or those living far from healthcare facilities, even in Finland where access to healthcare is considered good. These barriers often lead to irregular treatment, strain on healthcare systems (which has consequences for other treatment and care activities as well) and unnecessary suffering. One of our goals with AbsorBuddy is to provide an alternative that could reduce the need for injections and improve treatment accessibility for patients whose B12 absorption is impaired and who are struggling to have access to regular injections.
Target 3.4 - Reduce by one-third premature mortality from non-communicable diseases through prevention and treatment, and promote mental health and well-being
Both B12 deficiency and pernicious anaemia, though often overlooked, have significant implications for physical and mental healths. Symptoms such as fatigue, cognitive decline, depression, and nerve damage can severely diminish quality of life if left untreated. A non-negligeable proportion of these cases go unrecognised for years due to insufficient diagnostic tools and limited awareness among healthcare professionals. Through our stakeholder engagement, we learned that delayed diagnosis and ineffective treatment worsen health outcomes and also cause profound psychological distress for patients who feel unheard or misunderstood. By focusing on improving the accessibility of treatment, our project indirectly supports mental health and the prevention of chronic complications associated with prolonged B12 deficiency. Additionally, our public education efforts, such as accessible videos and surveys, help to break the lack of awareness around B12 deficiency, empower patients to advocate for better care, and inform the public about early warning signs. In doing so, our work contributes to reducing preventable suffering and promoting holistic well-being, addressing both the physical and emotional dimensions of health.
Furthermore, our interviews revealed that B12 deficiency is frequently misdiagnosed, especially among older adults, because its symptoms often resemble those of ageing or neurodegenerative diseases such as dementia. In many cases, individuals may experience walking difficulties, incontinence, or cognitive decline that could be reversed or alleviated with proper B12 supplementation. Yet, because these symptoms are assumed to be irreversible consequences of ageing, the underlying deficiency often goes untested and untreated. This issue underscores a serious gap in medical awareness and diagnostic practices, where treatable conditions are mistaken for permanent decline. By raising awareness through our outreach materials and stakeholder engagement, we aim to help prevent such misdiagnoses and reduce avoidable suffering, advancing the SDG 3.4 objective of improving early detection, treatment, and well-being.
Sustainable
Development Goals

Sustainable Development Goal 3 aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. It calls for universal access to quality healthcare, including disease prevention, mental health support, and protection from health-related risks. The goal emphasises reducing maternal and child mortality, combating infectious and non-communicable diseases, and strengthening health systems globally. SDG 3 also highlights the importance of equitable healthcare access, ensuring that no one is left behind due to geography, income, or background. Beyond clinical care, it recognises that well-being is shaped by broader social and environmental factors, such as nutrition, pollution, and living conditions.
Quality Education
Target 4.4 - By 2030, substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship
Our educational initiatives, including workshops, competitions, and the BioLingua app, directly contribute to equipping youth with technical and scientific skills essential for future employment and innovation. By participating in the Kipinä science competition and the IBO workshop, we inspired students to pursue careers in STEM fields, providing mentorship and practical insights into the university experience, research possibilities (including in synthetic biology) and scientific communication. Our BioLingua app further advances this goal by offering accessible, multilingual learning materials that teach biological theory and concrete laboratory techniques, accessible to people of any age. This empowers students from diverse backgrounds, including non-native English speakers, to build the vocabulary and conceptual understanding needed to thrive in scientific and technical environments, even outside of their home country. Together, these initiatives help cultivate the next generation of scientists and innovators, contributing to SDG 4.4 by promoting skill development, employability, and inclusivity in STEM education. Thus, in addition to lowering barriers to STEM learning and highlighting how synthetic biology can intersect with sustainability and health, our work empowered learners by integrating cultural and linguistic inclusivity into science education.

Sustainable Development Goal 4 aims to ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. It promotes education as a human right... click to read more
Reduced Inequalities
Target 10.2 - Empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic or other status
Our project contributes to Target 10.2 by highlighting health inequalities and advocating for a more inclusive healthcare landscape. B12 deficiency and pernicious anaemia disproportionately affect groups that already face barriers in healthcare access, such as the elderly, people with chronic illnesses, and those in low-income or rural areas, even in countries of the Global North. Regular injections require time, financial and logistical resources that are not equally available to everyone, making accessibility a core equity issue. By laying the groundwork for the development of AbsorBuddy, we attempt to reduce dependency on frequent clinical visits, thereby increasing autonomy and reducing inequality in treatment access. Moreover, our engagement with diverse stakeholders (patients, doctors, civil society groups, and researchers) helped us understand how social structures and medical regulations can unintentionally exclude people by not recognising their needs. Through those meetings and our public communication efforts, we sought to amplify patient voices and highlight the need for more flexible, patient-centered approaches in healthcare systems. In this way, our project contributes to the broader goal of empowering individuals to participate in decisions affecting their well-being, promoting equity and inclusion in healthcare.
Target 10.3 - Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome by eliminating discriminatory laws, policies, and practices and promoting appropriate legislation, policies, and action in this regard.
Through our Human Practices research, we identified systemic inequities embedded in existing medical guidelines for B12 treatment. Many patients experience inadequate care because rigid regulations (like the “one injection every three months” rule) do not account for individual variability in symptom response. Despite communicating their needs, patients often face skepticism or reluctance from healthcare professionals, highlighting a structural imbalance of power in clinical care. By documenting and communicating these issues, we contribute to raising awareness about policy-level gaps that perpetuate inequality in healthcare outcomes. Our project demonstrates that scientific innovation must be accompanied by policy engagement, emphasising the importance of collaboration between researchers, clinicians, and regulatory bodies to design more flexible and inclusive frameworks. In this sense, our work in Human Practices points to the need for systemic change toward healthcare systems that listen to patients, adapt to diversity, and eliminate biases in access and treatment quality.

