Loading POSEIDON...
Team Banner IISER-Berhampur - iGEM 2025

Project Design Stage

The Design stage marks the start of our engineering journey. Here, our goal was to rationally design and model biological components that align with our project’s vision before stepping into the Wet Lab. This stage combined two core aspects of synthetic biology design:

By integrating both approaches, we ensured that every construct built later in the lab was already validated computationally for structural stability, substrate specificity, and compatibility with our chosen chassis.

Defining the Design Objective

Our project aimed to engineer a synthetic circuit capable of efficient heavy metal chelation and tolerance. To achieve this, we needed two major functional components:

Thus, the Dry Lab Design Phase was devoted to identifying the most efficient versions of these proteins and validating their potential through in silico molecular design and simulations.

Phytochelatin Synthase (PCS) Screening and Design Pipeline

Engineering Metallothionein (MT)

For the metal-binding component, we started with a native Metallothionein (MT) sequence from Triticum aestivum (wheat), known for mercury and cadmium binding. To tailor it toward our project’s targets—iron, chromium, and aluminium—we used in silico mutagenesis and binding pocket re-engineering. This optimized MT variant displayed enhanced binding site complementarity toward the new metals and was finalized as our Engineered MT construct (BBa_25YMLSNG). This part was later integrated into our composite circuit and prepared for submission to the iGEM Registry as a new engineered part.

In Silico Cloning: Construct Assembly in SnapGene

Once our protein candidates were finalized, we proceeded to assemble the genetic constructs virtually using SnapGene.
This step allowed us to simulate the cloning strategy, check for restriction sites, and verify construct integrity before lab work. Our in silico cloning pipeline included:

Integrating Computational & Experimental Design

The insights from docking and structural modeling directly informed our wet lab construct selection. By integrating in silico design with experimental feasibility, we minimized redundant trials and ensured:

Our Design stage unified bioinformatics, structural biology, and molecular cloning into a cohesive workflow:

This rational design ensured that the foundation of our project was computationally validated, modular, and purpose-driven—ready for smooth transition into the Build stage.