Reduced Inequalities
Sustainable Development Goal 10 seeks to reduce inequality within and among countries by addressing structural barriers that limit opportunity and access. It promotes social, economic, and political inclusion regardless of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic status. The goal calls for fairer income distribution, improved representation in decision-making, and policies that empower marginalised groups. SDG 10 also stresses the need for international cooperation to ensure that developing countries can benefit equally from global growth and innovation.
Responsible Consumption and Production
Target 12.4 - By 2030, achieve the environmentally sound management of chemicals and all wastes throughout their life cycle, in accordance with agreed international frameworks, and significantly reduce their release to air, water and soil in order to minimize their adverse impacts on human health and the environment
Our project contributes to SDG 12.4 by embedding environmental considerations into several stages of our work, such as reagent selection and waste management. Laboratory research of students, while often small in physical scale, can generate non-negligible negative environmental impacts through chemical waste, solvent use, and single-use plastics. Recognising this, we examined and documented the materials, reagents, and workflows used throughout our project to identify opportunities for safer and more sustainable practices.
Then, through our stakeholder discussions, we shifted from unrealistic and speculative life-cycle modelling of an unscaled supplement toward a realistic assessment of our laboratory footprint. We categorised reagents by hazard level, identified chemicals with high environmental persistence (such as ethidium bromide, phenol, and chloroform), and ensured proper segregation and collection of hazardous liquid waste for centralised disposal. Some reuse practices, such as recycling Coomassie staining solutions and regenerating purification resins, further minimised hazardous waste output. Moreover, we quantified the plastic waste generated by our experiments (~ 4.4 kg) and evaluated recycling barriers linked to biosafety regulations. This data now serves as a benchmark for future Aalto-Helsinki and other iGEM teams, encouraging them to adopt tracking systems and alternative consumables. Our work also highlighted the environmental cost of “invisible” lab practices, such as excessive energy use during purification or cold storage, prompting procedural changes like batching experiments and optimising instrument usage.
By explicitly documenting both the environmental impact and mitigation strategies of a synthetic biology project, we have taken steps toward achieving less environmental harm through the management of laboratory waste. Our approach demonstrates how even student research teams can contribute to SDG 12.4, by reducing hazardous waste at its source, using greener substitutes, ensuring proper treatment, and thus promoting a culture of environmental responsibility within scientific practice.
Target 12.5 - By 2030, substantially reduce waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling and reuse
Our project has potential to contribute to SDG 12.5 by addressing a critical yet often overlooked source of medical waste: the lifelong use of B12 injections. Our long-term environmental analysis remains preliminary, but our hypothesis is grounded in insights from multiple stakeholders, including patients and clinicians, who identified the environmental burden of injectable treatments as a recurring concern. Since current treatment protocols rely on frequent intramuscular injections, they generate large quantities of disposable plastic, metal, and packaging waste, such as syringes, needles, vials, and single-use safety containers. These materials are not recyclable and must be treated as biohazardous waste, ultimately ending up incinerated. Over a lifetime of treatment, this waste accumulates significantly both at the individual and global level.
By proposing AbsorBuddy, we aim to explore a pathway toward reducing this waste stream at its source. If proven safe and effective, an oral alternative could replace or reduce the frequency of injections for certain patient groups, thereby preventing substantial amounts of sharp and plastic waste before it is ever generated. This approach represents a shift from end-of-life waste management toward prevention, which is considered more impactful and can help reduce healthcare-related waste generation, directly advancing SDG 12.5.
Target 12.6 - Encourage companies, especially large and transnational companies, to adopt sustainable practices and to integrate sustainability information into their reporting cycle
While our team operates within an academic setting, our work under SDG 12.6 centers on creating a framework that aligns biotechnology research with industrial sustainability principles. In developing AbsorBuddy, we recognized that real-world deployment of any recombinant supplement would inevitably involve collaboration with biotech companies, contract manufacturers, and regulators. Therefore, we began integrating sustainability thinking into our processes early and identifying where environmental data collection, reporting, and transparency would be necessary for future scale-up. Thus, we began building documentation habits that mirror those of industrial environmental management systems, including energy tracking, material inventorying, and reagent-level hazard assessment. This form of “micro-reporting” creates a foundation that future research or industrial partners can expand upon when assessing large-scale environmental performance.
Our investigation into sustainable sourcing for microbial media components, such as plant-based peptones, brewery-derived yeast extract, and second-generation dextrose, further reflects SDG 12.6. These substitutions model the kind of upstream supply-chain transparency that sustainability-oriented companies must adopt. Similarly, by quantifying plastic waste and identifying possibilities for closed-loop recycling or supplier take-back programs, we align our laboratory practices with circular-economy reporting frameworks. Finally, by publishing our sustainability reflections openly on our wiki, we contribute to the culture of transparent environmental reporting that SDG 12.6 promotes. This encourages other iGEM teams and early-stage biotech innovators to integrate sustainability metrics from the outset: long before regulatory pressure or commercial scaling demands it. In this way, we extend the objective of accountability of SDG 12.6 into the formative stages of scientific innovation.

Responsible Consumption and Production
Sustainable Development Goal 12 seeks to ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns. It calls for a systemic transformation of how societies produce, use, and dispose of goods and resources. This includes improving resource efficiency, reducing waste generation, managing chemicals responsibly, and promoting sustainable business practices. SDG 12 also emphasises the shared responsibility between producers, consumers, governments, and industries to minimise environmental harm across entire life cycles (from raw material extraction to end-of-life disposal). Achieving this goal requires innovation in product design, transparency in supply chains, and the adoption of circular economy principles.
Limitations and potentials tensions with other SDGs
Although AbsorBuddy aligns with several UN Sustainable Development Goals, we recognise that pursuing these goals can generate tensions with other SDG targets, or even between different dimensions of sustainability themselves.
The first potential clash that we identified is in relation to SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth since biotechnology innovation can unintentionally deepen inequalities if its benefits are not equitably distributed. Under Target 8.4 (“improve global resource efficiency in consumption and production”), scaling AbsorBuddy without clear access strategies could risk creating profit-oriented and exclusive health markets, particularly if production relies on patents that limit affordability. So far, our team has not conducted detailed market research or assessed production costs, pricing, or the potential for global distribution. As a result, it remains uncertain whether AbsorBuddy, or similar future products, could be made accessible across different income levels and countries. Addressing this gap will be essential to ensuring that such innovations do not reinforce existing healthcare disparities, especially among countries, but instead contribute to equitable access to treatment worldwide.
Similarly, there is a potential tension with SDG 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation and target 9.4, which promotes sustainable industrial innovation. Large-scale biotechnological production can strain natural resources if scaling is not managed responsibly and is solely profit-oriented. This underlines the importance of life-cycle thinking in the scaling of products and regulatory engagement, elements that remain unresolved in our current project stage.
Another area of potential tension relates to SDG 16: Peace Justice and Strong Institutions, and in particular, Target 16.6 (develop effective, accountable, and transparent institutions). Although our project indirectly touches upon it, our engagement has been primarily at the level of raising awareness and creating dialogue rather than influencing institutional accountability directly. We did not engage with policymakers, healthcare regulators, or institutional decision-makers, which would have been essential for encouraging greater transparency and responsiveness within formal governance structures. Instead, our efforts focused on lower levels of engagement to investigate and highlight ethical grey areas and bring underrepresented perspectives into public discussion. These actions can help create the social foundations upon which institutional accountability can later be built. Nonetheless, to fully contribute to SDG 16, future work must include direct collaboration with policy and regulatory bodies to ensure that innovations like AbsorBuddy are developed and governed through inclusive, transparent, and trustworthy decision-making processes.
Similarly, there is a potential tension with SDG 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation and target 9.4, which promotes sustainable industrial innovation. Large-scale biotechnological production can strain natural resources if scaling is not managed responsibly and is solely profit-oriented. This underlines the importance of life-cycle thinking in the scaling of products and regulatory engagement, elements that remain unresolved in our current project stage.
In summary, we would like to highlight that even though AbsorBuddy’s concept advances health, accessibility and sustainability in certain areas, it also illustrates the interconnectedness and complexity of the SDGs, where progress in one area may come with costs in another. Recognising these trade-offs is a first step toward mitigating this unbalance and creating truly sustainable innovations in synthetic biology.

References
[1] Robertson, M. (2017). Sustainability Principles and Practice, Routledge. Ch. 1 & 2, 3–31 & 32–50.
[2] Steffen, W. (2014). Connecting the Solution to the Problem.” Solutions, vol. 5 no. 4.
[3] Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Sustainability Institute.
[4] Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island press.
[5] World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
[6] Sen, A. (2013). The ends and means of sustainability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 14, No. 1, 6-20.
[7] UN (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, 42809, 1-13.